Re: Run SCO OpenServer in a VM?
On 10/23/2011 03:34 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Any hope that I could get KVM to provide usable serial ports to the VM using a modern card? I don't think KVM will run SCO. It wouldn't last time I tried. I have SCO running under VirtualBox and I have passed it serial ports from a PCI-Express card without a problem. SCO sees it as a dummy serial card. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:48, Abu Attar Musharih abuattar.musha...@gmail.com wrote: 4. if this last step shows you that connection is not happening, you can try looking at your router settings. there should be a way to port forward your ssh connections to port 22 of the machine you want to use as a server. The problem is, ssh does not work from another online laptop to to this machine. Neither does ping. Can you see entries corresponding to each login attempt in /var/log/secure? -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: More printer strangeness
On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 18:47 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote: Folks, I'm seeing more printer strangeness. I ran s-c-p and 3 printers show which I did not explicitly add. All three have a Device URI of file:///dev/null. If I delete them they go away momentarily and then all re-appear again. There is no way to actually print to them so why are they present? Sounds like there might be a CUPS system on the network which is advertising bad queues, or else the printer cache is upset. Try: cupsctl --no-remote-printers service cups stop rm -f /var/cache/cups/printers.cache service cups start Wait for a minute or two. Do the queues show now? How about after 'cupsctl --remote-printers'? Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:35 PM, suvayu ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote: Can you see entries corresponding to each login attempt in /var/log/secure? I tried INCOMING ssh several times and check file /var/log/secure No entries related to login attempt found. Now, it becomes even worse. Yesterday I could do OUTGOING ssh, but not anymore. The following site is inaccessible http://www.yougetsignal.com/tools/open-ports/ While using different provider, there is no problem. Regards, AA -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
On Monday 24 October 2011 12:15:03 Abu Attar Musharih wrote: I tried INCOMING ssh several times and check file /var/log/secure No entries related to login attempt found. Now, it becomes even worse. Yesterday I could do OUTGOING ssh, but not anymore. The following site is inaccessible http://www.yougetsignal.com/tools/open-ports/ While using different provider, there is no problem. I think that by now it is obvious that the problem is not with your machine, and that your ISP has closed down the ports. Your choices are probably the following: (1) Talk to your provider and ask them to open all ports to your IP. This is a reasonable request, since you have a public IP number, and should be able to use it however you like (provided that nobody complains about spam or attacks coming from your IP). Note, though, that the ISP may choose to charge you extra money for this. (2) Change the ISP for another that is more forthcoming. (3) Scan your IP from outside for any open ports, pick one and use it for ssh/openvpn/whatever, without discussing it with your ISP. This will work, but may not be considered legal by the ISP. Also, you might have a hard time choosing a port, if only a few of them are open, since you may need them all for their regular job (like ports 80/443 for the web, 25 for e-mail, etc.). YMMV. Best, :-) Marko -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: NFS issues
On 23 October 2011 23:11, Gerhard Magnus mag...@agora.rdrop.com wrote: I can ping (and ssh) the server from the client. When I restart nfs and nfslock on the server I get this in the server /var/log/messages: PuteF kernel: [25572.902466] NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state recovery directory PuteF kernel: [25572.902504] NFSD: starting 90-second grace period PuteF rpc.mountd[8699]: Version 1.2.4 starting But on the client, mount /home/magnusg/Music returns: mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting 192.168.1.14:/home/magnusg/Music --- Restating the problem from yesterday: On the server, running FC15 (192.168.1.14): (1) My /etc/exports file looks like this: /home/magnusg/Music 192.168.1.12,192.168.1.13(rw,insecure,sync,nohide) (2) Using the system-config-nfs General Options tab I have Allow connections from port 1024 and higher checked. (3) I have services nfs and nfslock running on levels 3,4,5. (4) In /etc/sysconfig/nfs I've set these ports: RQUOTAD_PORT=4000 LOCKD_TCPPORT=4001 LOCKD_UDPPORT=4001 MOUNTD_PORT=4002 STATD_PORT=4003 (5) In the firewall I have these ports open: NFSV4 2049 (tcp) 4000-4003 (tcp and udp) 111 (tcp and udp) on the client, running FC13 (192.168.1.13): (1) I added this to /etc/fstab: 192.168.1.14:/home/magnusg/Music /home/magnusg/Music nfs rw,auto,hard,intr,bg 0 0 (2) Services netfs, nfslock and rpcbind are running on levels 3,4,5. netfs or nfs? netfs is client rc script to mount fstabs network fs mounts (nfs, smb, ) nfs is rc script for nfs server. I'm not sure if F13 have nfsv4. try to set mountd_nfs_v3=yes in /etc/sysconfig/nfs file. what is return rpcinfo -p (nfs_server) from client comp? what is the status of selinux on server and client? try with: # setenforce 0 # service iptables stop on client and server and try to mount nfs share. When I boot the client and get to the Mounting NFS filesystems section I don't get error messages -- but I do see this: mount.nfs: backgrounding 192.168.1.14:/home/magnusg/Music : mount options hard,intr,bg,vers=4,addr=192.168.1.14,clientaddr=192.168.1.13 /home/magnusg/Music remains unmounted -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
Am 23.10.2011 11:09, schrieb Abu Attar Musharih: The customer service said that ssh is not allowed. So, what to do then? I badly need a server with global IP for experimenting grid computing [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/ssh/sshd_config Port 22 Port 10022 Protocol 2 .. if we are spaeking OUTGOING ssh from your home-network is not allowed by your ISP then search a new one because this is unacceptable signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
Am 23.10.2011 12:09, schrieb suvayu ali: Hi Abu Attar, On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:09, Abu Attar Musharih abuattar.musha...@gmail.com wrote: The customer service said that ssh is not allowed. So, what to do then? I badly need a server with global IP for experimenting grid computing. To be absolutely sure you can try the following. 1. confirm your global ip (e.g. here: http://checkip.dyndns.com) 2. check sshd is running at your end and is using port 22. you can try ssh-ing to another local user to check easily. 3. nc -z global.ip 22 (from a machine outside your local network) 4. if this last step shows you that connection is not happening, you can try looking at your router settings. there should be a way to port forward your ssh connections to port 22 of the machine you want to use as a server mh and hwo do you start nc if you can not connect to the machine and if you drive to the machine doing this manually what after internet is shortly down - driving all the time around? put sshd on port 10022 and all is well this has the additional benefit to get rid of the most idiots trying password-attacks all day long signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
Am 23.10.2011 12:20, schrieb suvayu ali: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:12, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: mh and hwo do you start nc if you can not connect to the machine and if you drive to the machine doing this manually what after internet is shortly down - driving all the time around? I didn't say that machine, I said a machine, as in any other machine not on the same local network. I am assuming if the OP wants to work with grid computing he has access to some other server/desktop/whatever which is connected to the internet. And he doesn't have to drive there, he can always use ssh. The OP never said ssh to some machine outside is not working, so its a fair assumption that he can. well, you can use 20 different machines to achieve a result or simply change a port so it is not blocked by the isp what do you think is smarter? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
Am 23.10.2011 12:58, schrieb suvayu ali: I am no expert, I just said what worked for me in the past. I ssh into many systems everyday so changing to non-standard ports is inconvenient where is there any single problem if you can read manuals? you have to specify the port only once per client and after that rsync, ssh, scp and sftp even in konqueror is using this port cat /etc/ssh/ssh_config Host* GSSAPIAuthentication no Compression yes CompressionLevel9 Protocol2 StrictHostKeyChecking ask Host yourhost.domain.tld Port10022 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
Am 23.10.2011 13:09, schrieb suvayu ali: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 13:04, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 23.10.2011 12:58, schrieb suvayu ali: I am no expert, I just said what worked for me in the past. I ssh into many systems everyday so changing to non-standard ports is inconvenient where is there any single problem if you can read manuals? you have to specify the port only once per client and after that rsync, ssh, scp and sftp even in konqueror is using this port Please read carefully. I ssh to *multiple* machines. The list of clients is hundreds, also I don't have the complete list. well i maintain 40 machines, all with non-standard-port and connecting multiple hundret times to omst of them each day /home/username/.ssh/id_rsa is needed on all clients or do you really allow password-login on standard-port and type the password all day long? so there is supported a file called config in the same folder I mostly have to login to a distributed computing resource where the physical node you is selected dynamically based on availability and load. So I don't have the complete list of IPs. ip-addresses are not interesting here failovers are working dns-based, so your hostname is the same the ssh-client config is hostname-based signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
On 10/23/2011 06:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 23.10.2011 12:58, schrieb suvayu ali: I am no expert, I just said what worked for me in the past. I ssh into many systems everyday so changing to non-standard ports is inconvenient where is there any single problem if you can read manuals? you have to specify the port only once per client and after that rsync, ssh, scp and sftp even in konqueror is using this port cat /etc/ssh/ssh_config Host* GSSAPIAuthentication no Compression yes CompressionLevel9 Protocol2 StrictHostKeyChecking ask Host yourhost.domain.tld Port10022 If the issue is with the ISP blocking 22, then leave SSHD on port 22 and simply map some external port on the WAN router (e.g., 10022) to 22 internally. It makes life a lot easier, because no matter how many machines you have on the internal network, you control it from a single point. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
Am 23.10.2011 14:10, schrieb suvayu ali:
I know about ~/.ssh/config and I use it. Logging in to the remote nodes
is not the issue in my case. I use kerberos to authenticate anyway. The
issue is when I want to access my machine from those remote nodes, I
have to copy the section relevant to my machine to the remote nodes.
if you have to maintain many hosts you should invest an hour
for a infrastructure and after that it does not matter if you
have 10, 100 or thousands of hosts where you need the same
file distributed
sorry, but you can tell me what you want - there is no single problem
maintaining thousands of machines with ssh on non-stadnard-port
and if the ISP of the OP is blocking incoming port 22 he has
no other solution - so what baout are we speaking here?
your nc will not work for him and your problem maintaining
multiple machines does not affect the whole world because
most does not have so many hosts and the others are knowing
about shell-scripts
___
[root@buildserver:~]$ cat /Volumes/dune/buildserver/server-list.txt
#!/bin/bash
RH_TARGET_SERVERS=()
RH_TARGET_SERVERS[1]=host1
RH_TARGET_SERVERS[2]=host2
RH_TARGET_SERVERS[3]=host3
RH_TARGET_SERVERS[4]=host4
RH_TARGET_SERVERS[5]=host5
RH_TARGET_SERVERS[6]=host6
[root@buildserver:~]$ cat /Volumes/dune/buildserver/distribute-file.sh
#!/bin/bash
source /Volumes/dune/buildserver/server-list.txt
function rh_push_file
{
echo $1
RSYNC_PARAMS='--ipv4 --compress --times --progress --force --links --perms
--owner --group'
/bin/nice /usr/bin/rsync $RSYNC_PARAMS --rsync-path='nice -n 19 rsync' $2
root@$1:$2
echo
}
if [ $2 == ]
then
echo /dev/null
else
echo Bitte Parameter in Quotes setzen
exit
fi
for item in ${RH_TARGET_SERVERS[*]}
do
rh_push_file $item $1
done
[root@buildserver:~]$ cat /Volumes/dune/buildserver/distribute-command.sh
#!/bin/bash
source /Volumes/dune/buildserver/server-list.txt
function rh_run_command
{
echo $1
ssh root@$1 $2
echo
}
if [ $2 == ]
then
echo /dev/null
else
echo Bitte Parameter in Quotes setzen
exit
fi
echo
for item in ${RH_TARGET_SERVERS[*]}
do
rh_run_command $item $1
done
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Apache2 problem - Ubuntu 11.10
Am 23.10.2011 14:19, schrieb Craig White: considering that this is Fedora Users List, your question seems quite out of place. that is true You might actually want to attach an strace to the PID of your running apache to see what is happening (ie, the error) but I would guess that you should probably remove/re-install apache2 on your Ubuntu server it would be the frist time taht reinstall a package on a system with a package-managment would change anything - this is not windows reinstall does never touch configurations and most mistakes leading to crahses are wrong configurations with third-party modules and these are also not touched be reinstall the main-package signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Creating partitions
Am 23.10.2011 16:57, schrieb Miguel Cardenas: For years I used to create 2 primary partitions, SWAP and EXT3, but now I found that Fedora requires a different layout with more partitions like other *nix operating systems that distribute the space in more areas for home, root, usr, etc. fedora REQUIRES nothing but a partition you can even use a single partition without seperate boot you can manually define a partition layout in anaconda /usr is SURELY not required and not recommended for several reasons and not part of teh default partition scheme - per default fedora would install LVM (a not so smart default) but it is not wise to have /home on the same partition as the system if you ever want to reinstall it and a small /boot is also wise because look back at times where / as ext4 was possible but not for /boot [root@ns2:~]$ df -hT Dateisystem Typ Size Used Avail Use% Eingehängt auf /dev/sdb1 ext46,0G 1,2G 4,8G 20% / /dev/sda1 ext4494M 20M 475M 4% /boot [root@ns2:~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) [root@buildserver64:~]$ df -hT | grep -v tmpf Dateisystem TypGröße Benut Verf Ben%% Eingehängt auf rootfs rootfs 15G 4,8G 10G 33% / /dev/sdb1 ext4 15G 4,8G 10G 33% / /dev/sda1 ext4190M 43M 148M 23% /boot [root@buildserver64:~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 15 (Lovelock) I still don't like the idea of an independent boot partition but let's do it in the Fedora way... /boot on a own partition doe snot hurt and offers more flexibility but it is not required so, I want to know if this layout may work for me... I want to ask before doing it to save hours of installation just to try and see the results... #1 PRIMARY type 0c (Win95 Fat32 LBA) #2 EXTENDED A - SWAP type 82 B - BOOT /boot type 83 (linux ext3) C - ROOT / type 83 (linux ext3) why will anybody use ext3 these days instead ext4? And one additional doubt... Fedora worked fine on this laptop but just bought a new one, it comes with Windows7 preinstalled and want to keep the original system backed up... Do you think it is safe to use Clonezilla for any modern hard disk? My doubt is because I have a relatively old IDE disk (80Gb) that after restoring a Clonezilla backup it does not boot anymore, I guess it is due a possible different geometry interpretation by my installed linux and the Clonezilla bootable linux, since the disk is ok and works always perfect... you can even boot with a live-cd and make dd if=dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=16M and make a bytewise clone on an additional disk or even use dd over a pipe and ssh to clone a whole machine including a raid10 - linux is not as stoopid as windows if hardware changes And, after the backup, during the Fedora installation, it asks how to use the hard disk, there is an option to shrink a used partition, but would it work with Win7? As far as I know a NTFS partition can not be shrinked... is it possible? can you comment something about this? be advised to make a full backup! NTFS can be shrinked all the last years and current gparted is supporting it but maybe winodws is too dumb to recognize the change and will not boot can not say anything about this because i never use windows outside vmware signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Creating partitions
Am 23.10.2011 20:22, schrieb Joe Zeff: On 10/23/2011 07:57 AM, Miguel Cardenas wrote: I would like to keep simple my disk, and reading the Fedora installation guide found that there are only 3 partitions required, SWAP, BOOT (ext3) and ROOT / (ext3)... I still don't like the idea of an independent boot partition but let's do it in the Fedora way... so, I want to know if this layout may work for me... I want to ask before doing it to save hours of installation just to try and see the results... You only need a /boot partition if root is ext4, because legacy grub doesn't grok it. If you only use ext3, you can get away with two partitions: / and swap. (I have a separate /home, but no /boot.) __ this is simply not true since F14 for sure ext4 is default, F13 i neve installed from scratch /dev/md1 ext4 29G 8,0G 21G 28% / /dev/md0 ext4485M 51M 430M 11% /boot /dev/md2 ext43,6T 1,2T 2,4T 34% /mnt/data signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
Am 24.10.2011 05:07, schrieb Marko Vojinovic: On Monday 24 October 2011 03:35:12 Ed Greshko wrote: On 10/24/2011 10:18 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: P.S. Sorry folks, just couldn't resist... :-D No hard feelings, Ed! :-) No hard feelings But. ISP ≠ Employer Oh, so if they are paying you, it's unethical to break the firewall, but if you are paying them, then it's perfectly ok to do so? if you really still not understand why someone MUST NOT break in through his companies fierwalls you should be fired now and never get a job again whereever this could be a topic signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Reading an OpenServer hard drive with Fedora
SCO OpenServer version? If i remember well, i was read and successfully recovering data from OpenServer 3 and 5.0.4 disks with SuSe 8 or 9 ( have on some CD's in the basement).[my first Open Server 3 installation media was have 78 floppies.] Reading disk content would depend on file system in use on those disks. Any Linux with 2.4 kernel can read SCO disk, maybe on some must recompile kernel to include support for different type of disk partitioning schemes and file systems. I forgot a lot of things, last time when administering SCO's is almost 12 years ago. SCO Unixware is different story. Anyhow, SCO use regular partitions, and slices are under them. On 24 October 2011 04:48, fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 09:12:05PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Is there a way to get at the odd SysV volume manager slices if I have access to an OS drive? The disk or partition is split into slices, sort of like a crude LVM. I need to recover the files from the disk, based on a full raw backup of the drive or the drive itself. I was hoping for a fuser implementation or so, since the extra cost networking stuff wasn't bought when the system was built. A local business depends on this, and I'm trying to help them recover. Bill: I'm having a somewhat vague recollection that much much older versions of Linux (from circa '95 when I was using Slackware 2.1 with the very up to date 1.5.9 kernel) had some flavor of support for SCO partitions. I have some memory of having read some docs or notes online somewhere about it. I don't think I've ever tried mounting a HD partition from one of them on linux, though. If it would be any help, I probably still have the CD with that ancient Slackware, and also a (now) really ancient Red Hat 4.1 CD. ISO images could be created in need. Fred -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord is like a strong tower. Those who do what is right can run to him for safety. --- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) - -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
They can't hear me gtalk, skype
I suspect this is an old cookie, and I fear I'm not seeing something really simple or even obvious. I can hear them, put they can't hear me. Except once on a skype test call, I hear my voice, and on one gtalk (Google) they could hear me after I set the left hand slider to zero and the right hand slider to max in Alsa mixer. I'm using XFCE in F15, been searching and reading alsamixer and other stuff on web and man pages to no avail. Any pointers, direction etc. Any info I could post to help? Thanks. -- Joe Feely -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
Seconding the move in this direction. Anything is better then a Micro$loth tainted product. - Original Message - From: Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:08 PM Subject: Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype? Well, reviving this old thread since I actually got a build of JItsi that appears to work just in case anyone's interested. It still needs a lot of work to remove some 3rd party files before it could possible be included in Fedora though. http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/jitsi/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: They can't hear me gtalk, skype
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Joe Feely joe.fe...@googlemail.com wrote: I suspect this is an old cookie, and I fear I'm not seeing something really simple or even obvious. I can hear them, put they can't hear me. Except once on a skype test call, I hear my voice, and on one gtalk (Google) they could hear me after I set the left hand slider to zero and the right hand slider to max in Alsa mixer. I'm using XFCE in F15, been searching and reading alsamixer and other stuff on web and man pages to no avail. Any pointers, direction etc. Any info I could post to help? Thanks. I'm more-or-less seeing the same thing on a number of Asus 1201N netbooks we have at our company. Unless you lower the volume of one side and increase the volume of the other, the built in microphone simply doesn't work. - Gilboa -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: NFS issues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/22/2011 11:20 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: On 10/22/2011 08:43 PM, Gerhard Magnus wrote: I didn't get anything running sealert -b. The widget SELinux Alert Browser showed no alerts. In /var/log/messages I get this message repeated at intervals: Oct 22 17:37:49 PuteB mount[1460]: mount to NFS server '192.168.1.14' failed: Connection refused, retrying This sounds like its on the client machine - was hoping for logs from the NFS server .. Doubtful an SELinux error would be a time out, almost always permission denied. I would expect you have a problem in Firewall or /etc/exports. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6lhxQACgkQrlYvE4MpobNaCgCdFa0TgM3/8cZZJzMMO27XN1El vhAAn0LHLcstwxfp3bqSngnAdFAlOhKM =eUOT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
Let it be the default added software. Also I suggest to check out Chandler (www.chandlerproject.org) - maybe it improves our communication through this. Chandler is barely written in python, so please check it out. Thx, Zoltan 2011/10/24 Joe Wulf joe_w...@yahoo.com: Seconding the move in this direction. Anything is better then a Micro$loth tainted product. - Original Message - From: Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:08 PM Subject: Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype? Well, reviving this old thread since I actually got a build of JItsi that appears to work just in case anyone's interested. It still needs a lot of work to remove some 3rd party files before it could possible be included in Fedora though. http://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/jitsi/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- PGP: 06853DF7 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
help me
mmx 352 modem (micromax) not connecting -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: put sshd on port 10022 and all is well this has the additional benefit to get rid of the most idiots trying password-attacks all day long Though it won't stop the more determined ones. Like those who scan for all open ports, and then look at what responses they get to determine what sort of server is listening. If you have a (potentially) vulnerable server exposed, using something like fail2ban (if I remembered the name correctly) can be a good idea. It allows a limited number of attempts from an IP, then temporarily blacklists that IP. A hacker would have to have tremendous luck to guess a password in only two attempts, for instance. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: help me
On 10/24/2011 05:10 PM, shailesh wrote: mmx 352 modem (micromax) not connecting You could be waiting a long time while we all absorb this data -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: help me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/24/2011 11:10 AM, shailesh wrote: mmx 352 modem (micromax) not connecting http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle? Follow *_Rediff Deal ho jaye! http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://dealhojaye.rediff.com?sc_cid=rediffmailsignature___cmp=signaturelnk=rediffmailsignaturenewservice=deals_* to get exciting offers in your city everyday. If you want help Id suggest you actually provide a better description of the problem as opposed to not connecting. The phrase not connecting is not helpful and you wont get any real help. You may want to reference http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOpZK5AAoJEF1Xw4ZWTEoJxKcQALINkAe23Yms2cQq/nwSZ9YP OAC9irUk/VafsqtMqZsstSg4ynRbrX2p7AC8tb7/OEUd6YUkdnpk1lAHBmHwFXRo bRggfCYoGO4FHm4Wq/vey9++CqN8de+ghyBPj+eunw5BFsZ0UNP4Ejke45Yas5Gj TYmXrMoD0aVwZQagQM1Odp9+aKtvyxgDH0ROJZSjCdYUkuZG+T5ud+tHh+Q4w0fB 6Skfkle2ICHsO2IgLRu1fSgp/Pj1KtHZdyT/aQm09ExljRrHTeqBO2MIFfoZo5dP InC7KdR0xOD9XoYCtzYz5Cj+S8jppMYQHe2VNoCREI6Zll3v54PmiRbnHctLxAJb HBQxIgilsrQutHDJQyljnacUGxggW2gznxydqGHwXmcufh9XAO5fC8NLlHu+Neq7 DpXRU0NWIcb42yYCdJmxklutrB9Q/JDDqscoh/X0IS7mPi8IvgY4fixanzMu+NVB XrWisCiLqchxpPDTlWxaHpPe+roV39z7lz7WZdz+NWsj9Dgigbiaa4I4bcHJEEFT SxzTyZ5jUYsYtBxySVNo1PBwy2pBtFyrh8WGJMrQK9Tl/gF5ICcaa6+FN/VEnnIL e/+uulY0PjiYAKrhcb9GszrB6jgnUtoGw/Dt+KMsM8UD8DN8a6bPLXGF755aGDhg 52yH/0gJSKcv6hfvOgne =YWIw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 18:12, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: If you have a (potentially) vulnerable server exposed, using something like fail2ban (if I remembered the name correctly) can be a good idea. It allows a limited number of attempts from an IP, then temporarily blacklists that IP. A hacker would have to have tremendous luck to guess a password in only two attempts, for instance. An alternative to fail2ban is denyhosts. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
usb serial console and systemd?
I can't seem to get systemd to spawn a getty on a USB tty. Here's what I've done: # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/getty@.service /etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/getty@ttyUSB0.service # systemctl daemon-reload # systemctl start getty@ttyUSB0.service When I look at the gettys that are running, all I see are: root 1153 1 0 Oct22 tty6 00:00:00 /sbin/agetty tty6 38400 root 1154 1 0 Oct22 tty4 00:00:00 /sbin/agetty tty4 38400 root 1155 1 0 Oct22 tty5 00:00:00 /sbin/agetty tty5 38400 root 1156 1 0 Oct22 tty3 00:00:00 /sbin/agetty tty3 38400 root 1157 1 0 Oct22 tty2 00:00:00 /sbin/agetty tty2 38400 I *do* have a ttyUSB0: [27151.541139] usb 1-1.2: pl2303 converter now attached to ttyUSB0 But can't seem to get a getty. What have I missed (sure was easier under inittab)? Oh, and where do you set the speed, vt, etc. for the getty under systemd? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
[389-users] NIS: doubled user entries with ypcat group
Hello, we run several 389 DirectoryServer with a master slave replication. To support our old solaris enviroment we use https://fedorahosted.org/slapi-nis/; for NIS: I use slapi-nis 0.26 from the Fedorarepository (src rpm) and compiled it for RH5. Solaris and other types of machines are running well. id user and groups user ist working. But I get with command ypcat groups doubled user entries for each group. When I have a group for example: group test1 with user user1 user2 I get with ypcat group | grep test1: test1: user1 user2 user1 user2 When I execute the command: id user1 I get test1 only once. In our dse.ldif I have following entries for group.byname: dn: nis-domain=+nis-map=group.byname,cn=NIS Server,cn=plugins,cn=config objectClass: extensibleObject objectClass: top nis-domain: nis-map: group.byname nis-base: ou=Groups, dc=y, dc=com and group.gid dn: nis-domain=+nis-map=group.bygid,cn=NIS Server,cn=plugins,cn=config objectClass: extensibleObject objectClass: top nis-domain: nis-map: group.bygid nis-base: ou=Groups, dc=y, dc=com With LDAP I get: [root@NIS2LDAP ~]# ldapsearch -x -h localhost -s base -b cn=test1,ou=groups,dc=y,dc=com # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base cn=test1,ou=groups,dc=y,dc=com with scope baseObject # filter: (objectclass=*) # requesting: ALL # # test1, Groups, y.com dn: cn=test1,ou=Groups,dc=y,dc=com objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top objectClass: groupOfUniqueNames cn: tiger gidNumber: 484 memberUid: user1 memberUid: user2 uniqueMember: uid=user1,ou=People,dc=y,dc=com uniqueMember: uid=user2,ou=People,dc=y,dc=com # search result search: 2 result: 0 Success # numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1 Is memberUid / uniqueMember a problem ? thanks, br cnu -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
fail2ban vs. logrotate
I've installed fail2ban on Fedora 15 to block repeated failed ssh connections. It works great up until logrotate kicks in. When it rotates /var/log/secure then fail2ban stops noticing failed ssh attempts. Using fail2ban-client to reload the jail fixes the problem, but it also causes fail2ban to forget all currently banned IP addresses. I've found scripts online that will allow for extracting the current bans before reloading, and then applying them again after, but that seems pretty extreme. I can't help but think I must be missing something simple that will get fail2ban to notice that the logs have been rotated. Has anyone else seeing this issue? I see some reports in bugzilla about fail2ban, but nothing that is definitely this problem. Thanks Mike -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Just installed RHEL 6.1 and i have 0 repositories
Hi, Im just wondering if someone know how to install packages on RHEL 6.1, I have installed the demo version but the repositories are empty. I want to install a GUI on that, along with DB2 and Websphere.. Anybody know how to do that? Thanks. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
bluetooth problems F15
F15 - I notice that on my laptop - sometimes - not always - bluetooth stops working after a wake from sleep. It works most of the time, and always works on a fresh reboot - but I usually sleep my laptop unless I'm rebooting a new kernel. Bluetooth works again by restarting: systemctl restart bluetooth.service I have standard F15 bluez.x86_64 version 4.87-7.fc15. I note that there are newer versions (4.96) but not for F15 for some reason. The bug looks similar to this one https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716509 but this has had no activity since the original bz 5 months ago. Anyone else aware of issues or resolutions? Thanks .. gene/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: fail2ban vs. logrotate
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Mike Wohlgemuth m...@woogie.net wrote: I've installed fail2ban on Fedora 15 to block repeated failed ssh connections. It works great up until logrotate kicks in. When it rotates /var/log/secure then fail2ban stops noticing failed ssh attempts. Using fail2ban-client to reload the jail fixes the problem, but it also causes fail2ban to forget all currently banned IP addresses. I've found scripts online that will allow for extracting the current bans before reloading, and then applying them again after, but that seems pretty extreme. I can't help but think I must be missing something simple that will get fail2ban to notice that the logs have been rotated. Has anyone else seeing this issue? I see some reports in bugzilla about fail2ban, but nothing that is definitely this problem. Thanks Mike -- Hi This does not address your problem directly. I use a program called denyhosts for blocking ssh attempts. It creates a list in /etc/hosts.deny. Great program. Good luck Marvin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Just installed RHEL 6.1 and i have 0 repositories
En 24/10/2011 13:19:28, Maxime Alarie mala...@processia.com escribió: Im just wondering if someone know how to install packages on RHEL 6.1, I have installed the demo version but the repositories are empty You should have in /etc/yum.repos.d/ folder a file rhel-base.repo, check inside in the property enabled and set it to 1 and then try: # yum update To download the package database and the try installing a desktop environment like GNOME or XCFE. Regards, Lázaro. Este mensaje de correo electrónico ha sido procesado por el servidor de Frioclima -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: fail2ban vs. logrotate
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 20:17, Marvin Kosmal mkos...@gmail.com wrote: Hi This does not address your problem directly. I use a program called denyhosts for blocking ssh attempts. It creates a list in /etc/hosts.deny. Great program. +1 to denyhosts. Good luck Marvin -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Best FOSS alternative for skype?
On 10/24/2011 09:33 AM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote: Let it be the default added software. Also I suggest to check out Chandler (www.chandlerproject.org) - maybe it improves our communication through this. Chandler is barely written in python, so please check it out. The Chandler project appears comatose and no longer developed. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: Just installed RHEL 6.1 and i have 0 repositories
Thanks for the quick reply, The file is empty.. [root@RHELV6 yum.repos.d]# cat redhat.repo # # Red Hat Repositories # Managed by (rhsm) subscription-manager #[root@RHELV6 yum.repos.d]# -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Lázaro Morales Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 2:27 PM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: Just installed RHEL 6.1 and i have 0 repositories En 24/10/2011 13:19:28, Maxime Alarie mala...@processia.com escribió: Im just wondering if someone know how to install packages on RHEL 6.1, I have installed the demo version but the repositories are empty You should have in /etc/yum.repos.d/ folder a file rhel-base.repo, check inside in the property enabled and set it to 1 and then try: # yum update To download the package database and the try installing a desktop environment like GNOME or XCFE. Regards, Lázaro. Este mensaje de correo electrónico ha sido procesado por el servidor de Frioclima -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Unable to ssh nodes with global IP
Am 24.10.2011 18:12, schrieb Tim: On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: put sshd on port 10022 and all is well this has the additional benefit to get rid of the most idiots trying password-attacks all day long Though it won't stop the more determined ones. Like those who scan for all open ports, and then look at what responses they get to determine what sort of server is listening. If you have a (potentially) vulnerable server exposed, using something like fail2ban (if I remembered the name correctly) can be a good idea. It allows a limited number of attempts from an IP, then temporarily blacklists that IP. A hacker would have to have tremendous luck to guess a password in only two attempts, for instance. i know this all but it is not in standard-nmap and so you have not the whole day the logfiles full and the overhead for non-standard-port is practically non-existent NOBODY should allow password-login on sshd, never and we do not additionally: iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 1024:65535 -m state --syn --state NEW --dport YOURPORT -m limit --limit 60/minute --limit-burst 20 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --syn --state NEW --dport YOURPORT -j REJECT ___ for portscans allow only 120 connections from the same ip per second makes it really hard do a full port-scan because it longs forever and aditionally webservers are proctected against a single dos-attack try it with ab -c 20 -n 10 http://yourhost/; and you will see htop shortly with 100% cpu and falling down to normal values in waves iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m recent --set iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -i eth0 -m state --state NEW -m recent --update --seconds 1 --hitcount 120 -j DROP ___ as you see security is never one setting and it is done and obscurity as additional prevention is good and no overhead if someone knows to handle his machines signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Creating partitions
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote: I would like to keep simple my disk, and reading the Fedora installation guide found that there are only 3 partitions required, SWAP, BOOT (ext3) and ROOT / (ext3)... I still don't like the idea of an independent boot this is simply not true since F14 for sure ext4 is default, F13 i neve installed from scratch /dev/md1 ext4 29G 8,0G 21G 28% / /dev/md0 ext4485M 51M 430M 11% /boot /dev/md2 ext43,6T 1,2T 2,4T 34% /mnt/data I forgot to say it was another distro, now am moving to Fedora but always in the past I've used swap and root only... of course Fedora uses ext4 :P Take care -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
remeber non broadcasted SSID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks, I have recently installed F-15, and I cant get the network manager to remember my non broadcasted wireless SSID, I can actually select it from the list, but It does not connect automatically as with any other broadcasted networks. any ideas? Jeronimo Calvo jeronimocal...@hush.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOpb5XAAoJEGNDE5xD5Cq480cIAMjW8zbFuTi1AqRu4LAQg750 ZBBdaag8XCrZRh/KSTr0pTORq5n2CzE32ostUghcQFmnbYby1IX2G5knXrYVPzdI nP/53B7erzKj+RSvnbAfzbCparFVb2iuOCULDhh95Zj5bjrH2ypfzEefK1nM84QS Tfw6ICp/FLfhRJ5h9lU/fsSMmTcn/7OKz8qu2GOGmMT0RXIxsbJ4usikjnDrmDwM q2Rq3P59IE/n3IeztxZdnYFL4Vc42/vFYC11TYRCDJM+ezA3OqOYcqxnNsyy6XLT P68adC3VfRNtp+bM8newzNqewT/KjiXbqvifO7UE25xfIxLQh6dXCYBGDHIkBvg= =hDoN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: more attempts to resolve NSF issues
On 10/23/2011 11:03 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: Mark Eackloff wrote: I am fishing a bit here, but I have no_root_squash as an option in my exports (server) file. When the client tries to mount the directory automatically at boot time through the entry in /etc/fstab I believe the request is identified as coming from root. See the User ID Mapping section in man (5) exports about this. If you have ever made that userid stuff work properly you are a better (or more patient) person than I. I think the root_id_squash prevents i/o requests from root, not the mount itself. At least that's the behavior I notice, root can read if public read is set, but can't write a 644 file. Yea. I tried it and you're right. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Just installed RHEL 6.1 and i have 0 repositories
En 24/10/2011 14:55:53, Maxime Alarie mala...@processia.com escribió: # Managed by (rhsm) subscription-manager If you have a valid subscription refer to: * http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/index.html Part II. Package Management, Chapter 4: Product Subscriptions and Entitlements to activate it. If not you can looking for availables packages at your DVD: Mount your DVD at /media/rhel # mkdir /media/rhel-dvd # mount /dev/dvd /media/rhel-dvd create a custom .repo file pointing your DVD if it not exist under /etc/yum.repos.d/: # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/rhel-media.repo EOF [rhel-media] name=RHEL-$releasever - Media baseurl=file:///media/rhel-dvd/ gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-RHEL-6 EOF And then try looking for packages in you DVD: # yum update # yum search php Regards, Lázaro. Este mensaje de correo electrónico ha sido procesado por el servidor de Frioclima -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Just installed RHEL 6.1 and i have 0 repositories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeronimo Calvo jeronimocal...@hush.com On 24 Oct 2011, at 19:55, Maxime Alarie wrote: Thanks for the quick reply, The file is empty.. Create a new repo file. rhel6.repo and add the following: = # CentOS-Base.repo # # The mirror system uses the connecting IP address of the client and the # update status of each mirror to pick mirrors that are updated to and # geographically close to the client. You should use this for CentOS updates # unless you are manually picking other mirrors. # # If the mirrorlist= does not work for you, as a fall back you can try the # remarked out baseurl= line instead. # # [base] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=os #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-6 #released updates [updates] name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=updates #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-6 #additional packages that may be useful [extras] name=CentOS-$releasever - Extras mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=extras #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/extras/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-6 #additional packages that extend functionality of existing packages [centosplus] name=CentOS-$releasever - Plus mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=centosplus #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/centosplus/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 enabled=0 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-6 #contrib - packages by Centos Users [contrib] name=CentOS-$releasever - Contrib mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=contrib #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/contrib/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 enabled=0 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-6 = After that do the following: yum clean all yum update you should accept the gpg keys from the centos repo. try your new repo with: yum list Cheers, Jero -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOpcUXAAoJEGNDE5xD5Cq4E1YIAN2tDBSuZt2Jeb37kTwKQ7fB nNyf271pB+kvMQKl9FzvYuAgvi5fmvZ/TkY54xbyYYaH/Ne/QG9w7XFLpmI1v35b XDA8e2WO9FJYCIR+IJTPGzol6ZtZVgUhgQ/UZJBhjk6+OkK7r5AAKi42UFVvTUJO 49kQvUjbAY7N1yGVRLkbV5CqTfYHOO1wzn12G/Je/xfzJpx2m0HQIU5ZPfuKwKaz X2DWCd0/DVCEExft5bW6WDQNBaEvltX5eAXfIC2WueBVbV0W04I8uMghuPmnmvav OgZF5TuZL+CmvPy9KXu2Ou2lq88XQTqqVNbrYH1xWmDVEkYTBnWYuMKcR4Z0pZw= =wfui -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: UEFI installation is non-functional in F16B - grub/grub2
On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 19:54 +0200, little.owl wrote: The grub2 and all (U)EFI stuff are completely new for me, so any hints or links are welcome. Try posting to the Test list. F16 is not a released system and not all testers read the Users list (this one). poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: remeber non broadcasted SSID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/24/2011 02:36 PM, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: Hi Folks, I have recently installed F-15, and I cant get the network manager to remember my non broadcasted wireless SSID, I can actually select it from the list, but It does not connect automatically as with any other broadcasted networks. any ideas? Turn on the broadcast of the SSID so network manager can see it and automatically connect to it. Mikkel - -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6l99AACgkQqbQrVW3JyMS9ZwCeNEu6FgSRMWD+8zRO0R9nPWe+ tQ8AnRSnywrT/3mYb91DPO58h/rM28tZ =DprU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: fail2ban vs. logrotate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/24/2011 12:14 PM, Mike Wohlgemuth wrote: I've installed fail2ban on Fedora 15 to block repeated failed ssh connections. It works great up until logrotate kicks in. When it rotates /var/log/secure then fail2ban stops noticing failed ssh attempts. Using fail2ban-client to reload the jail fixes the problem, but it also causes fail2ban to forget all currently banned IP addresses. I've found scripts online that will allow for extracting the current bans before reloading, and then applying them again after, but that seems pretty extreme. I can't help but think I must be missing something simple that will get fail2ban to notice that the logs have been rotated. Has anyone else seeing this issue? I see some reports in bugzilla about fail2ban, but nothing that is definitely this problem. Thanks Mike It sounds like fail2ban still has the old log file open. You need to have logrotate tell fail2ban that the log file has changed. Logrotate already does this will other services when it rotates their log file. I am surprised the .rpm did not include the files for logrotate to automatically sent the proper signal to fail2ban. Mikkel - -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6l+nwACgkQqbQrVW3JyMQXbwCfWwWQXNCmsHlIriPqHy1FALI9 asQAn1qsjxbOzlxOT3yn81XHj5bR5aLn =vGsK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: fail2ban vs. logrotate
It sounds like fail2ban still has the old log file open. You need to have logrotate tell fail2ban that the log file has changed. Change the config file for logrotate so that it does not create a new file, but that it uses copy-and-truncate. The exact syntax is easily found in the man-page. Logrotate already does this will other services when it rotates their log file. I am surprised the .rpm did not include the files for logrotate to automatically sent the proper signal to fail2ban. /var/log/secure is not a daemon specific file, but a general log-file and as such does not have a (daemon-) specific rpm. And a general file can't send signals to all kinds of daemons that may, or may not run on a system. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
