RE: dlr-mask example
Peng, I also get these errors sometimes: 2003-03-04 11:02:48 [7] DEBUG: EMI2[VodMT055]: emi2 sending packet: 01/00274/O/51/0031650698222/02035/3//547970697363682076 726F7577656C696A6B3A20776161726F6D202246616B656E222076726F7577656E206565 6E206F726761736D653F204F6D646174207A652064656E6B656E2064617420686574206F 6E732069657473206B616E20736368656C656E2E2E2E/C8 2003-03-04 11:02:48 [7] DEBUG: Adding DLR smsc=VodMT055, ts=VodMT055-1, src=02035, dst=0031650698222, mask=24 2003-03-04 11:02:48 [7] DEBUG: EMI2[VodMT055]: Got packet from the main socket 2003-03-04 11:02:48 [7] DEBUG: EMI2[VodMT055]: emi2 parsing packet: 01/00046/R/51/A//0031650698222:040303110211/C3 2003-03-04 11:02:48 [7] DEBUG: Looking for DLR smsc=VodMT055, ts=VodMT055-1, dst=0031650698222, type=8 2003-03-04 11:02:48 [7] DEBUG: created DLR message for URL http://172.16.0.130/mmx-httpgw/KannelReportGateway?messageid=1046727238 075status=%dtimestamp=%treasoncode=%Asmsc_id=%i 2003-03-04 11:02:48 [7] PANIC: gwlib/octstr.c:2140: seems_valid_real: Assertion `ostr-data[ostr-len] == '\0'' failed. (Called from gwlib/octstr.c:292:octstr_duplicate_real.) Do you know what this means? Regards, Edwin Poot -Original Message- From: Kwok Peng Tuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:07 AM To: Edwin R. Poot Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dlr-mask example What is the error you are getting ? Edwin R. Poot wrote: Peng, If I use the 31 value, I get an error with Kannel. But just adding the values, is not a bitmask, isn't it? Have you used the value 31 in the dlr-mask element without problems? Regards, Edwin -Original Message- From: Kwok Peng Tuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:55 AM To: Edwin R. Poot Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dlr-mask example If you read chapter 9 you'll see that it says for multiple report types, you simply add the values together (togeter in the manual, seems to be a spelling error) . Edwin R. Poot wrote: Hello Peng, Is the value 31 the sum of 1. delivered to phone 2. Non-delivered to phone 4. Queued on SMSc 8. Delivered on SMSc 16. Non-delivered on SMSc But the value 31 is not a bitmask, isn't it? Shouldn't it be 37, (octet value/binary value)? Regards, Edwin Poot -Original Message- From: Peng Tuck Kwok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 1:35 AM To: Edwin R. Poot Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dlr-mask example If you look in chapter 9 of the docs it's actually explained to you how you can get the various combinations. The value you are after is actually 31 which is all the values added together. Edwin R. Poot wrote: Does someone have an example of all types of statusreports, such as delivered on SMS-c, etc that I could use within the dlr-mask tag of the XML to be posted to Kannel for a submitmessage? According to the documentation the value should be a bitmask value. In the kannel.log I see a message that the dlr mask is ignored. Thanks in advance... Regards, Edwin Poot
RE: dlr-mask example
Hello Peng, Is the value 31 the sum of 1. delivered to phone 2. Non-delivered to phone 4. Queued on SMSc 8. Delivered on SMSc 16. Non-delivered on SMSc But the value 31 is not a bitmask, isn't it? Shouldn't it be 37, (octet value/binary value)? Regards, Edwin Poot -Original Message- From: Peng Tuck Kwok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 1:35 AM To: Edwin R. Poot Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dlr-mask example If you look in chapter 9 of the docs it's actually explained to you how you can get the various combinations. The value you are after is actually 31 which is all the values added together. Edwin R. Poot wrote: Does someone have an example of all types of statusreports, such as delivered on SMS-c, etc that I could use within the dlr-mask tag of the XML to be posted to Kannel for a submitmessage? According to the documentation the value should be a bitmask value. In the kannel.log I see a message that the dlr mask is ignored. Thanks in advance... Regards, Edwin Poot
RE: dlr-mask example
Hello Peng, This is the error I get: 2003-02-28 14:40:19 [7] DEBUG: EMI2[VodMOMT]: emi2 sending packet: 01/00364/O/51/0652332353///1//7/3//4A65206C6F746E722069 7320424830353637303020696E207370656C6E72203420766F6F72206465207472656B6B 696E67206F702032382D322D3230303320656E206465206578747261207765656B747265 6B6B696E67206F7020332D332D323030332E204C656573206465207370656C726567656C 73206F7020772E736576656E732E6E6C2E205665656C2067656C756B21// ///4F 2003-02-28 14:40:20 [7] DEBUG: EMI2[VodMOMT]: Got packet from the main socket 2003-02-28 14:40:20 [7] DEBUG: EMI2[VodMOMT]: emi2 parsing packet: 01/00043/R/51/A//0652332353:280203142826/3A 2003-02-28 14:40:20 [7] DEBUG: Adding DLR smsc=VodMOMT, ts=280203142826, src=, dst=0652332353, mask=37 2003-02-28 14:40:20 [7] DEBUG: EMI2[VodMOMT]: Got packet from the main socket 2003-02-28 14:40:20 [7] DEBUG: EMI2[VodMOMT]: emi2 parsing packet: 03/00095/O/53//0031652332353/280203142826/1/001/2802031 42826/3///14 2003-02-28 14:40:20 [7] DEBUG: Looking for DLR smsc=VodMOMT, ts=280203142826, dst=0031652332353, type=4 2003-02-28 14:40:20 [7] DEBUG: created DLR message for URL http://172.16.0.130:13010/mmx-httpgw/KannelReportGateway 2003-02-28 14:40:20 [7] INFO: dlr not destroyed, still waiting for other delivery report 2003-02-28 14:40:20 [7] PANIC: gwlib/octstr.c:2119: seems_valid_real: Assertion `ostr != NULL' failed. (Called from gwlib/octstr.c:413:octstr_hex_to_binary.) Hope you can help me, our application relies on the DLR for billing purposes. Kind regards, Edwin Poot -Original Message- From: Kwok Peng Tuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:07 AM To: Edwin R. Poot Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dlr-mask example What is the error you are getting ? Edwin R. Poot wrote: Peng, If I use the 31 value, I get an error with Kannel. But just adding the values, is not a bitmask, isn't it? Have you used the value 31 in the dlr-mask element without problems? Regards, Edwin -Original Message- From: Kwok Peng Tuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:55 AM To: Edwin R. Poot Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dlr-mask example If you read chapter 9 you'll see that it says for multiple report types, you simply add the values together (togeter in the manual, seems to be a spelling error) . Edwin R. Poot wrote: Hello Peng, Is the value 31 the sum of 1. delivered to phone 2. Non-delivered to phone 4. Queued on SMSc 8. Delivered on SMSc 16. Non-delivered on SMSc But the value 31 is not a bitmask, isn't it? Shouldn't it be 37, (octet value/binary value)? Regards, Edwin Poot -Original Message- From: Peng Tuck Kwok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 1:35 AM To: Edwin R. Poot Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dlr-mask example If you look in chapter 9 of the docs it's actually explained to you how you can get the various combinations. The value you are after is actually 31 which is all the values added together. Edwin R. Poot wrote: Does someone have an example of all types of statusreports, such as delivered on SMS-c, etc that I could use within the dlr-mask tag of the XML to be posted to Kannel for a submitmessage? According to the documentation the value should be a bitmask value. In the kannel.log I see a message that the dlr mask is ignored. Thanks in advance... Regards, Edwin Poot
dlr-mask example
Does someone have an example of all types of statusreports, such as delivered on SMS-c, etc that I could use within the dlr-mask tag of the XML to be posted to Kannel for a submitmessage? According to the documentation the value should be a bitmask value. In the kannel.log I see a message that the dlr mask is ignored. Thanks in advance... Regards, Edwin Poot
RE: SMPP and (reverse) billing?
Hi Bas, You say you found some information regarding billing parameters and support for UCP. Can you tell me where you found that information? Thanks in advance, Edwin Poot -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bas A. Schulte Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SMPP and (reverse) billing? Hi, I'm doing some research on using SMPP and I can't seem to find anything regarding adding billing parameters to a submit_sm request. I noticed there is some support for this in UCP but not SMPP. Does anyone know how this is handled in practice? Are other fields in the submit_sm request abused to transport billing parameters? If this is the case, I expect this to be very non-standard and would be problematic to add to Kannel in a generic way! Thanks for any info. Bas.
