[Bug 940932] Re: Vibration of the screen when you zoom in Shotwell!
This bug is known and has been fixed in trunk. See http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4775 We'll be releasing Shotwell 0.11.93 including the bug fix early next week. ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940932 Title: Vibration of the screen when you zoom in Shotwell! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/940932/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 853373] Re: does not import RW2 raw-images
Romano, the gphoto bug has been fixed in the latest libgphoto, version 2.4.12. That version is not yet available in Ubuntu Precise, but should appear there soon. We're still not completely sure whether that will solve the RW2 problem in Shotwell, however; see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3428 for details. What, specifically, do you feel is dangerous? It looks like you imported photos from a folder and expected Shotwell to copy them, but they stayed in place. That has nothing to do with RW2, so if you're concerned about that behavior in Shotwell you should open a separate bug to discuss it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853373 Title: does not import RW2 raw-images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libgphoto/+bug/853373/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938098] Re: Email Client will not show when trying to send a photo, never has...
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 887357 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357 This is a duplicate of #887357, reported upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4432. It has been fixed in Shotwell 0.11.92 (currently available in Ubuntu Precise). ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 887357 send to... broken -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938098 Title: Email Client will not show when trying to send a photo, never has... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/938098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938181] Re: RED battery indicator on full battery (Al the time)
This is filed as a Shotwell bug, but has nothing to do with Shotwell. So I'm marking this as invalid - please reopen or refile this under a different Ubuntu component. ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938181 Title: RED battery indicator on full battery (Al the time) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/938181/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 929959] Re: freezing on Right Click to rename Event
This looks like bug http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4201 upstream. As described in comments #5 and #7 on that ticket, the rename operation can lead to a crash or other unpredictable behavior. The bug has been fixed for the next release of Shotwell, version 0.12. The fix is also present in the version of Shotwell in Ubuntu Precise. ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/929959 Title: freezing on Right Click to rename Event To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/929959/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 927511] Re: Only displaying the left half of the image in Precise
I see this too. I've ticketed this upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4715 . We'll look into this right away. ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927511 Title: Only displaying the left half of the image in Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/927511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 746697] Re: panels come forward when any fullscreen application opens a new window
Yes, this bug still occurs on Precise with all the latest updates. To see it, for example, open gedit, choose View-Fullscreen, then press Ctrl+H for Replace. When the Replace dialog appears, the Unity panel and launcher will appear too. This bug also affects Shotwell; see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3441 . ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746697 Title: panels come forward when any fullscreen application opens a new window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/746697/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 924587] [NEW] libraw-dev should depend on liblcms2-dev
Public bug reported: In Precise, libraw5 depends on liblcms2-2. If I install libraw-dev without liblcms2-dev, then 'pkg-config --libs libraw' fails: Package lcms2 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `lcms2.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'lcms2', required by 'libraw', not found And that in turn causes the Shotwell build to fail. So I believe that libraw-dev should depend on liblcms2-dev. ** Affects: libraw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924587 Title: libraw-dev should depend on liblcms2-dev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libraw/+bug/924587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923325] Re: Setting Developer to Camera on RAW files loses rotation orientation
Thanks for the bug report. This bug is known upstream: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4262 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923325 Title: Setting Developer to Camera on RAW files loses rotation orientation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/923325/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 916441] Re: gsettings-data-convert crashed with signal 5 in g_settings_set_value()
This seems worth investigating. I've ticketed this upstream: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4649 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916441 Title: gsettings-data-convert crashed with signal 5 in g_settings_set_value() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/916441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915087] [NEW] critical assertion: GDK_IS_WINDOW(window) failed
Public bug reported: I'm running Nemiver 0.9.1 on Ubuntu Precise (12.04) alpha. Every time I launch an application for debugging from within Nemiver, I get this critical assertion: Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_pointer: assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed This behavior is specific to Ubuntu; I don't see the assertion when I run the same version of Nemiver on Fedora, for instance. I've seen similar assertions when running various GNOME programs under Unity. In this case, though, the assertion is harmful - here's why. I sometimes want to run a debugged program with G_DEBUG=fatal-criticals so that it will break into the debugger when it hits a critical assertion of its own. Unfortunately, if I set G_DEBUG=fatal-criticals, then Nemiver itself will generate the assertion above and abort, preventing me from debugging. ** Affects: nemiver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915087 Title: critical assertion: GDK_IS_WINDOW(window) failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nemiver/+bug/915087/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912126] Re: can't drag from shotwell to any dropbox in any browser
Actually I think this is just a specific instance of a more general problem, which is that dragging and dropping from Shotwell works only to Nautilus, not to other applications. This is http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1563 . (See also bug #821915 , which is another instance of this.) ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912126 Title: can't drag from shotwell to any dropbox in any browser To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/912126/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911598] Re: Shotwell crashes when importing from USB
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862347 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862347 This is actually a duplicate of bug #860657, found upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4172. It was fixed in Shotwell 0.11.3. You should be able to update to 0.11.6 via the oneiric-updates repository. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911598 Title: Shotwell crashes when importing from USB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/911598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911598] Re: Shotwell crashes when importing from USB
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862347 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862347 Actually a duplicate of bug #862347. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 862347 shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in import_ui_get_media_specific_string(): code should not be reached -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911598 Title: Shotwell crashes when importing from USB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/911598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 909254] Re: Shotwell completely freezes upon start
Thanks for the bug report. We've ticketed this upstream: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4541 Could you possibly attach the offending video (MOVIEOBJ.BDM) here, or post a link to it if it's too large to attach? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909254 Title: Shotwell completely freezes upon start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/909254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 908640] Re: doesnt recognize vertical movie clips, it leave them orizzontal
Thanks for the sample video. Both Totem and VLC behave the same way as Shotwell: they play the movie in an horizontal orientation. It's not clear whether the video contains any information that would allow a program to determine its proper orientation. Are you aware of any program which will play it vertically? Regarding your second observation (another problem i noticed), please file a separate bug for that. Each bug report should address only a single issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908640 Title: doesnt recognize vertical movie clips, it leave them orizzontal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/908640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 908640] Re: doesnt recognize vertical movie clips, it leave them orizzontal
ffplay also plays the video horizontally, by the way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908640 Title: doesnt recognize vertical movie clips, it leave them orizzontal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/908640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 908640] Re: doesnt recognize vertical movie clips, it leave them orizzontal
Thanks for the bug report. What format are your video clips in? What kind of camera did you use to take them? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908640 Title: doesnt recognize vertical movie clips, it leave them orizzontal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/908640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 800459] Re: View reverts to album view when a photo is deleted
This bug was http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4263 upstream. It is present in Shotwell 0.11.6 as you observed, and has been fixed in the development trunk. The fix will be in the next Shotwell release (0.12). ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800459 Title: View reverts to album view when a photo is deleted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/800459/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 908640] Re: doesnt recognize vertical movie clips, it leave them orizzontal
Thanks for the information. Could you take a 1-second vertical video with your camera and attach it to this ticket? It would be a useful test case for this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908640 Title: doesnt recognize vertical movie clips, it leave them orizzontal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/908640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907937] Re: Last Import and Already imported not working
This looks like a bug already reported upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3895 We should investigate this for the upcoming 0.12 release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907937 Title: Last Import and Already imported not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/907937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907937] Re: Last Import and Already imported not working
Jim, what kind of camera do you have? Does this problem happen after every single import? If you import, say, 20 pictures from your camera and then select Last Import from the sidebar, does it show almost all the pictures (say, 18 or 19), or just a few? Are you importing only JPEG photos, or RAW photos as well? Do you notice any pattern in the photos which fail to appear in Last Import? For example, are those the latest photos you took with the camera, or the earliest? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907937 Title: Last Import and Already imported not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/907937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 908214] Re: Cannot delete photo's in Shotwell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 893326 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893326 Thanks for the bug report. This looks like a duplicate of bug #893326. It's also known upstream as http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4207 . ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 893326 Shotwell does not delete files it claims to... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908214 Title: Cannot delete photo's in Shotwell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/908214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907579] Re: Shotwell Send To button does not create email
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 887357 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357 I believe you've run into https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/887357 http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4432 This is a known bug which we've fixed for the upcoming 0.12 release. As such I'm marking this as a duplicate. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 887357 send to... broken -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907579 Title: Shotwell Send To button does not create email To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/907579/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 906167] Re: photos import but do not display
Adrian, the photo you attached has no EXIF, IPTC or XMP data, as revealed by the exiv2 command: $ exiv2 -pa Alicia%27s%20Motorcycle.jpg $ Shotwell has no idea what its date is, so it lists it in No Event. This is expected behavior. ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906167 Title: photos import but do not display To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/906167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 887357] Re: send to... broken
Note that this bug has been fixed upstream. The fix will be in the Shotwell release (0.12). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357 Title: send to... broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/887357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 906167] Re: photos import but do not display
Adrian, you're running a fairly old version of Shotwell (0.7). The current release is Shotwell 0.11. Could you upgrade to a newer version of Ubuntu and/or Shotwell and see if the problem still occurs? If you can't upgrade, could you attach the photos that are failing to display here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906167 Title: photos import but do not display To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/906167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797117] Re: Import of photos to be COPIED does not work correctly
The bugs are not the same. This bug (797117) does not involve missing photos, and as I explained in comment #6 it's not actually a bug according to the Shotwell designers. It's simply how Shotwell works, though we could possibly display more helpful messages to explain what's going on (as proposed in http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4502). Bug #813191 involves missing photos. It's a tricky edge case, and Shotwell's current behavior is possibly not ideal. The corresponding upstream ticket is http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3875 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797117 Title: Import of photos to be COPIED does not work correctly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/shotwell/+bug/797117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797117] Re: Import of photos to be COPIED does not work correctly
Daisy, first, to be clear, there are no symbolic links involved in this situation. Shotwell simply imports the photos in question into its database in their current filesystem locations. (Shotwell will never, in fact, create a symbolic link). In earlier versions of Shotwell we referred to this behavior as linking, but people found that confusing so we now call it importing in place. I can understand that it may not have been obvious why the copy/no copy dialog didn't appear for you. I've created a ticket upstream (http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4502) for possibly displaying a dialog as you suggest. Also, I think that before long we may display a set of options on every import, and once we're doing that we could simply disable the copy option in this situation; that might make things a little clearer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797117 Title: Import of photos to be COPIED does not work correctly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/shotwell/+bug/797117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 890372] Re: use libraw shared libary
Great - thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890372 Title: use libraw shared libary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/890372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 898028] Re: assertion failed in hash_timed_queue_removed while importing photos from F-Spot
Alex, there are a couple of things you can helpfully do: 1. Enable logging. To do this, run SHOTWELL_LOG=1 shotwell from a command prompt. As Shotwell runs, it will write a log file to ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log. 2. Run Shotwell under GDB. That way when Shotwell crashes you'll get a stack trace, which could be helpful. See http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#I-found-a -bug-in-Shotwell-How-can-I-report-it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898028 Title: assertion failed in hash_timed_queue_removed while importing photos from F-Spot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/898028/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797117] Re: Import of photos to be COPIED does not work correctly
This behavior is expected if the photos you're importing are already in the library directory: in that case Shotwell won't copy them (and, in recent versions of Shotwell, won't ask you whether you want the photos copied). So if Shotwell doesn't seem to be copying your photos, you should check your library directory setting in Shotwell's Preferences dialog. Perhaps it's mistakenly set to your home directory, in which case Shotwell will never copy photos imported from your home directory or any of its subdirectories. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797117 Title: Import of photos to be COPIED does not work correctly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/shotwell/+bug/797117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894553] Re: Writing metadata to files... never finishes
Thanks for the bug report and log file. This has also been reported upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4297 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894553 Title: Writing metadata to files... never finishes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/894553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 896611] Re: Date-modified images are not refiled in correct year etc
Also: this bug has been reported upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1940, and has already been reported in Launchpad as bug #696138. If you're looking for a workaround, then instead of filing a duplicate bug report it would be better to ask for help on the mailing list and/or post a comment to the existing bug entry. So this bug was originally a duplicate, but we can keep it open while we investigate the behavior you described in comment #2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896611 Title: Date-modified images are not refiled in correct year etc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/896611/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894553] Re: Writing metadata to files... never finishes
Thanks for the bug report. Could you generate a log file and attach it to this bug? To do that, run Shotwell from the command line like this: $ SHOTWELL_LOG=1 shotwell After the metadata writing hangs, exit Shotwell. Then find the file ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log and attach it here. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894553 Title: Writing metadata to files... never finishes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/894553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 887357] Re: send to... broken
I can reproduce this in the current trunk build of Shotwell. I've filed a bug upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4432 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357 Title: send to... broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/887357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 890372] Re: use libraw shared libary
As long as libraw is installed on the system, the normal Shotwell build should link to it dynamically. If that doesn't seem to be happening and it's unclear why, let us know and we can investigate more. ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890372 Title: use libraw shared libary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/890372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 893326] Re: Shotwell does not delete files it claims to...
This bug is known upstream: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4207 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893326 Title: Shotwell does not delete files it claims to... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/893326/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568726] Re: [needs-packaging] libraw
libraw has been packaged in Ubuntu since Maverick, so I think this bug can now be closed. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568726 Title: [needs-packaging] libraw To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/568726/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891779] [NEW] update libraw to 0.14.3
Public bug reported: Precise currently has libraw 0.14.0. It would be nice to update to the latest release, 0.14.3. ** Affects: libraw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891779 Title: update libraw to 0.14.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libraw/+bug/891779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891801] [NEW] please package gmime 2.6 for Precise
Public bug reported: Precise currently includes only gmime 2.4. It would be great to have gmime 2.6 available. (This will likely be a requirement for Geary, Yorba's upcoming email client - see http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/geary/wiki .) ** Affects: gmime2.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891801 Title: please package gmime 2.6 for Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gmime2.4/+bug/891801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 889738] Re: Shotwell doesn't show meta data from RAW file (exposure, aperture etc.)
That's a reasonable suggestion. I've created a ticket upstream here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4372 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889738 Title: Shotwell doesn't show meta data from RAW file (exposure, aperture etc.) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/889738/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885645] Re: create separate package for libraw shared library
Aha - I see. Thanks for the explanation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885645 Title: create separate package for libraw shared library To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libraw/+bug/885645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885324] Re: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu
I was mistaken: the libraw shared library is available in an Ubuntu
package today ('libraw2'). We should build Shotwell to use this shared
library and depend on this package. I've ticketed that as #890372.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdegraphics in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885324
Title:
Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/885324/+subscriptions
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 890379] [NEW] build using lcms2
Public bug reported: libraw currently builds and links to liblcms1. There's an effort underway to completely replace lcms1 with lcms2 in Ubuntu (see bug #885324). Given this, we should modify the libraw packaging to use liblcms2 instead. libraw's configure.ac checks for lcms2 as well as lcms1, so we should be able to fix this by modifying only the Ubuntu packaging. ** Affects: libraw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890379 Title: build using lcms2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libraw/+bug/890379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885324] Re: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu
...and we also need libraw itself to link to lcms2 rather than lcms1. I've ticketed that as bug #890379. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdegraphics in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885324 Title: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/885324/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 890372] [NEW] use libraw shared libary
Public bug reported:
Shotwell is currently build to link to libraw statically. This is
probably a historical artifact from previous times when libraw offered
only a static library. libraw now has a shared library in its own
package in Ubuntu ('libraw2'), so we should now build Shotwell to link
to this shared library and to depend on the libraw2 package.
** Affects: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890372
Title:
use libraw shared libary
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/890372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 889622] Re: Label for device says 'documents' rather than 'photos'
I, for one, can't reproduce this. I'm also running Ubuntu 11.10. If I plug in an iPhone running iOS 5 and then start Shotwell, the Shotwell sidebar shows the device as iPhone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889622 Title: Label for device says 'documents' rather than 'photos' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/889622/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882825] Re: Does not save the configuration file under ~/.config/
For Shotwell, this is ticketed upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/421 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882825 Title: Does not save the configuration file under ~/.config/ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/882825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 888363] Re: Crash on right click on event in text entry mode
Thanks for the bug report. I can reproduce this. The good news is that in git master (where we've ported to GTK 3), the hang does not occur. The assertions do still occur there, though, and we should fix those, so I've ticketed this upstream: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4366 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888363 Title: Crash on right click on event in text entry mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/888363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 888738] [NEW] abiword doesn't show up in Open With list, so I can't set it as default
Public bug reported: I'm running Abiword 2.8.6 on Ubuntu 11.10. I'd like to set Abiword as the default application for opening ODT and DOC files. When I right click a DOC file in Nautilus, Abiword shows up in the context menu; that's good. When I right click an ODT file in Nautilus, Abiword shows up in the Open With submenu in the context menu; that's also good. Unfortunately, when I right click a file of either of these types and choose Properties and visit the Open With tab, Abiword does not appeaer in the resulting list, even if I click the Show other applications button. As a result, I can't set Abiword as the default application for these types. (If it were in the list in this tab, I could select it and then press Set as default). ** Affects: abiword (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888738 Title: abiword doesn't show up in Open With list, so I can't set it as default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/888738/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 845174] Re: Second monitor doesn't work on MacBookAir3, 1 with nvidia-current driver
To chime in here, as I mentioned above I have a newer Macbook (a MacBook7,1) and am still seeing this behavior running Oneiric with all the latest updates. More specifically: 1. I start my laptop with an external monitor connected. After I log in, the external monitor is still blank. 2. I run nvidia-settings and select X Server Display Configuration on the left. nvidia-settings shows both the laptop display and the external monitor. I select the external monitor and choose Configuration: TwinView. 3. I press Apply. The laptop display flashes briefly, but nothing else changes. The external monitor is still blank. 4. I press Apply a second time. Now I briefly see garbage on both displays. After a few seconds it goes away, and I see a dialog box on the external monitor asking me whether I want to accept the display change. I click OK. 5. Unfortunately, at this point Unity is no longer running (the sidebar and panel have vanished) and so I can't run any programs. I have to switch to a different terminal console and reboot. As a result, I can't use an external monitor with Ubuntu on this Macbook. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/845174 Title: Second monitor doesn't work on MacBookAir3,1 with nvidia-current driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mactel-support/+bug/845174/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 887522] Re: Shotwell does not show 3gp videos
Thanks for the bug report. We have a ticket for this upstream: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3030 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887522 Title: Shotwell does not show 3gp videos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/887522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885645] [NEW] create separate package for libraw shared library
Public bug reported: It was once possible to build libraw only as a static library. A few releases ago libraw changed to support both static and shared libraries. Currently in Ubuntu both libraw.a and libraw.so are packaged in the libraw-dev package. Instead, libraw.so should live in a separate non- development package that can be used by applications. ** Affects: libraw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885645 Title: create separate package for libraw shared library To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libraw/+bug/885645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885324] Re: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu
Till: Yes, there really is a libraw. :) You're not seeing it because on Ubuntu Shotwell is built using libraw as a static library, so libraw is compiled into the Shotwell executable. It would be nice to use a shared library instead, but we can't do that at the moment because libraw.so currently lives inside libraw-dev, which we can't expect end users to install. Instead, libraw.so should be broken out into a separate package. I've created a separate Launchpad ticket for this issue: #885645. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to libkdcraw in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885324 Title: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/885324/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885324] Re: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu
Shotwell itself does not use lcms; it uses libraw, which depends on lcms1 in Ubuntu. Note that libraw 0.13.8 (present in Oneiric) can build using either lcms1 or lcms2. So to solve this particular dependency I suspect that you only need to update your libraw packaging to build using lcms2. You might also consider updating Precise to the latest libraw (0.14.3) while you're at it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to libkdcraw in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885324 Title: Completely replace lcms1 by lcms2 in Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/885324/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878498] Re: Shotwell Viewer - No fullscreen mode when double clicking an img
This seems like a reasonable idea. I've created a ticket in Shotwell's bug database: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4274 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878498 Title: Shotwell Viewer - No fullscreen mode when double clicking an img To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/878498/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878472] Re: Shotwell Viewer can't open files without file ending
We have a ticket for this upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3469 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878472 Title: Shotwell Viewer can't open files without file ending To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/878472/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 871034] Re: need packaging with gtk3
Thanks for the sleuthing, Steve. I've now fixed the malformed changelog entries upstream. Yes, we should use dch from now on. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871034 Title: need packaging with gtk3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/871034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 873851] Re: Shotwell 0.11.4 available, fixes crashes on import
Maxxer is right. It turns out that the bug fix in 0.11.4 was inadequate, and so we're planning to release 0.11.5 in the next few days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873851 Title: Shotwell 0.11.4 available, fixes crashes on import To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/873851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874166] Re: Disappears after usb import
This now looks like this bug, which we fixed in Shotwell 0.11.3: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4172 Hopefully Ubuntu will push 0.11.3 (or later) to Oneiric soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874166 Title: Disappears after usb import To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/874166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625331] Re: Multiple-tag research is not available
We're hoping to implement this for Shotwell 0.12, which will appear early next year. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625331 Title: Multiple-tag research is not available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/shotwell/+bug/625331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 871034] Re: need packaging whit gtk3
Note that the latest release of Shotwell (0.11) builds only with GTK 2. The next release (0.12) will appear in early 2012, and will support GTK 3. In the meantime, we'd like to have a daily build of the current trunk, which does already support GTK 3. We're working on that: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1220 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871034 Title: need packaging whit gtk3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/871034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 845174] Re: Second monitor doesn't work on MacBookAir3, 1 with nvidia-current driver
I'm seeing this too. I'm on a MacBook7,1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/845174 Title: Second monitor doesn't work on MacBookAir3,1 with nvidia-current driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mactel-support/+bug/845174/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756566] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
This bug report is about an older version of Shotwell (0.9). Could you upgrade to the latest release (0.11) and see whether the problem still occurs? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756566 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/756566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 861265] Re: [Oneiric] [Regression] firefox title bar does not appear (same problem with thunderbird) no window decoration for either application.
I'm also missing the title bar in Firefox. On my machine Thunderbird does have a title bar. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861265 Title: [Oneiric] [Regression] firefox title bar does not appear (same problem with thunderbird) no window decoration for either application. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/861265/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 850525] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGSEGV in progress_dialog_monitor()
Yes - Shotwell doesn't yet support building with Vala 0.13. We'll fix this in Shotwell 0.12: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3760 On Oneiric, you can install the valac-0.12 package to get a version of valac that works for Shotwell today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850525 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGSEGV in progress_dialog_monitor() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/shotwell/+bug/850525/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776977] Re: Double click on menu bar should reset a maximized window to original size
I'm seeing this too: on my Oneiric machine, a double click on a maximized window's title bar does nothing. It should unmaximize the window. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776977 Title: Double click on menu bar should reset a maximized window to original size To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/776977/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 713295] Re: shotwell crashed with SIGSEGV in data_source_get_typename()
Mark, what versions of Shotwell and Ubuntu are you using? Are you seeing the same crash others have reported here (SIGSEGV in data_source_get_typename)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713295 Title: shotwell crashed with SIGSEGV in data_source_get_typename() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/713295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 831791] Re: Function 'Send to' resize pictures to /tmp with % instead of space
Andries, I just tried your steps with Shotwell 0.11+trunk, Ubuntu 11.10 and Thunderbird 7.0 and everything worked just fine - both the on-disk filename and the attachment filename contain spaces. So it looks like this has been fixed by the newer versions of one or more of these software entities. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831791 Title: Function 'Send to' resize pictures to /tmp with % instead of space To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/831791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 835490] Re: Elimination of commas when entering tags in Shotwell
I can't reproduce this in the current Shotwell trunk. Could you update to the current version of Shotwell (0.11) and see whether the problem still occurs? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835490 Title: Elimination of commas when entering tags in Shotwell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/835490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 830594] Re: ShotWell crashes while writing metadata to files.
This bug has been reported upstream here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3641 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830594 Title: ShotWell crashes while writing metadata to files. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/830594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 826257] Re: unable to set the time transition when creating a desktop slideshow
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 822268 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822268 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 822268 Can't set delay/time for background slideshow -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826257 Title: unable to set the time transition when creating a desktop slideshow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/826257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 824062] Re: tool windows don't refresh properly when window moved or resized
Sebastien wrote this via email: Oh btw I checked a bit on the refresh issue you showed me during the summit (the one with your special overlay toolbars not getting refreshed properly). There is a compiz bug there but the way you display those seem suboptimal, under gnome-shell or unity-2d the bar is refreshed but it seems to happen for each move event, dragging shotwell across the screen creates a lot of flickering and slowness), we will take care of the compiz refresh issue but you might want to look at doing things differently in shotwell as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/824062 Title: tool windows don't refresh properly when window moved or resized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/824062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 806636] Re: [Oneiric] Compiz fails to update window title until focused window is changed unless window is maximized
This is also fixed for me with Oneiric updates as of today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806636 Title: [Oneiric] Compiz fails to update window title until focused window is changed unless window is maximized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/806636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 824062] [NEW] tool windows don't refresh properly when window moved or resized
Public bug reported: This is an Oneiric-specific display bug, originally reported upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3932 : 1. Open any photo in full-window mode. 2. Open any editing tool (such as Crop). 3. Move or resize the main Shotwell window. The editing tool window will appear garbaged: it will move along with the main window but will not refresh properly. ** Affects: shotwell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/824062 Title: tool windows don't refresh properly when window moved or resized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/824062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 824068] [NEW] no toolbar in fullscreen mode
Public bug reported: This is an Oneiric-specific bug, originally reported upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3948: 1. Select a photo and press F11 to enter fullscreen mode. 2. Move the mouse to the bottom of the screen. The toolbar should appear, but usually it will not. Occasionally the toolbar will actually appear in step 2. If that happens, press F11 to exit fullscreen mode, then F11 to enter it again. The toolbar will fail to appear the second time around. ** Affects: shotwell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/824068 Title: no toolbar in fullscreen mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/824068/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 822924] Re: Changing directory structure does not do anything
John, the tree view in the side panel does not correspond to the directory hierarchy on disk. Instead, the side panel displays your events arranged by year and month. This is completely independent of the on- disk hierarchy: even if all your photos are all in the same directory, for example, the side panel will display events by year and month. The option you mentioned affects only the on-disk structure. This is all by design. We are, however, considering adding a folder tree to the sidebar in the future (see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1594). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822924 Title: Changing directory structure does not do anything To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/822924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 822924] Re: Changing directory structure does not do anything
Well, your original post said directory structure. A directory is an on-disk entity, and so the sidebar tree has nothing to do with the directory structure. Probably this is what you found confusing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822924 Title: Changing directory structure does not do anything To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/822924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 822924] Re: Changing preferences for side panel structure does not do anything
To make things even more clear, here are answers to each of your questions in #11: - if there are no preferences for the events, then how come the events tree represents exactly the Year/Month/Day structure? It's purely a coincidence that the event tree hierarchy happens to be similar to the directory hierarchy which Shotwell uses by default. They are not tied together in any way. - if the dropdown menu in the prefs IS supposed to change the events tree (which I suspect it is supposed to do), then how is calling it directory structure correct? The dropdown menu in the prefs is *not* supposed to change the event tree in any way. Its name is correct since it affects only the on-disk directory structure. - if whats in the prefs is correct, changing Directory structure should change the directory structure on the disk, which is does not and is certainly neither what it is supposed to do nor what I want it to do Changing the directory structure preference affects only the locations of photos which you import *after* you change this preference. It has no effect on the locations of photos which you have already imported. As Jim mentioned back in comment #3, we'd like to enhance Shotwell to be able to rearrange your existing photo files into a new directory structure, but it can't do that yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822924 Title: Changing preferences for side panel structure does not do anything To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/822924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 821915] Re: shotwell drag photo or video to pitivi does not work
Vincent, If we want this sort of drag and drop to work, Shotwell will need to keep an on-disk copy of each photo including all edits the user has made. Today, Shotwell only keeps the originals on disk, and applies the user's edits on the fly each time the user opens a photo.As a result, fixing this will be a large change to Shotwell. (See http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1798.) It certainly won't happen for the upcoming 0.11 release. Perhaps we'll be able to implement this for 0.12 or 0.13 depending on other priorities. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821915 Title: shotwell drag photo or video to pitivi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/821915/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 822268] Re: Can't set delay/time for background slideshow
Thanks for the bug report. I can reproduce this. I've ticketed this upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3946 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822268 Title: Can't set delay/time for background slideshow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/822268/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 821915] Re: shotwell drag photo or video to pitivi does not work
Vincent, it's possible to drag and drop photos from Shotwell to Nautilus, but not to any other application. This is a known issue: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1563 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821915 Title: shotwell drag photo or video to pitivi does not work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/821915/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812712] Re: Can't get normal modal dialog size
I was just burned by this too. In Thunderbird, I installed an add-on called Zindus. I opened the Zindus Configuration Settings dialog, then pressed Add to add an account. Compiz forced the resulting New Account dialog to fit inside the parent Configuration Settings dialog and wouldn't let me resize it. I had no idea how to fix the problem, and only when I read this ticket did I realize that if I made the parent dialog larger then the child dialog would appear large enough. I think this behavior is absolutely a bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812712 Title: Can't get normal modal dialog size To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/812712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 806636] Re: [Oneiric] Compiz fails to update window title until focused window is changed unless window is maximized
I'm seeing this too in the current Oneiric build. I'm running on a MacBook which has an nVidia graphics card, so the problem does not seem to be specific to ATI. I think this bug should have importance High. It's quite distracting that window titles are wrong all the time. As a workaround, I can resize a window to fix its title every time I notice that it's wrong, but that gets old fast. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806636 Title: [Oneiric] Compiz fails to update window title until focused window is changed unless window is maximized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/806636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812158] Re: shotwell slideshow freezes when going backward before the first picture
I can reproduce this both in 0.9.3 and in the current trunk. It occurs only if I press the left arrow *immediately* after initiating the slideshow. I think this is probably the same bug as http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1502 as Clint suggested above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812158 Title: shotwell slideshow freezes when going backward before the first picture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/shotwell/+bug/812158/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812269] Re: Publish queue
This is related to this existing feature request: http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2318 Once that's implemented, youll be able to upload photos while still viewing photos and using Shotwell's other features. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #2318 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2318 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812269 Title: Publish queue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/812269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812312] Re: When trying to import pictures from a Nexus One Android phone, *all* pics on SD are proposed
This bug is known upstream at http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1903 . ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #1903 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1903 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/1903 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812312 Title: When trying to import pictures from a Nexus One Android phone, *all* pics on SD are proposed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/shotwell/+bug/812312/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812312] Re: When trying to import pictures from a Nexus One Android phone, *all* pics on SD are proposed
This has also been reported as bug #771757 . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812312 Title: When trying to import pictures from a Nexus One Android phone, *all* pics on SD are proposed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/shotwell/+bug/812312/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 808272] Re: Shotwell doesn't find input file(s)
This bug was http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3672 , and has been fixed in trunk. The fix will be in the next release, Shotwell 0.11. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3672 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3672 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808272 Title: Shotwell doesn't find input file(s) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/808272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 807627] [NEW] URL is unreadable while page is loading
Public bug reported: I'm running Epiphany 3.0.3 on Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric) using the default theme. Normally, the URL in the URL bar appears black on a light gray background and is easy to read. While a page is loading, however, the URL is in white text on a light gray background and is virtually impossible to read. This seems odd, and harms usability: even while a page is loading, I might want to know its URL so I can be sure that I've ended up where I wanted to go. I've attached a screenshot. I originally reported this bug to the Epiphany team at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=654133 , but they believe it's actually an Ubuntu bug, specifically with the default Ambiance theme in Ubuntu. ** Affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807627 Title: URL is unreadable while page is loading To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/807627/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 807627] Re: URL is unreadable while page is loading
** Attachment added: screenshot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807627/+attachment/2197696/+files/screenshot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807627 Title: URL is unreadable while page is loading To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/807627/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797941] Re: shotwell prints filename on all photos
Shotwell's search capability does not current match the names of folders that pictures are in. This might be a reasonable idea, though I have some concern that it might yield mysterious matches for some users. Feel free to file a ticket at trac.yorba.org if you'd like us to consider this for a future release. Note that searching in Shotwell *does* match tag names. So in the example you gave above, you don't actually have to rename each individual picture: instead, you can tag all those pictures with oliver. Today, when you import photos into Shotwell it doesn't pay attention to the folder hierarchy containing those photos, though some users would like us to derive events automatically from that hierarchy; see http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2108 . That might also solve your problem, since Shotwell searches do match event names. Shotwell does have a plugin system but today it can only be used to add publishing destinations and new slideshow transitions, not filters or effects. It would be nice if Shotwell's plugins allowed arbitrary photo transformations, but we're not there yet. See http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3440 . ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #2108 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2108 ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3440 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3440 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797941 Title: shotwell prints filename on all photos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/797941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797941] Re: shotwell prints filename on all photos
It is actually possible to turn off this behavior. In the Image Settings tab in the Print dialog, uncheck the box Print image title. (The fact that the titles overlap the images is a known bug; see http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3249 .) ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3249 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3249 ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797941 Title: shotwell prints filename on all photos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/797941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 793375] Re: Crashes during load, starting shotweel on command line gives the following...�: data corrupted at 3662724
David, you're running a fairly old version of Shotwell. Can you try upgrading to the latest release (0.10) and let us know whether the crash still occurs? See http://yorba.org/shotwell/install/ . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793375 Title: Crashes during load, starting shotweel on command line gives the following...�: data corrupted at 3662724 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 793095] Re: Pictures of a tag are not sorted correctly
This was http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3539 . It was fixed in Shotwell 0.10. ** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3539 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3539 ** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793095 Title: Pictures of a tag are not sorted correctly -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 769940] Re: authenticate and authorize webviews for flickr does not accept mouse clicks for form submit actions/buttons
Endomancer, we fixed this bug in Shotwell 0.10, which was released just yesterday. I suggest you upgrade to 0.10. The Shotwell web site will tell you how to do that: http://yorba.org/shotwell/install/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769940 Title: authenticate and authorize webviews for flickr does not accept mouse clicks for form submit actions/buttons -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 784753] Re: second crop undoes the first
Avi, I'm not sure I understand, In what sense does the second crop operation undo the first? When I follow your steps to reproduce, then when I click 'crop' for the second time, Shotwell displays the crop rectangle I chose when I first cropped the image. In other words, after I press 'crop' the second time, the display looks *exactly* the same as it did right before I pressed OK when cropping the first time. Are you seeing different behavior? As Vera pointed out, you can't crop while zoomed yet, though I'm not sure that's what you're complaining about - or is it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784753 Title: second crop undoes the first -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 784753] Re: second crop undoes the first
Thanks for the screencast. The behavior in the screencast is expected and is how cropping is intended to work: when you press Crop the second time, Shotwell once again displays the entire image and displays the crop rectangle you chose the first time so that you can adjust it as you like. It's still not clear to me how you'd like it to behave differently - can you explain? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784753 Title: second crop undoes the first -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 779488] Re: Slow and lag transition effects in slideshow mode !
** Bug watch added: trac.yorba.org/ #3140 http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3140 ** Also affects: shotwell via http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/3140 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779488 Title: Slow and lag transition effects in slideshow mode ! -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
