Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-28 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Alvin Thompson al...@thompsonlogic.com wrote:
 Currently, the Apache Maven package doesn't work due to the libplexus
 packages (a Maven dependency) being synced from Debian but not Maven
 itself.  According to the bug reports [1][2], this isn't going to be
 fixed for Karmic and the Maven package will most likely just be dropped.

 First, as a Java developer I hope this doesn't happen as Maven is pretty
 much required for Java development (at least in the U.S.).

 Second, There are a great many people who are currently using Maven in
 Ubuntu.  If it is necessary to drop the packages you really need to warn
 people during the upgrade process so they won't spend too much time
 wondering why their projects aren't building anymore (or so they can
 stick to 9.04 for the time being).  It should also be mentioned in the
 release notes that Ubuntu no longer supports Maven because that would
 certainly come as a surprise to developers and would factor into their
 decision on which version to install.  I've created a bug report for
 that [3] but it doesn't appear to have been looked at yet.  True, it's
 only been a few days, but since the release date is quite close now I
 figured I'd shoot off this email so hopefully this will be resolved one
 way or the other before the release.



 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539
 2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417164
 3. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450554

I think you wrongly assumed that Maven was being removed. There were
some bugs which were being worked on and most of them have been fixed.
Rest will be fixed post release.

Credit belongs to many people (I was not involved), and most
importantly to the Debian developers who put the packages in shape
first.


Onkar

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: [thanks!]Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Alvin Thompson [2009-10-27 10:36 -0400]:
 I'd just like to publicly thank whoever was responsible for getting 
 Maven up to snuff in time for this release.

That was Matthias Klose. Kudos for your hard last-minute work!

For the record, some plugins are still missing, but these will be
provided in a post-release update. These are already being prepared.

 And of course, thanks to all of the many people who make Ubuntu great 
 release after release.  When my people come to invade your planet, you 
 will not be harmed.

apt-get install force-field

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-16 Thread Joao Pinto
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:53 PM, John Moser john.r.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alvin Thompson
 al...@thompsonlogic.com wrote:
 First, as a Java developer I hope this doesn't happen as Maven is pretty
 much required for Java development (at least in the U.S.).

 I laughed.

 Your pet project is NOT pretty much required for X in any global
 scope.  I've hardly seen any Java shops, and the ones I did... well
 I've never seen Maven.  Most of the bigger shops are moving to the
 next buzzword anyway:  .NET (why the hell do people do this?)

 --
 Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
 Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
 Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

John,
What's so funny about someone not being able to develop his projects on Ubuntu ?
Probably 50% of the universe packages do not have a global scope,
however their are important enough for their developers/users so that
a lof of people works hard to have those packages available in a good
shape on each Ubuntu release.
Please STOP being disrespectful for other people.

I also believe that there should be a list of the packages which are
removed linked from the release notes, it can be an adoption blocker.
A good option would be to link to a wiki page, that would allow other
people to provide workarounds when available.

Best regards,

-- 
João Luís Marques Pinto
GetDeb Team Leader
http://www.getdeb.net
http://blog.getdeb.net

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-16 Thread Neal McBurnett
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:09:41AM -0400, Alvin Thompson wrote:
 Currently, the Apache Maven package doesn't work due to the libplexus 
 packages (a Maven dependency) being synced from Debian but not Maven 
 itself.  According to the bug reports [1][2], this isn't going to be 
 fixed for Karmic and the Maven package will most likely just be dropped.
...
 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539
 2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/417164
 3. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450554

Thanks for linking to the source of great information on the complex
issues here.  The bugs in launchpad are where developers generally
focus most of their attention, so there is high quality updated linked
information there.

Note in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427539 that there is a Maven2
package from Artur reported to work in karmic, deployed now in a
personal package archive (ppa):

 Workaround is install maven2 from ppa:
 https://launchpad.net/~uninea/+archive/java
 Please test it and give feedback.

And there still seems to possibly be a chance of getting that in
karmic if people can test it out and help get it built in a way that
works properly within the ubuntu build process.

If that doesn't work out, please recognize how hard it is to put
together a project like Ubuntu with over 24000 packages, many at the
cutting edge, most maintained by loosely-coupled volunteers, on a
clockwork schedule that can't possibly match the schedules of all the
component upstream development projects.  We can always use new
testers, developers, and folks to get involved early in a release
cycle to look out for issues like this.

Thanks,

Neal McBurnett http://neal.mcburnett.org/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-15 Thread John Moser
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alvin Thompson
al...@thompsonlogic.com wrote:
 First, as a Java developer I hope this doesn't happen as Maven is pretty
 much required for Java development (at least in the U.S.).

I laughed.

Your pet project is NOT pretty much required for X in any global
scope.  I've hardly seen any Java shops, and the ones I did... well
I've never seen Maven.  Most of the bigger shops are moving to the
next buzzword anyway:  .NET (why the hell do people do this?)

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-15 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:53 AM, John Moser john.r.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alvin Thompson
 al...@thompsonlogic.com wrote:
 First, as a Java developer I hope this doesn't happen as Maven is pretty
 much required for Java development (at least in the U.S.).

 I laughed.

 Your pet project is NOT pretty much required for X in any global
 scope.  I've hardly seen any Java shops, and the ones I did... well
 I've never seen Maven.  Most of the bigger shops are moving to the
 next buzzword anyway:  .NET (why the hell do people do this?)

Hi John-

I'm not a Java developer, but I certainly know of Maven.  It is as
essential to Java programmers as Make is to C programmers.

I can't weigh in on the discussion about removing Maven, but I don't
think it's appropriate to attack Alvin for stating his support of
Maven in Ubuntu.

:-Dustin

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-15 Thread Alvin Thompson
You *do* understand that Maven is Apache's replacement for Ant, don't you?

-Alvin


On 10/15/2009 12:53 PM, John Moser wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alvin Thompson
 al...@thompsonlogic.com  wrote:
 First, as a Java developer I hope this doesn't happen as Maven is pretty
 much required for Java development (at least in the U.S.).

 I laughed.

 Your pet project is NOT pretty much required for X in any global
 scope.  I've hardly seen any Java shops, and the ones I did... well
 I've never seen Maven.  Most of the bigger shops are moving to the
 next buzzword anyway:  .NET (why the hell do people do this?)


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-15 Thread John Moser
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:53 AM, John Moser john.r.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alvin Thompson
 al...@thompsonlogic.com wrote:
 First, as a Java developer I hope this doesn't happen as Maven is pretty
 much required for Java development (at least in the U.S.).

 I laughed.

 Your pet project is NOT pretty much required for X in any global
 scope.  I've hardly seen any Java shops, and the ones I did... well
 I've never seen Maven.  Most of the bigger shops are moving to the
 next buzzword anyway:  .NET (why the hell do people do this?)

 Hi John-

 I'm not a Java developer, but I certainly know of Maven.  It is as
 essential to Java programmers as Make is to C programmers.


I think he's overstating the popularity and necessity of a particular
package, to a large degree.  There are plenty of Java programs in
Ubuntu; with Maven being dropped, they should all cease to build, and
also be dropped (imagine dropping gmake).  Unless, of course, Maven
isn't really essential to anything.

I could state that a LiveCD build of Nexuiz is essential to a
successful Linux build, because everyone wants to play FPS games and
we can't have a real operating system if you can't just reboot your
computer onto a cleanroom disc with Nexuiz in it.  While Nexuiz does
exist, and is fun, it's hardly essential for anything (even flexing
Ubuntu as a gaming platform), and a LiveCD boot to run a single
application is obviously just a pet project of mine.

I will continue to laugh at people who present anything with *a* user
base as something *essential* to an *entire* class of users, unless it
obviously is and thus dropping it would horribly break Ubuntu's
functionality or drastically alter the user experience for the entire
install base (i.e. libc-dev for C programmers, OpenOffice.org-Writer
or Firefox getting dropped, etc).  Something only used by a subset of
a subset of the userbase isn't required for that whole subset to
function, just the further subset thereof.

Again, case in point, if Ubuntu drops Maven and suddenly every Java
application fails to build on the BS, then Maven is required for
Java programming.

 I can't weigh in on the discussion about removing Maven, but I don't
 think it's appropriate to attack Alvin for stating his support of
 Maven in Ubuntu.

 :-Dustin


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-15 Thread Alvin Thompson
You're *seriously* trying to make the argument that a build 
tool--especially the one that is due to replace Ant--isn't essential to 
Java developers? [Alvin files John Moser's name in the list of people 
NEVER to hire as a developer...]


On 10/15/2009 01:29 PM, John Moser wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Dustin Kirklandkirkl...@ubuntu.com  wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:53 AM, John Moserjohn.r.mo...@gmail.com  wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alvin Thompson
 al...@thompsonlogic.com  wrote:
 First, as a Java developer I hope this doesn't happen as Maven is pretty
 much required for Java development (at least in the U.S.).

 I laughed.

 Your pet project is NOT pretty much required for X in any global
 scope.  I've hardly seen any Java shops, and the ones I did... well
 I've never seen Maven.  Most of the bigger shops are moving to the
 next buzzword anyway:  .NET (why the hell do people do this?)

 Hi John-

 I'm not a Java developer, but I certainly know of Maven.  It is as
 essential to Java programmers as Make is to C programmers.


 I think he's overstating the popularity and necessity of a particular
 package, to a large degree.  There are plenty of Java programs in
 Ubuntu; with Maven being dropped, they should all cease to build, and
 also be dropped (imagine dropping gmake).  Unless, of course, Maven
 isn't really essential to anything.

 I could state that a LiveCD build of Nexuiz is essential to a
 successful Linux build, because everyone wants to play FPS games and
 we can't have a real operating system if you can't just reboot your
 computer onto a cleanroom disc with Nexuiz in it.  While Nexuiz does
 exist, and is fun, it's hardly essential for anything (even flexing
 Ubuntu as a gaming platform), and a LiveCD boot to run a single
 application is obviously just a pet project of mine.

 I will continue to laugh at people who present anything with *a* user
 base as something *essential* to an *entire* class of users, unless it
 obviously is and thus dropping it would horribly break Ubuntu's
 functionality or drastically alter the user experience for the entire
 install base (i.e. libc-dev for C programmers, OpenOffice.org-Writer
 or Firefox getting dropped, etc).  Something only used by a subset of
 a subset of the userbase isn't required for that whole subset to
 function, just the further subset thereof.

 Again, case in point, if Ubuntu drops Maven and suddenly every Java
 application fails to build on the BS, then Maven is required for
 Java programming.

 I can't weigh in on the discussion about removing Maven, but I don't
 think it's appropriate to attack Alvin for stating his support of
 Maven in Ubuntu.

 :-Dustin



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Apache Maven to be removed from Karmic?

2009-10-15 Thread Derek Broughton
John Moser wrote:

 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Alvin Thompson
 al...@thompsonlogic.com wrote:
 First, as a Java developer I hope this doesn't happen as Maven is pretty
 much required for Java development (at least in the U.S.).
 
 I laughed.
 
 Your pet project is NOT pretty much required for X in any global
 scope.  I've hardly seen any Java shops, and the ones I did... well
 I've never seen Maven.  Most of the bigger shops are moving to the
 next buzzword anyway:  .NET (why the hell do people do this?)

I beg to differ.  I despise maven, but have been unable to avoid using it.  
It _is_ pretty much required for any significant J2EE development.

And no, they're not all moving to .net.
-- 
derek


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss