Re: [389-users] Windows sync stopped working
Just figured it out. I had written a script that finds people with the same username (which is uniformly how we've done it) in both active directory and 389ds. If they had the same username in both (I manually verified these were correct matches) I added the ntUser class and set their username in 389ds. I didn't have a prob on the initial init because I hadn't run my script yet and only had a couple i added by hand. I then ran my script which ended up pulling in people that were deleted in the AD side but on a blind search they show up from the deleted user's OU (or something like that). Once I figured that out I also found a couple of people that were active accounts but were not in the subtree I had setup the windows sync for which also caused the problem. So I wrote a new script to remove the ntUser objectClass for people not in the substree I was planning on syncing and did a new initialization of the consumer and it worked. On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: Aaron Hagopian wrote: I had everything setup to sync to my domain controller and things were working fine. Recently I saw this message in the logs: [30/Apr/2010:11:59:10 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt=cn=toto.hra.local (10:636): windows_replay_update: Cannot replay add operation. So I thought maybe I would try to remove the agreement and re-add it and re-initalize. After doing this now I get this message again along with the every 5 seconds. [30/Apr/2010:12:01:31 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt=cn=toto.hra.local (10:636): Replica has no update vector. It has never been initialized. This happens sometimes. Not sure why, but sometimes you have to re-init a few times before it actually starts working. This is on 389-ds 1.2.5 running on x86_64 RHEL 5.4 I think this all started when I added an ipHost entry to an OU that should not even be looked at for syncing purposes. Does it have any user/person related or group related object classes? Any ideas on how to clear this up so I can sync with windows again? I'm not using the create new users or groups, just trying to sync passwords. -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Re: Fedora 13 install problem
I am trying to install only fedora on a new Dell precision T1500. No duel boot or anything. I think the issue is that it is too new to be included in the general support. The live Fedora 12 just dies with a black screen, The DVD Fedora 13 goes into a install error, sleeping forever message. The live Fedora 13 boots with a warning on the panel about a kernel crash. The save to HD fails most of the time and the network is down until tg3 is rmmod, broadcom and tg3 are modprobed. Normally my installs are nice and boring. I hope this is just a new system not fully understood by the Linux community. Frank -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Re: Fedora 13 install problem
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 06:26 -0400, Wm_Frank Pont jr wrote: I am trying to install only fedora on a new Dell precision T1500. No duel boot or anything. I think the issue is that it is too new to be included in the general support. The live Fedora 12 just dies with a black screen, The DVD Fedora 13 goes into a install error, sleeping forever message. The live Fedora 13 boots with a warning on the panel about a kernel crash. The save to HD fails most of the time and the network is down until tg3 is rmmod, broadcom and tg3 are modprobed. Normally my installs are nice and boring. I hope this is just a new system not fully understood by the Linux community. Frank Has the hardware been tested with the OS that came with it? Could just be faulty hardware. Like that's never happened out of the box before. ;-) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Re: Fedora 13 install problem
Fedora 13 Beta was in my first post. Fedora 12 would not install. Thinks for the advice. Frank Since Fedora 13 won't be released for almost three weeks, this must be either the Beta or a nightly compose. You may want to try the Test Compose that was just issued, which is a candidate we test against our release criteria for final release: -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: OOo 3.2 for F12?
On Friday 30 April 2010 04:54 AM, Kirk Lowery wrote: On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Suvayu Alifatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday 29 April 2010 12:03 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: I would spend a few minutes downloading the F13 rpms and attempting some rpm --test -Uhv commands. Or just create a repo file for F13 and do, # yum --enablerepo Fedora-13 update openoffice.org\* That way yum handles the deps and the yumdb is consistent. :) Hmmm. If there aren't a lot of extra dependencies needed that also interferes with F12 libraries, etc., then this seems to be the simplest solution. I've done some googling around and it's not obvious: where can I get a F13 repo file? Or find out how to create one specifically for F13? You can look at the your current fedora or updates repo file and use them as your template. In the new file you create, replace $releasever with the appropriate string for Fedora 13. You can find this by browsing the directory structure of any of the fedora repos. You would need to create 2 repo files, one for the F13 beta release[1], another for F13 updates[2]. The directory for release will be simpler to figure out if you can wait until the release of F13. Another (simpler) way to do this would be to download the F13 release rpm, and do $ rpm2cpio /path/to/F13-release.rpm |cpio -ivV The repo files should be in there. :) Thanks! Kirk GL [1]http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/13-Beta/Fedora/ [2]http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/13/ -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: EVGA GTX 295 not working
On 27/04/2010 2:00 AM, Michael Miles wrote: On 04/26/2010 07:27 AM, suvayu ali wrote: On 26 April 2010 06:46, badmagicbadma...@foo-unix.org wrote: Hi all (figured out the problem), I've had trouble installing Fedora for the last few releases. I don't have it installed at the moment so I can't offer much help BUT as I'm certain my prob relates to my EVGA GTX 295 Co-Op Edition graphics card and these are quite common cards, I'm sure the fix is quite widely known. Everything installs/boots okay until I get to the bit where I need to log in. I get the GDM graphical login screen but the mouse and keyboard seem to stop working. If I change to terminal view (Ctrl Alt F2 for memory) I can still type DMESG shows problems with the graphics card - can't remember specifics. I tried changing the xorg.conf to settings I know worked under other distros/BSD/Solaris (using xorg) to no avail. Is this a known problem? Is there a fix? Is there some GRUB switch I can throw in there that'll work - I tried some to no avail. I am not sure but your card is probably not supported by the open source nouveau drivers. Have you tried using the proprietary drivers packaged by rpmfusion [http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia]? If not you could give that a shot. I would go about it like this, 1. Boot to runlevel 3 2. use yum to install rpmfusion free and non-free repo 3. now use yum to install the nvidia proprietary drivers 4. reboot My specs are as follows: ASUS P5Q Deluxe motherboard 4GB Kingston (compatible with mobo) RAM EVGA GTX 295 co-op edition graphics card Corsair HX 1000W (more than enough) Nice rig ;) That's about all GL Regards, Steve Laurie You must also blacklist nouveau in the grub config There is a complete write up in the above RPMFUSION HOWTO Hi all, Still no success on the graphics. I get the graphical screen come up with the word Fedora and 1 dot under the F (are the number of dots some kind of indication of progress? Not sure but I thoough it might be a clue). at this point, the mouse still works and the keyboard still has power but it's as though the keyboard doesn't work. Not even the caps lock, number lock etc. lights change when I press the associated buttons. Needless to say Ctrl-Alt-F2 doesn't work. I am still trying to do what has already been suggested but in the mean time, if someone could take a look at my dmesg (attached), I'd appreciate it. Also, while I was in runlevel 3, I created an xorg.conf.new file and have also attached that. Perhaps it can give some clues as to what's going on. Thanks, Steve Laurie Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Initializing cgroup subsys cpu Linux version 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.x86_64 (mockbu...@x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) (gcc version 4.4.2 20091027 (Red Hat 4.4.2-7) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Sat Nov 7 21:11:14 EST 2009 Command line: initrd=initrd0.img root=live:CDLABEL=Fedora-12-x86_64-Live-KDE rootfstype=auto ro liveimg quiet rhgb rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_MD noiswmd init 3 BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinuz0 KERNEL supported cpus: Intel GenuineIntel AMD AuthenticAMD Centaur CentaurHauls BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000e4000 - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0010 - bff7 (usable) BIOS-e820: bff7 - bff7e000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: bff7e000 - bffd (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: bffd - c000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: ffe0 - 0001 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0001 - 00014000 (usable) DMI present. AMI BIOS detected: BIOS may corrupt low RAM, working around it. e820 update range: - 0001 (usable) == (reserved) last_pfn = 0x14 max_arch_pfn = 0x4 MTRR default type: uncachable MTRR fixed ranges enabled: 0-9 write-back A-B uncachable C-D write-protect E-E write-through F-F write-protect MTRR variable ranges enabled: 0 base 0 mask F write-back 1 base 1 mask FC000 write-back 2 base 0C000 mask FC000 uncachable 3 disabled 4 disabled 5 disabled 6 disabled 7 disabled x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106 original variable MTRRs reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 4GB, type WB reg 1, base: 4GB, range: 1GB, type WB reg 2, base: 3GB, range: 1GB, type UC total RAM coverred: 4096M Found optimal setting for mtrr clean up gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 64K num_reg: 3 lose cover RAM: 0G New variable MTRRs reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 2GB, type WB reg 1, base: 2GB, range: 1GB, type WB reg 2, base: 4GB, range: 1GB, type WB x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106 e820 update range: c000
Re: EVGA GTX 295 not working
On 04/30/2010 06:17 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: On Friday 30 April 2010 05:49 AM, badmagic wrote: On 27/04/2010 2:00 AM, Michael Miles wrote: On 04/26/2010 07:27 AM, suvayu ali wrote: On 26 April 2010 06:46, badmagicbadma...@foo-unix.org wrote: Hi all (figured out the problem), I've had trouble installing Fedora for the last few releases. I don't have it installed at the moment so I can't offer much help BUT as I'm certain my prob relates to my EVGA GTX 295 Co-Op Edition graphics card and these are quite common cards, I'm sure the fix is quite widely known. Everything installs/boots okay until I get to the bit where I need to log in. I get the GDM graphical login screen but the mouse and keyboard seem to stop working. If I change to terminal view (Ctrl Alt F2 for memory) I can still type DMESG shows problems with the graphics card - can't remember specifics. I tried changing the xorg.conf to settings I know worked under other distros/BSD/Solaris (using xorg) to no avail. Is this a known problem? Is there a fix? Is there some GRUB switch I can throw in there that'll work - I tried some to no avail. I am not sure but your card is probably not supported by the open source nouveau drivers. Have you tried using the proprietary drivers packaged by rpmfusion [http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia]? If not you could give that a shot. I would go about it like this, 1. Boot to runlevel 3 2. use yum to install rpmfusion free and non-free repo 3. now use yum to install the nvidia proprietary drivers 4. reboot My specs are as follows: ASUS P5Q Deluxe motherboard 4GB Kingston (compatible with mobo) RAM EVGA GTX 295 co-op edition graphics card Corsair HX 1000W (more than enough) Nice rig ;) That's about all GL Regards, Steve Laurie You must also blacklist nouveau in the grub config There is a complete write up in the above RPMFUSION HOWTO Hi all, Still no success on the graphics. I get the graphical screen come up with the word Fedora and 1 dot under the F (are the number of dots some kind of indication of progress? Not sure but I thoough it might be a clue). at this point, the mouse still works and the keyboard still has power but it's as though the keyboard doesn't work. Not even the caps lock, number lock etc. lights change when I press the associated buttons. Needless to say Ctrl-Alt-F2 doesn't work. I am still trying to do what has already been suggested but in the mean time, if someone could take a look at my dmesg (attached), I'd appreciate it. I see that you are booting from the KDE LiveCD. So when you boot, it uses the nouveau driver. But wasn't that the problem in the first place? You can try a text install and then boot to runlevel 3 and edit grub.conf to include the blacklist nouveau option and install the rpmfusion repo and the proprietary NVidia drivers? A few things of note here, 1. If you need custom partitioning, you will have to boot with a LiveCD (with a supported graphics driver, so maybe an older version or use the mesa driver or maybe any text based livecd) and partition according to your needs) 2. Once you have everything up and running don't forget to make sure firstboot is run (if it doesn't run by itself) 3. I am assuming the LiveCD can install in text mode (my memory is hazy about this) Also, while I was in runlevel 3, I created an xorg.conf.new file and have also attached that. Perhaps it can give some clues as to what's going on. Thanks, Steve Laurie GL Is your motherboard bios the latest? If not then would be a good idea to flash with latest -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Nvidia - Problems with 3D acceleration
Hi all! I have some troubles with my 3D acceleration of my Nvidia Card GeForce GTS 250. My system is fedora 12 x86_64 (Kernel 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64) and I installed the Nvidia driver (driver version 195.36.15) like described in the fedoraforum.org via rpmfusion. Then I installed wine and started WoW. The game starts but I have massive graphical corruptions (so I cant see a thing on the display) and my screen flickers every few seconds. I tried to activate Compiz, but I have nearly the same problems like with WoW: My screen is flickering, my mouse is very slow and also if I try to move the terminal window, it is nearly impossible. So I started to search for the reason. I installed these nvidia packages: nvidia-settings-1.0-3.4.fc12.x86_64 akmod-nvidia-195.36.15-1.fc12.x86_64 nvidia-xconfig-1.0-2.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-195.36.15-1.fc12.i686 kmod-nvidia-2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64-195.36.15-1.fc12.2.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-195.36.15-1.fc12.x86_64 glxinfo | grep rendering says direct rendering: yes glxinfo OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation OpenGL renderer string: GeForce GTS 250/PCI/SSE2 OpenGL version string: 3.2.0 NVIDIA 195.36.15 OpenGL shading language version string: 1.50 NVIDIA via Cg compiler For me everything looks fine here. I know glxgears is not a benchmark, but I think I have really very low frames: 27 frames in 5.8 seconds = 22.000 FPS 132 frames in 5.0 seconds = 26.174 FPS 59 frames in 6.3 seconds = 9.335 FPS 106 frames in 6.2 seconds = 16.969 FPS 45 frames in 5.9 seconds = 7.665 FPS 45 frames in 5.4 seconds = 8.371 FPS 41 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8.120 FPS My xorg.conf is short: [r...@melanie X11]# cat xorg.conf # Xorg configuration created by livna-config-display Section Files ModulePath /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia ModulePath /usr/lib64/xorg/modules EndSection Section ServerFlags Option AIGLX on EndSection Section Device Identifier Videocard0 Driver nvidia Option AddARGBGLXVisuals True EndSection Section Extensions Option Composite Enable EndSection I have no idea what the reason is for the bad 3D acceleration. Do you have any suggestions for me? Thank you in advance. Best regards, Melanie -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
[389-users] Windows sync stopped working
I had everything setup to sync to my domain controller and things were working fine. Recently I saw this message in the logs: [30/Apr/2010:11:59:10 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt=cn=toto.hra.local (10:636): windows_replay_update: Cannot replay add operation. So I thought maybe I would try to remove the agreement and re-add it and re-initalize. After doing this now I get this message again along with the every 5 seconds. [30/Apr/2010:12:01:31 -0500] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt=cn=toto.hra.local (10:636): Replica has no update vector. It has never been initialized. This is on 389-ds 1.2.5 running on x86_64 RHEL 5.4 I think this all started when I added an ipHost entry to an OU that should not even be looked at for syncing purposes. Any ideas on how to clear this up so I can sync with windows again? I'm not using the create new users or groups, just trying to sync passwords. -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Re: Fedora 13 install problem
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 08:11 -0400, Wm_Frank Pont jr wrote: Fedora 13 Beta was in my first post. Fedora 12 would not install. Thinks for the advice. Probably you got a bad download. This happen to me before when I try try direct download, and I got a good download when using Torrent to download. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Preupgrade??
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.comwrote: Now Fedora by default installs a 500 MB /boot, which should be sufficient for the foreseeable future. (Admittedly in free software, things change rapidly so the horizon of foreseeable isn't as long as you might find in crustier realms.) ;-) I believe a /boot partition became necessary in F11 because (I adopted Fedora with the 11 version): Since Fedora uses LVM by default and GRUB doesn't support that either, in practice you will need to keep using the Ext3 filesystem for the /boot partition. This is the recommended setup and is how Anaconda sets it up by default. To prevent boot issues, Anaconda will not let you format a /boot partition with Ext4. (...) Note that Rawhide (and hence Fedora 12) will support Ext4 on the boot partition. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ext4_in_Fedora_11#Does_GRUB_support_Ext4.3F === Isn't it now possible to revert to not using a /boot partition and having the full / space for installation? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Preupgrade??
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/01/2010 02:28 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote: On === Isn't it now possible to revert to not using a /boot partition and having the full / space for installation? No. Because while the latest GRUB in Fedora supports Ext4, it does not support booting from LVM. My /boot partition is 290 MB. Since the default is now 500MB is it necessary that I resize? Will /swap be used if necessary? I have 2 GB of swap that have, I believe, never been used since I have 4 GB RAM. Maybe another formatting would have been preferable... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Sound Problems FC12
On 04/28/2010 05:48 PM, Jim wrote: On 04/28/2010 01:18 PM, Jim wrote: On 04/28/2010 12:59 PM, Jim wrote: Fc12-X86_64/KDE No sound at all. Pulseaudio volume is set to 100% , alsamixer is set to 80% and in System Settings Multimedia it shows Dummy for devices, no sound using test I have a Ensoniq ens-1371 and it has a driver snd-ens1371 the module is being loaded at boot time. See below. Where is the system-config-soundcard package for Fedora 12. Sound worked perfect in Fedora 11 , did upgrade to Fedora 12 and no sound. Module Size Used by lp 6794 0 sunrpc160138 1 p4_clockmod 3003 0 ip6t_REJECT 3394 2 nf_conntrack_ipv6 14859 2 ip6table_filter 2227 1 ip6_tables 9409 1 ip6table_filter ipv6 223810 38 ip6t_REJECT,nf_conntrack_ipv6 uinput 5244 0 snd_ens137116151 0 gameport7557 1 snd_ens1371 snd_rawmidi16314 1 snd_ens1371 snd_ac97_codec 89540 1 snd_ens1371 ac97_bus 902 1 snd_ac97_codec snd_seq42811 0 snd_seq_device 5031 2 snd_rawmidi,snd_seq snd_pcm60772 2 snd_ens1371,snd_ac97_codec snd_timer 15541 2 snd_seq,snd_pcm ppdev 6529 0 snd46576 7 snd_ens1371,snd_rawmidi,snd_ac97_codec,snd_seq,snd_seq_device,snd_pcm,snd_timer parport_pc 17509 1 soundcore 4863 1 snd dcdbas 6596 0 parport27256 3 lp,ppdev,parport_pc snd_page_alloc 6061 1 snd_pcm nvidia 9921635 38 tulip 37886 0 i2c_i8018337 0 i2c_core 21732 2 nvidia,i2c_i801 iTCO_wdt7850 0 iTCO_vendor_support 2023 1 iTCO_wdt dm_multipath 12324 0 floppy 45110 0 Big mistake on CPU. The box I'm having problems with is a 32 bit/i686 . My box is a X86_64. I found this in /var/log/messages rtkit-daemon[1596]: Sucessfully made thread 1946 of process 1946 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by '500' high priority at nice level -11. pulseaudio[1946]: pid.c: Daemon already running. rtkit-daemon[1596]: Sucessfully made thread 1952 of process 1952 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by '500' high priority at nice level -11. pulseaudio[1952]: pid.c: Daemon already running. gnome-keyring-daemon[1957]: couldn't set environment variable in session: The name org.gnome.SessionManager was not provided by any .service files pulseaudio[1593]: module.c: Module module-device-manager should be loaded once at most. Refusing to load. pulseaudio[1593]: module-x11-xsmp.c: module-x11-xsmp may no be loaded twice. pulseaudio[1593]: module.c: Failed to load module module-x11-xsmp (argument: display=:1006 session_manager=local/unix:@/tmp/.ICE-unix/1889,unix/unix:/tmp/.ICE-unix/1889): initialization failed. In the /var/log/messages it says that module-x11-xsmp is not loading. In /etc/pulse/default.pa it shows the paragraph; /etc/pulse/default.pa ### Register ourselves in the X11 session manager #load-module module-x11-xsmp It appears here that the module is not ment to be loaded. And here is the only place I can find about xsmp; locate xsmp /usr/lib/pulse-0.9.21/modules/module-x11-xsmp.so Why is this module interfering with my not getting any sound ?? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Ending in bin
I d/l adobe reader 9. the file comes with an ending of '.bin'. I get the feeling yum nor rpm will for. If I am incorrect, how do they work. If not, what make the file come apart. Thank you -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Ending in bin
I d/l adobe reader he file comes with an ending of '.bin'. I get the feeling yum nor rpm will not work. If I am incorrect, how do they work. If not, what make the file come apart. Thank you -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: internet access
terry wrote: Hello, When I start the next day, after shutting off the computer, I must turn oneth0each time after reboot or start up in AM. Could SE Linux be doing this or is it something else in some start up script? everything that I use works okay except for the aforementioned problem. The computer is hard wired to a Cisco wireless router then to a modem. Have you made sure that eth0 is set to start on boot? By I must turn on eth0 are you referring to ifup eth0 or something like service network start ? Can you provide the contents of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: internet access
On 04/30/2010 07:32 PM, terry wrote: Hello, When I start the next day, after shutting off the computer, I must turn oneth0each time after reboot or start up in AM. Could SE Linux be doing this or is it something else in some start up script? everything that I use works okay except for the aforementioned problem. The computer is hard wired to a Cisco wireless router then to a modem. Look at your boot logs (/var/log/dmesg) and see what's up with eth0. Its usually controlled by the network service (is it running?) or by NetworkManager. You need to determine *why* its not configured. Does it configure using DHCP? Is it configured properly? What does: chkconfig network --list say? If it is configured to start, what does: service network status say? What about NetworkManager? (same questions) -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@rcn.com cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: internet access
On 04/30/2010 07:32 PM, terry wrote: Hello, When I start the next day, after shutting off the computer, I must turn oneth0each time after reboot or start up in AM. Could SE Linux be doing this or is it something else in some start up script? everything that I use works okay except for the aforementioned problem. The computer is hard wired to a Cisco wireless router then to a modem. Hook it up direct to the modem and see if you get the same result. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Ending in bin
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 20:04 -0400, terry wrote: I d/l adobe reader he file comes with an ending of '.bin'. I get the feeling yum nor rpm will not work. If I am incorrect, how do they work. If not, what make the file come apart. You're downloading the wrong thing. The easiest solution is detailed here: http://blogs.adobe.com/acroread/2008/02/adobe_reader_now_available_via.html -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Sound Problems FC12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/30/2010 06:30 PM, Jim wrote: On 04/28/2010 05:48 PM, Jim wrote: On 04/28/2010 01:18 PM, Jim wrote: On 04/28/2010 12:59 PM, Jim wrote: Fc12-X86_64/KDE No sound at all. Pulseaudio volume is set to 100% , alsamixer is set to 80% and in System Settings Multimedia it shows Dummy for devices, no sound using test I have a Ensoniq ens-1371 and it has a driver snd-ens1371 the module is being loaded at boot time. See below. Where is the system-config-soundcard package for Fedora 12. I don't know where the system-config-soundcard package is either. Sound worked perfect in Fedora 11 , did upgrade to Fedora 12 and no sound. ... rtkit-daemon[1596]: Sucessfully made thread 1946 of process 1946 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by '500' high priority at nice level -11. pulseaudio[1946]: pid.c: Daemon already running. rtkit-daemon[1596]: Sucessfully made thread 1952 of process 1952 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by '500' high priority at nice level -11. pulseaudio[1952]: pid.c: Daemon already running. gnome-keyring-daemon[1957]: couldn't set environment variable in session: The name org.gnome.SessionManager was not provided by any .service files pulseaudio[1593]: module.c: Module module-device-manager should be loaded once at most. Refusing to load. pulseaudio[1593]: module-x11-xsmp.c: module-x11-xsmp may no be loaded twice. pulseaudio[1593]: module.c: Failed to load module module-x11-xsmp (argument: display=:1006 session_manager=local/unix:@/tmp/.ICE-unix/1889,unix/unix:/tmp/.ICE-unix/1889): initialization failed. In the /var/log/messages it says that module-x11-xsmp is not loading. In /etc/pulse/default.pa it shows the paragraph; /etc/pulse/default.pa ### Register ourselves in the X11 session manager #load-module module-x11-xsmp It appears here that the module is not ment to be loaded. And here is the only place I can find about xsmp; locate xsmp /usr/lib/pulse-0.9.21/modules/module-x11-xsmp.so Why is this module interfering with my not getting any sound ?? I don't know the answer to your questions. It sounds as if pulseaudio is already running when your session starts. You wouldn't, by any chance, be running pulse audio in system mode? Please see URL: http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/SystemWideInstance I am guessing you are not running pulse audio in system mode. I don't understand how pulse audio can already be running. Do you have something in your .bash_profile or .bashrc file, maybe? I found two pulse audio commands useful when I had sound problems: pavucontrol -- yum info pavucontrol and to a lesser extent, paman -- yum info paman Please install pavucontrol if you haven't already: yum install pavucontrol Please run pavucontrol -- it is GUI based (please note I use Gnome; I assume it works fine on KDE) You will see the following tabs: Playback Recording Output Devices Input Devices Configuration Please select the Output Devices tab. One possibility, and it is probably a long-shot, you may have multiple output devices. One output device might have good volume. The other might not. The output devices are selected by changing the Port: ... item. For me, I have Port: Analog Output and Port: Headphones The volume is always the same for both devices for me...but you might be changing the volume of one and not the other...I don't know. For grins, please install paman if you haven't already. yum install paman Please run paman -- it is GUI based It has the following tabs: Server Information Devices Clients Modules Sample Cache I am wondering if you can find module-x11-xsmp under Modules. I am curious to know what is listed in Clients, and, if something is listed under devices. I assume, under Server Information, it is not disconnected or anything. I have since found another pulse audio command. yum info padevchooser -- it is GUI based. If I am not mistaken, one can advertise one's sound devices over the network with pulse audio and one can select a pulse audio sound device on another host. I doubt if you have done this, but is interesting if it can be done. I better add a disclaimer. I don't know or understand the workings of pulse audio and alsa and sound devices very well. I looked at lots of stuff when I upgraded to Fedora 12 and my sound wasn't working. I got sound to work so I am happy. I can't remember what was wrong. It would be nice if someone who knows and understands pulse audio and alsa better would chime in with better advice than I can give. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvblngACgkQyc8Kn0p/AZS6ewCgpNvRHIqviP7ICXxctOCvE92p NFQAn2koSTkg5Vod2FPqnaZSiQEBkOzK =lI8x -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
Re: how would this work as a fedora laptop?
You know, if you go to Dell you can build a laptop that you *know* will be supported by Linux for about the same as an off-the-shelf laptop at TigerDirect. That's about what I was going to say, but I suggest starting at http://outlet.dell.com and one with 4GB of DD3, 500GB HDD, 17.3 900p LCD and an i3 CPU can likely be had for the same price as that acer... I would UNcheck the scratch dent selection and just look at the 'certified refurbished' and 'open-box/returns' (they call them 'previously ordered new') models. If you're patient (the selection changes daily, of course) you might find one there with 1080p LCD and a WiFi/WiMAXan combo card for slightly more. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
X-window to the remote Fedora system
Dear List, I want to establish an X-window session from my PC to a Fedora (FC 5) OS Linux system using X-Win32 program, but so far no luck. I can do that to a remote Redhat system and SGI computer, but don't know what I am doing wrong in the case of Fedora system. Any suggestion much appreciated. Cheers, Siavoush -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
How can SATA power management feature be controlled?
How can I control the automatic power management feature of my SATA disk drives? Right now the heads are unloading so frequently that within one year I will have exceeded the rated number of load/unload cycles for the drives. The drives are Western Digital model WD10EADS. I tried using hdparm -B 254 and hdparm -B 0, but neither works: # hdparm -B 254 /dev/sda /dev/sda: setting Advanced Power Management level to 0xfe (254) HDIO_DRIVE_CMD failed: Input/output error HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Input/output error # hdparm -B 0 /dev/sda /dev/sda: setting Advanced Power Management level to 0xfe (254) HDIO_DRIVE_CMD failed: Input/output error HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Input/output error My efforts to find anything useful with 'sdparm' have been fruitless. -- Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
