Re: [uportal-dev] Switching to SLF4j logback for 4.1
Should we start switching our portlets over as well? On Aug 12, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Eric Dalquist eric.dalqu...@doit.wisc.edu wrote: I'd like to switch from commons-logging + log4j to slf4j + logback in 4.1. SLF4j has bridge APIs so no code needs to change just our pom and logging config. Logback is easier to configure and includes a java.util.logging bridge which is handy for a few libraries we use. I have the work done in a branch here: https://github.com/Jasig/uPortal/compare/master...UP-3531_logback I'll plan on merging that into 4.1 next week unless there are any objections. -Eric -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
Re: [uportal-dev] Switching to SLF4j logback for 4.1
I'd be all for that, there is no interdependency but consistent logging configuration is always nice. If you keep poking me I'll writeup a little how to switch page since there are a few helpful tricks to make sure commons-logging and log4j stay out of the project. -Eric On 08/13/2012 11:53 AM, Jen Bourey wrote: Should we start switching our portlets over as well? On Aug 12, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Eric Dalquist eric.dalqu...@doit.wisc.edu wrote: I'd like to switch from commons-logging + log4j to slf4j + logback in 4.1. SLF4j has bridge APIs so no code needs to change just our pom and logging config. Logback is easier to configure and includes a java.util.logging bridge which is handy for a few libraries we use. I have the work done in a branch here: https://github.com/Jasig/uPortal/compare/master...UP-3531_logback I'll plan on merging that into 4.1 next week unless there are any objections. -Eric smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
