according to their answer on the forum, theyr don't vent the hydrogen at
all, execept if deadly improbable dysfunction.
It seems they did answer about quiescence, saying they see none...
however they use a pulse control to avoid burnout.
2012/5/12 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
If you recall our past discussions (Re: Excess heat due to proton
pairing in metal hydrides) about the DGT maintenance process of
periodically venting the hydrogen envelope and occasionally vacuuming the
nickel powder. I suggested that this procedure was to mitigate the
“quiescence” problem whose causation is localized in the hydrogen envelope.
What this maintenance procedure would do is reduce to low levels, the
“secret sauce” additive. This catalyst would need to be reformulated and
reactivated after envelope venting.
The function of the second spark plug is rebuild the nano-structures of
the “secret sauce” when the DGT reactor is restarted.
There must be a large resource of functional additive precursor compound
that is in close proximity to the plasma end on the second spark plug.
In the Rossi reactor, the functional additive is only formulated at the
initial startup and is maintained for long term running.
But in the DGT reactor which can be restarted many times on-site, the
functional additive must be rebuilt after each on-site maintenance
procedure.
The second plug is only activated for a short timeframe until the
functional additive is vaporized from a powdered or a solid feedstock
compound packed closely around the plasma end of the second spark plug.
Cheers: Axil
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
**
Having 2 spark plugs on both ends, and firing them alternately in groups
will cause the hot zone to alternate between the 2 ends. This to me would
push the hydrogen back and forth between the 2 ends, as hot hydrogen
expands and migrate to the cool end. Timing the sparks properly would
create a constant hot hydrogen gas pulse alternating between the 2 ends.
And fast flowing hydrogen should carry the nickel nanopowder along for the
ride thereby ensuring that the sparks never hit the same powder particles.
This to me is a effective means to create turbulence.
My approach to creating turbulence is to take advantage of the
themosiphon Chimneyeffect. Hot gas flows up and is cooled and then gets
pulled along an alternate tube back to the bottom where the spark plug is.
I calculated the gas flow in the order of 137m/s within my reactor.
Whether this figure is accurate or not, one thing is clear - I have
sufficient turbulence.
It appears unneccesary to use spark plug for temperature measurements.
There appears to be an abundance of thermocouple connections in that
reactor. Looking at the reactor end plates, there are a lot of holes for
a bunch of different instrument probes. The presence of the spark plug is
unneccesary for the purposes you mentioned.
To me, sparks appear to be critical for the creation of Rydberg matter as
speculated by Axil.
I am unfamiliar with the Atomic Battery calculations you are alluding
to. Can you please elaborate?
Jojo
- Original Message -
*From:* David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, May 11, 2012 1:24 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Progress Photographs pdf from Defkalion Green
Technologies
I do see the two plugs at opposite ends of the device but it is not
obvious why this configuration would generate a large amount turbulence.
The fact that they are using two plugs might indicate that there are two
isolated voltage feeds; one positive and the other negative (or AC to
balance the effect). This might tend to spread the ion stream along the
length of the cylinder.
The metal caps at each end of the device are quite thick which explains
the long reach plugs.
An earlier poster suggested that the plugs were merely used as a means of
breaching the metal caps with a high pressure and temperature resistant
connector. This might be the reason for the plugs if we follow their
reasoning since spark plugs are used in ICE in that manner. Of course they
also carry the high voltage to activate the plugs in those services.
There may be good logic associated with the spark induced ion current
injection. I once looked at that from a different perspective. I
calculated the induced current associated with an atomic battery that
operated with beta plus decays that would occur according to Rossi's
original paper. It was a while back in time but I recall that several
milliamps of current would be induced at the power level of a few
kilowatts. I can reproduce the number if it is of additional interest.
If the current is in the form of protons required to interact then it
should not be too difficult to generate the necessary number by spark
ionization. I have to wonder how effeciently the protons interact with the
nickel
