[Vo]:Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission

2008-09-10 Thread David Jonsson
Hi

A professor on a seminar yesterday said plate tectonics have a role in CO2
emission.

Anyone here knows more?

David

-- 
David Jonsson
Sweden
phone callto:+46703000370


[Vo]:The LHC

2008-09-10 Thread Remi Cornwall
Vo,

This LHC white elephant is being strongly hyped in the UK. Keynesians and
Free-marketers go hang! How about commonsense? If this is the face of state
subsidised science Heck help us, mind you toadying to the Dragon's Den
doesn't look good either...

Here are some comments I saw on a discussion site (I like #4 most):

#1
It is a question of priorities. We could turn over 50% of World GDP to
landing and setting up bases on Mars and the moon. The common man whose work
is taken by force through tax by the state already knows that the universe
'works' he lives in it every day! No, these physicists (or one particular
kind) are SELF INDULGENT. All it is is about tallying up how they think with
their symbols. No useful engineering really comes about below distance
scales of an angstrom (10^-10metres) it's a waste.

#2 
I'm also sick of hearing how clever these people are. They are highly
trained and specialised. Most of the people at CERN are journeymen with the
mentality of jumping on the bandwagon. There are people working at the
hinterlands who will break mainstream doing stuff which is seemingly 'just
engineering' but *is* fundamental physics. For example quantum entanglement
experiments are just 'bench top', or even alternative energy and long held
cherished notions about what can be done with 'energy'.

#3
Don't talk about spins off of research, teflon pans, microchips and the
like. They would come as spin offs from other well funded project(S) too WWW
could have come from cancer research. No, tinkering with the sub-atomic
would be useful if we could: use the weak/strong forces to render
radioactive materials inert or alter inertia. There just isn't much direct
engineering that can come from partphys. I think there is too much SF and
Star Trek attached to these glamourboys. Ahead Warp Factor Zero!

#4
Since the outcome will be highly arcane and only understandable to the few
initiated (since no engineering applications below about 10^-10metres,
engineering makes theories real) we will be told that the Universe is made
from quarks and strings held together by glue-on and this will be based on
highly repeatable experiments (one event in trillions of other
collisions). So its all becoming a just-so-story. One branch of
philosophy/poetry against another. Wanna swap creation myths anyone?  





[Vo]:Re: Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission

2008-09-10 Thread Michel Jullian
Makes sense, since plate tectonics obviously have a role in volcanic activity, 
which has a role in CO2 emission (cf the nice postings by Stephen and Taylor in 
the Thawing... thread explaining how the planet may have recovered from 
snowball Earth conditions thanks to volcanic CO2 emission and subsequent 
greenhouse effect)

Michel

- Original Message - 
From: David Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 2:11 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission


 Hi
 
 A professor on a seminar yesterday said plate tectonics have a role in CO2
 emission.
 
 Anyone here knows more?
 
 David
 
 -- 
 David Jonsson
 Sweden
 phone callto:+46703000370




Re: [Vo]:Re: Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission

2008-09-10 Thread David Jonsson
Positive or negative? Seems like more tectonic movement causes more CO2? On
the other hand biomass might get covered when a plate goes below another. I
suppose this is a necessity for oil production?

Here is a link http://dilu.bol.ucla.edu/ . The relations seems complex.

The PDF of the lecture yesterday is 55 MB and we haven't yet a way to
transfer the file. This was mentioned in relation to astrobiology and
tectonic plates and motion only occurs under narrow conditions for a planet.


David

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 Makes sense, since plate tectonics obviously have a role in volcanic
 activity, which has a role in CO2 emission (cf the nice postings by Stephen
 and Taylor in the Thawing... thread explaining how the planet may have
 recovered from snowball Earth conditions thanks to volcanic CO2 emission
 and subsequent greenhouse effect)

 Michel

 - Original Message -
 From: David Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 2:11 PM
 Subject: [Vo]:Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission


  Hi
 
  A professor on a seminar yesterday said plate tectonics have a role in
 CO2
  emission.
 
  Anyone here knows more?
 
  David
 


-- 
David Jonsson
Sweden
phone callto:+46703000370


[Vo]:Perosin

2008-09-10 Thread Jones Beene
Not just for blondes anymore ...

http://techrepublic-cnet.com.com/military-tech/?keyword=Perosin


[Vo]:the LHC

2008-09-10 Thread fznidarsic
#4
Since the outcome will be highly arcane and only understandable to the few
initiated (since no engineering applications below about 10^-10metres,
engineering makes theories real) we will be told that the Universe is made
from quarks and strings held together by glue-on and this will be based on
highly repeatable experiments (one event in trillions of other
collisions). So its all becoming a just-so-story. One branch of
philosophy/poetry against another. Wanna swap creation myths anyone?? 


snip
And let someone like me say that he has discovered a usefull low energy 
condition, like the path
of the quantum transition, and the science police stomp on it until it is dead.

ref comments below


http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter0.html


Frank Znidarsic


Re: [Vo]:Perosin

2008-09-10 Thread Terry Blanton
Or:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_pack

Note that Jetpack International's H2O2 packs are not for sale.

Terry

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Not just for blondes anymore ...

 http://techrepublic-cnet.com.com/military-tech/?keyword=Perosin




Re: [Vo]:Perosin

2008-09-10 Thread Terry Blanton
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Not just for blondes anymore ...


Oh, neither is lipstick.  g,d,r



[Vo]:Re: Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission

2008-09-10 Thread Michel Jullian
Indeed I would think more tectonic activity  more volcanic activity  more 
CO2, I don't see why the biomass which gets covered would counter that, on the 
contrary it seems to replenish the magma's carbon content, enabling CO2 
emission by future volcanoes erupting downstream as shown on the nice page you 
pointed us to.

Michel

- Original Message - 
From: David Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission


 Positive or negative? Seems like more tectonic movement causes more CO2? On
 the other hand biomass might get covered when a plate goes below another. I
 suppose this is a necessity for oil production?
 
 Here is a link http://dilu.bol.ucla.edu/ . The relations seems complex.
 
 The PDF of the lecture yesterday is 55 MB and we haven't yet a way to
 transfer the file. This was mentioned in relation to astrobiology and
 tectonic plates and motion only occurs under narrow conditions for a planet.
 
 
 David
 
 On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
 
 Makes sense, since plate tectonics obviously have a role in volcanic
 activity, which has a role in CO2 emission (cf the nice postings by Stephen
 and Taylor in the Thawing... thread explaining how the planet may have
 recovered from snowball Earth conditions thanks to volcanic CO2 emission
 and subsequent greenhouse effect)

 Michel

 - Original Message -
 From: David Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 2:11 PM
 Subject: [Vo]:Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission


  Hi
 
  A professor on a seminar yesterday said plate tectonics have a role in
 CO2
  emission.
 
  Anyone here knows more?
 
  David
 

 
 -- 
 David Jonsson
 Sweden
 phone callto:+46703000370




RE: [Vo]:the LHC

2008-09-10 Thread Remi Cornwall

Frank,
I wish you well. Creativity not brute force is the way to solve problems.

This current generation are no match for the people who founded QM, did the
Manhattan Project, the Moonshots. They seem to be
wannabe/acolyte/bandwagoners joining the big sexy projects - genius by
association. Someone said to me that in any organisation probably 1% is any
good, the rest are along for the ride... The blue-skies argument goes these
guys are clever just give 'em resources and they will come up with
something.

This area of physics has been linked to the profound and fundamental such
things as did a big bang occur, the nature of time, do other dimensions
exist, the nature of mass. Buy into the dream.

There are many 'emergent' phenomena on a large scale that are just as
profound without the recourse to the very small and high energy. Does it
always follow that consciousness or the arrow of time falls in the domain of
HE physics? 

Why shouldn't engineers using 'old stuff' solve the energy crisis, do
reactionless propulsion, go faster than light. Their gift is the creativity
to look at problems from a different perspective than the over schooled
theoreticians cramped by over tutelage.

In a different area but with a similar big spending ability, we had the head
of IFER (or is it ITER?) come over to QMUL once begging for engineers and
mat. Sci. to solve his problems. We quietly sat as this guy went through his
slides and the unspoken thought among us was this is so impractical (hot
fusion) why do you get so much funding? 


I think the main discovery will be The Law of Diminishing Returns in Big
Physics Projects followed up by Over mining a vein leads to a paradigm
shift.

It will happen, it is happening - profound physics done on a shoe-string on
a bench top. One only needs to look at the comparatively mainstream stuff in
Quantum Entanglement.

Regs,
Remi.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 10 September 2008 17:55
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:the LHC

#4
Since the outcome will be highly arcane and only understandable to the few
initiated (since no engineering applications below about 10^-10metres,
engineering makes theories real) we will be told that the Universe is made
from quarks and strings held together by glue-on and this will be based on
highly repeatable experiments (one event in trillions of other
collisions). So its all becoming a just-so-story. One branch of
philosophy/poetry against another. Wanna swap creation myths anyone?  


snip
And let someone like me say that he has discovered a usefull low energy
condition, like the path
of the quantum transition, and the science police stomp on it until it is
dead.

ref comments below


http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter0.html


Frank Znidarsic

Looking for spoilers and reviews on the new TV season? Get AOL's ultimate
guide to fall TV. 




Re: [Vo]:Re: Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission

2008-09-10 Thread leaking pen
I wouldnt think the carbon content needs replenishment, more the
oxygen content.

In addition, it would help free pockets of gas into the atmosphere.  I
dont think hiding biomass would be big, as any biomass it submerges
was already taken out of the system in terms of peat and loam.

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Indeed I would think more tectonic activity  more volcanic activity  more 
 CO2, I don't see why the biomass which gets covered would counter that, on 
 the contrary it seems to replenish the magma's carbon content, enabling CO2 
 emission by future volcanoes erupting downstream as shown on the nice page 
 you pointed us to.

 Michel

 - Original Message -
 From: David Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:05 PM
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission


 Positive or negative? Seems like more tectonic movement causes more CO2? On
 the other hand biomass might get covered when a plate goes below another. I
 suppose this is a necessity for oil production?

 Here is a link http://dilu.bol.ucla.edu/ . The relations seems complex.

 The PDF of the lecture yesterday is 55 MB and we haven't yet a way to
 transfer the file. This was mentioned in relation to astrobiology and
 tectonic plates and motion only occurs under narrow conditions for a planet.


 David

 On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 Makes sense, since plate tectonics obviously have a role in volcanic
 activity, which has a role in CO2 emission (cf the nice postings by Stephen
 and Taylor in the Thawing... thread explaining how the planet may have
 recovered from snowball Earth conditions thanks to volcanic CO2 emission
 and subsequent greenhouse effect)

 Michel

 - Original Message -
 From: David Jonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 2:11 PM
 Subject: [Vo]:Plate tectonics cause CO2 emission


  Hi
 
  A professor on a seminar yesterday said plate tectonics have a role in
 CO2
  emission.
 
  Anyone here knows more?
 
  David
 


 --
 David Jonsson
 Sweden
 phone callto:+46703000370






Re: [Vo]:Perosin

2008-09-10 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:34:52 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Not just for blondes anymore ...

http://techrepublic-cnet.com.com/military-tech/?keyword=Perosin

A search on Perosin yielded http://www.chemdrug.com/MSDSInfo.asp?ID=4311. Food
for conspiracy fans?

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]