Re: Word Counts

2015-07-15 Thread Jonathan Allen
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 06:47:28PM +, toki wrote:
   2. from an academic point of view, if a word-count limit is set for
  a document, would you expect a best-effort count in OO to be an
  excuse for being a tad over in MS Word?
 
 What ruleset does that academic institution in question use, to
 determine the number of words in a document?

Well, I've now asked the question, so hope to find out soon.  Perhaps
it is wrong to quibble over word-counts anyway in academic documents.
If you are having to shave words at that level of minutiae, then you
might have written too much.

 More pertinent to the original question, is how does the institution
 define word?

Probably as defined by the institution's preferred word processor or an
acceptable alternative.

Bit I have a suspicion we are starting (as many great threads do) to drift
away from OO ...

Jonathan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Word Counts

2015-07-14 Thread Jonathan Allen
Hello List,

Can you help me with how the word counts are done?  Not what makes
up a word or a word-boundary - the 'help' told me that.  Footnotes
or endnotes.  Are the words in footnotes counted?  And does that
differ for the whole document when nothing is selected, or when a
block of text (including footnotes) is selected?

Jonathan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Word Counts

2015-07-14 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:17:10 +0100
Jonathan Allen jonat...@barumtrading.co.uk wrote:

 Hello List,
 
 Can you help me with how the word counts are done?  Not what makes
 up a word or a word-boundary - the 'help' told me that.  Footnotes
 or endnotes.  Are the words in footnotes counted?  And does that
 differ for the whole document when nothing is selected, or when a
 block of text (including footnotes) is selected?
 
 Jonathan

When text is selected the footnotes for that block are not counted.  Otherwise 
they are, and their number in the footnote seems to be counted as a word. But 
don't rely on the word count matching that of MS Word.

-- 
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Word Counts

2015-07-14 Thread Jonathan Allen
Rory,

 When text is selected the footnotes for that block are not counted.
 Otherwise they are, and their number in the footnote seems to be
 counted as a word. But don't rely on the word count matching that
 of MS Word.

Thank you so much for that.  It's a good start.  Two follow on questions:

  1. does LibreOffice work with the same rules?

  2. from an academic point of view, if a word-count limit is set for
 a document, would you expect a best-effort count in OO to be an
 excuse for being a tad over in MS Word?

Jonathan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Word Counts

2015-07-14 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:50:13 +0100
Jonathan Allen jonat...@barumtrading.co.uk wrote:

 Rory,
 
  When text is selected the footnotes for that block are not counted.
  Otherwise they are, and their number in the footnote seems to be
  counted as a word. But don't rely on the word count matching that
  of MS Word.
 
 Thank you so much for that.  It's a good start.  Two follow on questions:
 
   1. does LibreOffice work with the same rules?
 
   2. from an academic point of view, if a word-count limit is set for
  a document, would you expect a best-effort count in OO to be an
  excuse for being a tad over in MS Word?
 
 Jonathan
 

I think LibreOffice (which I don't use) should work with the same rules, but 
they do tweak things, so the only sure way to know is to query this on a 
LibreOffice list.

My understanding is that most academic standards allow +/-10% in word count.  
Unless the academic standards committee defines the exact word count process to 
be used, one word counter is as good as another.

In any event I personally would object to any academic institution insisting on 
the use of proprietary software and proprietary formats - this is as 
restrictive as insisting that one should write one's submissions in purple ink 
on a green paper.




-- 
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Word Counts

2015-07-14 Thread From
Please unsubscribe

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:47 AM, toki toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:



 On 07/14/2015 04:50 PM, Jonathan Allen wrote:

1. does LibreOffice work with the same rules?

 Yes, no, and maybe.

 The Maybe part is that how words are counted, depends upon what, and
 how LibreOffice has been configured to count words.

 The Yes part is that LibreOffice that can count words, using word
 boundaries.

 The No part, is that LibreOffice that can count words, ignoring word
 boundaries.

2. from an academic point of view, if a word-count limit is set for
   a document, would you expect a best-effort count in OO to be an
   excuse for being a tad over in MS Word?

 What ruleset does that academic institution in question use, to
 determine the number of words in a document?

 More pertinent to the original question, is how does the institution
 define word?

 Historically, a word is either five successive characters (typing) or
 six successive characters (printing), with no consideration being given
 to word-boundaries.

 jonathon




Re: Word Counts

2015-07-14 Thread toki


On 07/14/2015 04:50 PM, Jonathan Allen wrote:

   1. does LibreOffice work with the same rules?

Yes, no, and maybe.

The Maybe part is that how words are counted, depends upon what, and
how LibreOffice has been configured to count words.

The Yes part is that LibreOffice that can count words, using word
boundaries.

The No part, is that LibreOffice that can count words, ignoring word
boundaries.

   2. from an academic point of view, if a word-count limit is set for
  a document, would you expect a best-effort count in OO to be an
  excuse for being a tad over in MS Word?

What ruleset does that academic institution in question use, to
determine the number of words in a document?

More pertinent to the original question, is how does the institution
define word?

Historically, a word is either five successive characters (typing) or
six successive characters (printing), with no consideration being given
to word-boundaries.

jonathon



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature