[Bug 316230] Re: python-lxml fails if python-stats is installed
This is fixed in later versions of lxml. Use 2.3 instead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316230 Title: python-lxml fails if python-stats is installed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 349701] Re: python-lxml fails to load etree module in jaunty
** Changed in: lxml (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349701 Title: python-lxml fails to load etree module in jaunty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599533] Re: lxml.html.parse does not recognize https
SSL/TLS is not supported by libxml2. Use Python's urllib2 instead. ** Changed in: lxml (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599533 Title: lxml.html.parse does not recognize https -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 690968] Re: Python lxml incompatible with html5lib
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 509766 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509766 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 509766 Upstream html5lib change breaks html5parser * You can subscribe to bug 509766 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lxml/+bug/509766/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690968 Title: Python lxml incompatible with html5lib -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 317487] Re: 2.2.1 needs Time::Progress
Lucid package works perfectly for me in karmic. -- 2.2.1 needs Time::Progress https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500296] Re: tcc: a new upstream version (0.9.25) is available that support x86_64
Miriam Ruiz also has updated packages in her PPA: https://launchpad.net/~miry/+archive/ppa They are built from git, not from the official release. -- tcc: a new upstream version (0.9.25) is available that support x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500296] [NEW] a new upstream version (0.9.25) is available that support x86_64
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tcc The tcc version that is currently in Ubuntu doesn't run on x86_64. The new version does (which is the main change in that version). This has already been reported as a Debian bug and a patch is available: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549100 ** Affects: tcc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- a new upstream version (0.9.25) is available that support x86_64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 337759] Re: openerp-server depends on python-xml and is therefore uninstallable ATM
What about trying to port the code to libxml2dom? If it's based on PyXML, that might not be too hard. (and please do *not* make this a bug report against libxml2dom now!) -- openerp-server depends on python-xml and is therefore uninstallable ATM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337759] Re: openerp-server depends on python-xml and is therefore uninstallable ATM
this doesn't affect lxml at all ** Changed in: lxml Status: New = Invalid -- openerp-server depends on python-xml and is therefore uninstallable ATM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 337759] Re: openerp-server depends on python-xml and is therefore uninstallable ATM
this doesn't affect lxml at all ** Changed in: lxml (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- openerp-server depends on python-xml and is therefore uninstallable ATM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 308633] Re: [jaunty] lxml FTBFS on all platforms
Debian wants to be able to build from source, and be able to change the source; if this cannot be done, then lxml has to be removed from Debian. It can be done, lxml should generally work just fine with the latest release version of Cython. It's just that using a different version won't yield the same C sources, so even small source changes won't result in a local change in the binary. And releasing lxml with a specific Cython version won't solve the problem as Debian would want to build it with the Cython version it ships, as would Ubuntu, and Redhat, and ... It's unfortunate that lxml relies on such unstable software. gcc generates different code depending on which version is used. Sometimes, using one gcc version can result in a crash, while other gcc versions work just fine. Does that make GCC unstable software? Updating GCC can lead to non-local changes in binaries, just like updating Cython does. I think the only difference is that GCC is a much slower moving target than Cython. -- [jaunty] lxml FTBFS on all platforms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 308633] Re: [jaunty] lxml FTBFS on all platforms
[regarding lxml recompilation:] I hope the Debian package users of lxml are happy with untested, unreleased sources. Cython is a quickly moving target that can generate very different code from one day to another. lxml is rarely released with C code generated from an official Cython release, so regenerating the sources can introduce all sorts of diverging behaviour. -- [jaunty] lxml FTBFS on all platforms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 308633] Re: [jaunty] lxml FTBFS on all platforms
During installation, Cython now compiles some of its own modules into C extensions to speed up compilation (by quite a bit, actually). If it can't import them for some reason (e.g. they were built for a different Python version), you will get the error above. BTW, this does not affect lxml as long as you only use released sources (which do not require Cython). -- [jaunty] lxml FTBFS on all platforms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181985] Re: denial of service bug in UTF-8 handling
** Visibility changed to: Public -- denial of service bug in UTF-8 handling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 181985] denial of service bug in UTF-8 handling
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libxml2 Daniel Veillard reported a security relevant bug on the mailing list that facilitates DoS attacks. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xml/2008-January/msg00036.html The patch is here: http://veillard.com/libxml2.patch ** Affects: libxml2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- denial of service bug in UTF-8 handling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181985 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157392] Re: rst.el (rst-mode) doesn't work with emacs 22
or here: http://svn.berlios.de/viewcvs/docutils/trunk/docutils/tools/editors/emacs/ -- rst.el (rst-mode) doesn't work with emacs 22 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157392] rst.el (rst-mode) doesn't work with emacs 22
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python-docutils The rst-mode that comes with the rst.el in docutils 0.4 doesn't work with emacs 22. A new (and nicely working) version is available here: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/tools/editors/emacs/rst.el Stefan ** Affects: python-docutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- rst.el (rst-mode) doesn't work with emacs 22 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157392 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140656] libxml2 2.6.27 has a severe crash bug in the XPath code
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libxml2 libxml2 2.6.27 has a known crash bug in the XPath code. When an error occurs curing the XPath evaluation, this can lead to a double free and a crash, and there is nothing the application can do about it. Feisty should upgrade to at least 2.6.28 as soon as possible (2.6.30 is current). ** Affects: libxml2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libxml2 2.6.27 has a severe crash bug in the XPath code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112874] Re: libxml2-doc lacks html/index.html
Feisty. And I definitely do not have the file /usr/share/doc/libxml2-doc/html/index.html The package version of libxml2-doc is 2.6.27.dfsg-1.ubuntu3, which lacks that file. -- libxml2-doc lacks html/index.html https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112874] Re: libxml2-doc lacks html/index.html
# dpkg -L libxml2-doc |grep index /usr/share/doc/libxml2-doc/examples/index.html /usr/share/doc/libxml2-doc/index.html /usr/share/doc/libxml2-doc/tutorial/index.html /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libxml2/index.html As I said, /usr/share/doc/libxml2-doc/html/index.html is missing. I also tried reinstalling the package - no difference. -- libxml2-doc lacks html/index.html https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125727] Re: sync request, new version 1.3.2 available
Great, thanks. Note that lxml now has a site on launchpad. https://launchpad.net/lxml Stefan -- sync request, new version 1.3.2 available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125727] new version 1.3.2 available
Public bug reported: lxml 1.3.2 is the latest release of the 1.3 series. Ubuntu currently uses 1.2 or 1.1 respectively. The 1.3 series had a couple of important bug fixes and cleanups at the API level, so they should be available in Ubuntu. http://codespeak.net/lxml/changes-1.3.2.html ** Affects: lxml (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- new version 1.3.2 available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112874] libxml2-doc lacks html/index.html
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libxml2-doc libxml2-doc lacks the file /usr/share/doc/libxml2-doc/html/index.html which is the entry file for the API docs. Pretty annoying, as it is an important entry point and linked to from a lot of places. ** Affects: libxml2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- libxml2-doc lacks html/index.html https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
