Re: [IronPython] Is any one use IronPython in your project?
Yes, i use it in a project where an electronical device makes phone calls to a server (this is the one that uses IP) telling it a client needs a service...Also, i did a server prototipe that listens in an UDP port for vehicles to send their GPS position. the server stores those positions inside a BD server... Greetings... - Original Message - From: Eyvind Axelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of IronPython users@lists.ironpython.com Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 3:15 AM Subject: Re: [IronPython] Is any one use IronPython in your project? Yes, we use it in a large C# WinForms application to build dynamic forms from XML definitions with inline python snipes. These snippets are executed at runtime and can be configured/altered by the user. Eyvind. -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Kevien Lee Sendt: 23. november 2006 08:30 Til: users@lists.ironpython.com Emne: [IronPython] Is any one use IronPython in your project? Hi, Now ,Ironpython had release some time,but i want to konw is any one use IronPython in your project? As a dynamic language ,what it will bring us some advantage for project,which the advantage C#,VB.net couldn't have? ___ users mailing list users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com __ Información de NOD32, revisión 1876 (20061121) __ Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system http://www.nod32.com ___ users mailing list users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging
Title: Bericht Hi, i just wanna say that i use SharpDevelop in my daily development, As it doesnt have IP support, i open an emacs windows to edit IP codeit would be great to have IP support inside SharpDevelop, as in VS... Cheers... - Original Message - From: fabio.pliger To: Discussion of IronPython Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 12:59 AM Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging I think that exchanging info about IDE, editor, or debugger people use could be really useful! So, can we do it here? If don't, can you please fw them to my email too? Personally, sometimes, i try to use VS SDK, but i have lots of indentation issues in the editor, intellisense is still a dream and the debugger don't work as i think it should... ( hope all those things could be fixed in the near future... and IP definitelly full integrated in VS 20XX ... (is it possible or just a dream? :) ))). Sometimes i use eclipse pydev or wing IDE for editing... cheers -Original Message-From: S H Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Discussion of IronPython users@lists.ironpython.comDate: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:41:51 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [IronPython] Final release packagingMSI could be nice for some, but I won't probably ever bother with it. Just let me know which envionmental var has to be set up and I will be happy.On more serious note, on my machine memory foot print on cpython is 3mb, but IPY takes up whopping 17mb+.Is this release candidate thing or is this something that we have to live with? I know that Jim did mention this as an issue before, but certainly seem bloated.BTW: What is everyone using for IDE, editor, or debugger? Pls, e-mail me directly with subject: "my IPY editor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would not like to clogg this space up. I would like to take a small sample.Thanks much!Dino Viehland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I’ve opened a bug for us to track this – (#2705, http://www.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?ProjectName=IronPythonWorkItemId=2705 ) if anyone else has any suggestions as for what the MSI should do please either comment here or add a comment to the bug. It’s too much work to get this ready for 1.0, but we’ll look at distributing an MSI shortly after 1.0 (either 1.01 or 1.1 hopefully). Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business. __ Informacie NOD32, revisi.1730 (20060829) __Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus systemhttp://www.nod32.com ___users mailing listusers@lists.ironpython.comhttp://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com__ Informacisn de NOD32, revisisn 1.1730 (20060829) __Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus systemhttp://www.nod32.com ___ users mailing list users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
Re: [IronPython] Embedded IP eating memory
i did as you said, the problem
didnt go, but the memory consumtion was only 150K. then what i tried was
to make only one static object of the class inside the module
CMOpFuncionalidad.py, and put it right there, so my while-cycle script now
is:
import sys
try:i =
sys.path.index("scripts")except:sys.path.append("scripts")
import CMOpFuncionalidad
try:#pyop = CMOpFuncionalidad.PyOperador()pyop =
CMOpFuncionalidad.pyop
if not
pyop.variablesInicializadas:pyop.colocaOpBD(cmop, dba,
connID)
pyop.atiendeCM()#pyop.liberaRecursos()pyop =
Noneexcept:if pyop !=
None:#pyop.liberaRecursos()pyop = None
raise
I.e. i initialize the object and the internal variables only once,
and now it only consumes 150 bytes each time. It seems IP beta was not able to
GC the pyop object and the related variables, evenno references were left
for it (and the internal variables were cleaned inside the method
pyop.liberaRecursos(). Now i dont know where the 150 bytes are being left,
perhaps local variables memoryisnt cleaned up neither (just a wild guess
here:) )??
Cheers...
- Original Message -
From:
Dino Viehland
To: Discussion of IronPython
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:25
PM
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Embedded IP
eating memory
The
real problem is that by directly interfacing w/ the Engine APIs youre not
doing a simple import. There is actually an Import API but thats only
going to import the code into the default module and not provide you w/ a
convenient way to execute it.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo
CondeSent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:50 PMTo: Discussion
of IronPythonSubject: Re: [IronPython] Embedded IP eating
memory
PS. The module the script loads with import (CMOpFuncionalidad.py) has 15
global-module variables, but with import the module loads only once...doesnt
it ??
Cheers...
- Original
Message -
From: Dino Viehland
To: Discussion of IronPython
Sent: Friday, August
11, 2006 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [IronPython]
Embedded IP eating memory
How
are you executing the script file? If youre creating a new optimized
module each time we wont be able to collection the optimized module
code. If on the other hand youre just compiling it as a helper method
then when its done running we can collect the code.
In
pre-RC1 we had a leak where creating a new PythonEngine would result in a
leak of a SystemState and ClrModule which were being hung onto by an event
rooted in the app domain. So if youre re-creating the engine each
time you might be seeing that. Also, now that Ive mentioned events,
you might want to check your own C# code if youre using events: Its
easy to forget to unhook one and leak memory because the event handler stays
alive forever.
If
none of those turn out to be the problem an option here would be to download
the free CLR Profiler and look at the object type that is consuming the
increased memory. Itll give you a nice graphical display w/ a block
view of whats referencing what.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo
CondeSent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:58 PMTo:
Discussion of IronPythonSubject: [IronPython] Embedded IP eating
memory
Hi
I have an IP-Embedded C#application (IP version IronPython 1.0.60523
(Beta) on .NET 2.0.50727.42, Yeah i know, im out of date, but i havent make
the change to latest version because i saw there weresome API changes
:) ), i create one PyEngine, set some global variablesand inside a
while block iexecute this little script every
time:
import
sys
try:i =
sys.path.index("scripts")except:sys.path.append("scripts")
import
CMOpFuncionalidad
try:pyop
= CMOpFuncionalidad.PyOperador(cmop, dba,
connID)pyop.atiendeCM()pyop.liberaRecursosBD()pyop
= Noneexcept:pyop.liberaRecursosBD()pyop =
Noneraise
The module
CMOpFuncionaliad is an IPython script i wrote, it contains a class
definition. Inside the scripts i use components defined in some assemblies i
made (these are already loaded into the CLR). The problem is,after the
Engine takes the usual 12M+- of memory it needs, every time the script
executes it consumes 2M more, i dont have a clue why is this...Does this
version of IP have memory problems ? Or what else could be ?? If you need to
see CMOpFuncionalidad.py let me know and ill send
it
Thanks for your help
[IronPython] Embedded IP eating memory
Hi
I have an IP-Embedded
C#application (IP version IronPython 1.0.60523 (Beta) on .NET
2.0.50727.42, Yeah i know, im out of date, but i havent make the change to
latest version because i saw there weresome API changes :) ), i create one
PyEngine, set some global variablesand inside a while block iexecute
this little script every time:
import sys
try:i =
sys.path.index("scripts")except:sys.path.append("scripts")
import CMOpFuncionalidad
try:pyop = CMOpFuncionalidad.PyOperador(cmop, dba,
connID)pyop.atiendeCM()pyop.liberaRecursosBD()pyop
= Noneexcept:pyop.liberaRecursosBD()pyop =
Noneraise
The module CMOpFuncionaliad is an IPython script i wrote, it contains a
class definition. Inside the scripts i use components defined in some assemblies
i made (these are already loaded into the CLR). The problem is,after the
Engine takes the usual 12M+- of memory it needs, every time the script executes
it consumes 2M more, i dont have a clue why is this...Does this version of IP
have memory problems ? Or what else could be ?? If you need to see
CMOpFuncionalidad.py let me know and ill send it
Thanks for your help
Greetings...
___
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
Re: [IronPython] Embedded IP eating memory
Inside the while cycle, i just
do this:
pyEngine.RunFile("scripts/CMOpAtiendeCM.py");
thats the little script file.
The engine is created only once.
However, i did inside the
cyclea Console.WriteLine("{0} bytes", System.GC.GetTotalMemory(true)) and
it gives lower memory usage, there i see that IP seems to be consuming each time
the file is run only 2k, no 2m, as the windowstaskmanager
says
I do use events, but i do remove
the handlers when no longer in use...
Where can i get a free CLR
profiler ?? :)...
thanks for the
help...
Greetings
- Original Message -
From:
Dino Viehland
To: Discussion of IronPython
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 1:48
PM
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Embedded IP
eating memory
How
are you executing the script file? If youre creating a new optimized
module each time we wont be able to collection the optimized module
code. If on the other hand youre just compiling it as a helper method
then when its done running we can collect the code.
In
pre-RC1 we had a leak where creating a new PythonEngine would result in a leak
of a SystemState and ClrModule which were being hung onto by an event rooted
in the app domain. So if youre re-creating the engine each time you
might be seeing that. Also, now that Ive mentioned events, you might
want to check your own C# code if youre using events: Its easy to
forget to unhook one and leak memory because the event handler stays alive
forever.
If
none of those turn out to be the problem an option here would be to download
the free CLR Profiler and look at the object type that is consuming the
increased memory. Itll give you a nice graphical display w/ a block
view of whats referencing what.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rodolfo CondeSent: Friday, August 11, 2006
12:58 PMTo: Discussion of IronPythonSubject:
[IronPython] Embedded IP eating memory
Hi
I have an IP-Embedded C#application (IP version IronPython 1.0.60523
(Beta) on .NET 2.0.50727.42, Yeah i know, im out of date, but i havent make
the change to latest version because i saw there weresome API changes :)
), i create one PyEngine, set some global variablesand inside a while
block iexecute this little script every
time:
import
sys
try:i =
sys.path.index("scripts")except:sys.path.append("scripts")
import
CMOpFuncionalidad
try:pyop
= CMOpFuncionalidad.PyOperador(cmop, dba,
connID)pyop.atiendeCM()pyop.liberaRecursosBD()pyop
= Noneexcept:pyop.liberaRecursosBD()pyop =
Noneraise
The module
CMOpFuncionaliad is an IPython script i wrote, it contains a class definition.
Inside the scripts i use components defined in some assemblies i made (these
are already loaded into the CLR). The problem is,after the Engine takes
the usual 12M+- of memory it needs, every time the script executes it consumes
2M more, i dont have a clue why is this...Does this version of IP have memory
problems ? Or what else could be ?? If you need to see CMOpFuncionalidad.py
let me know and ill send it
Thanks for your help
Greetings...
__
Información de NOD32, revisión 1.1703 (20060811) __Este
mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus systemhttp://www.nod32.com
___users mailing
listusers@lists.ironpython.comhttp://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com__
Información de NOD32, revisión 1.1703 (20060811) __Este
mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus
systemhttp://www.nod32.com
___
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
Re: [IronPython] Embedded IP eating memory
PS. The module the script loads
with import (CMOpFuncionalidad.py) has 15 global-module variables, but with
import the module loads only once...doesnt it ??
Cheers...
- Original Message -
From:
Dino Viehland
To: Discussion of IronPython
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 1:48
PM
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Embedded IP
eating memory
How
are you executing the script file? If youre creating a new optimized
module each time we wont be able to collection the optimized module
code. If on the other hand youre just compiling it as a helper method
then when its done running we can collect the code.
In
pre-RC1 we had a leak where creating a new PythonEngine would result in a leak
of a SystemState and ClrModule which were being hung onto by an event rooted
in the app domain. So if youre re-creating the engine each time you
might be seeing that. Also, now that Ive mentioned events, you might
want to check your own C# code if youre using events: Its easy to
forget to unhook one and leak memory because the event handler stays alive
forever.
If
none of those turn out to be the problem an option here would be to download
the free CLR Profiler and look at the object type that is consuming the
increased memory. Itll give you a nice graphical display w/ a block
view of whats referencing what.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rodolfo CondeSent: Friday, August 11, 2006
12:58 PMTo: Discussion of IronPythonSubject:
[IronPython] Embedded IP eating memory
Hi
I have an IP-Embedded C#application (IP version IronPython 1.0.60523
(Beta) on .NET 2.0.50727.42, Yeah i know, im out of date, but i havent make
the change to latest version because i saw there weresome API changes :)
), i create one PyEngine, set some global variablesand inside a while
block iexecute this little script every
time:
import
sys
try:i =
sys.path.index("scripts")except:sys.path.append("scripts")
import
CMOpFuncionalidad
try:pyop
= CMOpFuncionalidad.PyOperador(cmop, dba,
connID)pyop.atiendeCM()pyop.liberaRecursosBD()pyop
= Noneexcept:pyop.liberaRecursosBD()pyop =
Noneraise
The module
CMOpFuncionaliad is an IPython script i wrote, it contains a class definition.
Inside the scripts i use components defined in some assemblies i made (these
are already loaded into the CLR). The problem is,after the Engine takes
the usual 12M+- of memory it needs, every time the script executes it consumes
2M more, i dont have a clue why is this...Does this version of IP have memory
problems ? Or what else could be ?? If you need to see CMOpFuncionalidad.py
let me know and ill send it
Thanks for your help
Greetings...
__
Información de NOD32, revisión 1.1703 (20060811) __Este
mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus systemhttp://www.nod32.com
___users mailing
listusers@lists.ironpython.comhttp://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com__
Información de NOD32, revisión 1.1703 (20060811) __Este
mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus
systemhttp://www.nod32.com
___
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
Re: [IronPython] producing exe's
Hi all, first mail on the list :)... Do you mean you have do make a little program with IronPython.Hosting.PythonCompiler class to make your assembly ?? Doest have the ipy.exe console an option for this purpose?? Greetings... - Original Message - From: Martin Maly To: Discussion of IronPython Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:05 AM Subject: Re: [IronPython] producing exe's Yes, that's correct. The -X:SaveAssemblies flag is mainly for debugging purposes. If you need to produce an exe, the recommended way is to use the IronPython.Hosting.PythonCompiler class which allows you to set the type of assembly among other things. Martin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jeff sackstederSent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:10 AMTo: users@lists.ironpython.comSubject: [IronPython] producing exe's If I make exe's like this-ipyw.exe -X:SaveAssemblies myscript.pyI still get the console window. Is this correct?__ Información de NOD32, revisión 1.1696 (20060807) __Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus systemhttp://www.nod32.com ___users mailing listusers@lists.ironpython.comhttp://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com__ Información de NOD32, revisión 1.1696 (20060807) __Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus systemhttp://www.nod32.com ___ users mailing list users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
