[Bug 1296660] Re: Kernel oops: fb: conflicting fb hw usage astdrmfb vs VESA VGA (unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference / con_set_unimap+0x32
Hi, I am also getting similar traces on boot, not every time. The following is from a fresh net install on a ProLiant DL380 G7. Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.347415] [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled. Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.347490] checking generic (e800 13) vs hw (e800 800) Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.347491] fb: conflicting fb hw usage radeondrmfb vs VESA VGA - removing generic driver Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349507] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349524] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0138 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349528] IP: [8145d382] con_set_unimap+0x32/0x290 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349531] PGD bdbef4067 PUD bdada8067 PMD 0 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349532] Oops: [#1] SMP Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349548] Modules linked in: intel_powerclamp radeon(+) coretemp kvm_intel kvm crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul gpio_ich ghash_clmulni_intel ttm aesni_intel drm_kms_helper aes_x86_64 drm lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper i2c_algo_bit cryptd hpilo hpwdt i7core_edac joydev edac_core lpc_ich ipmi_si serio_raw mac_hid acpi_power_meter lp parport hid_generic usbhid hid psmouse bnx2 hpsa Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349551] CPU: 22 PID: 700 Comm: setfont Tainted: G I 3.13.0-37-generic #64-Ubuntu Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349552] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL380 G7, BIOS P67 05/05/2011 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349553] task: 8817da688000 ti: 880bd5d6 task.ti: 880bd5d6 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349556] RIP: 0010:[8145d382] [8145d382] con_set_unimap+0x32/0x290 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349557] RSP: 0018:880bd5d61d48 EFLAGS: 00010246 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349558] RAX: 880bdadd0b08 RBX: 01c0bb10 RCX: c100 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349558] RDX: 1530 RSI: 0296 RDI: 0296 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349559] RBP: 880bd5d61db0 R08: 880bd5d6 R09: 001c Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349561] R10: 0054 R11: 004c R12: Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349562] R13: 4b67 R14: 880bdadd0800 R15: 880bdadd0800 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349563] FS: 7f81dbf6c740() GS:880befd6() knlGS: Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349564] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349565] CR2: 0138 CR3: 000bd5c8e000 CR4: 07e0 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349566] Stack: Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349571] 880bd5d61d78 8131226d 8817da688000 0002 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349575] 4b67 880bdadd0800 02e1d5d61d88 880bdadd0800 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349577] 0002 4b67 880bdadd0800 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349577] Call Trace: Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349583] [8131226d] ? apparmor_capable+0x1d/0x130 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349587] [81457223] vt_ioctl+0xe83/0x11c0 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349590] [8144ad3d] tty_ioctl+0x26d/0xbb0 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349594] [811d03a0] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2e0/0x4c0 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349597] [8117fa07] ? do_munmap+0x297/0x3b0 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349599] [811d0601] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349602] [8172f82d] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349614] Code: 89 e5 41 57 49 89 ff 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 48 89 d3 48 83 ec 40 48 89 7d d0 89 75 cc e8 a8 e4 c5 ff 49 8b 87 10 03 00 00 4c 8b 20 41 8b 84 24 38 01 00 00 85 c0 0f 85 38 02 00 00 66 83 7d cc 00 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349616] RIP [8145d382] con_set_unimap+0x32/0x290 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349616] RSP 880bd5d61d48 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349617] CR2: 0138 Oct 13 11:54:36 node21 kernel: [3.349618] ---[ end trace f62d7fc492f713e6 ]--- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296660 Title: Kernel oops: fb: conflicting fb hw usage astdrmfb vs VESA VGA (unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference / con_set_unimap+0x32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1296660/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
[Bug 293207] Re: Conversion of existing mailboxes fails silently
I'm also doing 8.04 -- 10.04 migrations, some user's mailboxes have been fine, while others refuse to migrate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293207 Title: Conversion of existing mailboxes fails silently -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705552] Re: 10.04 nut package is missing 52_nut-usbups.rules
Apologies, I had forgotten about /lib/udev/rules.d. I have removed 52-nut-usbups.rules from /etc/udev/rules.d and it still works (see log below). There must have been some other configuration problem initially. I have marked this bug as invalid. admin-user@barradas:~$ sudo upsdrvctl stop Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3 dmin-user@barradas:~$ sudo upsdrvctl start Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3 Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.34 (2.4.3) USB communication driver 0.31 Broadcast Message from nut@barradas (somewhere) at 13:51 ... Communications with UPS mgeups@localhost lost Using subdriver: MGE HID 1.18 Broadcast Message from nut@barradas (somewhere) at 13:51 ... Communications with UPS mgeups@localhost established lsusb, just for info. Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 006 Device 003: ID 0922:0008 Dymo-CoStar Corp. Bus 006 Device 002: ID 0463: MGE UPS Systems UPS Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 14dd:0002 Raritan Computer, Inc. Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705552 Title: 10.04 nut package is missing 52_nut-usbups.rules -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 705552] Re: 10.04 nut package is missing 52_nut-usbups.rules
Apologies, I had forgotten about /lib/udev/rules.d. I have removed 52-nut-usbups.rules from /etc/udev/rules.d and it still works (see log below). There must have been some other configuration problem initially. I have marked this bug as invalid. admin-user@barradas:~$ sudo upsdrvctl stop Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3 dmin-user@barradas:~$ sudo upsdrvctl start Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3 Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.34 (2.4.3) USB communication driver 0.31 Broadcast Message from nut@barradas (somewhere) at 13:51 ... Communications with UPS mgeups@localhost lost Using subdriver: MGE HID 1.18 Broadcast Message from nut@barradas (somewhere) at 13:51 ... Communications with UPS mgeups@localhost established lsusb, just for info. Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 006 Device 003: ID 0922:0008 Dymo-CoStar Corp. Bus 006 Device 002: ID 0463: MGE UPS Systems UPS Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 14dd:0002 Raritan Computer, Inc. Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub ** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705552 Title: 10.04 nut package is missing 52_nut-usbups.rules -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705552] [NEW] 10.04 nut package is missing 52_nut-usbups.rules
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nut /etc/udev/rules.d/52_nut-usbups.rules is missing from the 10.04 version of the nut package. This prevents upsd from monitoring USB UPSs. I copied these udev rules from an old 8.04 install, in order to get nut to monitor my usb connected mge ups. lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid apt-cache policy nut nut: Installed: 2.4.3-1ubuntu3.1 Candidate: 2.4.3-1ubuntu3.1 Version table: *** 2.4.3-1ubuntu3.1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.4.3-1ubuntu3 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages ** Affects: nut (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705552 Title: 10.04 nut package is missing 52_nut-usbups.rules -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 0x98400)
I couldn't boot into memtest from my lucid install. I then tried lucid and hardy CDs, but neither worked. I then downloaded a memtest iso[1] from memtest.org, and that worked. [1] http://www.memtest.org/download/4.10/memtest86+-4.10.bin.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 0x98400) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 688464] [NEW] Wrong default path for kpropd.acl in kpropd man page
Public bug reported: --Ubuntu Release: 8.04 Hardy --Package Version: krb5-kdc: Installed: 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2ubuntu1.5 Candidate: 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2ubuntu1.5 Version table: *** 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2ubuntu1.5 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/universe Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com hardy-security/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2ubuntu1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages --What happened: There is a discrepancy between the default location of kpropd.acl specified in the kpropd man page, and the actual default location that the program reads. from the man page for kpropd: FILES kpropd.acl Access file for kpropd; the default location is KPROPD_ACL_FILE (normally /usr/local/var/krb5kdc/kpropd.acl). Each entry is a line containing the principal of a host from which the local machine will allow Kerberos database propagation via kprop. Strace shows that kpropd is actually looking for the file in /etc/krb5kdc/: r...@tribble:/etc/xinetd.d# strace -F kpropd -Sd 21 |grep 'open.*acl' open(/etc/krb5kdc/kpropd.acl, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) --What I expected to happen: The man page and the program agree. ** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688464 Title: Wrong default path for kpropd.acl in kpropd man page -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 688464] [NEW] Wrong default path for kpropd.acl in kpropd man page
Public bug reported: --Ubuntu Release: 8.04 Hardy --Package Version: krb5-kdc: Installed: 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2ubuntu1.5 Candidate: 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2ubuntu1.5 Version table: *** 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2ubuntu1.5 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/universe Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com hardy-security/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2ubuntu1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages --What happened: There is a discrepancy between the default location of kpropd.acl specified in the kpropd man page, and the actual default location that the program reads. from the man page for kpropd: FILES kpropd.acl Access file for kpropd; the default location is KPROPD_ACL_FILE (normally /usr/local/var/krb5kdc/kpropd.acl). Each entry is a line containing the principal of a host from which the local machine will allow Kerberos database propagation via kprop. Strace shows that kpropd is actually looking for the file in /etc/krb5kdc/: r...@tribble:/etc/xinetd.d# strace -F kpropd -Sd 21 |grep 'open.*acl' open(/etc/krb5kdc/kpropd.acl, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) --What I expected to happen: The man page and the program agree. ** Affects: krb5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688464 Title: Wrong default path for kpropd.acl in kpropd man page -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218929] Re: disk space error, but no prior warning (reiserfs)
I had a similar problem installing 10.10 on an eeepc with 4g of ssd. I used 250mb for /boot, 500mb for swap and the rest for /. The install hung halfway through with a no space left on device error. Surely the installer knows roughly how large the install is, and should warn if the selected partition isn't big enough? -- disk space error, but no prior warning (reiserfs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218929] Re: disk space error, but no prior warning (reiserfs)
I should add that I was using ext2 on /boot, and btrfs on / -- disk space error, but no prior warning (reiserfs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563879] Re: evolution-data-server consumes massive amounts of memory, invokes OOM killer
I'm using evolution-data-server 2.28.3.1-0ubuntu2, and seeing large amount of memory being used: h...@zartan:~$ ps u $(pgrep evolution-data) USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND hugh 13410 0.0 5.7 2799768 118464 ? Sl May17 2:34 /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-data-server-2.28 --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_DataServer_CalFactory:1.2 --oaf-ior-fd=27 -- evolution-data-server consumes massive amounts of memory, invokes OOM killer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556774] Re: [Lucid] No volume indicator
I had the indicator applet showing on a panel, but also had no volume control. Had to install indicator-sound, remove the indicator applet from the panel and add it again. This was after upgrading from hardy. -- [Lucid] No volume indicator https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433714] Re: initial empathy account wizard does not offer IRC as an account
I had to create an account for a service I dont use, just to get passed the wizard, and add an irc account. UI fail. If the initial list is too long, have a more... option or something like that. -- initial empathy account wizard does not offer IRC as an account https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348453] Re: Wiki login fails
I'm having trouble logging in to the ubuntu wiki using a launchpad account. I clicked the login/register button from an ubuntu wiki page, and was transferred to the launchpad login service, I logged in, was given an authorisation page, then clicked continue. At that point I landed on a moinmoin error: HTTPFetchingError (77, 'Problem with the SSL CA cert (path? access rights?)') Have attached the debug info available from the error page. Appologies if this should be in a new bug. ** Attachment added: Debug info that moinmoin offered. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44245325/debug-info-ubuntu-wiki-openid-login.txt -- Wiki login fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348453 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548814] Re: Shows 'setup broadcast accounts' even accounts set and running
Added branch of gwibber packaging with python-indicate dependency. ** Branch linked: lp:~hugh-smtl/gwibber/packaging -- Shows 'setup broadcast accounts' even accounts set and running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548814] Re: Shows 'setup broadcast accounts' even accounts set and running
h...@hugh-desktop:~/Projects/packaging$ apt-cache rdepends python-indicate python-indicate Reverse Depends: gajim gwibber-service Now that is strange, as I had gwibber-service installed, but had to install python-indicate manually. -- Shows 'setup broadcast accounts' even accounts set and running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548814] Re: Shows 'setup broadcast accounts' even accounts set and running
Ahh, ignore me, I just read Ken's comment in #21, Gwibber doesn't _need_ to use the indicator menu to function, so python-indicate is not a dependency. So the problem is why isn't python-indicate being installed by default. Maybe python-indicate should be a dependency of ubuntu-desktop or some other meta package? ** Branch unlinked: lp:~hugh-smtl/gwibber/packaging -- Shows 'setup broadcast accounts' even accounts set and running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 323815] Re: Install progress window has no title
Linked branch with naive fix, found the dialogue in glade and gave it a title, not sure if that is the correct way to do it, or how that works with i18n. ** Branch linked: lp:~hugh-smtl/jockey/window_progress_title -- Install progress window has no title https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526379] Re: GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386)
@Jonathan Harker, not a good way of upgrading, See http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/lucid/beta1 for upgrade instructions. -- GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 519830] Re: gwibber crashed with TypeError in set_stream()
I linked a branch which does pretty much the same as Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen's patch. Probably doesn't fix the problem correctly, but lets gwibber start. ** Branch linked: lp:~hugh-smtl/+junk/gwibber -- gwibber crashed with TypeError in set_stream() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/519830 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 536953] Re: hamster-standalone crashed with Error in __init__()
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40725869/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40725870/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40725871/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Traceback.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40725872/Traceback.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- hamster-standalone crashed with Error in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526379] Re: GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386)
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/7.7-4ubuntu1 was released a couple of days ago and also fixed the problem for me, so I don't need the xorg-edgers ppa any more. -- GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526379] Re: GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386)
I added the xorg-edgers ppa, dist-upgraded and rebooted, this solved the problem, I can now login to a normal gnome session. -- GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526379] Re: GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386)
For me, this is a symptom of #515846. -- GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526379] Re: GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386)
Maybe previous comment was presumptuous. I have the similar symptoms: have upgraded to lucid, can login to gnome failsafe, but not gnome normal session. When watching the X output and the gnome-session output, I see X crash with output similar to that mentioned in bug #515846: X: ../common/drirenderbuffer.c:69: driNewRenderbuffer: Assertion `format == 0x1908 || format == 0x8050 || format == 0x8058 || format == 0x81A5 || format == 0x81A6 || format == 0x81A7 || format == 0x8D48' failed. Aborted (core dumped) After that because X has crashed, gdm restarts it and I end up back at the login screen. It maybe that we are experiencing the same symptoms but for completely different reasons? -- GDM login fails with regular gnome-session (lucid, i386) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526379 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 396564] Re: karmic alpha: grub2 shows 'biosdisk read error', then boots
I'm using the Karmic Beta, I have legacy grub chain loading grub2. On boot I get the legacy grub prompt, I select chain load grub2, then I get biosdisk read error then the system boots without showing the grub2 prompt. I am using a separate /boot and raid1+lvm for other partitions. -- karmic alpha: grub2 shows 'biosdisk read error', then boots https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396564 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291606] Re: apt-cacher broken in intrepid
I was also having the problem that development releases were not listed by do-release-upgrade -d. I upgraded apt-cacher to 1.6.4ubuntu2 from intreprid-proposed, which solved the problem. Thanks! -- apt-cacher broken in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291606 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 156070] Re: Failed Upgrade tool signature when using do-release-upgrade
Thanks Brian, I upgraded apt-cacher to 1.6.4ubuntu2 from intreprid- proposed, which solved the problem. I was confused by the launchpad janitor comment above: This bug was fixed in the package apt-cacher - 1.6.4ubuntu1 I have also commented on #291606 -- Failed Upgrade tool signature when using do-release-upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 156070] Re: Failed Upgrade tool signature when using do-release-upgrade
I use apt-cacher(1.6.4ubuntu1) on intrepid but I still experience the problem. Boxes that pull packages through apt-cacher cannot find new releases using do-release-upgrade -d, unless the Acquire::http::Proxy line is commented out in apt.conf -- Failed Upgrade tool signature when using do-release-upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 358382] [NEW] iostat -N doesn't report device mapper names
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sysstat Ubuntu Release: 8.04LTS Package: sysstat Package Version: 8.0.3-1ubuntu1 Expected: Using iostat -N statistics are shown against device mapper names (from /dev/mapper/*) Actually Happened: Statistics are shown against devices labeled as dm-n Further Information = From iostat manpage: -N Display the registered device mapper names for any device mapper devices. Useful for viewing LVM2 statistics. Reproduction Transcript: admin-u...@solok:~$ ls /dev/mapper control sda5_crypt sdcard_crypt solok-root solok-rsnapshot solok-swap_1 admin-u...@solok:~$ iostat Linux 2.6.24-23-generic (solok) 09/04/09 avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 1.180.201.062.880.00 94.68 Device:tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn sda 8.67 180.92 131.48 133121459674338 dm-0 25.77 180.84 131.48 133059399674328 dm-1 9.6489.7149.4166007223635848 dm-2 0.14 0.02 1.09 1288 79896 dm-3 15.9991.1080.9867033465958584 mmcblk0 1.40 4.7858.15 3515704278440 dm-4 7.86 4.7558.15 3496984278440 admin-u...@solok:~$ iostat -N Linux 2.6.24-23-generic (solok) 09/04/09 avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 1.180.201.062.880.00 94.68 Device:tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn sda 8.67 180.92 131.48 133121459674338 dm-0 25.77 180.83 131.48 133059399674328 dm-1 9.6489.7149.4166007223635848 dm-2 0.14 0.02 1.09 1288 79896 dm-3 15.9991.1080.9867033465958584 mmcblk0 1.40 4.7858.15 3515704278440 dm-4 7.86 4.7558.15 3496984278440 ** Affects: sysstat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- iostat -N doesn't report device mapper names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to sysstat in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 358382] [NEW] iostat -N doesn't report device mapper names
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sysstat Ubuntu Release: 8.04LTS Package: sysstat Package Version: 8.0.3-1ubuntu1 Expected: Using iostat -N statistics are shown against device mapper names (from /dev/mapper/*) Actually Happened: Statistics are shown against devices labeled as dm-n Further Information = From iostat manpage: -N Display the registered device mapper names for any device mapper devices. Useful for viewing LVM2 statistics. Reproduction Transcript: admin-u...@solok:~$ ls /dev/mapper control sda5_crypt sdcard_crypt solok-root solok-rsnapshot solok-swap_1 admin-u...@solok:~$ iostat Linux 2.6.24-23-generic (solok) 09/04/09 avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 1.180.201.062.880.00 94.68 Device:tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn sda 8.67 180.92 131.48 133121459674338 dm-0 25.77 180.84 131.48 133059399674328 dm-1 9.6489.7149.4166007223635848 dm-2 0.14 0.02 1.09 1288 79896 dm-3 15.9991.1080.9867033465958584 mmcblk0 1.40 4.7858.15 3515704278440 dm-4 7.86 4.7558.15 3496984278440 admin-u...@solok:~$ iostat -N Linux 2.6.24-23-generic (solok) 09/04/09 avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 1.180.201.062.880.00 94.68 Device:tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn sda 8.67 180.92 131.48 133121459674338 dm-0 25.77 180.83 131.48 133059399674328 dm-1 9.6489.7149.4166007223635848 dm-2 0.14 0.02 1.09 1288 79896 dm-3 15.9991.1080.9867033465958584 mmcblk0 1.40 4.7858.15 3515704278440 dm-4 7.86 4.7558.15 3496984278440 ** Affects: sysstat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- iostat -N doesn't report device mapper names https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358382 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268447] Re: MOTD should not point to https://landscape.canonical.com if you are not a customer
In my opinion there shouldn't be canonical adverts displayed in a default ubuntu install. However if there are going to be adverts, it should be made obvious that they are for a product, not a free software project. Some users maybe unaware of the details of the ubuntu/canonical relationship and so wouldn't know from the URL that its not going to be free (beer). People may think mmm pretty graphs and follow the link only to discover its a paid for service. -- MOTD should not point to https://landscape.canonical.com if you are not a customer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257858] [NEW] rcs reports incorect time
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rcs System Information: -- Package version: 5.7-21 Ubuntu Version: 8.04.1 Hardy Heron. uname -a: Linux sidespin 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 23:41:49 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux To Reproduce The Problem [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/scripts$ echo '$Date:$' test; ci test; co test; cat test; date test,v -- test enter description, terminated with single '.' or end of file: NOTE: This is NOT the log message! . initial revision: 1.1 done test,v -- test revision 1.1 done $Date: 2008/08/14 09:35:01 $ Thu Aug 14 10:35:03 BST 2008 Expected: Dates on last two lines to agree Happened: Dates differ - looks like RCS is not reading the system timezone data so doesn't report time in BST. Other Information The manual page for rcs includes this line: -zzone Use zone as the default time zone. This option has no effect; it is present for compatibility with other RCS commands. Looks like it may have solved the problem if it were implemented. ** Affects: rcs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- rcs reports incorect time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257858 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
