[Bug 1099539] Re: Can't Boot 12.10 live USB on MacBook Air
Same problem with my MacBookPro8,1! The Ubuntu USB device doesn't show up in the EFI boot menu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099539 Title: Can't Boot 12.10 live USB on MacBook Air To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1099539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991059]
(In reply to comment #4) Raphael Frey, here is the problem with trying to correctly triage this bug: 1) Your downstream bug is completely different then this upstream one. In the downstream, you are requesting the ability to resize the window (ENHANCEMENT), and noting you are having a UI bug in Linux. 2) Here you include all that, plus a similar but potentially different UI problem on the Mac platform. 3) All totaled, you have at least 1 bug and an ENHANCEMENT. Please re-file this bug, one for the ENHANCEMENT, one for the problem on Linux, and one for the problem on Mac. Thank you for your understanding in this. Okay, I see the problem and I'm very sorry for causing this confusion ... Let me just explain the situation briefly: I remarked the problem using LibreOffice in Ubuntu and I thought the problem comes from the options window which is not resizable. (There were similar problems with other programmes in Ubuntu in the past, with options/settings windows which were too small and not resizable). Then I noticed the same problem using LibreOffice on my MacBook. As you might know, settings windows on Mac OS X usually aren't resizable. So I thought the problems on my Ubuntu and Lion system were the same and therefore I reported the bug here (only once). To sum up, this bug report only concerns the bug itself (i.e.: too small select lists in Language Settings Writing Aids). I don't know how the bug can be solved (resizable options window could be one possible solution, but I think larger select lists may be the better solution). Therefore this bug report is really a bug report and not an enhancement request. I'll adjust the bug title and description on Launchpad (Ubuntu) if possible, because it is misleading and differs from this bug request. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991059 Title: [Upstream] CONFIGURATION: Too small select lists in Language Settings Writing Aids To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/991059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991059] Re: CONFIGURATION: Too small select lists in Language Settings Writing Aids
** Summary changed: - Options window not resizable + CONFIGURATION: Too small select lists in Language Settings Writing Aids -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991059 Title: CONFIGURATION: Too small select lists in Language Settings Writing Aids To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/991059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991059] Re: CONFIGURATION: Too small select lists in Language Settings Writing Aids
** Description changed: - The Options window is not resizeable in Language Settings - Writing - Aids. + The select lists in Language Settings Writing Aids are too small, + especially the first one (Available language modules). + + Using Ubuntu Precise Pangolin, first line (Hunspell SpellChecker) below + Available language modules is not selectable with up and down arrow keys, but + only with the scroll wheel. Furthermore the scroll bar is too much compressed + and can't be used (except for the down arrow button). + + [...] ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic-pae 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Apr 29 13:42:59 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120423) SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991059 Title: CONFIGURATION: Too small select lists in Language Settings Writing Aids To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/991059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991059] Re: Options window not resizable
Upstream bug report: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49421 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #49421 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49421 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991059 Title: Options window not resizable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/991059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 990985] [NEW] Description Says It'll Install Java, But It Doesn't
Public bug reported: The package description says that installing this package will install Java (Icedtea plug-in), but it doesn't. Java is neither a primary nor a passed down dependency of this package (see http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/ubuntu-restricted-extras). Package description: Commonly used applications with restricted copyright (mp3, avi, mpeg, TrueType, Java, Flash, Codecs) ** Affects: ubuntu-restricted-extras (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990985 Title: Description Says It'll Install Java, But It Doesn't To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-restricted-extras/+bug/990985/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 990998] [NEW] Purged packages not showing up in history
Public bug reported: Packages that were purged using the terminal (sudo apt-get purge ...) don't show up in history (Ubuntu Software Center - History). No problem with normally removed (sudo apt-get remove ...) or installed packages (sudo apt-get install ...). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: software-center 5.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic-pae 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Apr 29 12:19:52 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120423) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: software-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990998 Title: Purged packages not showing up in history To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/990998/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 990998] Re: Purged packages not showing up in history
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990998 Title: Purged packages not showing up in history To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/990998/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 990985] Re: Description Says It'll Install Java, But It Doesn't
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention that I was referring to the package description in Software Center. (I don't know where it gets this description from ...) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990985 Title: Description Says It'll Install Java, But It Doesn't To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-restricted-extras/+bug/990985/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991059] [NEW] Options window not resizeable
Public bug reported: The Options window is not resizeable which leads to nearly unusable option lists in Language Settings - Writing Aids. E.g. the first option line (Hunspell SpellChecker) below Available Language Modules is not selectable with up and down arrow keys, but only with the scroll wheel. Furthermore the scroll bar is too much compressed and can't be used (except for the down arrow button). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic-pae 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Apr 29 13:42:59 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120423) SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991059 Title: Options window not resizeable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/991059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991059] Re: Options window not resizeable
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991059 Title: Options window not resizeable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/991059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991059] Re: Options window not resizeable
** Attachment added: Screenshot showing the problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/991059/+attachment/3115104/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-04-29%2013%3A43%3A21.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991059 Title: Options window not resizeable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/991059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991459] [NEW] Enhancement request: import from iPhoto Aperture
Public bug reported: Please enhance Shotwell so it can import iPhoto Aperture libraries. Thank you! =) (At present Shotwell can only import from F-Spot, see File - Import From Application... ** Affects: shotwell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991459 Title: Enhancement request: import from iPhoto Aperture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/991459/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 991490] [NEW] Enhancement request: save lyrics to music file
Public bug reported: Please enhance Rhythmbox to be able to save lyrics to the music file (MP3/ID3: USLT; M4A: ©lyr) and to display lyrics saved in the meta- data/tags of music files. This would allow easy music file exchange to other audio players (software hardware; such as Exaile, iTunes, iPod, iPhone etc.) without loosing the lyrics informations. Thank you for implementing this feature! =) ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991490 Title: Enhancement request: save lyrics to music file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/991490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923011] [NEW] CD import 'year' tag problem
Public bug reported: Importing an audio CD to MP3 shows following problems with the ID3 'year' tag: - If Banshee can't get album information from Internet and you set the 'year' tag manually, Banshee doesn't save the 'year' as ID3 tag. When opening the files with EasyTag (or any other tagging software) , the 'year' tag is empty, although visible in Banshee. - If Banshee get album information from Internet, but the year is wrong (for classical music I use the recording date as 'year', not the album release date) and you change it manually, Banshee saves the wrong year as ID3 tag but shows the correct date (see attachment)!! ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: banshee 2.2.1-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-15.26-generic 3.0.13 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-15-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 28 09:59:14 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: banshee UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: banshee (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923011 Title: CD import 'year' tag problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/923011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923011] Re: CD import 'year' tag problem
** Attachment added: Banshee_bug.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923011/+attachment/2698038/+files/Banshee_bug.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923011 Title: CD import 'year' tag problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/923011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247113]
I know that this comment is not really useful, but I'd like to point out that, unfortunately, this bug is still not fixed in the newest version of Poppler (FC15: 0.16.7-1.fc15). I would really appreciate if someone could try to fix this bug (unfortunately I'm not able to do so) because due to this bug I cannot use Evince/Okular to print sheet music created with Lilypond. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247113 Title: vertical bars are too thick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler/+bug/247113/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560096] Re: Just one workspace is useless
** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560096 Title: Just one workspace is useless To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/560096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560096] Re: Just one workspace is useless
Hi, I’m sorry, I didn't notice your comment from 2011-05-19. I just checked if this bug is still present in Natty (10.04) or not. Fortunately I didn't have this issue any more. It seems that it has been fixed in the meantime. Best regards -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560096 Title: Just one workspace is useless To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/560096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572789] Re: No volume control in notification area without indicator applet
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 526796 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526796 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 526796 No sound applet on the gnome panel -- No volume control in notification area without indicator applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560096] Re: Just one workspace is useless
What a pity that this bug could not (?) be fixed in Ubuntu 10.04 (see screenshot) … :( ** Attachment added: Screenshot showing this bug http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46650256/Screenshot.ppm -- Just one workspace is useless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560096] Re: Just one workspace is useless
Can you please re-increase this bug’s severity? I don’t think this bug has low importance, however it could make many Ubuntu/Linux newbies that don’t resp. can’t use Compiz confuse if the bug won’t be fixed for 10.04. -- Just one workspace is useless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556071] Re: Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed
Please see the latest activities on the Debian bugtracker [1]. The Latin Modern fonts are the default fonts for Xetex and should therefore be automatically installed (as dependeny) when you install the ‘texlive- xetex’ package. __ 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576599 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #576599 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576599 -- Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560096] Re: Just one workspace is useless
Sorry for mixing up package names. Of course the bug cannot be in ‘gnome-panel’ because I cannot use the keyboard shortcut [Ctrl] + [Alt] + [→] either. As I do not use Compiz, the bug seems to be in package ‘metacity’ resp. in its the default settings. If you use Compiz but want to reproduce this bug, you have to replace the window manager by either typing ‘metacity --replace ’ in a console or by turning off desktop effects under ‘System → Settings → Appearance → desktop effects’. ** Package changed: compiz (Ubuntu) = metacity (Ubuntu) -- Just one workspace is useless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 560090] [NEW] ‘Detect keyboard layo ut’ option not working 100% correctly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity It’s no serious bug but still a bit annoying – the ‘detect keyboard layout’ option in ubiquity present on the Live CD of Ubuntu 10.04 beta 2 doesn’t work 100% correctly: I’ve got a Swiss-French keyboard layout (please see [1] for the difference between Swiss-German and Swiss-French keyboard layouts). The suggested keyboard layout in ubiquity (step 3 of 7) is ‘France - Autre’. Because this is not the right layout, I’ve chosen ‘Détecter la disposition du clavier’ (detect keyboard layout). There I’ve typed following keys: u, w, z (on an US keyboard: u, w, y) Then I was asked if the letter ‘ö’ is present on my keyboard. I pressed ‘oui’ (yes) because it is. Now I had to type this letter which I can reach with [⇧] + [é] ([shift] + [é], on US keyboard [⇧] + [:] I think). Finally I was asked if the letter ‘é’ is present on my keyboard. It is, so I pressed ‘oui’ again. The programme now showed me that it has chosen the ‘Suisse’ (Swiss) keyboard layout. As I remarked while testing the keyboard in the box below, the detected layout is the Swiss-German layout and not the Swiss-French keyboard! So I had to correct this mistake manually. In addition it is a bit strange that ‘Suisse’ refers to the Swiss-German layout while the Swiss-French layout is called ‘Suisse - Français’ (Swiss-French). It would be more obvious if the option ‘Suisse’ (Swiss) would be called ‘Suisse - German’ (Swiss-German). __ 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_layout#Switzerland_.28German.2C_French.2C_Italian.29.2C_Liechtenstein.2C_Luxembourg ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: ** Description changed: Binary package hint: ubiquity It’s no serious bug but still a bit annoying – the ‘detect keyboard layout’ option in ubiquity present on the Live CD of Ubuntu 10.04 beta 2 doesn’t work 100% correctly: I’ve got a Swiss-French keyboard layout (please see [1] for the difference between Swiss-German and Swiss-French keyboard layouts). The suggested keyboard layout in ubiquity (step 3 of 7) is ‘France - Autre’. Because this is not the right layout, I’ve chosen ‘Détecter la disposition du clavier’ (detect keyboard layout). There I’ve typed following keys: u, w, z (on an US keyboard: u, w, y) Then I was asked if the letter ‘ö’ is present on my keyboard. I pressed ‘oui’ (yes) because it is. Now I had to type this letter which I can reach with [⇧] + [é] ([shift] + [é], on US keyboard [⇧] + [:] I think). Finally I was asked if the letter ‘é’ is present on my keyboard. It is, so I pressed ‘oui’ again. The programme now showed me that it has chosen the ‘Suisse’ (Switzerland) keyboard layout. As I remarked while testing the keyboard in the box below, the detected layout is the Swiss-German - layout and not the Swiss-French keyboard. So I had to correct this + layout and not the Swiss-French keyboard! So I had to correct this mistake manually. In addition it is a bit strange that ‘Suisse’ refers to the Swiss-German layout while the Swiss-French layout is called ‘Suisse - Français’ (Swiss-French). It would be more obvious if the option ‘Suisse’ (Swiss) would be called ‘Suisse - German’ (Swiss-German). __ 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_layout#Switzerland_.28German.2C_French.2C_Italian.29.2C_Liechtenstein.2C_Luxembourg ** Description changed: Binary package hint: ubiquity It’s no serious bug but still a bit annoying – the ‘detect keyboard layout’ option in ubiquity present on the Live CD of Ubuntu 10.04 beta 2 doesn’t work 100% correctly: I’ve got a Swiss-French keyboard layout (please see [1] for the difference between Swiss-German and Swiss-French keyboard layouts). The suggested keyboard layout in ubiquity (step 3 of 7) is ‘France - Autre’. Because this is not the right layout, I’ve chosen ‘Détecter la disposition du clavier’ (detect keyboard layout). There I’ve typed following keys: u, w, z (on an US keyboard: u, w, y) Then I was asked if the letter ‘ö’ is present on my keyboard. I pressed ‘oui’ (yes) because it is. Now I had to type this letter which I can reach with [⇧] + [é] ([shift] + [é], on US keyboard [⇧] + [:] I think). Finally I was asked if the letter ‘é’ is present on my keyboard. It is, so I pressed ‘oui’ again. The programme now showed me that it has chosen - the ‘Suisse’ (Switzerland) keyboard layout. As I remarked while testing - the keyboard in the box below, the detected layout is the Swiss-German + the ‘Suisse’ (Swiss) keyboard layout. As I remarked while testing the + keyboard in the box below, the detected layout is the Swiss-German layout and not the Swiss-French keyboard! So I had to correct this mistake manually. In addition it is a bit strange that ‘Suisse’ refers to the Swiss-German layout while the Swiss-French layout is called ‘Suisse - Français’
[Bug 560096] [NEW] Just one workspace is useless
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel In Ubuntu 10.04 Beta 2 there is only one active workspace. I think this is a bug because if you really intended to activate only one virtual desktop (workspace) the workspace switcher is useless and can be removed from the panel. ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Just one workspace is useless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556074] [NEW] Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: texlive-xetex There is exactly the same problem in Ubuntu 9.10 as described in this Debian bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576599 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 5 23:28:13 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: wl Package: texlive-xetex 2007.dfsg.2-7ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic SourcePackage: texlive-bin Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic i686 ** Affects: texlive-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556074 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556074] Re: Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43194350/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43194351/XsessionErrors.txt -- Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556074 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556073] [NEW] Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: texlive-xetex There is exactly the same problem in Ubuntu 9.10 as described in this Debian bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576599 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 5 23:28:13 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: wl Package: texlive-xetex 2007.dfsg.2-7ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic SourcePackage: texlive-bin Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic i686 ** Affects: texlive-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556073] Re: Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43194350/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43194351/XsessionErrors.txt -- Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556071] [NEW] Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: texlive-xetex There is exactly the same problem in Ubuntu 9.10 as described in this Debian bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576599 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 5 23:28:13 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: wl Package: texlive-xetex 2007.dfsg.2-7ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic SourcePackage: texlive-bin Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic i686 ** Affects: texlive-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556071] Re: Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43194350/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43194351/XsessionErrors.txt -- Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556073] Re: Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed
I am sorry, it seems that something went wrong when I reported this bug. Please close this bug report because it is a duplicate of bug 556071. Thanks. -- Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556073 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556074] Re: Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed
I am sorry, it seems that something went wrong when I reported this bug. Please close this bug report because it is a duplicate of bug 556071. Thanks. -- Xelatex complains that lmodern fonts are not installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556074 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550255] [NEW] SIFT algorithm is patented in US
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: autopano-sift Please remove ‘autopano-sift’ from the ‘universe’ repository (and move it to Medibuntu if possible). The scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) algorithm used by ‘autopano-sift’ is patented in United States (see [1] and [2]) by the University of British Columbia and therefore cannot be freely used there. __ 1. http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~nowozin/autopano-sift/#download 2. http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=USNR=6711293KC=FT=E ** Affects: autopano-sift (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- SIFT algorithm is patented in US https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
