[Vo]:
Asking for further help: Cn you please put this on your Facebook pages or send it everywhere to alll places it could genearte answers and signatures? *Hello!* *I've started the petition Any person worldwide who has problems: Read and studyhttp://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/stop-probletence-pandemic.html http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/stop-probletence-pandemic.html Learn to apply the set of 20 real life problem solving rules. and need your help to get it off the ground.* *Will you take 30 seconds to sign it right now? Here's the link:* *http://www.change.org/p/any-person-worldwide-who-has-problems-read-and-study-http-egooutpeters-blogspot-ro-2014-10-stop-probletence-pandemic-html-learn-to-apply-the-set-of-20-real-life-problem-solving-rules* http://www.change.org/p/any-person-worldwide-who-has-problems-read-and-study-http-egooutpeters-blogspot-ro-2014-10-stop-probletence-pandemic-html-learn-to-apply-the-set-of-20-real-life-problem-solving-rules?utm_source=guidesutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=petition_lonely *Here's why it's important:* *It is not only important, it is vital because our World is in deadly danger due to ever aggravating Probletence.* *You can sign my petition by clicking here. http://www.change.org/p/any-person-worldwide-who-has-problems-read-and-study-http-egooutpeters-blogspot-ro-2014-10-stop-probletence-pandemic-html-learn-to-apply-the-set-of-20-real-life-problem-solving-rules?utm_source=guidesutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=petition_lonely* *Thanks! Peter Gluck* -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:questions on McKubre cells and AC component
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: From the point of the calorimeter heat is not absorbed since no heat vanishes. The energy does vanish! You put in X amount of electricity but only a fraction of X comes out. The rest goes into changing the chemical structure of the egg you are cooking, or the hydride you are forming (or whatever endothermic process is happening). Like all measuring instruments a calorimeter is incapable of doing anything other than it was designed to do and that consists in detecting changes or lack of changes in heat content. Whether or not the data it supplies represents exothermic or endothermic reactions requires further interpretation based on additional knowledge. Endothermic means the reaction absorbs energy. It outputs less than you put in. Obviously the calorimeter tells you that is happening. It can do that for the same reason it tells you that a chemical or nuclear reaction produces *more* than you put in. It does not require any interpretation or additional knowledge. That's like saying you need additional knowledge to be sure you have gained weight when your bathroom scale says you are 10 lbs heavier. No, you don't. The numbers are right there. We can rule out this scenario for most cold fusion experiments, including McKubre's, because the periods when there is no heat are shorter than the continuous periods when there is heat. So the deficit would have to be as large or larger than the positive heat release. Whether or not an excess heat event is long or short is relative to when the accounting period begins. Does he include the time and energy spent loading? The balance is zero during loading, except the initial phase when the palladium loads a significant amount of hydrogen. As I said, there are no quiescent periods long enough to store energy below the level of detection, and during the exothermic periods far more energy comes out than any mechanism can store in chemical reactions. The calorimeter doesn't tell you there is a deficit. Of course it does! That's what it is for. The only thing it tells you is how much and how quickly the heat content of the system changes.The deficit is an *interpretation* of this raw data. Since you measure input electricity as well as output heat, you can see there is a balance, a deficit or an excess. To repeat, unless the temperature falls a calorimeter by itself cannot tell you if an endothermic process has occurred. No, the temperature does not need to fall. When it does not rise as much as it does when all input energy converts to heat, you know you have an endothermic reaction. Imagine you shovel 20 kg of coal into a 1 kg container. You then weigh the container. If it weighs 25 kg you have magically created excess mass. It weighs only 15 kg you have destroyed mass. That cannot happen with mass but it happens all the time with energy going into a system, for example when you cook eggs, charge up a battery, or strike a match (endothermic, endothermic, exothermic). The whole point of a calorimeter is to measure the energy balance in such reactions. You need additional information to interpret the meaning of the lack of rise in temperature . Well, you have to know how the temperature reflects the power, but that is the same knowledge you need to characterize an exothermic reaction. I suggest you read a book about calorimetry, such as Hemminger and Hohne, which I spent a few hours cribbing from yesterday. - Jed
[Vo]:Unidentified subject!
A symmetrical pairing is made here so that two rotational emf devices are powered on the same axle rotation: but from the relative viewpoint of each sides 3 phase stator ring those sources of rotating magnetic flux are rotating oppositely as each opposite view of the rotation dictates. To compensate then the direction of the (DC) field current is changed oppositely on each rotating side by wiring them in series backwards to each other; which is actually the only possibility given the casing on both sides consists of the grounds for both of the fields on each side..A further double negative approach between the influence of field current direction related to rotational direction is shown. The verification of an initial remanent magnetic field and its removal by reverse field magnetization and the process of attempting to restore the former amount of remanent magnetization is shown. Bus Alternator Video Pt. 1 Dismantled bus alternator components and modification of symmetrically joining two bus alternators together with a common pulley for both. Each three phase system can also varied in timing between them to provide any needed phase angle between them, but here a test of that phase angle put identical to unity is made. Magnetek modification of changing the DC output to three independent delta phasing sources also shown. Two of of these are combined in series to obtain a wye output on both sides of operation and those wye outputs are then themselves combined in series. Three voltage meters showing the summation of the seriesed segments are shown to show voltage unity of each side of the three phase outputs. Experiment of a double reversal of both field currents and rotational direction is described and shown in pt 2. Bus Alternator Video Pt. 1 Bus Alternator Video Pt. 1 Dismantled bus alternator components and modification of symmetrically joining two bus alternators together with a common pulley for both. Each three pha... View on youtu.be Preview by Yahoo Experiment of a double negative combination of both directions of pole face rotation and field current shows the remanent magnetism of the field rotor has become demagnetized, and now the voltage output shown at the beginning test of 2.5 volt field DC field magnetization no longer produces the better effect found at the beginning of the demonstration. Hence the field current is then doubled and shut off in attempt to regain the former amount of (correctly)magnetized field. Then it is tripled to make the no field former no field observations appear when bearing or offset pulley drive problems develop and the alternators must have the field influence removed. These tests are done at the slower speed of 600 rpm of a 6 pole face rotor making three cycles per revolution establishing ~ 60 hz stator output and the efficiency seems terrible as the field voltage input and stator voltage output are near identical. The pair is driven from a variable speed motor incorporating a Leeson variable frequency drive set at 20 hz equating to 20 revolutions/sec for both ends of alternators and input drive via equal pulley sizes. Bus Alternator Video pt. 2 Bus Alternator Video pt. 2 Experiment of a double negative combination of both directions of pole face rotation and field current shows the remanent magnetism of the field rotor h... View on youtu.be Preview by Yahoo HDN Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
[Vo]:Symmetrically Paired Reluctance Bus Altenators
A symmetrical pairing is made here so that two rotational emf devices are powered on the same axle rotation: but from the relative viewpoint of each sides 3 phase stator ring those sources of rotating magnetic flux are rotating oppositely as each opposite view of the rotation dictates. To compensate then the direction of the (DC) field current is changed oppositely on each rotating side by wiring them in series backwards to each other; which is actually the only possibility given the casing on both sides consists of the grounds for both of the fields on each side..A further double negative approach between the influence of field current direction related to rotational direction is shown. The verification of an initial remanent magnetic field and its removal by reverse field magnetization and the process of attempting to restore the former amount of remanent magnetization is shown.Bus Alternator Video Pt. 1 Dismantled bus alternator components and modification of symmetrically joining two bus alternators together with a common pulley for both. Each three phase system can also varied in timing between them to provide any needed phase angle between them, but here a test of that phase angle put identical to unity is made. Magnetek modification of changing the DC output to three independent delta phasing sources also shown. Two of of these are combined in series to obtain a wye output on both sides of operation and those wye outputs are then themselves combined in series. Three voltage meters showing the summation of the seriesed segments are shown to show voltage unity of each side of the three phase outputs. Experiment of a double reversal of both field currents and rotational direction is described and shown in pt 2. Bus Alternator Video Pt. 1 Bus Alternator Video Pt. 1 Dismantled bus alternator components and modification of symmetrically joining two bus alternators together with a common pulley for both. Each three pha... View on youtu.be Preview by Yahoo Experiment of a double negative combination of both directions of pole face rotation and field current shows the remanent magnetism of the field rotor has become demagnetized, and now the voltage output shown at the beginning test of 2.5 volt field DC field magnetization no longer produces the better effect found at the beginning of the demonstration. Hence the field current is then doubled and shut off in attempt to regain the former amount of (correctly)magnetized field. Then it is tripled to make the no field former no field observations appear when bearing or offset pulley drive problems develop and the alternators must have the field influence removed. These tests are done at the slower speed of 600 rpm of a 6 pole face rotor making three cycles per revolution establishing ~ 60 hz stator output and the efficiency seems terrible as the field voltage input and stator voltage output are near identical. The pair is driven from a variable speed motor incorporating a Leeson variable frequency drive set at 20 hz equating to 20 revolutions/sec for both ends of alternators and input drive via equal pulley sizes. Bus Alternator Video pt. 2 Bus Alternator Video pt. 2 Experiment of a double negative combination of both directions of pole face rotation and field current shows the remanent magnetism of the field rotor h... View on youtu.be Preview by Yahoo Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
[Vo]:Konstantin Meyl's Potential Vortex Departure
A particularly intriguing notion of Konstantin Meyl's is that a complex speed of light is derivable from the conventional interpretation of the dielectric coefficient, rendering that conventional interpretation an offense against the basic principles of physics: http://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/2P9_0930-1-piers-extended_field_theory.pdf This seems to be his point of departure into fringe physics his replacement of the vector potential with his derivation of the potential vortex.
Re: [Vo]:MFMP interviews spokesman from WILLIAMSON
Having looked at the Robert Greenyer video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyp14fnE1jQ and his observation of the wavy nature of a commercial heater and the Lugana hotcat : http://lenr.qumbu.com/web_hotcat_pics/141030_blackbody_04.png Greenyer notes the wavy structure of an electric heating element wound round a ceramic tube, and thinks that this explains the irregular structure of the Lugano hotcat: it's most likely alumina cement over an inner alumina cylinder. I now think this is the most likely construction (sorry for the 300dpi scans) : http://lenr.qumbu.com/web_hotcat_pics/hotcat_141030_fig20.png and (as usual) the banding could be explained in multiple ways : http://lenr.qumbu.com/web_hotcat_pics/hotcat_141030_fig21.png Only the shadow hypothesis requires the ceramic to be visually transparent -- the other two just could depend on thermal conductivity. Updated paper's at : http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_hotcat_oct2014_banding_d.php ps : It's now obvious that the hotcat's unusual shape -- particularly the 2013 versions with the flange -- are intended as plug-in replacements for new or existing commercial heating systems, which also operate in the 1300-1400C range. Huge market.
Re: [Vo]:Konstantin Meyl's Potential Vortex Departure
Right James. I think his work is very interesting. I'm interested to know when someone finally digs into it w/ some technical background and can see what is good, and what is bad, about it. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:45 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: A particularly intriguing notion of Konstantin Meyl's is that a complex speed of light is derivable from the conventional interpretation of the dielectric coefficient, rendering that conventional interpretation an offense against the basic principles of physics: http://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/2P9_0930-1-piers-extended_field_theory.pdf This seems to be his point of departure into fringe physics his replacement of the vector potential with his derivation of the potential vortex.
Re: [Vo]:MFMP interviews spokesman from WILLIAMSON
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: Only the shadow hypothesis requires the ceramic to be visually transparent -- the other two just could depend on thermal conductivity. The shadow hypothesis has always seemed like a stretch to me. It sounds speculative. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Konstantin Meyl's Potential Vortex Departure
From a colleague: I can't help but think this is backwards, and is the more offensive departure, not from orthodoxy (which always deserves to be challenged) but from simplicity (Occam) and common sense. Still, he's not far off the track because of the close connection between the speed of light and the ultimate discrete motion -- the imaginary logic value or oscillation, which is a simple case of complex. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote: Right James. I think his work is very interesting. I'm interested to know when someone finally digs into it w/ some technical background and can see what is good, and what is bad, about it. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:45 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: A particularly intriguing notion of Konstantin Meyl's is that a complex speed of light is derivable from the conventional interpretation of the dielectric coefficient, rendering that conventional interpretation an offense against the basic principles of physics: http://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/2P9_0930-1-piers-extended_field_theory.pdf This seems to be his point of departure into fringe physics his replacement of the vector potential with his derivation of the potential vortex.
Re: [Vo]:Konstantin Meyl's Potential Vortex Departure
Interesting, thanks for sharing. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:46 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: From a colleague: I can't help but think this is backwards, and is the more offensive departure, not from orthodoxy (which always deserves to be challenged) but from simplicity (Occam) and common sense. Still, he's not far off the track because of the close connection between the speed of light and the ultimate discrete motion -- the imaginary logic value or oscillation, which is a simple case of complex. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote: Right James. I think his work is very interesting. I'm interested to know when someone finally digs into it w/ some technical background and can see what is good, and what is bad, about it. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:45 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote: A particularly intriguing notion of Konstantin Meyl's is that a complex speed of light is derivable from the conventional interpretation of the dielectric coefficient, rendering that conventional interpretation an offense against the basic principles of physics: http://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/2P9_0930-1-piers-extended_field_theory.pdf This seems to be his point of departure into fringe physics his replacement of the vector potential with his derivation of the potential vortex.
