[USMA:9475] (off topic) Re: Canadian General Election

2000-12-01 Thread Daniel Bishop

No recounts?  No lawsuits?  No lengthy debates over chads?

Why can't the US have a system like that?

- Original Message -
From: "Joseph B. Reid" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "U.S. Metric Association" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 06:02
Subject: [USMA:9406] Canadian General Election


 I must apologize for this very off-topic posting.  However, I think some
 other persons have been as quilty as I in this regard.

 Yesterday Canada had a general election.  The old-fashioned paper ballots
 were marked with lead pencils.  There were no exit polls.  All ballolts
 were hand counted  - no machinery.  The result was known by 22:15 EST, and
 the Leader of the Opposition made his concession speech at 23:15 EST.  The
 Globe and Mail this morning printed the results from the the 301
 constituencies, including three arctic constituencies.


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




[USMA:9477] Re: Figures of speech remain!!

2000-12-01 Thread CarletonM

In a message dated 2000-11-30 18:11:33 Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Milestone.  We need to get Microsoft Project and the Project Management
  Institute to change that also.
  
  Baron

Also our local big-box shopping center in Germantown, Maryland, just north of 
here, so I can go to Petsmart, Home Depot, Target and Mega Lo Mart at the 
Kilometerstone Center.

Carleton




[USMA:9479] Swatch Time editorial

2000-12-01 Thread Howard Ressel

There was an editorial in my local paper today, the Rochester Democrat
 Chronicle. It was an anti-swatch time editorial but there was a hidden
pro metric message. The article was against swatch time arguing that the
24 hr clock was based on scientific principles and does not lends itself to
a logical division by 10.  

"Time doesn't fit nicely into division of 10 the way that measuring
distance or weight does. Scientist had their reasons for choosing 24
hours and 60 minutes , and they still hold"

I may write and ask them, if measuring by 10's is so simple why does the
paper insist on measuring everything in 12's (ie inches/feet).

Howard Ressel, Metric Manager
New York State Department of Transportation, Region 4




[USMA:9480] new teasers are posted

2000-12-01 Thread Hillger, Don

Valerie and Lorelle,

There are some additional upgrades to post at some time, but instead of
waiting for those I just uploaded the MT page with the latest teasers.

Receive my 5 copies of MT in the mail yesterday.

Don




[USMA:9481] RE: Babylonian units

2000-12-01 Thread Dennis Brownridge

Newspaper editors are so incredibly ignorant about measurement. "Scientists"
didn't have any "reason" to divide days into 24 hours and hours into 60
minutes and minutes into 60 seconds. It was the ancient Babylonians who
invented hours, for superstitious astrological reasons (12 zodiac
constellations = 12 hours). The Babylonians, who had a complicated
non-decimal number system, also gave us those clumsy sexagesimal
subdivisions, "first minúte parts" [minutes] and "second minúte parts"
[seconds] that still plague us in several different angle and time units
(especially in astronomy and geography). "Scientists" tried to introduce
decimal time along with the original metric system, but it failed because
the old units were too entrenched. And I understand that in the middle ages,
hours were divided decimally for a while. The second of time is one of the
major weaknesses of SI, but it's too late to change now.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Howard Ressel
 Sent: 2000 December 1 Friday 06:17
 To: U.S. Metric Association
 Subject: [USMA:9479] Swatch Time editorial


 There was an editorial in my local paper today, the Rochester Democrat
  Chronicle. It was an anti-swatch time editorial but there was a hidden
 pro metric message. The article was against swatch time arguing that the
 24 hr clock was based on scientific principles and does not lends
 itself to
 a logical division by 10.

 "Time doesn't fit nicely into division of 10 the way that measuring
 distance or weight does. Scientist had their reasons for choosing 24
 hours and 60 minutes , and they still hold"

 I may write and ask them, if measuring by 10's is so simple why does the
 paper insist on measuring everything in 12's (ie inches/feet).

 Howard Ressel, Metric Manager
 New York State Department of Transportation, Region 4






[USMA:9482] Re: Babylonian units

2000-12-01 Thread Ma Be

On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 09:00:29Dennis Brownridge wrote:
...The second of time is one of the
major weaknesses of SI, but it's too late to change now.
...
While I agreed with nearly everything you said in this post, I unfortunately cannot on 
this one above.  I still honestly and sincerely do not think that it's too late for a 
change there.

True, the best solution to fix this might be to redefine the second to a .864 fraction 
of the current one, i.e. to make it "faster" (this would evidently entail changes in a 
host of other time-related units, I know...  But I'm focusing on this from a 
theoretical point of view).  

But I'd be happy to also consider keeping the second as is while changing time's 
framework from a 24-60-60 one to some "near" decimal alternative.  In that regard I 
consider the "swatch time" proposal a rather interesting one.  
I'm rooting for it to... "hold" or be successful.  Who knows if we might eventually 
"switch" to using a "beat" as an official unit of time (I know, I know, it would wreak 
havoc just the same, but this is at least a proposal which is on the table and that 
may have a better chance to "succeed" at fixing some "time woes" than to consider the 
redefinition of time as .864 of the "old" second.  BTW, who knows if this may not 
trigger CGPM to reconsider meddling into this affair of time... again, "for the first 
time", and finally come up with an SI version 2.0...  :-)   ).

Marcus


Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com




[USMA:9484] SI is English!

2000-12-01 Thread Scott Clauss

I have gotten tired of hearing the British and Americans say that SI is
French, and isn't their system.  This morning while looking at torque
wrenches it stuck me as odd that they advertize them as using "English and
metric" units, but the metric units were newton-meters.  I thought is was
silly saying Newton wasn't English, so I made this little table.  Appears SI
is more UK than anything else.  What did I miss, and did I get anything
wrong?

meter   From the Latin metrum and the Greek metron, both meaning "measure."
kilogramFrom chilioi, the Greek word for a thousand +  the Latin gramma,
which was   a small weight similar to the English grain
second  the second division of the hour, latin secundus
ampere  French physicist André-Marie Ampère
kelvin  English (Scottish?) mathematician and physicist William Thomson,
later   Lord Kelvin
molenamed by W. Ostwald, a German Chemist, from MOLekulargewicht.
candela From the Latin word for "candle."
radian  named by James Thomson, brother of Lord Kelvin, latin radius.
steradian   from the Greek stereos, solid + radian
hertz   German physicist Heinrich Rudolf Hertz
newton  English mathematician, and physicist Isaac Newton
pascal  French mathematician Blaise Pascal
joule   British physicist James Prescott Joule
wattBritish engineer James Watt
coulomb French physicist, Charles-Augustin de Coulomb
voltItalian scientist Count Alessandro Volta
farad   British physicist Michael Faraday
ohm German physicist Georg Simon Ohm
siemens German electrical engineer Werner von Siemens
weber   German physicist Wilhelm Eduard Weber
tesla   (Croatian- (or Serbian-?))American electrical engineer Nikola Tesla
henry   American physicist Joseph Henry
degree Celsius  Swedish astronomer and physicist Anders Celsius
lumen   from Latin for light
lux from Latin for light
becquerel   French physicist, Antoine-Henri Becquerel
grayBritish physician L. H. Gray
sievert Swedish physicist Rolf Sievert
katal   From "catalyst"?

Totals:
Non-proper name origin  10
English/British 6
German  4
French  4
American2
Swedish 2
Italian 1

If you add the quasi-SI units of talbot, bel and neper you pick up two more
Brits and another American.

After spending some time doing this I found a nice web page that has a
similar list with pictures of the men (yes they're all men) involved.
http://indykfi.atomki.hu/indyKFI/MT/orig_si.htm
Quick what metric derived, but not SI, unit is named after a woman?

And on a off topic, what is the difference between British and English?  I
suppose they used to swing swords at each other because of the distinction,
but in America at least in modern times the distinction has faded.

Since this is non-HTML the columns may get messed up in transit.

Cheers,
Scott C




[USMA:9485] Re: SI is English!

2000-12-01 Thread Louis JOURDAN

At 11:07 -0800 00/12/1, Scott Clauss wrote:
Quick what metric derived, but not SI, unit is named after a woman?

the curie, from Marie Curie (1867-1934), a great French scientist of 
Polish origin. A pity that her name was not retained for a SI unit...

Louis




[USMA:9487] Re: SI is English!

2000-12-01 Thread James R.Frysinger

OK, I give up. What's a talbot? The only thing I can find within 2 min
is "Talbot", an English dog that may have been the predecessor for the
bloodhound.

And while you're at it, how many Sverdrup Janskies per Dobson Unit is
that? ;-)

Jim

On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Scott Clauss wrote:
 I have gotten tired of hearing the British and Americans say that SI is
 French, and isn't their system.  This morning while looking at torque
 wrenches it stuck me as odd that they advertize them as using "English and
 metric" units, but the metric units were newton-meters.  I thought is was
 silly saying Newton wasn't English, so I made this little table.  Appears SI
 is more UK than anything else.  What did I miss, and did I get anything
 wrong?
 
 meter From the Latin metrum and the Greek metron, both meaning "measure."
 kilogram  From chilioi, the Greek word for a thousand +  the Latin gramma,
 which was a small weight similar to the English grain
 secondthe second division of the hour, latin secundus
 ampereFrench physicist André-Marie Ampère
 kelvinEnglish (Scottish?) mathematician and physicist William 
Thomson,
 later Lord Kelvin
 mole  named by W. Ostwald, a German Chemist, from MOLekulargewicht.
 candela   From the Latin word for "candle."
 radiannamed by James Thomson, brother of Lord Kelvin, latin radius.
 steradian from the Greek stereos, solid + radian
 hertz German physicist Heinrich Rudolf Hertz
 newtonEnglish mathematician, and physicist Isaac Newton
 pascalFrench mathematician Blaise Pascal
 joule British physicist James Prescott Joule
 watt  British engineer James Watt
 coulomb   French physicist, Charles-Augustin de Coulomb
 volt  Italian scientist Count Alessandro Volta
 farad British physicist Michael Faraday
 ohm   German physicist Georg Simon Ohm
 siemens   German electrical engineer Werner von Siemens
 weber German physicist Wilhelm Eduard Weber
 tesla (Croatian- (or Serbian-?))American electrical engineer Nikola Tesla
 henry American physicist Joseph Henry
 degree CelsiusSwedish astronomer and physicist Anders Celsius
 lumen from Latin for light
 lux   from Latin for light
 becquerel French physicist, Antoine-Henri Becquerel
 gray  British physician L. H. Gray
 sievert   Swedish physicist Rolf Sievert
 katal From "catalyst"?
 
 Totals:
 Non-proper name origin10
 English/British   6
 German4
 French4
 American  2
 Swedish   2
 Italian   1
 
 If you add the quasi-SI units of talbot, bel and neper you pick up two more
 Brits and another American.
 
 After spending some time doing this I found a nice web page that has a
 similar list with pictures of the men (yes they're all men) involved.
 http://indykfi.atomki.hu/indyKFI/MT/orig_si.htm
 Quick what metric derived, but not SI, unit is named after a woman?
 
 And on a off topic, what is the difference between British and English?  I
 suppose they used to swing swords at each other because of the distinction,
 but in America at least in modern times the distinction has faded.
 
 Since this is non-HTML the columns may get messed up in transit.
 
 Cheers,
 Scott C
-- 
James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644




[USMA:9488] Re: SI is English!

2000-12-01 Thread Bill Potts

Henry Fox Talbot.

Check this reference:
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Talbot.html.

I made a quick visit, myself, and noticed a glaring error (Wiltshire
misspelled Whiltshire). No other obvious errors though.

You might try using the Google search engine (http://google.com). The above
URL was from the ninth hit.

Bill Potts, CMS
San Jose, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of James R.Frysinger
 Sent: December 01, 2000 14:04
 To: U.S. Metric Association
 Subject: [USMA:9487] Re: SI is English!


 OK, I give up. What's a talbot? The only thing I can find within 2 min
 is "Talbot", an English dog that may have been the predecessor for the
 bloodhound.

 And while you're at it, how many Sverdrup Janskies per Dobson Unit is
 that? ;-)

 Jim

 On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Scott Clauss wrote:
  I have gotten tired of hearing the British and Americans say that SI is
  French, and isn't their system.  This morning while looking at torque
  wrenches it stuck me as odd that they advertize them as using
 "English and
  metric" units, but the metric units were newton-meters.  I
 thought is was
  silly saying Newton wasn't English, so I made this little
 table.  Appears SI
  is more UK than anything else.  What did I miss, and did I get anything
  wrong?
 
  meter   From the Latin metrum and the Greek metron,
 both meaning "measure."
  kilogramFrom chilioi, the Greek word for a thousand +  the
 Latin gramma,
  which was   a small weight similar to the English grain
  second  the second division of the hour, latin secundus
  ampere  French physicist André-Marie Ampère
  kelvin  English (Scottish?) mathematician and
 physicist William Thomson,
  later   Lord Kelvin
  molenamed by W. Ostwald, a German Chemist, from
 MOLekulargewicht.
  candela From the Latin word for "candle."
  radian  named by James Thomson, brother of Lord
 Kelvin, latin radius.
  steradian   from the Greek stereos, solid + radian
  hertz   German physicist Heinrich Rudolf Hertz
  newton  English mathematician, and physicist Isaac Newton
  pascal  French mathematician Blaise Pascal
  joule   British physicist James Prescott Joule
  wattBritish engineer James Watt
  coulomb French physicist, Charles-Augustin de Coulomb
  voltItalian scientist Count Alessandro Volta
  farad   British physicist Michael Faraday
  ohm German physicist Georg Simon Ohm
  siemens German electrical engineer Werner von Siemens
  weber   German physicist Wilhelm Eduard Weber
  tesla   (Croatian- (or Serbian-?))American
 electrical engineer Nikola Tesla
  henry   American physicist Joseph Henry
  degree Celsius  Swedish astronomer and physicist Anders Celsius
  lumen   from Latin for light
  lux from Latin for light
  becquerel   French physicist, Antoine-Henri Becquerel
  grayBritish physician L. H. Gray
  sievert Swedish physicist Rolf Sievert
  katal   From "catalyst"?
 
  Totals:
  Non-proper name origin  10
  English/British 6
  German  4
  French  4
  American2
  Swedish 2
  Italian 1
 
  If you add the quasi-SI units of talbot, bel and neper you pick
 up two more
  Brits and another American.
 
  After spending some time doing this I found a nice web page that has a
  similar list with pictures of the men (yes they're all men) involved.
  http://indykfi.atomki.hu/indyKFI/MT/orig_si.htm
  Quick what metric derived, but not SI, unit is named after a woman?
 
  And on a off topic, what is the difference between British and
 English?  I
  suppose they used to swing swords at each other because of the
 distinction,
  but in America at least in modern times the distinction has faded.
 
  Since this is non-HTML the columns may get messed up in transit.
 
  Cheers,
  Scott C
 --
 James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
 10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
 Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
 843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
 http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644






[USMA:9489] Re: Australia not fully converted yet

2000-12-01 Thread Paul Trusten

I'm not sure what an international unit is vis a vis SI, but it is not
backward. It is a correct expression of a concentration, sayeth this
apothecary.

"Carter, Baron" wrote:
 
 Australia not fully converted yet.  Its Quarantine and Inspection Service
 still quotes vaccination doses in IU/ml
 
 http://www.aqis.gov.au/docs/anpolicy/dogcatapplication.pdf
 http://www.aqis.gov.au/docs/anpolicy/dogcatapplication.pdf
 
   
 Name: Boomerang.gif
Boomerang.gifType: GIF Image (image/gif)
 Encoding: base64

-- 
Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apt. 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


"No one from the Audubon Society has yet documented the
finding of a modified barium swallow."   
 --Byrd Ona Wyng, Forensic Ornithologist

"Free Billy Rubin!" ---Medical Technologists'  protest cry




[USMA:9490] Re: Australia not fully converted yet

2000-12-01 Thread Scott Clauss

Some vitamin and vaccine doses are measured by their biological activity,
which, in turn, does not directly relate to the mass of a discrete compound
per unit volume (concentration), so it is impossible to give a exact
concentration for them in any metric units (or FFUs for that matter).
International Units (IU) are used instead.  These are based on an
internationally agreed on biologicall effect or response.  I don't know what
organizations do this agreeing.  Vitamins A, D and E are examples of this.
There are various forms of these vitamins with which the body can "do its
thing."  Each has a different molecular weight so to get the same effect
would require different concentrations of each form.  The vitamins you buy
are most likely mixtures of various forms.  Vaccines are sometimes made of
busted up bits of viruses or bacteria.  Some of these bits can evoke an
immune response, but trying to get a precise mass and therefore a precise
concentration based on which bits cause a immune response while discounting
those that do not would not be useful.

In short I think that dispensing vaccine by IU/mL does not disqualify
Australia from the fully converted side of the isle.

Scott C

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Paul Trusten
 Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 2:33 PM
 To: U.S. Metric Association
 Cc: U.S. Metric Association
 Subject: [USMA:9489] Re: Australia not fully converted yet


 I'm not sure what an international unit is vis a vis SI, but it is not
 backward. It is a correct expression of a concentration, sayeth this
 apothecary.

 "Carter, Baron" wrote:
 
  Australia not fully converted yet.  Its Quarantine and
 Inspection Service
  still quotes vaccination doses in IU/ml
 
  http://www.aqis.gov.au/docs/anpolicy/dogcatapplication.pdf
  http://www.aqis.gov.au/docs/anpolicy/dogcatapplication.pdf
 
 
 
  Name: Boomerang.gif
 Boomerang.gifType: GIF Image (image/gif)
  Encoding: base64

 --
 Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
 3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apt. 122
 Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 "No one from the Audubon Society has yet documented the
 finding of a modified barium swallow."
  --Byrd Ona Wyng, Forensic Ornithologist

 "Free Billy Rubin!" ---Medical Technologists'  protest cry





[USMA:9491] FW: SI is English!

2000-12-01 Thread Scott Clauss

Meant to send this to the list, but it went to James F. only--oops.

SC

-Original Message-
From: Scott Clauss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [USMA:9484] SI is English!


The talbot is a unit of luminous (light) energy. One talbot is the energy
carried by a light flux of one lumen in one second, that is, the talbot is
the same as the lumen second (lm·s). For light of wavelength 555 nanometers
(nm), the wavelength to which the eye is most sensitive, the talbot equals
1.464 millijoule. For other wavelengths l, the talbot equals 1.464·V(l)
millijoules, where V(l) is the "luminous efficiency," a factor representing
the relative sensitivity of the eye at wavelength l. Although the talbot is
compatible with the SI, it has not been accepted as part of the
International System; the symbol T would not be acceptable since it
duplicates the symbol for the tesla. The unit, previously called the
lumberg, is now named for the British physicist W.H. Fox Talbot (1800-1877).

Above stolen from :  http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/dictT.html

I don't think you could convert talbots to Sverdrup(m3/s) Janskies(W/m2Hz)
per Dobson Unit(m)  without extreme difficulty and much hand waving, but
Sverdrup was Norwegian, Jansky was American and Dobson was (is?)
British--none is French.

SC

 -Original Message-
 From: James R.Frysinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 2:04 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Scott Clauss; U.S. Metric Association
 Subject: Re: [USMA:9484] SI is English!


 OK, I give up. What's a talbot? The only thing I can find within 2 min
 is "Talbot", an English dog that may have been the predecessor for the
 bloodhound.

 And while you're at it, how many Sverdrup Janskies per Dobson Unit is
 that? ;-)

 Jim

 On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Scott Clauss wrote:
  I have gotten tired of hearing the British and Americans say that SI is
  French, and isn't their system.  This morning while looking at torque
  wrenches it stuck me as odd that they advertize them as using
 "English and
  metric" units, but the metric units were newton-meters.  I
 thought is was
  silly saying Newton wasn't English, so I made this little
 table.  Appears SI
  is more UK than anything else.  What did I miss, and did I get anything
  wrong?
 
  meter   From the Latin metrum and the Greek metron,
 both meaning "measure."
  kilogramFrom chilioi, the Greek word for a thousand +  the
 Latin gramma,
  which was   a small weight similar to the English grain
  second  the second division of the hour, latin secundus
  ampere  French physicist André-Marie Ampère
  kelvin  English (Scottish?) mathematician and
 physicist William Thomson,
  later   Lord Kelvin
  molenamed by W. Ostwald, a German Chemist, from
 MOLekulargewicht.
  candela From the Latin word for "candle."
  radian  named by James Thomson, brother of Lord
 Kelvin, latin radius.
  steradian   from the Greek stereos, solid + radian
  hertz   German physicist Heinrich Rudolf Hertz
  newton  English mathematician, and physicist Isaac Newton
  pascal  French mathematician Blaise Pascal
  joule   British physicist James Prescott Joule
  wattBritish engineer James Watt
  coulomb French physicist, Charles-Augustin de Coulomb
  voltItalian scientist Count Alessandro Volta
  farad   British physicist Michael Faraday
  ohm German physicist Georg Simon Ohm
  siemens German electrical engineer Werner von Siemens
  weber   German physicist Wilhelm Eduard Weber
  tesla   (Croatian- (or Serbian-?))American
 electrical engineer Nikola Tesla
  henry   American physicist Joseph Henry
  degree Celsius  Swedish astronomer and physicist Anders Celsius
  lumen   from Latin for light
  lux from Latin for light
  becquerel   French physicist, Antoine-Henri Becquerel
  grayBritish physician L. H. Gray
  sievert Swedish physicist Rolf Sievert
  katal   From "catalyst"?
 
  Totals:
  Non-proper name origin  10
  English/British 6
  German  4
  French  4
  American2
  Swedish 2
  Italian 1
 
  If you add the quasi-SI units of talbot, bel and neper you pick
 up two more
  Brits and another American.
 
  After spending some time doing this I found a nice web page that has a
  similar list with pictures of the men (yes they're all men) involved.
  http://indykfi.atomki.hu/indyKFI/MT/orig_si.htm
  Quick what metric derived, but not SI, unit is named after a woman?
 
  And on a off topic, what is the difference between British and
 English?  I
  

[USMA:9492] Re: SI is English!

2000-12-01 Thread James R.Frysinger

Thanks to Bill and Scott, on the talbot. As I said, I had not taken the
time to do an internet keyword search. I appreciate you two for doing
that for me. I'll have to add that to my unwritten list of arcane,
guild-craft terminology, along with the Sverdrup, Jansky, Dobson Unit,
Kilpatrick, etc. Gee, and scientists wonder why beginning students
think we make things complicated!

Jim

On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Bill Potts wrote:
 Henry Fox Talbot.
 
 Check this reference:
 http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Talbot.html.
 
 I made a quick visit, myself, and noticed a glaring error (Wiltshire
 misspelled Whiltshire). No other obvious errors though.
 
 You might try using the Google search engine (http://google.com). The above
 URL was from the ninth hit.
 
 Bill Potts, CMS
 San Jose, CA
 http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
  Behalf Of James R.Frysinger
  Sent: December 01, 2000 14:04
  To: U.S. Metric Association
  Subject: [USMA:9487] Re: SI is English!
 
 
  OK, I give up. What's a talbot? The only thing I can find within 2 min
  is "Talbot", an English dog that may have been the predecessor for the
  bloodhound.
 
  And while you're at it, how many Sverdrup Janskies per Dobson Unit is
  that? ;-)
 
  Jim
 
  On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Scott Clauss wrote:
   I have gotten tired of hearing the British and Americans say that SI is
   French, and isn't their system.  This morning while looking at torque
   wrenches it stuck me as odd that they advertize them as using
  "English and
   metric" units, but the metric units were newton-meters.  I
  thought is was
   silly saying Newton wasn't English, so I made this little
  table.  Appears SI
   is more UK than anything else.  What did I miss, and did I get anything
   wrong?
  
   meter From the Latin metrum and the Greek metron,
  both meaning "measure."
   kilogram  From chilioi, the Greek word for a thousand +  the
  Latin gramma,
   which was a small weight similar to the English grain
   secondthe second division of the hour, latin secundus
   ampereFrench physicist André-Marie Ampère
   kelvinEnglish (Scottish?) mathematician and
  physicist William Thomson,
   later Lord Kelvin
   mole  named by W. Ostwald, a German Chemist, from
  MOLekulargewicht.
   candela   From the Latin word for "candle."
   radiannamed by James Thomson, brother of Lord
  Kelvin, latin radius.
   steradian from the Greek stereos, solid + radian
   hertz German physicist Heinrich Rudolf Hertz
   newtonEnglish mathematician, and physicist Isaac Newton
   pascalFrench mathematician Blaise Pascal
   joule British physicist James Prescott Joule
   watt  British engineer James Watt
   coulomb   French physicist, Charles-Augustin de Coulomb
   volt  Italian scientist Count Alessandro Volta
   farad British physicist Michael Faraday
   ohm   German physicist Georg Simon Ohm
   siemens   German electrical engineer Werner von Siemens
   weber German physicist Wilhelm Eduard Weber
   tesla (Croatian- (or Serbian-?))American
  electrical engineer Nikola Tesla
   henry American physicist Joseph Henry
   degree CelsiusSwedish astronomer and physicist Anders Celsius
   lumen from Latin for light
   lux   from Latin for light
   becquerel French physicist, Antoine-Henri Becquerel
   gray  British physician L. H. Gray
   sievert   Swedish physicist Rolf Sievert
   katal From "catalyst"?
  
   Totals:
   Non-proper name origin10
   English/British   6
   German4
   French4
   American  2
   Swedish   2
   Italian   1
  
   If you add the quasi-SI units of talbot, bel and neper you pick
  up two more
   Brits and another American.
  
   After spending some time doing this I found a nice web page that has a
   similar list with pictures of the men (yes they're all men) involved.
   http://indykfi.atomki.hu/indyKFI/MT/orig_si.htm
   Quick what metric derived, but not SI, unit is named after a woman?
  
   And on a off topic, what is the difference between British and
  English?  I
   suppose they used to swing swords at each other because of the
  distinction,
   but in America at least in modern times the distinction has faded.
  
   Since this is non-HTML the columns may get messed up in transit.
  
   Cheers,
   Scott C
  --
  James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
  10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
  Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
  843.225.0805

[USMA:9493] Re: SI is English!

2000-12-01 Thread Joseph B. Reid

Scott Clauss wrote in USMA 9484:

If you add the quasi-SI units of talbot, bel and neper you pick up two more
Brits and another American.


I suspect the talbot has something to do with William Henry Fox Talbot
(1800-1877) who was one of the pioneers of photography.


Quick what metric derived, but not SI, unit is named after a woman?


I suggest the curie, nanmed after the Poliah Marie Curie, née Sklodowska.


And on a off topic, what is the difference between British and English?  I
suppose they used to swing swords at each other because of the distinction,
but in America at least in modern times the distinction has faded.


I suppose the term British would be appropriate for events after 1707 when
the Scottish parliament was abolished and Scotland started to send MPs to
the parliament of Westminster.




[USMA:9494] RE: SI is English!

2000-12-01 Thread Dennis Brownridge

Scott has made a very important point, which I have often tried to pound
into editors and textbook authors, to no avail:  SI is really more "English"
than "French."  Of the 30 SI units, the great majority were either named by
or for Anglo-American scientists, or are longstanding "English"
units--usually with no competitors--that people don't realize are metric
(second, hertz, volt, ampere, ohm, candle, lumen, lux, radian, mole, etc.),
or were developed under the leadership of British or Americans (BAAS in
1870s, Chicago electrical conference in 1880s), or at the very least have
long been familiar on all sorts of household products (L, mm, g). It is
truly an international system. Everyone contributed. There are really very
few SI units that most Americans have a "discomfort level" with (kg, km, cm,
m, °C) and shun in favor of WOMBAT.

Ironically, the major defects of SI were inherited either from traditional
Babylo-English-Euro units (the second) or from the original French metric
system (the irregularity of the kilogram, size of the meter, non-coherence
of liter, prefix names, names with too many syllables, etc.). One could even
argue--with all due respect to the French--that SI would be a much better
and more coherent system if it hadn't been based on the metric system!

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Scott Clauss
 Sent: 2000 December 1 Friday 12:07
 To: U.S. Metric Association
 Subject: [USMA:9484] SI is English!


 I have gotten tired of hearing the British and Americans say that SI is
 French, and isn't their system.  This morning while looking at torque
 wrenches it stuck me as odd that they advertize them as using "English and
 metric" units, but the metric units were newton-meters.  I thought is was
 silly saying Newton wasn't English, so I made this little table.
 Appears SI
 is more UK than anything else.  What did I miss, and did I get anything
 wrong?

 meter From the Latin metrum and the Greek metron, both
 meaning "measure."
 kilogram  From chilioi, the Greek word for a thousand +  the
 Latin gramma,
 which was a small weight similar to the English grain
 secondthe second division of the hour, latin secundus
 ampereFrench physicist André-Marie Ampère
 kelvinEnglish (Scottish?) mathematician and
 physicist William Thomson,
 later Lord Kelvin
 mole  named by W. Ostwald, a German Chemist, from
 MOLekulargewicht.
 candela   From the Latin word for "candle."
 radiannamed by James Thomson, brother of Lord
 Kelvin, latin radius.
 steradian from the Greek stereos, solid + radian
 hertz German physicist Heinrich Rudolf Hertz
 newtonEnglish mathematician, and physicist Isaac Newton
 pascalFrench mathematician Blaise Pascal
 joule British physicist James Prescott Joule
 watt  British engineer James Watt
 coulomb   French physicist, Charles-Augustin de Coulomb
 volt  Italian scientist Count Alessandro Volta
 farad British physicist Michael Faraday
 ohm   German physicist Georg Simon Ohm
 siemens   German electrical engineer Werner von Siemens
 weber German physicist Wilhelm Eduard Weber
 tesla (Croatian- (or Serbian-?))American electrical
 engineer Nikola Tesla
 henry American physicist Joseph Henry
 degree CelsiusSwedish astronomer and physicist Anders Celsius
 lumen from Latin for light
 lux   from Latin for light
 becquerel French physicist, Antoine-Henri Becquerel
 gray  British physician L. H. Gray
 sievert   Swedish physicist Rolf Sievert
 katal From "catalyst"?

 Totals:
 Non-proper name origin10
 English/British   6
 German4
 French4
 American  2
 Swedish   2
 Italian   1

 If you add the quasi-SI units of talbot, bel and neper you pick
 up two more
 Brits and another American.

 After spending some time doing this I found a nice web page that has a
 similar list with pictures of the men (yes they're all men) involved.
 http://indykfi.atomki.hu/indyKFI/MT/orig_si.htm
 Quick what metric derived, but not SI, unit is named after a woman?

 And on a off topic, what is the difference between British and English?  I
 suppose they used to swing swords at each other because of the
 distinction,
 but in America at least in modern times the distinction has faded.

 Since this is non-HTML the columns may get messed up in transit.

 Cheers,
 Scott C






[USMA:9495] RE: time units

2000-12-01 Thread Dennis Brownridge

We can lament that the decimal time introduced by the French never caught
on, and that Gauss and later scientists chose  the second as the base unit
for a coherent system. But we're stuck with it now. Without the second, SI
would cease to exist.

We can't avoid the natural time units, day and year, so people must learn
that d = 86.4 ks and a = 31.6 Ms and do clumsy conversions. We can, however,
avoid expressing quantities with the artificial hours and minutes (e.g., use
m/s or L/s, not km/h or L/min), except or course when dealing with the time
of day.

Time is the first quantity that children learn to measure--in pre-school,
even before length. It takes them years to master the ridiculous Babylonian
system and analog clock, which are much more difficult than feet and inches
or ounces and pounds. We could, I suppose, express the time of day in das,
hs, or ks. But the Babylonian system is so engrained and universal that I
don't think we'll ever root it out. My international students, who are
justifiably amused by our irrational American units, nonetheless see nothing
irrational or inconvenient about our time units--even when you ask them to
add 6 d 3 h 18 min 43 s + 5 d 18 h 29 min 17 s and it takes them half a
period to do it!

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
 Behalf Of Ma Be
 Sent: 2000 December 1 Friday 09:57
 To: U.S. Metric Association
 Subject: [USMA:9482] Re: Babylonian units


 On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 09:00:29Dennis Brownridge wrote:
 ...The second of time is one of the
 major weaknesses of SI, but it's too late to change now.
 ...
 While I agreed with nearly everything you said in this post, I
 unfortunately cannot on this one above.  I still honestly and
 sincerely do not think that it's too late for a change there.

 True, the best solution to fix this might be to redefine the
 second to a .864 fraction of the current one, i.e. to make it
 "faster" (this would evidently entail changes in a host of other
 time-related units, I know...  But I'm focusing on this from a
 theoretical point of view).

 But I'd be happy to also consider keeping the second as is while
 changing time's framework from a 24-60-60 one to some "near"
 decimal alternative.  In that regard I consider the "swatch time"
 proposal a rather interesting one.
 I'm rooting for it to... "hold" or be successful.  Who knows if
 we might eventually "switch" to using a "beat" as an official
 unit of time (I know, I know, it would wreak havoc just the same,
 but this is at least a proposal which is on the table and that
 may have a better chance to "succeed" at fixing some "time woes"
 than to consider the redefinition of time as .864 of the "old"
 second.  BTW, who knows if this may not trigger CGPM to
 reconsider meddling into this affair of time... again, "for the
 first time", and finally come up with an SI version 2.0...  :-)   ).

 Marcus


 Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com






[USMA:9496] RE: International Unit

2000-12-01 Thread Dennis Brownridge

I can understand that different substances, virus fragments, etc., have
different relative physiological effect. This is a problem with some of the
SI physiological units too, notably the sievert, which measures J/kg of
radiation dose multiplied by some inscrutable "quality factor" that varies
with the substance. But at some point in the manufacturing process, the
medical industry has to measure the stuff somehow, regardless of what is in
it, and they presumably do it by mass. Surely they are not counting out the
molecules or virus fragments in every pill or dose. So couldn't we say that
the IU is indirectly a measure of mass, with various mysterious "quality
factors" multiplied in?

 -Original Message-
 From:  Scott Clauss
 
 Some vitamin and vaccine doses are measured by their biological activity,
 which, in turn, does not directly relate to the mass of a
 discrete compound
 per unit volume (concentration), so it is impossible to give a exact
 concentration for them in any metric units (or FFUs for that matter).
 International Units (IU) are used instead.  These are based on an
 internationally agreed on biologicall effect or response.  I
 don't know what
 organizations do this agreeing.  Vitamins A, D and E are examples of this.
 There are various forms of these vitamins with which the body can "do its
 thing."  Each has a different molecular weight so to get the same effect
 would require different concentrations of each form.  The vitamins you buy
 are most likely mixtures of various forms.  Vaccines are sometimes made of
 busted up bits of viruses or bacteria.  Some of these bits can evoke an
 immune response, but trying to get a precise mass and therefore a precise
 concentration based on which bits cause a immune response while
 discounting
 those that do not would not be useful.

 In short I think that dispensing vaccine by IU/mL does not disqualify
 Australia from the fully converted side of the isle.

 Scott C

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
  Behalf Of Paul Trusten
  Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 2:33 PM
  To: U.S. Metric Association
  Cc: U.S. Metric Association
  Subject: [USMA:9489] Re: Australia not fully converted yet
 
 
  I'm not sure what an international unit is vis a vis SI, but it is not
  backward. It is a correct expression of a concentration, sayeth this
  apothecary.
 
  "Carter, Baron" wrote:
  
   Australia not fully converted yet.  Its Quarantine and
  Inspection Service
   still quotes vaccination doses in IU/ml
  
   http://www.aqis.gov.au/docs/anpolicy/dogcatapplication.pdf
   http://www.aqis.gov.au/docs/anpolicy/dogcatapplication.pdf
  
  
  
   Name: Boomerang.gif
  Boomerang.gifType: GIF Image (image/gif)
   Encoding: base64
 
  --
  Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
  3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apt. 122
  Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  "No one from the Audubon Society has yet documented the
  finding of a modified barium swallow."
   --Byrd Ona Wyng, Forensic Ornithologist
 
  "Free Billy Rubin!" ---Medical Technologists'  protest cry
 






[USMA:9497] RE: International Unit

2000-12-01 Thread James R.Frysinger

As I understand it, the problem is that a medication may be formulated
in more than one manner. For example, in the case of vitamins, at least
some of them are actually presented as precursors, I believe, and not
the vitamin itself (because the vitamin would be destroyed by digestion
prior to absorption). Those precursors might vary from one brand to
another, so standard trials are used to empirically quantify the
effects of the dose. I'm sure that Paul Trusten can tell us a lot more
about this.

Jim

On Fri, 01 Dec 2000, Dennis Brownridge wrote:
 I can understand that different substances, virus fragments, etc., have
 different relative physiological effect. This is a problem with some of the
 SI physiological units too, notably the sievert, which measures J/kg of
 radiation dose multiplied by some inscrutable "quality factor" that varies
 with the substance. But at some point in the manufacturing process, the
 medical industry has to measure the stuff somehow, regardless of what is in
 it, and they presumably do it by mass. Surely they are not counting out the
 molecules or virus fragments in every pill or dose. So couldn't we say that
 the IU is indirectly a measure of mass, with various mysterious "quality
 factors" multiplied in?
 
  -Original Message-
  From:  Scott Clauss
  
  Some vitamin and vaccine doses are measured by their biological activity,
  which, in turn, does not directly relate to the mass of a
  discrete compound
  per unit volume (concentration), so it is impossible to give a exact
  concentration for them in any metric units (or FFUs for that matter).
  International Units (IU) are used instead.  These are based on an
  internationally agreed on biologicall effect or response.  I
  don't know what
  organizations do this agreeing.  Vitamins A, D and E are examples of this.
  There are various forms of these vitamins with which the body can "do its
  thing."  Each has a different molecular weight so to get the same effect
  would require different concentrations of each form.  The vitamins you buy
  are most likely mixtures of various forms.  Vaccines are sometimes made of
  busted up bits of viruses or bacteria.  Some of these bits can evoke an
  immune response, but trying to get a precise mass and therefore a precise
  concentration based on which bits cause a immune response while
  discounting
  those that do not would not be useful.
 
  In short I think that dispensing vaccine by IU/mL does not disqualify
  Australia from the fully converted side of the isle.
 
  Scott C
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
   Behalf Of Paul Trusten
   Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 2:33 PM
   To: U.S. Metric Association
   Cc: U.S. Metric Association
   Subject: [USMA:9489] Re: Australia not fully converted yet
  
  
   I'm not sure what an international unit is vis a vis SI, but it is not
   backward. It is a correct expression of a concentration, sayeth this
   apothecary.
  
   "Carter, Baron" wrote:
   
Australia not fully converted yet.  Its Quarantine and
   Inspection Service
still quotes vaccination doses in IU/ml
   
http://www.aqis.gov.au/docs/anpolicy/dogcatapplication.pdf
http://www.aqis.gov.au/docs/anpolicy/dogcatapplication.pdf
   
   
   
Name: Boomerang.gif
   Boomerang.gifType: GIF Image (image/gif)
Encoding: base64
  
   --
   Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
   3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apt. 122
   Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
   "No one from the Audubon Society has yet documented the
   finding of a modified barium swallow."
--Byrd Ona Wyng, Forensic Ornithologist
  
   "Free Billy Rubin!" ---Medical Technologists'  protest cry
  
 
 
-- 
James R. Frysinger  University/College of Charleston
10 Captiva Row  Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
Charleston, SC 2940766 George Street
843.225.0805Charleston, SC 29424
http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cert. Adv. Metrication Specialist   843.953.7644




[USMA:9499] Re: Figures of speech remain!!

2000-12-01 Thread Pat Naughtin

Dear Gustaf,

I have interspersed some comments.

on 02.12.2000 03.02, Gustaf Sjöberg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Pat Naughtin wrote:
 
 on 31.10.2000 02.27, Howard Ressel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Dear Howard and All,
 
 I received a call a few moments ago to say that an article of mine in a
 national editorial journal 'Stylewise', had been taken up by the Brisbane
 Courier-Mail.
 
 
 snip
 
 interesting!
 
 I have some questions about Australia and metric:
 
 When were speedlimits changed and was it done in an overnight-manner?

During the early part of 1975 signs were erected all over the country with
the hard metric speed limits and the hard metric distances, and, as soon as
they were built, all these signs were covered. On a planned date - I seem to
recall it was a Sunday in mid winter - all of the covers were removed and on
the following days the old imperial signs were taken away. The whole
operation probably took a year, but it all seemed to happen on one day.
Within a month or so almost all Australians had accepted the new system.

 How do you say km/h? K per hour?

This varies widely from person to person and on the formality of the
occasion. You might here the full expression 'kilometres per hour', the
shortened form 'kilometres', or the abbreviated form 'kays'; but none of
these have an absolute preference.
 
 Is the word "klick" used for km in everyday speech? (I read about
 "klicksticks".)

No this is not common. It seems to me that this term originated in rural
areas and while you might here it in a city it seems to be regarded as
having a sort of country hick feel about it.

 What other pet-names or quasi-metric units are used? Do you have 50 cL metric
 pints?

No, the pints - as in a pint of milk for example - was converted to 600 mL
and these are still available along with 1 L, 2 L and 4 L containers. Beer
in other nations has been a strong repository of the word pint, but here the
pint has been commonly used in only one state, New South Wales. Other
states, and in NSW for other sizes  glasses of beer, have always had pet
names that have little meaning outside Australia. Some of the beer glasses
are called butcher, glass, pot, pony, and schooner; these have a fixed size
within any one state but the size can vary widely as soon as you cross a
state border. For take away containers the bottles and cans of beer are
called cans, tinnies, stubbies, or Darwin stubbies. The Darwin stubby is
notable in that it holds a little over 2.2 litres of beer.

 Are mL used exclusively?

Yes, for all soft drinks, beer, spirits, milk and so on. For larger volumes
and capacities, refrigerators are measured in litres (L), and water storages
are measured in kilolitres (kL), megalitres (ML), and gigalitres (GL). In
contrast to this, building volumes are measured in cubic metres (m3) for air
conditioning calculations.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin CAMS
Geelong, Australia