[Bug 1732803] Re: systemd-journald RateLimitBurst is sometimes divided by 4
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1732803 Title: systemd-journald RateLimitBurst is sometimes divided by 4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1732803/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1639776] Re: dnsmasq fails to send queries out after suspend disconnects the interface
I've installed this package on Xenial, and it fixes this issue for me (specifically, with openvpn). ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639776 Title: dnsmasq fails to send queries out after suspend disconnects the interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1639776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1547231] Re: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression
What makes this unsuitable for an SRU? Is the concern that this would be considered an interface change? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547231 Title: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1547231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1547231] Re: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression
** Description changed: /proc/$pid/maps experienced a significant performance regression for processes with large numbers of threads between Precise and Trusty due to an upstream bug. This behavior is currently blocking my ability to upgrade to Trusty, as we depend on applications with with 10s of thousands of threads. - The issue has been fixed in the usptream -mm tree. + The issue has been fixed in the 4.5 release. Upstream report: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/144712 - Upstream patches: - https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git/commit/?h=since-4.4=2d2a106c79f4b5b2b10e72957f7448e276dbf0a9 - https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git/commit/?h=since-4.4=eb1899e03405faf7c79396ae9593303d53e2710d + Upstream patches: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=65376df582174ffcec9e6471bf5b0dd79ba05e4a ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-36-generic 3.13.0-36.63 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-36.63-generic 3.13.11.6 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-36-generic x86_64 AlsaDevices: - total 0 - crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Feb 18 12:13 seq - crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Feb 18 12:13 timer + total 0 + crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Feb 18 12:13 seq + crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Feb 18 12:13 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord' AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: Date: Thu Feb 18 13:44:23 2016 MachineType: Supermicro A1SAi PciMultimedia: - + ProcEnviron: - TERM=screen - PATH=(custom, no user) - XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + TERM=screen + PATH=(custom, no user) + XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash ProcFB: 0 astdrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: root=/dev/md1 ro console=tty0 console=ttyS0,57600 RelatedPackageVersions: - linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-36-generic N/A - linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-36-generic N/A - linux-firmware 1.127.20 + linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-36-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-36-generic N/A + linux-firmware 1.127.20 RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill' SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-07-18 (579 days ago) WifiSyslog: - + dmi.bios.date: 02/27/2014 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 1.0c dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.board.name: A1SAi dmi.board.vendor: Supermicro dmi.board.version: 123456789 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.type: 18 dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1.0c:bd02/27/2014:svnSupermicro:pnA1SAi:pvr123456789:rvnSupermicro:rnA1SAi:rvr123456789:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct18:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: dmi.product.name: A1SAi dmi.product.version: 123456789 dmi.sys.vendor: Supermicro -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547231 Title: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1547231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1547231] Re: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression
Hey folks - Anything I can do to get this into the next trusty kernel release? This has now caused multiple production incidents for us. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547231 Title: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1547231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
Thanks Martin. I've confirmed that the package solves the issue for me. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
Sorry about that, Martin. Not sure what happened. Just re-uploaded without the noise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
** Changed in: ccid (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
** Description changed: + + [DESCRIPTION] + + When hotplugging a composite USB device that expose multiple interfaces + (such as a Yubikey NEO or Yubikey 4), libccid does not correctly de- + initialize the USB library when it skips over the non-CCID interface. + + This subsequently results in pcscd (or, presumably, anything that loads + libccid, though I don't think anything else does) either using 100% CPU + or segfaulting when the device is unplugged. + + This seems worthy of an SRU as it is an easily reproducible bug with a + simple, targeted fix. + + [TEST CASE] + + 1. Make sure pcscd is running (sudo systemctl start pcscd; possibly sudo systemctl restart pcscd if a potentially fixed package has just been installed) + 2. Plug and then unplug a composite USB device that includes a CCID interface (such as a Yubikey NEO) + 3. Observe that pcscd has crashed with a segfault (sudo systemctl status pcscd) + + [REGRESSION POTENTIAL] + + The patch is quite narrow, and thus the potential for regression should + be limited. The new code adds calls to close_libusb_if_needed, which is + already written to be fairly conservative. + + The worst case here is likely an unexpected call to libusb_exit, which + could cause libusb to get into an inconsistent state. However, in + practice the call seems quite safe, and the likelihood of regression + low. + + + == + Original bug description: + In xenial, pcscd CPU utilization occasionally goes haywire: - PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND - 27404 root 20 0 384264 4992 2228 S 100.3 0.0 75:39.03 /usr/sbin/pcscd --foreground --auto-exit + PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND + 27404 root 20 0 384264 4992 2228 S 100.3 0.0 75:39.03 /usr/sbin/pcscd --foreground --auto-exit I get this about once a day since installing xenial. I can't quite connect it to any specific event on the system, it just seems to happen sporadically -- fan turns on, I run top, and there it is again. Never had this issue on same hardware incl. smartcard with trusty. I wonder if it might be this? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718473 ** Description changed: - - [DESCRIPTION] + [Impact] When hotplugging a composite USB device that expose multiple interfaces (such as a Yubikey NEO or Yubikey 4), libccid does not correctly de- initialize the USB library when it skips over the non-CCID interface. This subsequently results in pcscd (or, presumably, anything that loads libccid, though I don't think anything else does) either using 100% CPU or segfaulting when the device is unplugged. This seems worthy of an SRU as it is an easily reproducible bug with a simple, targeted fix. - [TEST CASE] + [Test Case] 1. Make sure pcscd is running (sudo systemctl start pcscd; possibly sudo systemctl restart pcscd if a potentially fixed package has just been installed) 2. Plug and then unplug a composite USB device that includes a CCID interface (such as a Yubikey NEO) 3. Observe that pcscd has crashed with a segfault (sudo systemctl status pcscd) - [REGRESSION POTENTIAL] + [Regression Potential] The patch is quite narrow, and thus the potential for regression should be limited. The new code adds calls to close_libusb_if_needed, which is already written to be fairly conservative. The worst case here is likely an unexpected call to libusb_exit, which could cause libusb to get into an inconsistent state. However, in practice the call seems quite safe, and the likelihood of regression low. - == Original bug description: In xenial, pcscd CPU utilization occasionally goes haywire: PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 27404 root 20 0 384264 4992 2228 S 100.3 0.0 75:39.03 /usr/sbin/pcscd --foreground --auto-exit I get this about once a day since installing xenial. I can't quite connect it to any specific event on the system, it just seems to happen sporadically -- fan turns on, I run top, and there it is again. Never had this issue on same hardware incl. smartcard with trusty. I wonder if it might be this? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718473 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
This is actually a bug in ccid's handling of composite USB devices, and has been fixed upstream (https://alioth.debian.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi- bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pcsclite/CCID.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=3c21f452543983f3625a1965ce234074cbda6865). My experience was that this bug caused pcscd to segfault, rather than to consume 100% CPU, but the fix appears to be the same either way. I've attached a debdiff that fixes the issue for me, and I've uploaded a test build to my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu /ubuntu-tests). I suspect this merits an SRU, since it's a significant regression in functionality without a good workaround; I'll start on the paperwork. ** Patch added: "ccid_1.4.22-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+attachment/4659458/+files/ccid_1.4.22-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
** Also affects: ccid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ccid (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ccid (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ccid (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297849] Re: [SRU] Virtual private network connection fails after distribution upgrade due to outdated Network Manager configuration files
@brian-murray: I just installed the package from proposed on trusty and it seems to have improved things, although there's a 5-10 second delay after nm-applet starts up where it hasn't registered itself as a secrets provider. Still, this seems to be an improvement in behavior. ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297849 Title: [SRU] Virtual private network connection fails after distribution upgrade due to outdated Network Manager configuration files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager-applet/+bug/1297849/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1499075] Re: python3.4.3 SRU breaks awscli
** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Patch added: "python-botocore_0.29.0+repack-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-botocore/+bug/1499075/+attachment/4472704/+files/python-botocore_0.29.0%2Brepack-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499075 Title: python3.4.3 SRU breaks awscli To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-botocore/+bug/1499075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1499075] Re: python3.4.3 SRU breaks awscli
** Also affects: python-botocore (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python3.4 (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python-botocore (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: python-botocore (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499075 Title: python3.4.3 SRU breaks awscli To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-botocore/+bug/1499075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
I've attached fixes for the issue for Trusty and Utopic, the only two affected releases. They're also building now in my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-tests). I'll upload to -proposed once I can confirm the test packages work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
** Patch added: nsd_4.0.3-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+attachment/4295873/+files/nsd_4.0.3-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
** Description changed: + [IMPACT] + + Currently, nsd fails to install. The postinst attempts to start the nsd + daemon before creating the nsd user, and fails when starting the daemon + fails. + + The daemon is started by debhelper-generated snippets. The attached + fixes move the auto-generated snippets to the end of the postinst, after + the non-auto-generated code creates the user. + + (This is the fix used by Debian to fix Debian bug #743396) + + [TEST CASE] + + 1. Ensure that the nsd user doesn't already exist: + +$ getent passwd nsd +$ + + 2. Install nsd: + +$ sudo apt-get install nsd + + Note: This won't work in an environment such as a buildd chroot where + daemons are disabled via policy-rc.d - you'll either have to remove the + file or specifically whitelist the nsd daemon. + + Expected results: package install successfully + + Actual results: + + $ sudo apt-get install nsd + + Unpacking nsd (4.0.1-1) ... + Processing triggers for man-db (2.6.7.1-1) ... + Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... + Setting up nsd (4.0.1-1) ... + start: Job failed to start + invoke-rc.d: initscript nsd, action start failed. + dpkg: error processing package nsd (--configure): + subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 + Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... + Errors were encountered while processing: + nsd + E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) + + [REGRESSION POTENTIAL] + + Seems quite low. There are no changes to the actual nsd code, so the + likelihood of affecting successful installs seems minimal. The only + debhelper-generated code in the postinst are related to the init script + (starting the daemon, and upgrading from sysvinit to upstart), so the + possibility for side-effects from moving the snippets also seems + minimal. + + === + Original description: + installing nsd fails unless the `nsd` user is created first. On a completely fresh Ubuntu 14.04 machine (from AWS's AMI): $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install nsd Unpacking nsd (4.0.1-1) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.6.7.1-1) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... Setting up nsd (4.0.1-1) ... start: Job failed to start invoke-rc.d: initscript nsd, action start failed. dpkg: error processing package nsd (--configure): - subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 + subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... Errors were encountered while processing: - nsd + nsd E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) $ sudo useradd nsd $ sudo dpkg --configure nsd Setting up nsd (4.0.1-1) ... nsd start/running, process 1887 ** Patch added: nsd_4.0.1-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+attachment/4295872/+files/nsd_4.0.1-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
** Also affects: nsd (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nsd (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
Thanks for the approvals, Sebastian and Brian. I've repeated the steps I outlined in the description and confirmed that the bug does not occur with the packages in -proposed. I've also installed the packages in our production nagios server and confirmed that things seem to more or less work as expected. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
Thanks for the approvals, Sebastian and Brian. I've repeated the steps I outlined in the description and confirmed that the bug does not occur with the packages in -proposed. I've also installed the packages in our production nagios server and confirmed that things seem to more or less work as expected. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
** Also affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
** Description changed: - Description: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS - Release: 12.04 + [Impact] + Under nagios 3.2.3 with state retention enabled, any host aliases or display names assigned to a host would be persisted into the retention file, and would supersede subsequent configuration changes. As a result, changes to either hosts' aliases or display names would not be reflected in either the nagios CGI interface or notification macros (like HOSTALIAS) - nagios3: - Installed: 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 - Candidate: 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 + There are numerous references to this bug online, including several upstream nagios issues: + http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=238 + http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=272 - The problem is described here http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=238 + And several blog posts: + http://ten-fingers-and-a-brain.com/2011/10/nagios-doesnt-update-the-host-alias-macro-%E2%80%93-workaround/ + http://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/179/nagios-notifications-contain-wrong-host-alias-name#.VIZph-pGjUY - The solution that worked for me is here - http://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/179/nagios-notifications-contain- - wrong-host-alias-name but instead of fully deleting - /var/lib/nagios3/retention.dat I stopped the nagios service update the - alias and restarted it. + [Test Case] + Although the bug is in nagios3-core, it's easiest to observe using nagios3-cgi: + + 1. Install nagios3-cgi + 2. Edit /etc/nagios3/cgi.cfg and set use_authentication=0 + 3. Edit /etc/apache2/conf.d/nagios3.conf and remove the AuthName, AuthType, AuthUserFile, and require lines + 4. Restart apache2 to pick up the new config + 5. Open http://localhost/cgi-bin/nagios3/extinfo.cgi?type=1host=localhost + 6. Observe that the host is described as Host localhost (localhost) - localhost is both the host name and the alias + 7. Edit /etc/nagios3/conf.d/localhost_nagios2.cfg and change alias to otherhost (line 10 or so) + 8. Restart nagios3 to pick up the new config + 9. Open http://localhost/cgi-bin/nagios3/extinfo.cgi?type=1host=localhost again + + Buggy behavior: host is still described as Host localhost (localhost) + Fixed behavior: host description is updated to Host otherhost (localhost) to reflect alias change + + [Regression Potential] + It's difficult to understand what the upstream intent was when this bug was introduced to know if it's addressing a broader issue - both the introduction and resolution of the issue lack useful commentary in the commit messages. + + However, this patch is definitely a behavior change: previously changes + to the disk configuration would not be reflected in the nagios runtime + configuration without manual intervention. It's possible there are use + cases which rely on this behavior. However, it seems unlikely to me that + a user would change a configuration file and restart the daemon and not + intend for those changes to take effect + + This issue has proven to be frustrating to our usage of nagios in + production, and my belief is that fixing it would create less net + confusion than leaving it. However, maybe that's not enough to satisfy + the SRU bar. + + Outside of that change, the patch is very narrow and regression + potential seems low. ** Patch added: nagios3_3.2.3-3ubuntu1.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+attachment/4276679/+files/nagios3_3.2.3-3ubuntu1.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
** Also affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
** Description changed: - Description: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS - Release: 12.04 + [Impact] + Under nagios 3.2.3 with state retention enabled, any host aliases or display names assigned to a host would be persisted into the retention file, and would supersede subsequent configuration changes. As a result, changes to either hosts' aliases or display names would not be reflected in either the nagios CGI interface or notification macros (like HOSTALIAS) - nagios3: - Installed: 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 - Candidate: 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 + There are numerous references to this bug online, including several upstream nagios issues: + http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=238 + http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=272 - The problem is described here http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=238 + And several blog posts: + http://ten-fingers-and-a-brain.com/2011/10/nagios-doesnt-update-the-host-alias-macro-%E2%80%93-workaround/ + http://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/179/nagios-notifications-contain-wrong-host-alias-name#.VIZph-pGjUY - The solution that worked for me is here - http://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/179/nagios-notifications-contain- - wrong-host-alias-name but instead of fully deleting - /var/lib/nagios3/retention.dat I stopped the nagios service update the - alias and restarted it. + [Test Case] + Although the bug is in nagios3-core, it's easiest to observe using nagios3-cgi: + + 1. Install nagios3-cgi + 2. Edit /etc/nagios3/cgi.cfg and set use_authentication=0 + 3. Edit /etc/apache2/conf.d/nagios3.conf and remove the AuthName, AuthType, AuthUserFile, and require lines + 4. Restart apache2 to pick up the new config + 5. Open http://localhost/cgi-bin/nagios3/extinfo.cgi?type=1host=localhost + 6. Observe that the host is described as Host localhost (localhost) - localhost is both the host name and the alias + 7. Edit /etc/nagios3/conf.d/localhost_nagios2.cfg and change alias to otherhost (line 10 or so) + 8. Restart nagios3 to pick up the new config + 9. Open http://localhost/cgi-bin/nagios3/extinfo.cgi?type=1host=localhost again + + Buggy behavior: host is still described as Host localhost (localhost) + Fixed behavior: host description is updated to Host otherhost (localhost) to reflect alias change + + [Regression Potential] + It's difficult to understand what the upstream intent was when this bug was introduced to know if it's addressing a broader issue - both the introduction and resolution of the issue lack useful commentary in the commit messages. + + However, this patch is definitely a behavior change: previously changes + to the disk configuration would not be reflected in the nagios runtime + configuration without manual intervention. It's possible there are use + cases which rely on this behavior. However, it seems unlikely to me that + a user would change a configuration file and restart the daemon and not + intend for those changes to take effect + + This issue has proven to be frustrating to our usage of nagios in + production, and my belief is that fixing it would create less net + confusion than leaving it. However, maybe that's not enough to satisfy + the SRU bar. + + Outside of that change, the patch is very narrow and regression + potential seems low. ** Patch added: nagios3_3.2.3-3ubuntu1.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+attachment/4276679/+files/nagios3_3.2.3-3ubuntu1.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191460] Re: $PreserveFQDN and $LocalHostName not always used
There's a comment at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- branches/ubuntu/saucy/rsyslog/saucy/view/head:/tools/syslogd.c#L2428 that says we need to re-call GenerateLocalHostNameProperty after parsing config, but as far as I can tell, that doesn't happen. Does adding a call to queryLocalHostname() around line 2958 of tools/syslogd.c make this work? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191460 Title: $PreserveFQDN and $LocalHostName not always used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1191460/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106429] Re: [backportpackage] -sa detection does not work with private PPAs
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106429 Title: [backportpackage] -sa detection does not work with private PPAs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1106429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
I did look at those - the patch for CVE-2009-5031 seems to have been applied already. The link to the patch for CVE-2012-2751 (http://mod- security.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mod- security?view=revisionsortby=logsortdir=downrevision=1918) appears to be dead, so I haven't been able to tell whether that patch has been applied or not. ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2009-5031 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2751 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
Ok, here's a patch with the fix for CVE-2012-2751 rolled in. I kind of made up the DEP-3 fields, but I think they'll at least satisfy their purpose. I've tested that the resulting packages with this patch work at at least a basic level, but I still don't have POCs to test with or anything. ** Patch added: libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+attachment/3645690/+files/libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
Bleh, looks to have been a stupid copy/paste error (missing / for the start of a /* comment). Builds for me now, and still seems to install/work at a basic level. ** Patch added: libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+attachment/3645778/+files/libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
And that, of course, is based off of completely the wrong version. I'm not even sure where I got that from. Here's a patch that's actually for the Lucid packaging. (Testing still forthcoming) ** Also affects: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+attachment/3644987/+files/libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff ** Changed in: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: modsecurity-apache (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Triaged ** Changed in: modsecurity-apache (Ubuntu) Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
Ok, I've installed this on one of my Lucid servers, and it still seems to work at at least a basic level. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
By the way, feel free to ping me (broder) in #ubuntu-hardened if I can do anything to improve the debdiff. ** Changed in: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Triaged ** Changed in: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] [NEW] CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: http://marc.info/?l=oss-securitym=136499182131283w=2 http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2013/CVE-2013-1915.html ** Affects: modsecurity-apache (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
Here's a patch which I believe be a correct backport of the upstream patch to Lucid (it didn't apply cleanly due to other additions to modsecurity since Lucid's release). I've verified that it builds but not yet done any testing - I'll be doing so shortly. ** Patch added: modsecurity-apache_2.6.6-5ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+attachment/3644365/+files/modsecurity-apache_2.6.6-5ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106429] [NEW] [backportpackage] -sa detection does not worth with private PPAs
Public bug reported: backportpackage's attempt to detect whether -sa is needed or not is foiled by private PPAs, as hitting https://launchpad.net/~whomever/+archive/whatever/+files/my_file redirects to the login page. httplib2 follows redirects, and the login page returns a 200, so backportpackage concludes it doesn't need to pass -sa. Not totally sure what the right fix here is. My recollection was that determining this from using the LP API was difficult, but I haven't looked at the options in a while. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106429 Title: [backportpackage] -sa detection does not worth with private PPAs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1106429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1007042] Re: [backportpackage] fails but worked last week
We used to generate backport version numbers of the form VERSION_BEING_BACKPORTED~RELEASE_CODENAME1. It worked well at the time because it guaranteed that a backport of the same version to, e.g., natty would have a lower version number than the backport to oneiric, since the n would sort before o. That's important because we rely on the version numbers sorting like that for release upgrade paths with backports to work. Colin pointed out that this would break down when we ran out of letters and started wrapping around, and suggested that we instead switch to using the version number, which is what backportpackage now does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042 Title: [backportpackage] fails but worked last week To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1007042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607896] Re: Please sync Griffith 0.12-1 from Debian (unstable) to Maverick - updated dependency
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607896 Title: Please sync Griffith 0.12-1 from Debian (unstable) to Maverick - updated dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/griffith/+bug/607896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382591] Re: Backport Gwyddion 2.24-1 to hardy, lucid, maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382591 Title: Backport Gwyddion 2.24-1 to hardy, lucid, maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/382591/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126 Title: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/353126/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 804034] Re: Please provide 0.9.6 package for Maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804034 Title: Please provide 0.9.6 package for Maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/804034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 682460] Re: please backport virtualbox-ose 3.2.10 from natty to maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682460 Title: please backport virtualbox-ose 3.2.10 from natty to maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/682460/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948485] Re: Suspend after undocking laptop doesn't work
Clayton - Thanks for the update. It does sound like your issue was different than mine, but I'm glad it was resolved. (For reference, because it's very difficult to detect whether a laptop is actually docked, upower instead looks at whether or not multiple displays are connected to the laptop, and uses that as a proxy for whether or not the laptop is docked. If you're docking the laptop but not using an external monitor when you do, upower will never set is- docked to true.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948485 Title: Suspend after undocking laptop doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/948485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 980746] [NEW] upower does not check dock state on resume from suspend
Public bug reported: Now that gnome-settings-daemon's power management code checks upower's is-docked flag, it's important that it be accurate. However, it is possible that the inputs to the is-docked state could change while the laptop is suspended without generating a drm udev event to trigger a re-probe. This is fairly easily reproducible: 1. Connect external monitor 2. Suspend using the system menu 3. Disconnect external monitor 4. Wake the laptop back up 5. Close lid I expect the laptop to go to sleep. However, it does not, because upower believes the laptop is still docked (you can confirm this by looking for the is-docked line in upower --dump) Fix for this issue was committed upstream as http://cgit.freedesktop.org/upower/commit/?id=6fb36eb5eb85386d2e1c5d9fb760d68053d8afc5 ** Affects: upower (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: upower (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: upower (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980746 Title: upower does not check dock state on resume from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/980746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948485] Re: Suspend after undocking laptop doesn't work
Hi Clayton - This sounds like it could be related to a bug I just filed (bug #980746). With my bug, the laptop suspends if I choose suspend from the system menu or by pressing the power button, but not if I close the laptop lid. Is that what you see as well? Could you run upower --dump after reproducing this issue, and paste or attach the output? I'm especially interested in the last block of output (starting with Daemon: Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948485 Title: Suspend after undocking laptop doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/948485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 852603] Re: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release
It's unfortunately not that simple. We've always shipped the hedgewars server as part of our packages. To drop the server in a post-release update would not be acceptable. However, the Haskell language has changed enough since early 2010 that the current server will not build using the Haskell packages from 10.04. Unless somebody comes up with a patch that allows us to build the 0.9.17 server on Ubuntu 10.04's Haskell stack, an SRU isn't an option. It may be possible to backport the package. However, due to the requirements of the backports project, one of 2 things would have to happen: either the maverick-proposed packages need to be verified in the next few days (in which case we would backport from maverick-updates to lucid-backports), or we need to wait a month until maverick is EOL (in which case backport policies allow us to backport from precise to lucid- backports). In either case, we need a patch to the packaging to disable the server so that the package builds on Lucid. In any case, there's a lot of work that needs to be done to get hedgewars 0.9.17 into Lucid, and I don't have the time to actively drive this anymore, so somebody else from the community needs to step up to do the development work. If there's nobody that can, then it may be time to accept that we can't offer current versions of hedgewars on an OS that's 2 years old. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852603 Title: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/852603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 852603] Re: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release
Hi Derek - Currently Ubuntu 11.10 has been updated to hedgewars 0.9.17. There are pending updates for Ubuntu 10.10 and 11.04. However, before we can release those updates to the general public, they need to be tested, and so far nobody has stepped up to verify that the new packages work on those releases. To test them, please follow the instructions to enable the maverick- proposed or natty-proposed repositories on your machine (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed) and report back. We can not release the changes until we have some confidence that they will work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852603 Title: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/852603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 961807] [NEW] [FFe] New package mosh
Public bug reported: mosh is a remote shell updated for the realities of modern network connectivity. It supports roaming (automatically reestablishes connections if they get broken) and predictive local echo (for better perceived interactivity on high-latency connections) Version 1.0 of mosh is currently in Debian unstable (http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mosh.html), and there are daily builds available in a PPA (https://launchpad.net/~keithw/+archive/mosh) with nearly identical packaging. The maintainer (for both Debian and upstream) has informed me that he will be releasing 1.1 in the near future, and has asked we hold off syncing until that is uploaded. Here is the current pending changelog for 1.1: 2012-03-18 Keith Winstein mosh-de...@mit.edu * Version 1.1 released (stable release). * Allows user to specify remote command to execute. * Only advertises 256 colors when user's terminal has 256 colors. * Add chaff to datagrams to frustrate statistical analysis of length * Cosmetic fixes to terminal handling * Improved startup script (Anders Kaseorg) In the mean time, the package has already built in Debian on all architectures except armel, armhf, and both kfreebsd architectures. I've verified that the current Debian package builds on Ubuntu without modifications (log attached), and that the resulting packages work (modulo some locale issues in my chroot) adconrad has volunteered to do the srcNEW review in exchange for cookies. Since we're late in the release process, I was hoping to get release- team approval before 1.1 actually landed so I could get this in as quickly as possible. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Wishlist Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961807 Title: [FFe] New package mosh To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/961807/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 961807] Re: [FFe] New package mosh
** Attachment added: mosh_1.0-1_amd64.build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961807/+attachment/2913944/+files/mosh_1.0-1_amd64.build -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961807 Title: [FFe] New package mosh To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/961807/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 954747] [NEW] vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute
Public bug reported: vpnc requests and fetches the default domain from a Cisco VPN server, but does not request the list of domains for which split DNS is configured. With Precise's new dnsmasq-by-default configuration, this means that only DNS queries for the default domain get routed over the VPN. ** Affects: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) Status: In Progress ** Affects: vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954747 Title: vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-vpnc/+bug/954747/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 954747] Re: vpnc does not support split DNS on Cisco VPN servers
** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) ** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Summary changed: - vpnc does not support split DNS on Cisco VPN servers + vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute ** Also affects: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954747 Title: vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-vpnc/+bug/954747/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 954747] Re: vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute
Here's a patch which queries the VPN server for the list of split DNS domains and passes it onto the vpnc-script. I've tested that it works with my company's VPN server, which lists several internal domain names under the split-dns attribute. However, it's not currently possible for a NetworkManager VPN plugin to pass multiple domains back to NM, so that API will need to be enhanced somehow. ** Patch added: vpnc_0.5.3r512-1ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-vpnc/+bug/954747/+attachment/2867586/+files/vpnc_0.5.3r512-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Triaged ** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954747 Title: vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-vpnc/+bug/954747/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 394398] Re: Logic to determine expected number of running session wrong (regression in hardy's open-iscsi 2.0.865-1ubuntu3.1)
** Changed in: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394398 Title: Logic to determine expected number of running session wrong (regression in hardy's open-iscsi 2.0.865-1ubuntu3.1) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/394398/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907081] Re: vmware-view-client:i386 is shown in software-center on amd64, but is uninstallable
FYI, I looked into multiarching libpcsclite1 when I originally opened this bug, and concluded that it probably couldn't easily be multiarched. Because the protocol headers consist of shoving integers into structs, it's not going to be endianness-agnostic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907081 Title: vmware-view-client:i386 is shown in software-center on amd64, but is uninstallable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vmware-view-client/+bug/907081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948117] Re: Please backport egenix-mx-base 3.2.1-1 from Precise to Oneiric
Because packages from backports are not installed by default, we prefer to only use backports as a way to offer new features, not fix bugs. Bugs in packages should be fixed through the SRU process (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates), so that all users of the package can benefit from the fix. I'm going to go ahead and retarget this as an SRU bug. I'm happy to sponsor the fix; all I need from you is an isolated patch that fixes the crash, and a few sentences for each of the 5 points in step 2 of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure - you can put the writeup in the bug description. ** Also affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948117 Title: Please backport egenix-mx-base 3.2.1-1 from Precise to Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/948117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884619] Re: Segfault with comparison to None
** Also affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619 Title: Segfault with comparison to None To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/egenix-mx-base/+bug/884619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948117] Re: Please backport egenix-mx-base 3.2.1-1 from Precise to Oneiric
Normally we prefer to isolate just the necessary changes to fix the bug. In this case, though, the entirety of the 3.2.1 release contains bugfixes. In these cases, we can upload the new release as an SRU. However, I made a mistake opening an SRU task on this bug, since bug #884619 is already tracking the original problem, so I'm going to close out this bug and we can move the discussion there. ** No longer affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu Oneiric) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948117 Title: Please backport egenix-mx-base 3.2.1-1 from Precise to Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/948117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884619] Re: Segfault with comparison to None
This has already been fixed in the 3.2.1 upstream release, currently in Precise as 3.2.1-1, so I'm closing the bug against the development release. I've gone ahead and uploaded an microrelease update of 3.2.1 to oneiric- proposed. Somebody from the SRU team should be through to review the SRU. In the mean time, please update the bug description with a few sentences for each of the 5 points mentioned in step 2 of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure ** Changed in: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619 Title: Segfault with comparison to None To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/egenix-mx-base/+bug/884619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884619] Re: Segfault with comparison to None
To clarify above, I chose to update to 3.2.1 not because it's difficult to isolate the relevant patch, but because all of the changes in the 3.2.1 release fix bugs in the code. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619 Title: Segfault with comparison to None To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/egenix-mx-base/+bug/884619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 934433] Re: [FFe] Multi-Arch version of elfutils wanted for Precise
We're carrying a diff for a -Werror=uninitialized build problem. It doesn't appear to have been fixed upstream. The upstream release carries new features, so I'll go ahead and put together an upload with just the multiarch fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934433 Title: [FFe] Multi-Arch version of elfutils wanted for Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/934433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 934433] Re: elfutils needs Multi-Arch support
Riku - Thanks for the patch. However, we were past FeatureFreeze when you filed this bug, and the current stance of the release team is that multiarchification requires a FFe (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess). Could you fill one out? Also, the patch that you uploaded to this bug appears to be slightly different from what the Debian maintainer actually uploaded. Can you update your patch to match what Debian did so that we can keep the diff minimal going forward? (I realize this will just be a sync for Q, but it would be good to make sure we're consistent) I'm going to go ahead and unsubscribe ubuntu-sponsors for the time being, but feel free to resubscribe them if you feel you've addressed those concerns. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934433 Title: elfutils needs Multi-Arch support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/934433/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926889] Re: Ubuntu gtk leaks references in GtkTreeView / GtTreeModelSort which cause segfault in bluefish
The commit message certainly leaves a lot to be desired. On the one hand, the commit is definitely fixing a bug in the reference tracking of the info struct, and it avoids storing pointers to the stack which are almost immediately invalidated. On the other hand, while I would expect either of those bugs to cause crashes, I don't see how either of those bugs could affect whether or not there's an extra reference to the GtkTreeModelSort - causing the crash that Olivier describes - but that may just be because of my weak understanding of the whole GtkTree* set of classes. I'm personally not willing to sponsor this into the archive proper without a better sense of whether or not it will fix the bug at hand. Olivier: Do you have a concise set of instructions on how to reproduce the bug using Bluefish? For the time being, I'm going to upload the patch to my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu-tests). If somebody can show me some evidence that this particular patch fixes this particular bug, I'd be happy to upload the change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926889 Title: Ubuntu gtk leaks references in GtkTreeView / GtTreeModelSort which cause segfault in bluefish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/926889/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712015] Re: package mpd 0.16.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I'm going to go ahead and close this. This was fixed in the 0.16.1-2 revision in Debian; Ubuntu Precise has 0.16.5-1ubuntu2, which should include that fix. Please feel free to re-open the bug if it is, in fact, not fixed in Precise. ** Changed in: mpd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712015 Title: package mpd 0.16.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mpd/+bug/712015/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 913793] Re: keyboard backlight adjust wrongly
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #670116 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913793 Title: keyboard backlight adjust wrongly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/913793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 903098] Re: Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing
Jason: Have you made any progress on fixing the initscript? Also, at this point we really need to get a FFe for this change. Could you fill one out? (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess lists the information that the release team will want to see - feel free to subscribe me to the new FFe bug, and I can take over once the release team approves it) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903098 Title: Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/903098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 933303] Re: Please upgrade aweather to version 0.7
Daniel - Actually, you can probably get way with claiming to interpret pitti's comment on bug #933299 as an FFe approval for both libgrits and aweather ;) Anyway, since aweather 0.7 is now available in Precise, I'm going to go ahead and mark this bug fixed. Feel free to undo that if you think I'm wrong. ** Changed in: aweather (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933303 Title: Please upgrade aweather to version 0.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aweather/+bug/933303/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 946001] [NEW] [sponsor-patch] Allow specifying branch instead of bug
Public bug reported: It would be helpful if I could specify a UDD branch instead of a bug number for sponsorship. For MP-based sponsorship items, the branch is what appears in the sponsorship queue, so finding a bug to give sponsor-patch is an extra step. Occasionally, these merge proposals aren't connected to a bug (due to the contributor committing directly instead of using --fixes or debcommit), requiring an extra step to link the branch to the bug. Still more occasionally, I sponsor changes that don't reference a bug directly. I'd prefer to avoid the extra bureaucracy of opening a ticket just to close it, but also appreciate the checks that sponsor-patch already does for me. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946001 Title: [sponsor-patch] Allow specifying branch instead of bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/946001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 917845] Re: apt-ftparchive sets permission of Packages file to 001 to
** Branch linked: lp:~l3on/ubuntu/lucid/apt/fix-917845 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917845 Title: apt-ftparchive sets permission of Packages file to 001 to To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/917845/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 903044] Re: Please convert gtkmm2.4 to multiarch
ABorland: This bug specifically covers multiarching gtkmm2.4; I'm not personally interested in multiarching gtkmm3.0. As this one has already been fixed, any discussion on it won't be noticed going forward. If you'd like to see gtkmm3.0 multiarched, could you please open a separate bug against that package? However, please note that Ubuntu is now in FeatureFreeze, and multiarchification is considered a feature, so multiarching gtkmm3.0 would require a FeatureFreezeException (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903044 Title: Please convert gtkmm2.4 to multiarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtkmm2.4/+bug/903044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 917845] Re: apt-ftparchive sets permission of Packages file to 001 to
I've just uploaded this fix to lucid-proposed. Somebody from the SRU
team should review it shortly.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- fill me in with explanation of severity and frequency of bug on users and
justification for backporting the fix to the stable release
+ When using apt-ftparchive with a config file, BinDirectory blocks don't
inherit the default file permissions, causing them to end up with a permission
of 0001
[Development Fix]
- fill me in with an explanation of how the bug has been addressed in the
development branch, including the relevant version numbers of packages modified
in order to implement the fix.
+ Fixed upstream in
http://anonscm.debian.org/loggerhead/apt/debian-sid/revision/2013 ;
incorporated into releases after Lucid.
[Stable Fix]
- fill me in by pointing out a minimal patch applicable to the stable version
of the package.
+ Cherry-picked the upstream patch -
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~l3on/ubuntu/lucid/apt/fix-917845/revision/107
[Text Case]
- fill me in with detailed *instructions* on how to reproduce the bug. This
will be used by people later on to verify the updated package fixes the
problem.
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- Broken Behavior:
- Fixed Behavior:
+ (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# mkdir -p apt/conf
+ (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# mkdir -p
apt/dists/sid/{main,contrib,non-free}/{binary-i386,source}
+ (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# mkdir -p apt/pool/{main,contrib,non-free}
+ (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# cd apt/
+ (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~/apt# cp
/usr/share/doc/apt-utils/examples/apt-ftparchive.conf conf/
+ (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~/apt# apt-ftparchive generate
conf/apt-ftparchive.conf
+ [...]
+ (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~/apt# ls -l dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages
+
+ Broken result: -x 1 root root 0 Feb 29 09:37
dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages
+ Fixed result: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb 29 11:11
dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages
[Regression Potential]
- fill me in with a discussion of likelihood and potential severity of
regressions and how users could get inadvertently affected.
+ Patch is isolated, straightforward, and contained within the apt-ftparchive
tool.
[Original Report]
This is the same as Debian Bug#595922 and was introduced in
0.7.25.3ubuntu9.9. It was not present in 0.7.25.3ubuntu9.7.
apt-ftparchive changes permissions on the Packages files to 001:
strace -F -e chmod /usr/bin/apt-ftparchive generate conf/apt-
ftparchive.conf
chmod(./dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages.bz2, 01) = 0
chmod(./dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz, 01) = 0
chmod(./dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages, 01) = 0
E: Could not open file ./dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages - open (13:
Permission denied)
E: Error processing contents dists/lucid/Contents-amd64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917845
Title:
apt-ftparchive sets permission of Packages file to 001 to
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/917845/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884402] Re: package libapache2-mod-shib2 2.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Looks like Jamie slightly misread the bug history. I'm working on this now, though. Russ - thanks for adopting the patch. However, it looks like Ubuntu is behind Debian on the libmemcached transition. Since we're past our feature freeze, we won't be updating for Precise, so I can't do a simple sync of the Debian package. I'm therefore sponsoring David's original change, as that's equivalent to what ended up in Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884402 Title: package libapache2-mod-shib2 2.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shibboleth-sp2/+bug/884402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 828731] Re: kdump functionality not working as expected when /boot is a separate partition
Unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors as all of the SRUs have been sponsored, and are just awaiting ubuntu-sru review. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828731 Title: kdump functionality not working as expected when /boot is a separate partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kexec-tools/+bug/828731/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
The fixes seem to work in my build chroots for all 4 releases: evan@caron:~$ schroot -c oneiric-amd64 -u root (oneiric-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get update -qq (oneiric-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -yy /dev/null (oneiric-amd64)root@caron:~# insserv /dev/null (oneiric-amd64)root@caron:~# ls /etc/rc6.d README S01rebootS01umountfs S01umountroot S01networking S01sendsigs S01umountnfs.sh S02urandom (oneiric-amd64)root@caron:~# echo 'deb http://localhost:/ubuntu oneiric-proposed main restricted universe multiverse' /etc/apt/sources.list (oneiric-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get update -qq (oneiric-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -yy /dev/null (oneiric-amd64)root@caron:~# ls /etc/rc6.d README S02urandom S31umountnfs.sh S60umountroot S01networking S20sendsigs S40umountfs S90reboot (oneiric-amd64)root@caron:~# hash insserv -bash: hash: insserv: not found evan@caron:~$ schroot -c natty-amd64 -u root (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get update -qq (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -yy /dev/null (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# insserv /dev/null (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# ls /etc/rc6.d README S01rebootS01umountfs S01umountroot S01networking S01sendsigs S01umountnfs.sh S02urandom (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# echo 'deb http://localhost:/ubuntu natty-proposed main restricted universe multiverse' /etc/apt/sources.list (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get update -qq (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -yy /dev/null (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# ls /etc/rc6.d README S02urandom S31umountnfs.sh S60umountroot S01networking S20sendsigs S40umountfs S90reboot (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# hash insserv -bash: hash: insserv: not found (natty-amd64)root@caron:~# logout evan@caron:~$ schroot -c maverick-amd64 -u root (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get update -qq (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -yy /dev/null (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# insserv /dev/null (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# ls /etc/rc6.d README S01rebootS01umountfs S01umountroot S01networking S01sendsigs S01umountnfs.sh S02urandom (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# echo 'deb http://localhost:/ubuntu maverick-proposed main restricted universe multiverse' /etc/apt/sources.list (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get update -qq (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -yy /dev/null (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# ls /etc/rc6.d README S02urandom S31umountnfs.sh S60umountroot S01networking S20sendsigs S40umountfs S90reboot (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# hash insserv -bash: hash: insserv: not found (maverick-amd64)root@caron:~# logout evan@caron:~$ schroot -c lucid-amd64 -u root (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get update -qq (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -yy /dev/null (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# insserv /dev/null (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# ls /etc/rc6.d README S01rebootS01umountfs S01umountroot S01networking S01sendsigs S01umountnfs.sh S02urandom (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# echo 'deb http://localhost:/ubuntu lucid-proposed main restricted universe multiverse' /etc/apt/sources.list (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get update -qq (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -yy /dev/null (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# ls /etc/rc6.d README S02urandom S31umountnfs.sh S60umountroot S01networking S20sendsigs S40umountfs S90reboot (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# hash insserv -bash: hash: insserv: not found (lucid-amd64)root@caron:~# logout ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
I've uploaded SRUs of insserv to lucid, maverick, natty, and oneiric. Based on IRC discussions with Steve, I added a postinst to those versions that cleans up the broken shutdown sequence. It's the same snippet that I added to initscripts, but for the SRU case, ensuring correct ordering of the upgrade is too difficult. ** No longer affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Lucid) ** No longer affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Maverick) ** No longer affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Natty) ** No longer affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Oneiric) ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884402] Re: package libapache2-mod-shib2 2.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Russ, I'm a little confused here. As far as I can tell, Ubuntu has not modified update-rc.d at all from what Debian ships. You can confirm this by looking at the most recent collection of Ubuntu changelog entries in http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/s/sysvinit/sysvinit_2.88dsf-13.10ubuntu9/changelog, since we re-list all changes from Debian every time we merge. Or you could just compare the two scripts: evan@caron:~$ schroot -c precise-amd64 sha1sum /usr/sbin/update-rc.d 6943e40e473cb3980af37be59aa9f26c745fe9c5 /usr/sbin/update-rc.d evan@caron:~$ schroot -c sid-amd64 sha1sum /usr/sbin/update-rc.d 6943e40e473cb3980af37be59aa9f26c745fe9c5 /usr/sbin/update-rc.d I haven't actually read update-rc.d yet, but it sounds like this could be caused by differences between dependency-based and legacy ordering. Is it possible that there's a bug there? And if so, would that be sufficient justification to adopt a change like this into the Debian packaging? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884402 Title: package libapache2-mod-shib2 2.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shibboleth-sp2/+bug/884402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884402] Re: package libapache2-mod-shib2 2.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I definitely get the same error on Debian if I disable insserv and then try to install libapache2-mod-shib2: (sid-amd64)root@caron:~# touch /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering (sid-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get install -y libapache2-mod-shib2 [...] Setting up libapache2-mod-shib2 (2.4.3+dfsg-4) ... Adding system-user for Shibboleth daemon update-rc.d: error: expected runlevel [0-9S] (did you forget . ?) usage: update-rc.d [-n] [-f] basename remove update-rc.d [-n] basename defaults [NN | SS KK] update-rc.d [-n] basename start|stop NN runlvl [runlvl] [...] . update-rc.d [-n] basename disable|enable [S|2|3|4|5] -n: not really -f: force The disable|enable API is not stable and might change in the future. dpkg: error processing libapache2-mod-shib2 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 configured to not write apport reports Errors were encountered while processing: libapache2-mod-shib2 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884402 Title: package libapache2-mod-shib2 2.4.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shibboleth-sp2/+bug/884402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915167] Re: pycompile will use /usr/local/bin/python2.X if available and python2.X is installed.
Uploaded to natty-proposed; unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915167 Title: pycompile will use /usr/local/bin/python2.X if available and python2.X is installed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-defaults/+bug/915167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
** Also affects: insserv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
(Err, to clarify, I have not sponsored it just yet, but will be doing so momentarily after a little more testing) ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Oneiric) Milestone: None = oneiric-updates ** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
Hi Adam - Thanks for working on getting that patch together. I've gone ahead and sponsored it into precise, and will be working on an SRU for oneiric momentarily. For future reference, I made a few tweaks before uploading: 1. The insserv package is source format 3.0 (quilt), so it uses quilt to manage patches (http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/patches- to-packages.html#patches-with-quilt). I created a quilt patch containing your change. We also try to apply the DEP-3 guidelines in distro patches so we can track their provenance down the road (http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/) 2. Your changelog entry targets unstable - Ubuntu changes should always refer to the Ubuntu release they're targeting; in this case, that would be precise 3. When Ubuntu changes a Debian package, our policy is to adjust the maintainer field in debian/control - the update-maintainer script in ubuntu-dev-tools will do this for you automatically. It's also our policy to adjust the Vcs-* fields to be XSBC-Debian-Vcs-*. update- maintainer doesn't currently do this, so you have to do it yourself (bug #567629) I'm also working on a change to initscripts to try and clean up some of the fallout of this bug for people who have hit it; hopefully that should land later today. Joonas: If you have not yet installed VMware Workstation 8, just removing /usr/sbin/insserv should be sufficient (nothing on an Ubuntu system should actually use it). If you have, run the series of mv commands in the bug's description -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 917088] Re: lsb_release crashed with SIGABRT in Py_FatalError()
I ran into this error while installing VMware Player on Precise. I believe I've tracked it down to the environment that the VMware installer sets. /usr/lib/vmware-installer/2.0/python/init.sh: if [ -z $_VMIS_INIT_PYTHON ]; then export PYTHON_ROOT=$VMWARE_INSTALLER/python . $PYTHON_ROOT/pygtk/init.sh export PYTHONHOME=`dirname $PYTHON_ROOT` export PYTHONPATH=$PYTHON_ROOT/lib:$PYTHON_ROOT/lib/lib-dynload:$PYTHONPATH export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PYTHON_ROOT/lib/libsqlite3:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH PYTHON=$PYTHON_ROOT/python export PYTHON export _VMIS_INIT_PYTHON=1 fi Setting PYTHONHOME as init.sh sets it is enough to get python3.2mu to abort: evan@evan-precise-amd64:~$ PYTHONHOME=/usr/lib/vmware-installer/2.0/python /usr/bin/python3.2mu /usr/bin/lsb_release -sd Fatal Python error: Py_Initialize: Unable to get the locale encoding LookupError: no codec search functions registered: can't find encoding Aborted (core dumped) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917088 Title: lsb_release crashed with SIGABRT in Py_FatalError() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.2/+bug/917088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
Ok. I've installed the package in a VM and then verified that installing VMware Player does not break my boot order. Therefore, I've uploaded the change to precise and oneiric-proposed. The oneiric-proposed upload should be processed by a member of the SRU team before too long. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)
** Also affects: insserv (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: insserv (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: insserv (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 682338] Re: GTK programs in Ubuntu 10.10 are sluggish over NX
Unfortunately it's a little more complicated than just which X server Ubuntu 12.04 contains. If you were to, say, X-forward an application from an Ubuntu 12.04 machine to a machine with an old server, you could crash that X server. Ideally, we would patch cairo to specifically detect the NX agent's X server, but I haven't been able to come up with a way to do that. After consulting with Sebastien, I've come up with the attached patch, which still disables the workaround for buggy repeat, but only for the specific X version that that the NX agent advertises. While our best judgement is that the NX agent is likely to be significantly more common than X-forwarding to an X server from 7 years ago, I'd still like to limit the scope of the change. I've uploaded a test build with this patch to my PPA (http://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu-tests); it should build and be available shortly. I'll attempt to test it, but if people who actively use NX could test it as well, that would be appreciated. Assuming no snags, I'll plan to upload it to the archive in the next few days. (In the mean time, I'm going to go ahead and unsubscribe ubuntu- sponsors, but I'll keep an eye on the bug myself) ** Patch added: cairo_1.10.2-6.1ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo/+bug/682338/+attachment/2737941/+files/cairo_1.10.2-6.1ubuntu3.debdiff ** Patch removed: nx_cairo_1.10.2-6ubuntu3.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cairo/+bug/682338/+attachment/2656561/+files/nx_cairo_1.10.2-6ubuntu3.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682338 Title: GTK programs in Ubuntu 10.10 are sluggish over NX To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libcairo/+bug/682338/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 898003] Re: usbip source is maintained in kernel tree now
Thanks for your work on getting these packages updated, and I'm sorry that it's taken so long to get this looked at. I asked the kernel team about building the usbip packages as part of the kernel build process: 1:18 PM broder i'm wondering whether or not it would be plausible to incorporate the usbip userspace pieces into the kernel package build (there's a client, a server, and a library), or whether we should keep snapshotting the source from the kernel into a separate source package 1:19 PM tgardner broder, looking 1:23 PM tgardner broder, this is still a staging driver. while we have a mechanism for building and distributing applications from the kernel source tree, I'm not sure I wanna bother with a staging driver. 1:25 PM broder tgardner: ok. that's reasonable. it doesn't seem like it's going through a whole lot of churn anyway 1:26 PM broder i'll work on updating the separate package 1:26 PM tgardner broder, maybe we can pick it up when it gets promoted to mainline For now, I'm going to mark the bug task on Linux as invalid. I'm also happy to try and review your packing updates. I have a few questions/concerns so far: - Where did the -2.5- in the version number come from? Was that the kernel version number when you snapshotted it? I'm assuming at this point that the package is out of date from the current kernel - Since the 3.0.0 version of the packaging was never uploaded to Ubuntu, there should only be a single changelog entry for 3.2.0 (similarly, the debian/NEWS file should be updated) - The changelog should be more explicit about changes to the packaging. In particular, it would be good to see some discussion about the debian/header/* files - Please use XS-Debian-Vcs-Browser and -Vcs-Git instead of -Original- (see https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- devel/2007-March/023332.html) - As more of a wishlist thing, we generally prefer dkms-based kernel module packages over module-assistant based ones these days. It would be excellent to have a usbip-dkms in addition to (or instead of) usbip- source If you'd like to update the packaging to address all of these, that's fine. If not, I'm happy to do the cleanup, but I need a hint on the version number to move forward. (I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors for the time being, but feel free to resubscribe them when you feel you've addressed my concerns) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898003 Title: usbip source is maintained in kernel tree now To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/898003/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 910965] Re: [python3-setuptools] AttributeError: 'HTTPMessage' object has no attribute 'getheaders'
Julian - Thanks for looking into this. I've uploaded the change to oneiric-proposed; someone from the SRU team should accept it and begin the verification process shortly. (They'd probably prefer if you could finish filling out the SRU report in the bug description by then) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910965 Title: [python3-setuptools] AttributeError: 'HTTPMessage' object has no attribute 'getheaders' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distribute/+bug/910965/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931644] [NEW] [sponsor-patch] No way to sponsor syncs from a non-default release
Public bug reported: What it says on the tin. There's no way for me to use sponsor-patch to sponsor syncs from testing or experimental: evan@caron:~$ sponsor-patch -k e...@ebroder.net -s 931152 Bug #931152 title: Sync schroot 1.4.25-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main) Is schroot 1.4.24-1 the version that should be synced [y|N]? n User abort. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931644 Title: [sponsor-patch] No way to sponsor syncs from a non-default release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/931644/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915029] Re: youtube-dl broken on older releases
Verified both maverick and natty. Thanks, Martin. ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-maverick verification-done-natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915029 Title: youtube-dl broken on older releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/youtube-dl/+bug/915029/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930701] Re: Sync librdf-query-perl 2.908-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
This bug was fixed in the package librdf-query-perl - 2.908-1 Sponsored for Kjetil Kjernsmo (kjetil) --- librdf-query-perl (2.908-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. [ gregor herrmann ] * Remove debian/source/local-options; abort-on-upstream-changes and unapply-patches are default in dpkg-source since 1.16.1. [ Jonas Smedegaard ] * Update short and long descriptions to match upstream. * Update package relations: + Stop recommending or build-depending on librdf-perl: Only optionally (and possibly bogusly) used in regression tests, not in production code. + Relax build-dependency on cdbs (needlessly tight). + Relax build-depend unversioned on debhelper and devscripts (needed versions satisfied even in oldstable). -- Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:01:17 +0100 ** Changed in: librdf-query-perl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930701 Title: Sync librdf-query-perl 2.908-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librdf-query-perl/+bug/930701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 903098] Re: Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing
Hi Jason - In the future, I'd strongly encourage falling back to debdiffs instead of bzr branches when you run into this much trouble getting the bzr MPs to do what you want. I don't want to blame you for the tardiness of the review here - that's clearly a failure of the development and sponsorship teams - but I do think that a debdiff on this bug would have gotten more eyeballs than the MP in its current state. After a lot of staring, though, I think I'm mostly satisfied with this change. I only really have one issue: /etc/couchdb/local.ini and /etc/couchdb/local.d/ were moved from couchdb-bin to couchdb. This means that couchdb should probably Replace couchdb-bin (= 1.0.1-0ubuntu18) in order to ensure a smooth upgrade. Does moving the file between packages trigger a conffile conflict if the user hasn't otherwise changed /etc/couchdb/local.ini? It's a little unfortunate that couchdb-bin used to create the couchdb user/group and never bothered to clean them up on uninstall, but I think that may be a historical turd we'll have to live with. Modulo the conffile conflict question, I'm satisfied with this. Jason, if you can add the missing Replaces, do some testing around that, and report back, I'd be happy to sponsor the change. I'm particularly interested to know whether the user is prompted on upgrade if they haven't changed the local.ini file. Thanks for the contribution! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903098 Title: Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/903098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 903098] Re: Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing
Oh yeah - and because the merge proposal just makes my eyes bleed, I'm going to go ahead and attach the debdiff from Debian here and reject the MP. The useful discussion is here and not on the MP, and the MP doesn't accurately represent the patch anyway. ** Patch added: couchdb_1.1.1-1_to_1.1.1-1ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/903098/+attachment/2731015/+files/couchdb_1.1.1-1_to_1.1.1-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903098 Title: Please merge (sort of) couchdb 1.1.1-1 from Debian testing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/couchdb/+bug/903098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 881862] Re: svn up Segmentation Fault with sasl enabled repositories
** Also affects: subversion (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881862 Title: svn up Segmentation Fault with sasl enabled repositories To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subversion/+bug/881862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919058] [NEW] libstdc++ gdb Python hooks cause warnings from ldconfig
Public bug reported:
Thank you for including the Python gdb hooks for libstdc++ in the
libstdc++6-4.6-dbg package. However, I believe that the hooks should be
moved into /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu. As of now, having
the Python script in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu causes ldconfig to warn
any time a library is installed:
(precise-amd64)root@caron:~# apt-get install -qq -y libxml2
Selecting previously unselected package libxml2.
(Reading database ... 16697 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libxml2 (from .../libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-5.1ubuntu3_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package sgml-base.
Unpacking sgml-base (from .../sgml-base_1.26+nmu1ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package xml-core.
Unpacking xml-core (from .../archives/xml-core_0.13_all.deb) ...
Setting up libxml2 (2.7.8.dfsg-5.1ubuntu3) ...
Setting up sgml-base (1.26+nmu1ubuntu1) ...
Setting up xml-core (0.13) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin ...
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
/sbin/ldconfig.real: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.16-gdb.py is
not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start.
I've verified that gdb is able to find the Python hooks if they're
installed within /usr/lib/debug:
evan@caron:~$ sudo mv
{,/usr/lib/debug}/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.16-gdb.py
evan@caron:~$ cat test.cpp
#include set
int main() {
std::setint test;
test.insert(2);
test.insert(3);
return 0;
}
evan@caron:~$ g++ -ggdb3 -o test test.cpp
evan@caron:~$ gdb -q ./test
Reading symbols from /home/evan/test...done.
(gdb) b test.cpp:7
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400885: file test.cpp, line 7.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/evan/test
Breakpoint 1, main () at test.cpp:7
7 return 0;
(gdb) p test
$1 = std::set with 2 elements = {
[0] = 2,
[1] = 3
}
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libstdc++6-4.6-dbg 4.6.2-10ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-14.23-generic 3.0.9
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-14-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: vmnet parport_pc vsock vmci vmmon usb_storage uas aufs
nls_iso8859_1 nls_cp437 vfat fat mmc_block overlayfs bnep rfcomm
ip6table_filter ip6_tables pci_stub vboxpci vboxnetadp vboxnetflt vboxdrv
joydev ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4
xt_state nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle xt_tcpudp
iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables bridge stp ppdev btusb bluetooth dm_crypt
kvm_intel kvm binfmt_misc uvcvideo videodev v4l2_compat_ioctl32 arc4
snd_hda_codec_conexant snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm
dm_multipath snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq psmouse
serio_raw snd_timer snd_seq_device thinkpad_acpi nvram snd tpm_tis iwlagn
mac80211 soundcore snd_page_alloc cfg80211 mei lp parport i915 ahci libahci
nouveau firewire_ohci ttm firewire_core crc_itu_t sdhci_pci sdhci
drm_kms_helper drm e1000e i2c_algo_bit mxm_wmi wmi video
ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Jan 19 21:32:29 2012
SourcePackage: gcc-4.6
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: gcc-4.6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919058
Title:
libstdc++ gdb Python hooks cause warnings from ldconfig
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6/+bug/919058/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919058] Re: libstdc++ gdb Python hooks cause warnings from ldconfig
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919058 Title: libstdc++ gdb Python hooks cause warnings from ldconfig To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6/+bug/919058/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915029] Re: youtube-dl broken on older releases
Martin: Thanks as always - I've tested the Lucid package, and I'm able to download Youtube videos. Rogerio: Normally, we sync packages in unstable into our development release automatically. For the current release (12.04 / precise), we're syncing from testing. You can explicitly request that we sync a package using the requestsync program, which is in ubuntu-dev-tools (in both Debian and Ubuntu) For our stable releases, our process (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates) generally requires minimal patches in order to minimize regression risk, but we can generally relax that for software that has already regressed due to changes in external services. You can either go through the process on the wiki page (open a bug with an appropriate description, generate a debdiff, and attach it to the bug), but you should also feel free to try and find somebody in #ubuntu-motu on Freenode to supervise the SRU process. At least for the moment, I'm comfortable volunteering to do that, so feel free to ping me (broder) directly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915029 Title: youtube-dl broken on older releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/youtube-dl/+bug/915029/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 887946] Re: Deadlocks in main loop
I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors from this bug. Merge-proposals requesting a review from ubuntu-sponsors or ubuntu-branches (the default) automatically show up in our queue for sponsorship. Additionally subscribing ubuntu-sponsors creates an extra entry, so it should only be used when attaching a debdiff to a bug, not when opening a merge proposal ** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887946 Title: Deadlocks in main loop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/887946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 914519] Re: Sync gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 0.10.13-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
This bug was fixed in the package gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg - 0.10.13-1 Sponsored for Jean-Louis Dupond (dupondje) --- gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg (0.10.13-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release: + debian/patches/99_ltmain_as-needed.patch: - Refreshed to apply cleanly again. -- Sebastian Dröge sl...@debian.org Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:25:58 +0100 gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg (0.10.12-3) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: + Depend on libavcodec53 ( 5:0) instead of libavcodec52 (Closes: #640862). -- Sebastian Dröge sl...@debian.org Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:37:22 +0200 gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg (0.10.12-2) unstable; urgency=low * Upload to unstable (Closes: #640317). -- Sebastian Dröge sl...@debian.org Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:32:37 +0200 ** Changed in: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914519 Title: Sync gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 0.10.13-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg/+bug/914519/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915029] [NEW] youtube-dl broken on older releases
Public bug reported: [Impact] youtube-dl can not download videos from youtube on any release older than oneiric [Development fix] Fixed in oneiric by updating to the latest release of youtube-dl [Stable fix] youtube-dl's primary functionality of downloading Youtube videos has been regressed due to external changes in the Youtube service, therefore I think it's reasonable to update the older releases to the new upstream version to correct the regression [Test case] Run youtube-dl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdUGJSknnWM; When youtube-dl is broken, this prints out: root@zygorthian-space-raiders:~# youtube-dl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdUGJSknnWM [youtube] Setting language [youtube] UdUGJSknnWM: Downloading video webpage [youtube] UdUGJSknnWM: Downloading video info webpage [youtube] UdUGJSknnWM: Extracting video information ERROR: no fmt_url_map or conn information found in video info When youtube-dl is working, this prints out: evan@caron:~$ youtube-dl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdUGJSknnWM [youtube] Setting language [youtube] UdUGJSknnWM: Downloading video webpage [youtube] UdUGJSknnWM: Downloading video info webpage [youtube] UdUGJSknnWM: Extracting video information [download] Destination: UdUGJSknnWM.webm [download] 100.0% of 8.73M at 664.14k/s ETA 00:00 [Regression potential] Moderate, as this is a significant update, but it also corrects for a regression which has already occurred. ** Affects: youtube-dl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: youtube-dl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915029 Title: youtube-dl broken on older releases To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/youtube-dl/+bug/915029/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885163] Re: pytz dst() incorrectly handles Pacific/Apia day leap
** Also affects: python-tz (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python-tz (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python-tz (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python-tz (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885163 Title: pytz dst() incorrectly handles Pacific/Apia day leap To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pytz/+bug/885163/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911732] Re: [12.04] citadel-server is producing errors every second in syslog (DB: not a restored transaction DB: PANIC: Invalid argument citadel: bdb(): PANIC: Invalid argument citadel: bdb(): t
ubuntu-sponsors should only be subscribed to a bug once there's a patch or debdiff or some sort of fix that needs sponsorship; it's not for bugs that still need diagnosis. I'm going to unsubscribe the list. ** Changed in: citadel (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911732 Title: [12.04] citadel-server is producing errors every second in syslog (DB: not a restored transaction DB: PANIC: Invalid argument citadel: bdb(): PANIC: Invalid argument citadel: bdb(): txn_commit: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recover) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/citadel/+bug/911732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
