Re: [Informal Vote] please express your opinion on using Nexus and Hudson: see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1717
Yes, it really sounds nice to me too (so +1 again). Tommaso 2010/4/6 Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com Marshall Schor wrote: Here's my vision of automation (achieved over time :-) ), and why CI could be important - it is building the potential releases from source checkout. We have CI going on Hudson; we decide at some point that things merit a release; so we push some button on the CI or Nexus interface and get a particular snapshot release tagged, checked out and built as a candidate. We do some additional integration testing, and then vote on the thing in the nexus repo, where it look like a release but is in some held state. After the vote succeeds, we log onto the Nexus web interface and push another button, and the release happens. +1 sounds nice Jörn
Re: [Informal Vote] please express your opinion on using Nexus and Hudson: see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1717
Marshall Schor wrote: Here's my vision of automation (achieved over time :-) ), and why CI could be important - it is building the potential releases from source checkout. We have CI going on Hudson; we decide at some point that things merit a release; so we push some button on the CI or Nexus interface and get a particular snapshot release tagged, checked out and built as a candidate. We do some additional integration testing, and then vote on the thing in the nexus repo, where it look like a release but is in some held state. After the vote succeeds, we log onto the Nexus web interface and push another button, and the release happens. +1 sounds nice Jörn
Re: [Informal Vote] please express your opinion on using Nexus and Hudson: see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1717
Here's my vision of automation (achieved over time :-) ), and why CI could be important - it is building the potential releases from source checkout. We have CI going on Hudson; we decide at some point that things merit a release; so we push some button on the CI or Nexus interface and get a particular snapshot release tagged, checked out and built as a candidate. We do some additional integration testing, and then vote on the thing in the nexus repo, where it look like a release but is in some held state. After the vote succeeds, we log onto the Nexus web interface and push another button, and the release happens. -Marshall On 3/28/2010 12:36 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: I'm +1 for doing this, and offer to do some/most of the legwork to get this to happen. Other opinions? From a development point of view Hudson can help us to make sure that our build is never broken, and if so notice us, but usually our build always works. Not sure if it is worth the effort to get one build broken notification per year. The only other advantage I see is that it can automatically publish snapshot builds, but when this is the motivation to get CI on Hudson we maybe should start to release more frequently. Jörn
Re: [Informal Vote] please express your opinion on using Nexus and Hudson: see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1717
On 3/28/2010 12:36 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: I'm +1 for doing this, and offer to do some/most of the legwork to get this to happen. Other opinions? From a development point of view Hudson can help us to make sure that our build is never broken, and if so notice us, but usually our build always works. Not sure if it is worth the effort to get one build broken notification per year. The only other advantage I see is that it can automatically publish snapshot builds, but when this is the motivation to get CI on Hudson we maybe should start to release more frequently. I'm in favor of streamlining our build process to release more frequently :-). -Marshall Jörn
Re: [Informal Vote] please express your opinion on using Nexus and Hudson: see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1717
2010/3/27 Marshall Schor m...@schor.com I'm +1 for doing this, and offer to do some/most of the legwork to get this to happen. Other opinions? I'm +1 too. Tommaso
Re: [Informal Vote] please express your opinion on using Nexus and Hudson: see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1717
Marshall Schor wrote: I'm +1 for doing this, and offer to do some/most of the legwork to get this to happen. Other opinions? From a development point of view Hudson can help us to make sure that our build is never broken, and if so notice us, but usually our build always works. Not sure if it is worth the effort to get one build broken notification per year. The only other advantage I see is that it can automatically publish snapshot builds, but when this is the motivation to get CI on Hudson we maybe should start to release more frequently. Jörn
