Re: Prefix error?

2002-04-07 Thread itojun

>>  we have decided so in address architecture document (at least under
>>  2000::/3 space), fixed boundary gives us ease of management.
>>  or do you really plan to connect more than 2^64 devices on a single
>>  subnet?
>More?  Not likely.  Less, quite possibly.  But coding that boundary into
>software that strictly enforces it is inflexible.

it is implementer's choice.  with some of non-Solaris systems you can
set prefix length to anything you want (but they do not make sense from
RFC2373 POV).  I guess Solaris developer have decided to hardcode it
to reduce the amount of support calls.

itojun
-
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



rtsol

2002-04-07 Thread Kristof Verhenne

Does there exist a command like rtsol on fbsd on windows xp or on linux?

-- 
Kristof Verhenne | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lugwv.be | http://www.bsdaemon.be
Running FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE
Man: 'mind if I smoke?' Steve: 'Mind if I fart...?'


-
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: what about 2002::/16 reverse DNS?

2002-04-07 Thread Aaron Angel

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:12:16AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >% Some Unix/g?libc or other resolvers only queries PTR for
> >% reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.int
> >% others (more newer ones) only for
> >% reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.arpa
> 
>   another way is to query:
>   reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.arpa
>   and then if there's no record:
>   reverses-dotted-nibbles.ip6.int
> 

Except that ip6.arpa has a completely difference format for entries...

-- 
Stop Policeware.  Visit www.stoppoliceware.org for more information.



msg00947/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature