RE: Strategies for splitting load across varnish instances? And avoiding single-point-of-failure?
So it is possible to start your Varnish with one VCL program, and have a small script change to another one some minutes later. What would this small script look like? Sorry if it's a dumb question :) ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Re: Strategies for splitting load across varnish instances? And avoiding single-point-of-failure?
In message 1ff67d7369ed1a45832180c7c1109bca13e23e7...@tmmail0.trademe.local, Ross Brown writes: So it is possible to start your Varnish with one VCL program, and have a small script change to another one some minutes later. What would this small script look like?=20 sleep 600 varnishadm vcl.load real_thing /usr/local/etc/varnish/real.vcl varnishadm vcl.use real_thing -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
RE: Strategies for splitting load across varnish instances? And avoiding single-point-of-failure?
I hadn't used varnishadm before. Looks useful. Thanks! -Original Message- From: p...@critter.freebsd.dk [mailto:p...@critter.freebsd.dk] On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp Sent: Monday, 18 January 2010 9:38 a.m. To: Ross Brown Cc: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no Subject: Re: Strategies for splitting load across varnish instances? And avoiding single-point-of-failure? In message 1ff67d7369ed1a45832180c7c1109bca13e23e7...@tmmail0.trademe.local, Ross Brown writes: So it is possible to start your Varnish with one VCL program, and have a small script change to another one some minutes later. What would this small script look like?=20 sleep 600 varnishadm vcl.load real_thing /usr/local/etc/varnish/real.vcl varnishadm vcl.use real_thing -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Re: Strategies for splitting load across varnish instances? And avoiding single-point-of-failure?
Hey, folks, I just want to thank for this great thread -- I think it would be well worth breaking it up into Q/A for the FAQ. We're still a bit undecided as to how we're going to configure our systems, but we feel like we have options now. On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Ross Brown r...@trademe.co.nz wrote: I hadn't used varnishadm before. Looks useful. Thanks! -Original Message- From: p...@critter.freebsd.dk [mailto:p...@critter.freebsd.dk] On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp Sent: Monday, 18 January 2010 9:38 a.m. To: Ross Brown Cc: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no Subject: Re: Strategies for splitting load across varnish instances? And avoiding single-point-of-failure? In message 1ff67d7369ed1a45832180c7c1109bca13e23e7...@tmmail0.trademe.local, Ross Brown writes: So it is possible to start your Varnish with one VCL program, and have a small script change to another one some minutes later. What would this small script look like?=20 sleep 600 varnishadm vcl.load real_thing /usr/local/etc/varnish/real.vcl varnishadm vcl.use real_thing -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
