RE: Using EL expressions in an ObjectFactory
Hi,
I implemented a simple ExpressionFactory @
https://github.com/kalgon/expression-factory.
I would love to see this ExpressionFactory next to
org.apache.naming.factory.BeanFactory in tomcat.
Regards,
Xavier
From: kal...@hotmail.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Using EL expressions in an ObjectFactory
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:41:09 +0200
Hi,
I don't think you understood me. The point here is not about the
${catalina.base}, it's about the whole expression
CacheManager.newInstance(URI('file:${catalina.base}/conf/ehcache.xml').toURL()).
The ${catalina.base} will of course be expanded and give something like:
CacheManager.newInstance(URI('file:/home/tomcat/conf/ehcache.xml').toURL())
And then, this expression can be evaluated through EL and give a real
CacheManager instance.
I could have written this that way:
CacheManager.newInstance(URI('file:'+System.getProperty('catalina.base')+'/conf/ehcache.xml').toURL())
The important thing here is that the whole expression parameter could be
given to an ELProcessor instead of having specialized ObjectFactory for each
case (I would of course use a specific ObjectFactory if there's one, like
BasicDataSourceFactory... but for exotic and rare cases where no
ObjectFactory exist, a generic EL-based one could be helpful).
Xavier
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:53:31 -0400
From: ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using EL expressions in an ObjectFactory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Xavier,
On 8/29/13 3:06 AM, Xavier Dury wrote:
Could it be possible for the tomcat team to include a
javax.naming.spi.ObjectFactory which would use EL3.0 expressions?
It would be great if you want to have resource-ref which are not of
the usual types.
I always wanted to have an ObjectFactory for URLs but having one
for each type is too much work... so now, that we have a more
powerful EL engine, maybe it would a great opportunity to use it.
Resource name=/url/SomeService type=java.net.URL
factory=org.apache.tomcat.jndi.ELObjectFactory
importClass=java.net.URI
expression=URI('http://some.service.url').toURL() /
Resource name=/cache/CacheManager
type=net.sf.ehcache.CacheManager
factory=org.apache.tomcat.jndi.ELObjectFactory
importClass=net.sf.ehcache.CacheManager,java.net.URI
importStatic=net.sf.ehcache.CacheManager.newInstance
expression=CacheManager.newInstance(URI('file:${catalina.base}/conf/ehcache.xml').toURL())
What's
wrong with just using $catalina.base within your context.xml?
It will expand appropriately already... no EL needed.
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=9lxu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Using EL expressions in an ObjectFactory
On 12/09/2013 11:49, Xavier Dury wrote: Hi, I implemented a simple ExpressionFactory @ https://github.com/kalgon/expression-factory. I would love to see this ExpressionFactory next to org.apache.naming.factory.BeanFactory in tomcat. No objections in principle. Haven't looked at the new code in detail. A few initial observations: - I'm assuming this is a contribution as per section 5 of the Apache License, version 2.0 - There is no documentation - Tomcat code standards use 4 spaces for indents, not tabs - Some @Override markers look to be missing Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Using EL expressions in an ObjectFactory
Ok, I fixed the styling and the documentation. If anything else must be changed, don't hesitate. Thanks, Xavier. Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:01:26 +0100 From: ma...@apache.org To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Using EL expressions in an ObjectFactory On 12/09/2013 11:49, Xavier Dury wrote: Hi, I implemented a simple ExpressionFactory @ https://github.com/kalgon/expression-factory. I would love to see this ExpressionFactory next to org.apache.naming.factory.BeanFactory in tomcat. No objections in principle. Haven't looked at the new code in detail. A few initial observations: - I'm assuming this is a contribution as per section 5 of the Apache License, version 2.0 - There is no documentation - Tomcat code standards use 4 spaces for indents, not tabs - Some @Override markers look to be missing Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Registering Plugins, e.g. javax.imageio...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Shanti, On 9/11/13 3:03 PM, Shanti Suresh wrote: Hi Konstantin, Hi Chris, On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: BTW, beware of known issue, mentioned in the FAQ, http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/KnownIssues#ImageIOIssues +1 Could you please explain this bug better? So from the nice writeup in the Wiki link above, I understand that the OutputStream object may be re-assigned by Tomcat to another servlet. So what does this statement mean: Tomcat recycles OutputStream http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/OutputStreamobjects to save resources, so it could be that when flush() is called from the ImageIO, the particular OutputStreamhttp://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/OutputStreamobject already belongs to another Response, which can produce the above errors, when the Servlet tries to get a Session for example, or can generally lead to broken responses. I had a little trouble with the term recycle a while back. In this case the opposite of recycle is discard. This means that the same (underlying) OutputStream is used over and over again across lots of requests. If you have ImageIO hold-on to a reference to one of these things (that's the bug), it can corrupt a later response. In other contexts, the term recycle actually means discard, such as in the system property org.apache.catalina.connector.RECYCLE_FACADES http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/systemprops.html#Security So my understanding of flush() is that any remaining bytes are written to the OutputStream. Yes. But, if there are no additional bytes to send, it can still interfere with the outgoing request (e.g. committing the response too early, etc.). But nowhere is it mentioned that flush() closes the OutputStream. It does not. So I am confused how a new Servlet cannot get a session object for a recycled OutputStream when all that's going on is that the remaining bytes are written out. Is the close() method the culprit? I think you are confused about a few things. Flushing the stream does not close it, but the finalizer I believe also closes the stream as well. Tomcat may not allow the stream to actually be closed (because Tomcat wants the stream to say open... at least the stream object that it presents to servlets), so the close() does nothing. The flush(), however, still occurs. Flushing the OutputStream of a response commits the response -- meaning that the bytes are actually sent to the client. If that happens (remember: ImageIO is interfering with a later and unrelated request to the image-related one) than the later request -- still in-process -- might not have expected that response-commit and things like request.getSession() can fail because those calls must be made before the response has been sent to the client (because creating the JSESSIONID cookie requires setting a response header). Hope that helps, - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSMdhqAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYB1gP/060YfcR6weyQCUyqhNXM3g5 DAISokCzJHoHTXlTyn3ekjwsr0w2NRpCdlqam/JLvDe9LEqOudyxT7vToJfsSe5p JIkI/p4aWAR5YizJ+blASpItN2/4jW4FTSBcfNTrvtKx7atUKbhvd9G6xOzmQsYA 6VPgFqJIwPW5bOf2KyHwrrKIPe8PhIva9eJKDJqRtWm0ruOmOxqUKn6ZTYkwcOrP L9DJSIcx0RPoX25IuqIA2lBOsHJzPsngUTiv/4wRUBun38XuBCvGdG+v6fW+jdvo Gg6TNlTxybNx6Wzs7Uk8/y/PVQGnZXr8ge1nN2/YoyUxEdegl7Ac25s7BeQZjdDI eey1xC9s9vJyz2YSn4TrTsD6iDfhZatU3JTt+5QdHFElkUgUhuI5g4Ivj4X4Nd+0 GyX20MN9y7k8DmGNSq6c7TB8jw1UwxFl9PUkGaXwQvtxHkMXe/xv+PAcINvo0nnw /VrWwKqzKg3QglzBuCvbNlV8SIJu2J/yusJXUq8THUvbkl9diimp+jQebjEi3SQD mtGgLd/+X8mzsEoM2w76ZMdQiw72gycGvebIF7793G2myHhvkYBab1Bjp6NpA/OA gFMWHOJFxrTB2ZgSTmXKCm2ScR28RkZAzF1rUzOqXYeApnyFPhrKAzfa9CzYQHsX U2YZMAhQnSK6udGCEPmC =Tfg4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: How tomcat is handling bandwidth sharing across all request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 André, On 9/11/13 3:41 PM, André Warnier wrote: Arun Kumar wrote: Hi We are developing small video hosting application ,we are not writing any special program for open the video file and send to player , simply we are using tomcat DefaultServlet for above all video request , now we have to benchmark our application for following scenario 1) video size 100MB (1080i HD) 2) Total Network bandwidth 10Mbps (IN/OUT) Now how to calculate how many max thread is allowed for above scenario ,with out interrupting users viewing experience, here each video response should secure 400kbps bandwidth for no interruption 400 Kb/s = (approx.) 0.4 Mb/s So in the theoretical very best of cases, you could possibly serve 10 / 0.4 = 25 clients at the same time. But of course that will never happen, because there will always be something else using a part of that bandwidth at any one time, or preventing some of the 25 threads to be serving a video file. So, realistically, count about 50% of that ? So my question is how many concurrent users can view videos without interrupt then how to test this scenario ,and how tomcat is handling bandwidth sharing across the request Tomcat is not doing anything in terms of sharing the bandwidth equally between threads. Your best bet is to try this out in reality. There are a number of client programs available that allow you to test this and measure the result. This one for instance : http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/programs/ab.html Install Apache httpd (any 2.x version), it comes with it free. Better yet, launch a bunch of the actual clients against a test service, and see how many you can run usably before things start lagging too much. That should give you a good idea of what is possible. Hint: you probably need more bandwidth than you think you do. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSMdVRAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYI7cP/0FSfiIkz6bSPwTW1stCtEYr Gmke5rHjR33PdKtG4C8M2UgU4cdibuXmtIJn7uBdkVZkT/ufi0LsiFnC63CZkB2Q 9g1/jLyB7dwx67+ZzMnNLU6Wt16/IxHUsHywFYu8DSvaSNwdRr9Tk65AKjU17eii 7xlEzCQN5FMHJSKlmWcThrMjJGwwSSzhQrylylxXtoH31pH5OUUz41onHiRgz7Xp UgjaurHw+THzJSmSn9Eqjsx5V0PCjAi6xPvjYbZsvdV0j1LrUOMei/mGTYBS7mxk OpBegz8iRkTuwm7Y3bjnsfoaSkU/3RDrdiNlu0Xb4WLPP6wEYke2hLgfSrpV9suY h9amPzIlEhWBn6KQzoQY8n06dGMONyWPmwTDSAEl1HhwMH5oYiyMoZuaQsekFNcJ 2zFAAatb3xu+z5kql+p/iafQk/gACjHUjJu1+emn//qcrWlKr7mspnF7IoJgf016 c+rMk/SKQRlD5v/+eGP1Hs/IOytNeIZLzcGfH9Dj6lYQjzQLk0NcctevUlNwjs3/ k+1yDmVGQloR+RJL5hiPBse+hPHiuW2JGajhBdg4Hb569zlEPpDBJAVaAwaESwzq e8goNdkjMZqzRy6ULqlLAqFhpFwQK1ES38WBYeVkuC0BcSN8pcYyc2pih2lQCdkq aB2wY4JyF8bZUeWxT0zv =v0nT -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: How tomcat is handling bandwidth sharing across all request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Arun, On 9/11/13 3:15 PM, Arun Kumar wrote: my native client is using http range parameter for requesting video Excellent! The client is on the right track, then. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSMdTkAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYyPUQALAkXweuEEqBeoCj1819BdF4 4uDiJIBf50MxvBG0eMMZeorkekdN1VB8doW8/zgUNo+7iQlIQdnU3vrK7Rg0Co8T nOgVjfKLIjOMota/T6xN117O5k3A99eexVAKS9KAzBkYt7YxaioIgJaa8Ap+4Ltd EKw7cIkd5RAJXO73l/lc7bj/ESCeZrs+FTPcfbAg2PWwT7G0o6M0BST266r/jk+I ZFrbmeicwY/09+LOYRJkfhP6SKHPNctrOENYvxXH6A3xWwKK0gFDG3TF7NkxMcHC /JiKOmte6VEGrmT8xOCLpO3ZeB8xQV74d2gIk/dpEaQfT6TbkJBpggn5WvxanDav 2LWni2ZK0Fn7alIbokEBzGOX3pkmFbQMz7iLxkgmFEpsCcjD9oBcfODLajLUrimA SehmParFls2m8+ccl3CYUyOVFpIpDd9iDdpoEnpnQ4b9/MZQB/l3uhAqVXAVLgfD nIvQXGncdFNUqFAis+lWiPINzcEl39pCQgcdqnAD5lyystBpyzKAOC2QnUyvsoEw g+3NewTrfHfqacNtSZ0GfwR0nGHkaITYsZG/RN+mLsJ+nRILsU1dEizRBXsshFXr ITXv7f58mLuqkzo186yhWEP5iswvZsM+p9V9jCJQD5jOmAKnC3Pz/Lt5mt1HvQ1G MkNSvukI/+q6P9YgHb/f =fz0l -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [Tomcat-7.0.42/JmxRemoteLifecycleListener] rmiBindAddress vs localhost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Marcin, On 9/11/13 2:29 PM, Marcin Domański wrote: Hi there! I am trying to setup a Tomcat instance using only specific address for all communications. This is convenient for us from the point of IPsec. I was able to succeed in http, https, ajp, etc. but for JMX I still cannot get it right. For this example, let's assume, my desired address is 127.2.0.1. Currently my configuration is as follows: - Listener className=org.apache.catalina.mbeans.JmxRemoteLifecycleListener rmiRegistryPortPlatform=9012 rmiServerPortPlatform=9013 useLocalPorts=true / Which allows to connect to the server at service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi:// 127.2.0.1:9012/jmxrmi but also localhost (means I cannot run second instance with different IP) Hmm. I would have expected useLocalPorts to bind only to 127.0.0.1 (i.e. localhost). What does netstat tell you under this configuration? On the other hand,when I try following: - Listener className=org.apache.catalina.mbeans.JmxRemoteLifecycleListener rmiRegistryPortPlatform=9012 rmiServerPortPlatform=9013 useLocalPorts=true rmiBindAddress=127.2.0.1/ On Windows machine I get a network error basically saying there is no server configured at localhost in JmxRemoteLifecycleListener:304. You get this on startup? Post the full stack trace, please. What do you have in /etc/hosts (or the win32 equivalent)? What happens if you do rmiBindAddress=127.2.0.1 and don't specify useLocalPorts=true (I believe the former essentially covers the latter)? Here's the code : http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.apache.tomcat/tomcat-catalina-jmx-remote/7.0.42/org/apache/catalina/mbeans/JmxRemoteLifecycleListener.java#304 According to that it seems that both Tomcat RMI server and registry must be accessible on localhost when using JmxRemoteLifecycleListener. Is it true? useLocalPorts=true means that Tomcat will use localhost as the binding host address. If you don't have localhost defined anywhere (usually /etc/hosts), then the IP lookup will fail. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSMdp3AAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYNl4QAJbbOhlb4Sjj1JN5IfP9GFhj IWACAiwnpvAnhwft86HJHzLPWP4i2+OLcRmko1txZv3xmP+KtdsFEe2g4dxhPeHd Ud9U3vXrf4iroBy5GssTdx0yF7NHBIvmI6yM0ec72Mm/OunPHJAfsBJsKTRczM1P mv+u40WacuyoTqMtAwpb8y3skhQXq1gAS53nrlleWM80xhx7vmdEo27S5JRk00hq g7hyENYWHfvxnctiIlwmY1e2nnLvp8+donxDBYwuGI4mQj9U8+kcl+zrt1V1d1ZM la4snyHhZM+VpLCDmF9xu5Qr2BC7Wu9BYZjC6jRv6EfqjkfymJd3KnasnLy62SkL 0pqka6KM1+j5kwXCLDdqnzB210pT2yGzcZN/uki+cSZHaZ1m7d+eBXmtH+FkrULN SYEPrcd3OCtkBE7wkV5JnAuArso/Pq70My9C4J/2R5cLqgFzq2gdSAKLz9gx3Cm0 tofye1Iceci/wEIXsdvvevMImLtVaqPMFjDH9KhMx8Wa0JFBx6u50JhIlehdrwD+ j/nqwB7pyeCMwz5cN9BTWXLA42qxiRw5hQfhMqsyhwT1vmXhEhzkG2KV+mkqtB7P FIhFmliRJLS9WXObjmpJQep13idPk/mbdLxXZIIzjpsk85gV0hndIZuszhiZGHe0 p1NjpJjVvbR7t2AHuOFr =e0yo -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: too many apache digester logs
this is the output from my console lots of these logs catalina.properties http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/file/n5004650/catalina.properties consoleoutput.txt http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/file/n5004650/consoleoutput.txt Attached catalina.properties and consoleoutput.txt Please advice. -- View this message in context: http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/too-many-apache-digester-logs-tp5004609p5004650.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Tomcat (build)
Hello to all, With Apache (http server), there are specific build IPV4 or IPV6. Is it the same kind of thing with Tomcat ? If yes, where i can find these builds ? Thanks in advance. Olivier.
Re: Tomcat (build)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Olivier, On 9/12/13 2:53 PM, olivier giorgi wrote: With Apache (http server), there are specific build IPV4 or IPV6. What? ASF only provides binaries for NetWare and win32, and none of them have separate IPv4 and IPv6 packages. Have a look for yourself: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/httpd/binaries/win32/ Is it the same kind of thing with Tomcat ? Uh... yes and no: Tomcat does not have separate binaries, so it's like httpd. But no, Tomcat doesn't have separate binaries so it's not like your (incorrect) expectations. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSMhxbAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYcLYP/3iAiHfqirAqNPdnvRS8jWSZ o6dnMJfY9khnOK3P049cz/NvQChDH6e62wv/ZTs1Mx1IQIErSLbzPzMOgtKJWtrQ OFkLMIpA2Mo/T9LRPI2SMCTjFMU9bJjmZIGhn63C90RkMs1YMItraQFeJ1ZEjSnp SWV0zf4+CcCGboOdcvCVJ4xyJaaFUjecXWsOHdW0QW2lao21tZnW7UJ/xxlldOtH jZbdzcMQDye9gaqkOQtN5uBvdrMCAL39fHIWFR+KxL76pyC6HSomc4e2kVnpluMb 4FBxfsap+voWiVRjcevvHFvUkSW0EwcwxMNFIXayaOu8uyiU2Td4uCT9xgHf24sl +8NQ6QcBFooJmDqkXS/6FG+aRbEiPQXoTESl0f9zKToqmxrFPY2u4glGiHsX53TF eNVVsrPnWC6ZzH1qUb2f6a994jhDHBoeaxyAY4YlitKVs4BrdiI0jmk0HZvh2O3U SscEtZLtGLXcA8KvAIgalL0ohTo8ZH4zvEfiP3gTCjAHK81zteCQRgSPuv0sbw8P sErj7tJ/uB3ukwTAbE4I2ukq6DHzhHLpC+E3W0x1z/fP57B80B+GcQtJrbgmM3mH YMg/+Nughm17VMRa3IjybFTdIKwX02GP66N2qNxhfzZ6tFHKD/Nd/0JdbMx1xM8X nSM6YTFCtC70Wxaap6ab =LR8k -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: too many apache digester logs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 fachhoch, On 9/12/13 1:08 PM, fachhoch wrote: this is the output from my console lots of these logs catalina.properties http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/file/n5004650/catalina.properties consoleoutput.txt http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/file/n5004650/consoleoutput.txt Attached catalina.properties and consoleoutput.txt Please advice. I think you want to look at conf/logging.properties. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSMht9AAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYc50QAMNqDBTh1fTjyWUH8DyM/QBq bLwFHklfYc3NCvlZwxXjdXkhpJhMXX5asHZWK9F1yJp0T6rNsAjVR8KuEvcvv5VF cYu7IEmLZ4cXh9Te4HMXFD4Cz4XJWkaG5G6QXA9QnLFumUSq+lyXmrVWIS50t5kD tgHUQuFzGXamjoKPYr4eW8Dd+voOsdsepAPDkh/TIrP0yZoJK15M8hysGThdeYsP 2TTQxjyMjyfagkqPLWHIVhuK0JVlfWQC1RJgLe9lZjq2VCSGVlCShF+UJUsiEJwI MHpiWFy+IzUEAyj6SiXj1VJcUV+0PNzQ0j/Ib435l2jSWTYf3a/aUzJfTd9UpcTR vrxCuM1jkR4xYWESosPfuhXcTl796xqxr2y7qYDx64mqqCRxUfmzmDNYQOa1mg5L zTTidthuzTRede4wS9asJFr059z7ugDe0dnU4jX+lzakAbeNd7PDcPOcee/8qkRG 6U78AS6viAaVTh7jBZzfqo2PbdIlqTXYrmxC6SRIU50xoq4EtWFSadonYaSllUty rOJqJeDWO1BJFuKROI2d8TwDbt364mauZ4ydtYSR0f4aiIoPKBHR5Ukp5MHOtQ5+ +1LdiM0y73HL0l4az+273cPowS97P7mPPR0KGOhhTe9Dc31TJga30aIJZWFpeqLd hWJNh7Dory+upeuaMpwv =GnfW -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
New website skin looks great
WOW! I love the new design of the tomcat web site. It looks much more professional and refined. It is also much easier to read. The prior background colors caused the text to run together. This is so much better. I love the subtle but clear separation and grouping of information. Thanks, Lance Campbell Software Architect Web Services at Public Affairs 217-333-0382 [University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo]http://illinois.edu/
problem with Remote Address Filter
Hi - I'm running Apache Tomcat Version 7.0.29. I have inserted a Remote Address filter into server.xml inside of the Host tag. It is not blocking addresses that are not in Allow. I am using the Remote Address filter because I want to allow access only to addresses in our institution's community. This is a large institution and we have 4 or 5 class B address ranges, maybe 10 class Cs, and a number of broken ranges. The regular expression runs to 8181 characters without doubling up on \. It does, however, work in a test Java class that I wrote, correctly allowing and disallowing a test group of addresses. One question I have is that the example in http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/filter.html#Remote_Address_Filter has single backslashes, but in order to make the pattern work in my test class, I had to double up on the slashes. I took a look at the RequestFilter code, and it looks like the pattern string is just passed to Pattern.compile, so the pattern in the filter should need double slashes. I've tried it both ways and neither worked. Anybody have any idea about what might be going wrong? Garey Mills Library Systems Office UC Berkeley
Re: Using EL expressions in an ObjectFactory
On Sep 12, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Xavier Dury kal...@hotmail.com wrote: Ok, I fixed the styling and the documentation. If anything else must be changed, don't hesitate. In your docs, you state the following remark... Try to avoid overloaded methods/constructors as much as possible in EL 3.0 expression as the ELProcessor will use the first one it will find by reflection. Can you clarify what you mean by this? There was a problem in RC-1 that sounds similar, but it's been fixed. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55483 Is this a problem in trunk? Point being, if you're seeing an issue with EL 3.0, we should try to fix it. Dan Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:01:26 +0100 From: ma...@apache.org To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Using EL expressions in an ObjectFactory On 12/09/2013 11:49, Xavier Dury wrote: Hi, I implemented a simple ExpressionFactory @ https://github.com/kalgon/expression-factory. I would love to see this ExpressionFactory next to org.apache.naming.factory.BeanFactory in tomcat. No objections in principle. Haven't looked at the new code in detail. A few initial observations: - I'm assuming this is a contribution as per section 5 of the Apache License, version 2.0 - There is no documentation - Tomcat code standards use 4 spaces for indents, not tabs - Some @Override markers look to be missing Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Tomcat (build)
On Sep 12, 2013, at 2:53 PM, olivier giorgi olivier_gio...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello to all, With Apache (http server), there are specific build IPV4 or IPV6. Is it the same kind of thing with Tomcat ? No. Tomcat uses the networking support provided by the JVM, which should support both IPv4 IPv6. The only time this would not be true is if you're using the tcnative library with Tomcat using the APR connector. In this case, you'd need to build the tcnative library against a version of libapr that supports IPv6. You can tell if this is the true, because when the tcnative library is loaded you'll see output like this. INFO: APR capabilities: IPv6 [true], sendfile [true], accept filters [false], random [true]. If yes, where i can find these builds ? There are no binaries for tcnative on Unix based systems, you'd simply need to build from source. There is a Windows binary here. http://apache.tradebit.com/pub/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.27/binaries/ Dan Thanks in advance. Olivier. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
