RE: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-23 Thread Gene Kwiecinski
often well beyond those of the present line.  I had been used
to this deleting up to 999 characters, but only up to the end
of the present line.  It appears that the set compatible 

Ummm, 'D' doesn't work?


Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-20 Thread panshizhu
A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-05-19 15:42:15:
 This is true, but rather than an empty vimrc I suggest the following:

 runtime vimrc_example.vim
  if and when we want to further customize Vim, we'll add more lines
below
 Best regards,
 Tony.
 --

I always recommend include the contents of vimrc_example.vim instead of
just source the file by :runtime.

By including the contents of vimrc_example.vim we know all it has done and
we can change it anyway. i.e. chang the .vimrc is a good way, changing the
$VIMRUNTIME/vimrc_example.vim is NOT a good pratice. (vimrc_example fits
the need of the author but it definetely do not fit everyone, so I suggest
most users to change it and create their own .vimrc.)

The second reason: vimrc_example.vim comes from the distribution and it may
change, when it change it may silently break our existing scripts or
configurations. include the contents into our .vimrc minimize the
incompatible changes.

So the better practise to create a new .vimrc may be: just copy the
vimrc_example.vim to ~/.vimrc
--
Sincerely, Pan, Shi Zhu. ext: 2606

Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-20 Thread A.J.Mechelynck

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2007-05-19 15:42:15:

This is true, but rather than an empty vimrc I suggest the following:

runtime vimrc_example.vim
 if and when we want to further customize Vim, we'll add more lines

below

Best regards,
Tony.
--


I always recommend include the contents of vimrc_example.vim instead of
just source the file by :runtime.

By including the contents of vimrc_example.vim we know all it has done and
we can change it anyway. i.e. chang the .vimrc is a good way, changing the
$VIMRUNTIME/vimrc_example.vim is NOT a good pratice. (vimrc_example fits
the need of the author but it definetely do not fit everyone, so I suggest
most users to change it and create their own .vimrc.)

The second reason: vimrc_example.vim comes from the distribution and it may
change, when it change it may silently break our existing scripts or
configurations. include the contents into our .vimrc minimize the
incompatible changes.

So the better practise to create a new .vimrc may be: just copy the
vimrc_example.vim to ~/.vimrc
--
Sincerely, Pan, Shi Zhu. ext: 2606




Changing the vimrc_example.com is not a good practice, but I prefer sourcing 
(contrary to Bram's repeated advice) because that way, if an improvement is 
distributed, I don't remain stuck with the old version. If the vimrc_example 
does something I don't want (and sometimes it does) I reverse it in the part 
of my own vimrc after the sourcing: for instance, to avoid filetype-specific 
indenting:


...
runtime vimrc_example.vim
filetype indent off
...

Likewise for other options. If I want to check what the vimrc_example actually 
does, I can always use :view $VIMRUNTIME/vimrc_example.vim; but that script 
is long, complex, and not written by me, enough for me to want it kept apart 
from my own changes -- and in a different file.


I don't remember the vimrc_example introducing changes which broke my own 
scripts, but if it did, :verbose set optionname would quickly tell me that 
'optionname' whas set there. YMMV.


Which practice is better depends on by which criteria you judge those 
practices. According to my criteria, sourcing the vimrc_example is better 
than copying it. Bram doesn't agree with me on that point, and neither do you, 
because you apply different criteria.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
The best book on programming for the layman is Alice in Wonderland;
but that's because it's the best book on anything for the layman.


Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-19 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-05-18, David Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Uh oh... I spoke slightly too soon.  Although the up/down/delete
 functions that I first asked about now behave normally, the
 
   vim -N -u NONE -i NONE
 
 option now results in 999 dspace deleting 999 characters,
 often well beyond those of the present line.  I had been used
 to this deleting up to 999 characters, but only up to the end
 of the present line.  It appears that the set compatible 
 option had been helping me to get the desired 'this line only'
 functionality, but the -N option above now overrides that.

As others have written, there are more efficient ways to get the 
motion you want than to use a 999 prefix.  Nevertheless, I know how 
it is when your fingers are used to certain ways of doing things and 
besides, it ought to work right.

You said in your first post that you were using vim, so I assumed 
you had been using it in non-compatible mode.  Since the 999 prefix 
used to work for you, and since it works for me in non-compatible 
mode, I think that is a safe assumption.

I just tried another experiment and think I found the answer.  I 
invoked vim as vim -u NONE which puts it into compatible mode.  
When I tried those commands, e.g., 999down and 999dd, I got a beep 
and no cursor motion!  So your new installation of vim appears to be 
putting you in compatible mode whereas your previous installation 
put you in non-compatible mode.  Now the question is, why.

Take a look at

   :help compatible-default
   :help compatible

and see if you can figure out from that what might have changed with 
this new installation.  One way to make sure that vim starts in 
non-compatible mode is to make sure you have a .vimrc file in your 
HOME directory, even if the file is empty.

You may also want to have a talk with the person who performed your 
vim upgrade and see if he can explain how and why the new 
configuration differs from the old one.  He may appreciate knowing 
that something appears to have gone wrong and having the opportunity 
to fix it at the system level so that each user doesn't have to fix 
it for himself.  This would also save you from troubleshooting this 
and possibly continuing to find things that no longer work as they 
used to.

As for the 999dspace deleting characters beyond the current line, 
that behavior is affected by the 'whichwrap' option.  If you get the 
'compatible' thing fixed and 999dspace still deletes beyond the 
current line, put this in your ~/.vimrc file:

   set whichwrap-=s

See

   :help whichwrap

Regards,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Mobile Broadband Division
 | Spokane, Washington, USA


Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-19 Thread A.J.Mechelynck

Gary Johnson wrote:
[...]
One way to make sure that vim starts in 
non-compatible mode is to make sure you have a .vimrc file in your 
HOME directory, even if the file is empty.

[...]

This is true, but rather than an empty vimrc I suggest the following:

 Vim startup file
 Preferences which affect the menus must come first: uncomment if desired
if 0
 force English messages and menus regardless of locale
if has(unix)
language messages C
else
language messages en
endif
endif  if 0
 invoke the example vimrc
runtime vimrc_example.vim
 if and when we want to further customize Vim, we'll add more lines below




Best regards,
Tony.
--
Let's talk about how to fill out your 1984 tax return.  Here's an often
overlooked accounting technique that can save you thousands of
dollars:  For several days before you put it in the mail, carry your
tax return around under your armpit.  No IRS agent is going to want to
spend hours poring over a sweat-stained document.  So even if you owe
money, you can put in for an enormous refund and the agent will
probably give it to you, just to avoid an audit.  What does he care?
It's not his money.
-- Dave Barry, Sweating Out Taxes


repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread David Pike

This will hopefully be an easy question or two...

An upgraded version of vim was installed on our systems recently,
and some tricks that I'm used to are no longer functional, such as:
[a large integer, say N] up to quickly get to the top of the
file that I am editting, [N] down to quickly get to the last
line of the file (similarly, PageUp and PageDown could be used).
Also, while part way through a file, [N] dd or [N] d Enter
was a handy way of deleting all remaining lines in the file.

The new version of vim does not seem to let me do this anymore.
Specifically, if the N value that I enter (typically ) is
larger than the number of lines involved, then vim now just beeps
to signal that it won't do what I would like to do.

Is there some easy way of getting vim to accept these commands
once again?

Thanks,

- David.


Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-05-18, David Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This will hopefully be an easy question or two...
 
 An upgraded version of vim was installed on our systems recently,
 and some tricks that I'm used to are no longer functional, such as:
 [a large integer, say N] up to quickly get to the top of the
 file that I am editting, [N] down to quickly get to the last
 line of the file (similarly, PageUp and PageDown could be used).
 Also, while part way through a file, [N] dd or [N] d Enter
 was a handy way of deleting all remaining lines in the file.
 
 The new version of vim does not seem to let me do this anymore.
 Specifically, if the N value that I enter (typically ) is
 larger than the number of lines involved, then vim now just beeps
 to signal that it won't do what I would like to do.
 
 Is there some easy way of getting vim to accept these commands
 once again?

I just tried this with a new installation of vim 7.1 on Linux and 
all of the examples you gave worked for me.  This was true whether I 
invoked vim as just vim or as vim -N -u NONE -i NONE.  I suspect 
some configuration file in your upgrade has botched this for you.  
Try invoking vim as

   vim -N -u NONE -i NONE

as see if it still misbehaves.  It might help us to know the 
operating system you are using and the complete output from
vim --version, too.

Regards,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Mobile Broadband Division
 | Spokane, Washington, USA


Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread David Pike
Hi Gary, and thanks for your response.  I just tried your
suggestion of

  vim -N -u NONE -i NONE

and it behaved normally (i.e., in the way that I want).

My operating system appears to be Gentoo Linux.
The (somewhat verbose) output from vim --version is:

=== begin output ===
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Apr 29 2007 13:06:51)
Included patches: 1-174
Modified by Gentoo-7.0.174
Compiled by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Huge version without GUI.  Features included (+) or not (-):
+arabic +autocmd -balloon_eval -browse ++builtin_terms +byte_offset +cindent
-clientserver -clipboard +cmdline_compl +cmdline_hist +cmdline_info +comments
+cryptv -cscope +cursorshape +dialog_con +diff +digraphs -dnd -ebcdic
+emacs_tags +eval +ex_extra +extra_search +farsi +file_in_path +find_in_path
+folding -footer +fork() +gettext -hangul_input +iconv +insert_expand +jumplist
 +keymap +langmap +libcall +linebreak +lispindent +listcmds +localmap +menu
 +mksession +modify_fname +mouse -mouseshape +mouse_dec +mouse_gpm
 -mouse_jsbterm +mouse_netterm +mouse_xterm +multi_byte +multi_lang -mzscheme
 -netbeans_intg -osfiletype +path_extra +perl +postscript +printer +profile
 +python +quickfix +reltime +rightleft -ruby +scrollbind +signs +smartindent
 -sniff +statusline -sun_workshop +syntax +tag_binary +tag_old_static
 -tag_any_white -tcl +terminfo +termresponse +textobjects +title -toolbar
 +user_commands +vertsplit +virtualedit +visual +visualextra +viminfo +vreplace
 +wildignore +wildmenu +windows +writebackup -X11 -xfontset -xim -xsmp
 -xterm_clipboard -xterm_save
system vimrc file: /etc/vim/vimrc
 user vimrc file: $HOME/.vimrc
   user exrc file: $HOME/.exrc
 fall-back for $VIM: /usr/share/vim
 Compilation: i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c -I. -Iproto 
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -mcpu=i586-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i586-linux/CORE  
-I/usr/include/python2.4 -pthread
 Linking: i586-pc-linux-gnu-gcc   -rdynamic   -L/usr/local/lib 
-o vim   -lcurses -lgpm   -rdynamic  -L/usr/local/lib 
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i586-linux/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a 
-L/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i586-linux/CORE -lperl -lutil -lc 
-L/usr/lib/python2.4/config -lpython2.4 -lpthread -lutil -lm -Xlinker 
-export-dynamic
=== end output ===

Again, thanks,

- David.


Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 18:39:54 -0700
From: Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vim@vim.org
Subject: Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

On 2007-05-18, David Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This will hopefully be an easy question or two...
 
 An upgraded version of vim was installed on our systems recently,
 and some tricks that I'm used to are no longer functional, such as:
 [a large integer, say N] up to quickly get to the top of the
 file that I am editting, [N] down to quickly get to the last
 line of the file (similarly, PageUp and PageDown could be used).
 Also, while part way through a file, [N] dd or [N] d Enter
 was a handy way of deleting all remaining lines in the file.
 
 The new version of vim does not seem to let me do this anymore.
 Specifically, if the N value that I enter (typically ) is
 larger than the number of lines involved, then vim now just beeps
 to signal that it won't do what I would like to do.
 
 Is there some easy way of getting vim to accept these commands
 once again?

I just tried this with a new installation of vim 7.1 on Linux and 
all of the examples you gave worked for me.  This was true whether I 
invoked vim as just vim or as vim -N -u NONE -i NONE.  I suspect 
some configuration file in your upgrade has botched this for you.  
Try invoking vim as

   vim -N -u NONE -i NONE

as see if it still misbehaves.  It might help us to know the 
operating system you are using and the complete output from
vim --version, too.

Regards,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Mobile Broadband Division
 | Spokane, Washington, USA



Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread David Pike

Uh oh... I spoke slightly too soon.  Although the up/down/delete
functions that I first asked about now behave normally, the

  vim -N -u NONE -i NONE

option now results in 999 dspace deleting 999 characters,
often well beyond those of the present line.  I had been used
to this deleting up to 999 characters, but only up to the end
of the present line.  It appears that the set compatible 
option had been helping me to get the desired 'this line only'
functionality, but the -N option above now overrides that.

- David.



To: vim@vim.org
Subject: Re: repeating up/down/delete commands
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 23:22:59 -0230 (NDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Pike)

Hi Gary, and thanks for your response.  I just tried your
suggestion of

  vim -N -u NONE -i NONE

and it behaved normally (i.e., in the way that I want).

snip

Again, thanks,

- David.


Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 18:39:54 -0700
From: Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vim@vim.org
Subject: Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

On 2007-05-18, David Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This will hopefully be an easy question or two...
 
 An upgraded version of vim was installed on our systems 
recently,
 and some tricks that I'm used to are no longer functional, 
such as:
 [a large integer, say N] up to quickly get to the top of 
the
 file that I am editting, [N] down to quickly get to the 
last
 line of the file (similarly, PageUp and PageDown could be 
used).
 Also, while part way through a file, [N] dd or [N] d 
Enter
 was a handy way of deleting all remaining lines in the file.
 
 The new version of vim does not seem to let me do this 
anymore.
 Specifically, if the N value that I enter (typically ) is
 larger than the number of lines involved, then vim now just 
beeps
 to signal that it won't do what I would like to do.
 
 Is there some easy way of getting vim to accept these commands
 once again?

I just tried this with a new installation of vim 7.1 on Linux 
and 
all of the examples you gave worked for me.  This was true 
whether I 
invoked vim as just vim or as vim -N -u NONE -i NONE.  I 
suspect 
some configuration file in your upgrade has botched this for 
you.  
Try invoking vim as

   vim -N -u NONE -i NONE

as see if it still misbehaves.  It might help us to know the 
operating system you are using and the complete output from
vim --version, too.

Regards,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Mobile Broadband Division
 | Spokane, Washington, USA



Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread Franco Saliola

In response to David Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

In case you don't know about these, here are commands that will do the
same thing.


[a large integer, say N] up to quickly get to the top of the
file that I am editting,


gg


[N] down to quickly get to the last line of the file


G


Also, while part way through a file, [N] dd or [N] d Enter
was a handy way of deleting all remaining lines in the file


dG

Franco

--


Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread A.J.Mechelynck

David Pike wrote:

This will hopefully be an easy question or two...

An upgraded version of vim was installed on our systems recently,
and some tricks that I'm used to are no longer functional, such as:
[a large integer, say N] up to quickly get to the top of the
file that I am editting, [N] down to quickly get to the last
line of the file (similarly, PageUp and PageDown could be used).
Also, while part way through a file, [N] dd or [N] d Enter
was a handy way of deleting all remaining lines in the file.

The new version of vim does not seem to let me do this anymore.
Specifically, if the N value that I enter (typically ) is
larger than the number of lines involved, then vim now just beeps
to signal that it won't do what I would like to do.

Is there some easy way of getting vim to accept these commands
once again?

Thanks,

- David.



To get to the top of the file:

gg

To get to the last line:

G


Best regards,
Tony.
--
Non-sequiturs make me eat lampshades.


Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread A.J.Mechelynck

David Pike wrote:

Uh oh... I spoke slightly too soon.  Although the up/down/delete
functions that I first asked about now behave normally, the

  vim -N -u NONE -i NONE

option now results in 999 dspace deleting 999 characters,
often well beyond those of the present line.  I had been used
to this deleting up to 999 characters, but only up to the end
of the present line.  It appears that the set compatible 
option had been helping me to get the desired 'this line only'

functionality, but the -N option above now overrides that.

- David.


To delete from cursor to end of line, use

d$

Is it so hard to remember?


Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
244. You use more than 20 passwords.



Re: repeating up/down/delete commands

2007-05-18 Thread Nelson Castillo

To delete from cursor to end of line, use

d$

Is it so hard to remember?


Also:
  D

Regards.

--
http://arhuaco.org
http://emQbit.com