Re: Shale vs JBoss Seam
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-05-2006/jw-0515-jsf.html Niall On 9/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Shale Group, Could some body explain me the difference between the Shale JBOSS Seam framework. if both are not trying to solve the same problem, is thare anyway we could use both for same project? Regards, Mohan
[OT] Shale and Cat incompatibility [was Re: stack traces from shale-clay-usecases]
On 2/3/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ignore the previous empty response -- that's what you get when you pet a cat who is pawing your mouse at that moment :-). LOL - my cat sometimes walks accross my keyboard, fortunately no strange messages have resulted to date, but its going to happen one day! Niall Craig
Re: Shale Tiger Extensions with Tomcat 5.5.23
On 6/26/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i think that particular tomcat has issues with reading listeners That was definitely the case in earlier 5.5 versions ... it's disappointing if they still haven't fixed it. Theres an on going vote on Tomcat 5.5.24 - might be worth seeing if its resolve in that version: http://tinyurl.com/23f4ku Niall Craig On 6/26/07, Vivian Steller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm trying to run Shale Tiger extensions with tomcat 5.5.23 using java 5 sdk. however it does not work, tomcat does not recognize my pojos annotated as shale beans. using tomcat 6.0.13 it all works fine. Thus I think my setup is right (I have faces-config in WEB-INF, and the shale-tiger-1.0.4.jar in WEB-INF/lib as well as the shale- core and shale-view libs). Any known issues with tomcat 5.5.23? btw. I want to use servlet 2.4., jsp 2.0 as they are bundled with tomcat 5.5. this should not be a problem or? Thanks for any comments. With best regards, Vivian -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: Shale Roadmap
On Feb 6, 2008 7:21 PM, linux.eavilesa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I've been tracking user and development mailing lists during some time, and I think that people is getting (including me) a little bit nervous about Shale project. and rightly so - the trends are stark: Overall: http://shale.markmail.org/search/?q= Dev: http://tinyurl.com/2d3e92 Commits: http://tinyurl.com/2synvm Unless those trends start to reverse, the only glimmer of hope on the horizon is/was the proposal to move the code to MyFaces. Niall I think that the main reason why is the fact that there is not a well defined road map now for the project and many of as have bitten to use Shale in front of other frameworks. First of all decide if Shale has a future (that I think that it does) and redefine or reinforce the project goal. So in my opinion we should focus on defining or determining three key concepts: · Define the project team organization, mainly the project leader and the development team. · Determine the release of the stable version (date and who will lead it) · Analyze each module and decide which must eliminated and which is worth keeping alive You will say Thanks for your time. Esteve
