Re: Multiplexed connections in commons pool

2014-06-19 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/19/14, 2:36 PM, James Leskovar wrote:
 Hi Phil,

 Thanks for the reply. I'll try my hand first at the PairConn,Int approach, 
 and if it looks workable I can open up a Jira issue.

Great!  Feel free to ask questions if things don't fall into place
easily. 

Phil

 Cheers,
 James


 -Original Message-
 From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2014 12:24 PM
 To: Commons Users List
 Subject: Re: Multiplexed connections in commons pool

 On 6/18/14, 4:07 PM, James Leskovar wrote:
 Hi there,

  

 I have an application that needs to perform connection pooling, with 
 the proviso that it's okay - and actually preferable - for more than 
 one client to checkout and use the same connection object from the 
 pool. Ideally, I would also like to limit the number of concurrent 
 clients that are using a single connection object. I'm wondering what 
 the best way to do this is. As a quick and dirty option, I suppose I 
 could basically have my PooledObjectFactory return the same objects 
 from makeObject(), and manually keep track of objects from inside my 
 implementation.
 Thoughts?

 This is an interesting use case that unfortunately is that easy to support in 
 [pool].  If you are interested in helping design and implement direct 
 support, please feel free to hop over to the dev list and open a JIRA.

 Your idea of just having the factory return identical instances won't work 
 because when clients return them, they will get exceptions because repeated 
 returns of the same object violates the
 pool contract.   You can make that approach work though by having
 your factory source Foo, int pairs where Foo is what you want to pool.  
 Just make sure the FooInt instances are distinguishable by equals.  
 Unfortunately, your factory will have to maintain counters, which it can do 
 via the lifecycle methods and probably a hashmap keyed on the actual Foo 
 instances with rep counts as values.

 Phil
  

 Cheers,

 *James Leskovar*
 Software Engineer, Location Platforms

 TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.

 [ *Address* : TCS, iC Enterprise 1, Innovation Campus, Squires Way, 
 Nth Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia ] [ *Tel* : +61 2 4221 2940 ] [ 
 *Fax* : +61 2 4221 2901 ] [ *Email* : james.lesko...@telecomsys.com 
 mailto:james.lesko...@telecomsys.com ]

 TCS http://www.telecomsys.com/default.aspxFacebook
 https://www.facebook.com/pages/TCS/340389379402958Twitter
 https://twitter.com/TeleComSysLinkedIn
 http://www.linkedin.com/company/telecommunication-systems

  

 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may 
 be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended 
 recipient, or responsible for delivering this message to the intended 
 recipient, any review, forwarding, dissemination, distribution or 
 copying of this communication or any attachment(s) is strictly 
 prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify 
 the sender immediately, and delete it and all attachments from your 
 computer and network.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org



Multiplexed connections in commons pool

2014-06-18 Thread James Leskovar
Hi there,

I have an application that needs to perform connection pooling, with the 
proviso that it's okay - and actually preferable - for more than one client to 
checkout and use the same connection object from the pool. Ideally, I would 
also like to limit the number of concurrent clients that are using a single 
connection object. I'm wondering what the best way to do this is. As a quick 
and dirty option, I suppose I could basically have my PooledObjectFactory 
return the same objects from makeObject(), and manually keep track of objects 
from inside my implementation. Thoughts?

Cheers,
James Leskovar
Software Engineer, Location Platforms
TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.

[ Address : TCS, iC Enterprise 1, Innovation Campus, Squires Way, Nth 
Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia ]
[ Tel : +61 2 4221 2940 ] [ Fax : +61 2 4221 2901 ]
[ Email : james.lesko...@telecomsys.commailto:james.lesko...@telecomsys.com ]
[TCS]http://www.telecomsys.com/default.aspx[Facebook]https://www.facebook.com/pages/TCS/340389379402958[Twitter]https://twitter.com/TeleComSys[LinkedIn]http://www.linkedin.com/company/telecommunication-systems


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may be 
privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or 
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, 
forwarding, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or any 
attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete it and all attachments 
from your computer and network.