[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2024-04-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for One Hundred Papercuts because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2024-04-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for grub2 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2024-02-26 Thread Mate Kukri
This seems to have been an update publication issue in a version of
Ubuntu that is no longer supported (14.10), I don't think there is bug
described here that still exists.

I am setting this to "Incomplete" to give some time for anyone to
confirm being affected by this, I am also downgrading severity from
"Critical".

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Status: Confirmed => Incomplete

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Critical => Medium

** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2019-07-24 Thread Brad Figg
** Tags added: cscc

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2019-01-28 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2019-01-28 Thread carmelo
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2018-12-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 08:25:41PM -, bokateeka wrote:
> Try https://sourceforge.net/u/yannubuntu/

> Dual Boot repair disk

Please do nothing of the sort.  This "repair disk" is developed with zero
coordination with the Ubuntu developers and the resulting changes to the
disk are unsupportable by us.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2018-12-27 Thread bokateeka via ubuntu-bugs
Try https://sourceforge.net/u/yannubuntu/

Dual Boot repair disk



https://sourceforge.net/projects/boot-repair-cd/files/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2016-01-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 07:14:48PM -, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> Wouldn't the grub2 package simply be held back if the proper version
> required by grub2-signed isn't available?

Not in all cases.

> Why did the grub2-signed binary package get uninstalled during the
> update?

This is allowable when running 'apt-get dist-upgrade', which is presumably
how the affected users have been applying updates.

When using update-manager, we have more control to avoid accidental removal
of packages when applying updates.  When a user explicitly invokes apt-get,
we don't have control over this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2016-01-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:59:30AM -, Seth Arnold wrote:
> Will users that have only the -security pocket enabled run into this
> issue until we publish a corresponding grub2-signed package into the
> -security pocket?

Yes.

> Can the packages in -updates in wily, vivid, and trusty be binarycopied
> into the -security pocket?

That doesn't help.  The grub2 and grub2-signed packages must be in exact
version lockstep to avoid problems.

> What steps need to be taken to publish future grub2 security updates?

Upon unembargo, the grub2 package needs to be copied first from the security
ppa to -proposed, where the grub .efi binaries can be signed, and then
grub2-signed needs to be uploaded to -proposed, after which the packages can
be copied to -security.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2016-01-06 Thread Seth Arnold
Will users that have only the -security pocket enabled run into this
issue until we publish a corresponding grub2-signed package into the
-security pocket? Can the packages in -updates in wily, vivid, and
trusty be binarycopied into the -security pocket?

What steps need to be taken to publish future grub2 security updates?

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2016-01-05 Thread planet
** Tags added: kernel-fs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2016-01-05 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: regression-update

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2016-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
This appears to have been caused by the publication of a grub2 security
update on 12/15 without the corresponding grub2-signed package being
published at the same time.

We have had similar issues in the past with publication of grub2 and
grub2-signed to the -updates pockets; the proposed solution there won't
help for the security pocket, however, since those publications don't go
via -proposed.

Subscribing the security team for comment.

To fix your current problem, you should install the grub-efi-
amd64-signed package.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2016-01-04 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2016-01-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1528345] Re: grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

2016-01-01 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528345

Title:
  grub or kernel update broke Secure Boot by putting grubx64.efi instead
  of shimx64.efi in EFI boot order

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1528345/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs