Re: [vchkpw] compiling 5.4.2[56] on solaris fails
Jeremy Kister wrote: looks like we need to test for setenv vs putenv at configure time. No need to test. Putenv is the preferred option, according to: http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/autoconf/Function-Portability.html We're already using putenv several other places in the code, and just this one instance of setenv. I've changed it to putenv in CVS. There are a couple of other issues I want to resolve before the next release. why does the environment variable SHELL have to be set for in this case? No idea, so I don't want to change it. !DSPAM:473eafe132001131818550!
Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.26 released
Il Saturday 17 November 2007 08:34:11 Rick Widmer ha scritto: aclocal.m4:17: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that, you should regenerate the build system entirely. I have updated the tar file in the 5.4.26 release with 5.4.26d.tar.gz which should take care of all the build system problems. Sorry... Ok, now on my debian sarge build fine! With this upgrade, i went from 5.4.25, i need to rebuild also qmail (i'm using chkuser) and courier-imap? Thank you Rick! -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS - http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux - http://www.cecchi.biz/ @ PLUG - Presidente, http://www.prato.linux.it !DSPAM:473eb90e32001283811440!
Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.26 released
Alessio Cecchi wrote: With this upgrade, i went from 5.4.25, i need to rebuild also qmail (i'm using chkuser) and courier-imap? Yes. qmail (because of chkuser), courier's authlib because it uses libvpopmail, and just for superstition I'd do courier imap too. thanks for testing! Rick !DSPAM:473eba8f32005998249707!
