Re: Python/Ruby completion requires language interface ?
* A.J.Mechelynck antoine.mechelynck@ [060928 01:06]: It surprised me because, after all, Vim doesn't need to be a C compiler to run ccomplete.vim, But it still needs tags information, generated bu ctags, for example... -- Regards, Sir Raorn. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Python/Ruby completion requires language interface ?
Dnia środa, 27 września 2006 11:35, A.J.Mechelynck napisał: I notice that the scripts autoload/pythoncomplete.vim and autoload/rubycomplete.vim terminate early and with error if the corresponding interface is not compiled-in. Is that intentional? I would expect to be able to _edit_ (for instance) a python script even on a Vim version which cannot _run_ python commands. I don't agree with that. If interface is required for good completion it should be done using that interface. But even in such situation good degrading of script behaviour is required. Crashing IMO is unacceptable. m.
Re: Python/Ruby completion requires language interface ?
The script terminates, not vim...
if !has('python')
echo Error: Required vim compiled with +python
finish
endif
is right at the start.
Regards,
Stefan
Re: Python/Ruby completion requires language interface ?
Dnia środa, 27 września 2006 14:27, Stefan Walk napisał:
The script terminates, not vim...
if !has('python')
echo Error: Required vim compiled with +python
finish
endif
is right at the start.
It could at least degrade to syntax highlighting completion.
m.
Re: Python/Ruby completion requires language interface ?
Mark Guzman wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
I notice that the scripts autoload/pythoncomplete.vim and
autoload/rubycomplete.vim terminate early and with error if the
corresponding interface is not compiled-in. Is that intentional? I
would expect to be able to _edit_ (for instance) a python script even
on a Vim version which cannot _run_ python commands.
if !has('ruby')
s:ErrMsg( Error: Required vim compiled with +ruby )
finish
endif
if version 700
s:ErrMsg( Error: Required vim = 7.0 )
finish
endif
Vim continues to run.
--mark
Yes, I never said anything else: ...the scripts... terminate early and with
error It surprised me because, after all, Vim doesn't need to be a C
compiler to run ccomplete.vim, or a Web browser (hiding tags, the whole HEAD
part, and OTOH showing clickable A HREF=... links and graphical IMG
pictures) to use htmlcomplete.vim. Executing a script and editing it are two
different things.
Best regards,
Tony.
P.S. Is that really your mail address? Looks bogus to me. But then if it were,
you shouldn't stay long on the mailing list...
Re: Python/Ruby completion requires language interface ?
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: Yes, I never said anything else: ...the scripts... terminate early and with error It surprised me because, after all, Vim doesn't need to be a C compiler to run ccomplete.vim, or a Web browser (hiding tags, the whole HEAD part, and OTOH showing clickable A HREF=... links and graphical IMG pictures) to use htmlcomplete.vim. Executing a script and editing it are two different things. My other message covered the reason for the requirement. C as a language does not provide introspection, python and ruby do. The most effective completion (for ruby) comes from asking the ruby interpreter itself what do you know about X. I will probably add a fail-over to syntax completion as someone else mentioned. I wonder how microsoft manages their completion system, I'm of the belief that they are also using introspection (probably in some sort of sandbox). It would be nice if I could access the spelling/underlining stuff to provide syntax error information. I haven't look too hard yet to see if this is possible, but I for one would find it useful. P.S. Is that really your mail address? Looks bogus to me. But then if it were, you shouldn't stay long on the mailing list... Yes, it is indeed my email address, though I have a few aliases that are a bit more formal. I am quite the trouble maker. I'm sure you can imagine that my address does not validate on many websites, apparently .info domains aren't valid in most peoples eyes. --mark -- sic transit gloria et adulescentia blog | http://blog.hasno.info/blog wiki | http://wiki.hasno.info
Re: Python/Ruby completion requires language interface ?
On 9/27/06, Mark Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: Yes, I never said anything else: ...the scripts... terminate early and with error It surprised me because, after all, Vim doesn't need to be a C compiler to run ccomplete.vim, or a Web browser (hiding tags, the whole HEAD part, and OTOH showing clickable A HREF=... links and graphical IMG pictures) to use htmlcomplete.vim. Executing a script and editing it are two different things. My other message covered the reason for the requirement. C as a language does not provide introspection, python and ruby do. The most effective completion (for ruby) comes from asking the ruby interpreter itself what do you know about X. I will probably add a fail-over to syntax completion as someone else mentioned. I wonder how microsoft manages their completion system, I'm of the belief that they are also using introspection (probably in some sort of sandbox). For obvious reasons, I'm going to side with Mark here. You can claim that vim doesn't need to be a C compiler to complete C - that's like comparing cats and potatoes. C and C++ have inheirant type information directly in the code itself. Header files are included verbatim, and easy to parse (when needed). Also, with regards to C, all completable symbols are top-level and require no extra scoping. Let's take a look a python. Tell me how you would gather the information from the sys module in order to complete it. Sure you could run through all of sys.path oh wait! no... somehow you'd have to determine the path python WOULD use to find the module, find the .py file (assuming you don't have a gimped install containing only pyc files), and parse that. Sure it's possible, and sure, it might be easy for sys - but take a look at pygtk. Tell me how long that would take to parse. Now, go to a terminal, type python and hit enter. Then type import sys; dir(sys) - tell me which was: a) faster b) easier c) less error prone d) guaranteed to work on all python installs It would be nice if I could access the spelling/underlining stuff to provide syntax error information. I haven't look too hard yet to see if this is possible, but I for one would find it useful. P.S. Is that really your mail address? Looks bogus to me. But then if it were, you shouldn't stay long on the mailing list... Yes, it is indeed my email address, though I have a few aliases that are a bit more formal. I am quite the trouble maker. I'm sure you can imagine that my address does not validate on many websites, apparently .info domains aren't valid in most peoples eyes. --mark -- sic transit gloria et adulescentia blog | http://blog.hasno.info/blog wiki | http://wiki.hasno.info
