Devanagari on MacOS 9.2 and IE 5.1
I spoke to fast. Upon taking a closer look at the file, the font was not set properly. MacOS 9.2, Indian Language Kit, Mac IE 5.1 and Devanagari MT as font face seem to display UTF-8 encoded Hindi just fine. Etienne Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:24:16 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Devanagari On this subject, Win2K and IE5+ seem to do a nice job displaying UTF8-encoded Hindi. On the Mac, the Indian Language Kit provides for OS support and fonts (with MacOS 9.2 and above), but I have not been able to display Hindi (UTF8 encoded) with Mac's IE 5.1. Am I correct in assuming that the Mac version of IE does not support Hindi without a hack? Etienne Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christopher J Fynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: Aman Chawla [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: DevanagariDate: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:59:38 +0600 Aman Here in Bhutan the Internet connection is still much worse than in most places I've visited in India Nepal (and the cost per minute is several times higher) - believe me even then UTF-8 (or UTF-16) encoded pages do not display noticeably slower than ASCII, ISCII or 8-bit font encoded pages - and I don't need to download any special plug-ins or fonts. - Chris -- Christopher J Fynn Thimphu, Bhutan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aman Chawla Sent: 21 January 2002 10:57 To: James Kass; Unicode Subject: Re: Devanagari - Original Message - From: James Kass [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Aman Chawla [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Unicode [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:46 AM Subject: Re: Devanagari 25% may not be 300%, but it isn't insignificant. As you note, if the mark-up were removed from both of those files, the percentage of increase would be slightly higher. But, as connection speeds continue to improve, these differences are becoming almost minuscule. With regards to South Asia, where the most widely used modems are approx. 14 kbps, maybe some 36 kbps and rarely 56 kbps, where broadband/DSL is mostly unheard of, efficiency in data transmission is of paramount importance... how can we convince the south asian user to create websites in an encoding that would make his client's 14 kbps modem as effective (rather, ineffective) as a 4.6 kbps modem? Hot After Christmas DEALS on just about everything! http://www.smartshop.com/cgi-bin/main.cgi?ssa=4099 Hot After Christmas DEALS on just about everything! http://www.smartshop.com/cgi-bin/main.cgi?ssa=4099
Re: Devanagari on MacOS 9.2 and IE 5.1
It should be fine also on Netscape 6.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> I spoke to fast. Upon taking a closer look at the file, the font was not set properly. MacOS 9.2, Indian Language Kit, Mac IE 5.1 and Devanagari MT as font face seem to display UTF-8 encoded Hindi just fine.Etienne Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:24:16 -0800"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]RE: DevanagariOn this subject, Win2K and IE5+ seem to do a nice job displaying UTF8-encoded Hindi. On the Mac, the Indian Language Kit provides for OS support and fonts (with MacOS 9.2 and above), but I have not been able to display Hindi (UTF8 encoded) with Mac's IE 5.1. Am I correct in assuming that the Mac version of IE does not support Hindi without a hack?Etienne Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"Christopher J Fynn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: "Aman Chawla" [EMAIL PROTECTED]RE: DevanagariDate: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:59:38 +0600AmanHere in Bhutan the Internet connection is still much worse than in mostplaces I've visited in India Nepal (and the cost per minute is severaltimes higher) - believe me even then UTF-8 (or UTF-16) encoded pages do notdisplay noticeably slower than ASCII, ISCII or 8-bit font encoded pages -and I don't need to download any special plug-ins or fonts.- Chris--Christopher J FynnThimphu, Bhuta n[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]OnBehalf Of Aman ChawlaSent: 21 January 2002 10:57To: James Kass; UnicodeSubject: Re: Devanagari- Original Message -From: "James Kass" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "Aman Chawla" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Unicode"[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:46 AMSubject: Re: Devanagari 25% may not be 300%, but it isn't insignificant. As you note, if themark-up were removed from both of those files, the percentage ofincrease would be slightly higher. But, as connection speeds continueto improve, these differences are becoming almost minuscule. With regards to South Asia, where the most widely used modems areapprox. 14kbps, maybe some 36 kbps and rarely 56 kbps, where broadband/DSL is mostlyunheard of, efficiency in data transmission is of paramount importance...how can we convince the south asian user to create websites in an encodingthat would make his client's 14 kbps modem as effective (rather,ineffective) as a 4.6 kbps modem? Hot After Christmas DEALS on just about everything!http://www.smartshop.com/cgi-bin/main.cgi?ssa=4099 Hot After Christmas DEALS on just about everything!http://www.smartshop.com/cgi-bin/main.cgi?ssa=4099
