Re: GPL and forking

2009-02-13 Thread Aaron Toponce
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
 Ioannis Vranos wrote:
 I am writing a GUI front-end for a GPLv2 or later, perl script, I can't 
 find the original author and I need to modify it, so as to work with my 
 front-end.

 May someone explain when GPL forking can take place and how?
 
 
 To be more precise I am talking about sysv-rc-conf Linux services 
 configuration tool, and my Glass front-end:
 
 
 http://www.cpp-software.net
 

The beauty of the GPL is that you don't need the author's permission if
you wish to take code, and fork. If you want to commit your change
upstream, that may be a different matter.

-- 
 ,-O  Aaron Toponce
O   } Ubuntu Member
 `-O  http://www.ubuntu.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Memtest86

2009-01-17 Thread Aaron Toponce
Evan wrote:
 the Ubuntu CD is not meant to be a diagnostic/repair CD.

Disagreed. I just used the Ubuntu LiveCD to repair my broken MBR on LVM:

http://pthree.org/2009/01/15/rescue-lilo-on-lvm-with-ubuntu/

Sure, I can do this with the alternate CD, but it's labeled alternate
to provide an alternate way at installing, or rescuing a system from the
GUI. I sure hope the LiveCD keeps the diagnostic tools. The take up very
little space on disk anyway.

-- 
 ,-O  Aaron Toponce
O   } Ubuntu Member
 `-O  http://www.ubuntu.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Thoughts about EXT4 optional in Jaunty Development questions about Plymouth

2009-01-08 Thread Aaron Toponce
Colin Watson wrote:
 ext4 will be available as a partitioning option as of tomorrow's daily
 builds.

I'm looking forward to this. I've been looking forward to ext4 for
years. I could do an install from scratch, but I'm hoping that I can
upgrade my existing ext3 to ext4 as you can going from ext2 to ext3.

-- 
 ,-O  Aaron Toponce
O   } Ubuntu Member
 `-O  http://www.ubuntu.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: rc scripts and stderr

2008-12-05 Thread Aaron Toponce
Onno Benschop wrote:
 The script to manage rc scripts is update-rc.d

I've always found 'sysv-rc-conf' to be much more intuitive than update-rc.d:

sysv-rc-conf --list
sysv-rc-conf apache2 on
sysv-rc-conf --level 345 apache2 off

-- 
   _
Aaron Toponce ( )  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
www.aarontoponce.org   X   www.asciiribbon.org
  / \



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Python 3?

2008-12-04 Thread Aaron Toponce
Chris wrote:
 Since Python 3 was released, how is Ubuntu going to transition it's PyGTK
 apps to 3.0?
 Most GNOME (and Ubuntu-centric) apps are made with Python 2.6, right?

No. Most GNOME applications are written in C, although some may be
written in Python and other languages.

Transitioning shouldn't be difficult. Python 2.6 was released as a
transition release to Python 3, so if any code is 2.6-compliant, it will
run in 3 without any trouble.

-- 
 ,-O  Aaron Toponce
O   } Ubuntu Member
 `-O  http://www.ubuntu.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Unmounting SSHFS

2008-12-02 Thread Aaron Toponce
Just a thought, but I find it a bit obnoxious. I can mount an SSHFS
directory as an unprivileged user, but I can't unmount it without root.
Why is this? We've already made progress in unmounting removable media
as an unprivileged user, so what would it take to unmount SSHFS as
unprivileged?

Just a thought,
-- 
 ,-O  Aaron Toponce
O   } Ubuntu Member
 `-O  http://www.ubuntu.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Unmounting SSHFS

2008-12-02 Thread Aaron Toponce
Chris Coulson wrote:
 I can unmount a SSHFS volume without being root. How are you trying to
 do it?

I wasn't aware of fuserumount, but I was using the GUI- right-clicking
the mounted icon on my desktop, and choosing Unmount volume. The
umount command also fails, although succeeds on removable media.

-- 
 ,-O  Aaron Toponce
O   } Ubuntu Member
 `-O  http://www.ubuntu.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Are file permissions in files on external devices silly?

2008-11-21 Thread Aaron Toponce
How would you propose to solve it? Change the permissions on files to
the person logged in? Add a user account with the matching UID to match
those found on the files, then log that user in? Change world
permissions on the file, so everyone can access it? I think you can see
the silly-ness behind these options.

What your brother doesn't realize, is that when you take files from
system to system, OS to OS, you're going to encounter these headaches.
It's just the way these things go.

What should be expected, is having your brother learn how Linux
operates. It's always bothered me that just because Windows dumbed down
the computing experience, means everyone else has to too. When Linux
starts asking its users to learn a little bit about their operating
system, such as files permissions, they throw their arms up in disgust,
saying that they aren't a programmer or advanced computer user. While
there may be a line to draw on what we should expect from theme, basic
file permissions, I think, is well behind that line.

-- 
   _
Aaron Toponce ( )  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
www.aarontoponce.org   X   www.asciiribbon.org
  / \

-- 
 ,-O  Aaron Toponce
O   } Ubuntu Member
 `-O  http://www.ubuntu.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Ubuntu 8.10 significantly slower than previous versions

2008-11-07 Thread Aaron Toponce
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 08:03:19AM +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
 Well, newer gcc's are meant to produce faster code, aren't they?

Faster code? No, GCC doesn't rewrite code. Streamline the compiled
binary to make efficient use of system calls? Yes. Different GCC
versions can have dramatic effects on binaries of the exact same code.

-- 
 ,-O  Aaron Toponce
O   } Ubuntu Member
 `-O  http://www.ubuntu.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss