RE: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

2016-01-28 Thread Jones Beene
I wish you were attending, Ron ā€“ but as everyone knows:

 

THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC DEMONSTRATION ā€“ attendance is being carefully controlled. 

 

Even strong supporters of BLP have been rejected for invitations, simply 
because they are scientists.

 

Mills does not want to address the problem of having no verifiable data to 
share. 

 

This appears to be a staged production of no scientific value. It is simply 
another PR event to raise funding.

 

From: Ron Kita [mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 9:21 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

 

Hmmm:

http://brilliantlightpower.com/invitational-public-demonstration/

 

Ron Kita, Chiralex

Doylestown, PA  50 miles to Mills



[Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

2016-01-28 Thread Ron Kita
Hmmm:
http://brilliantlightpower.com/invitational-public-demonstration/

Ron Kita, Chiralex
Doylestown, PA  50 miles to Mills


Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

2016-01-28 Thread Esa Ruoho
d'you know where it is going to be held?


On 28 January 2016 at 19:20, Ron Kita  wrote:

> Hmmm:
> http://brilliantlightpower.com/invitational-public-demonstration/
>
> Ron Kita, Chiralex
> Doylestown, PA  50 miles to Mills
>



-- 
---
http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com // +358403703659
//
skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // iMessage:
esaru...@gmail.com //


Re: [Vo]:dense plasma seen in sonoluminescence experiments

2016-01-28 Thread Eric Walker

> On Jan 28, 2016, at 12:05, H Veeder  wrote:
> 
> Perhaps the energy of the collapsing bubble is channeled ( with the help of 
> the dense plasma) into the isotope'sā€‹ nucleus converting it into an unstable 
> isomer which triggers prompt beta decay.

This is along the lines of what I was thinking, although I wasn't thinking of 
an isomeric transition.  In this particular case, where we have a (double) beta 
emitter, perhaps, like you say, the dense plasma of electrons is partially 
channelled through the nucleus. Although the weak interaction has a small cross 
section, a much higher flux of electrons than usual might  compensate.

Eric

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

2016-01-28 Thread Jed Rothwell
"Invitational public demonstration" is a contradiction of terms. If it is
invitational, it is not public.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:dense plasma seen in sonoluminescence experiments

2016-01-28 Thread H Veeder
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Eric Walker  wrote:

> See:
>
> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-15876145
>
> This is a 2011 article that discusses a proposal by Seth Putterman, a
> professor well-known for investigating sonoluminescence.  The proposal is
> that in sonoluminescence, a plasma is created that is hundreds of times
> more dense than plasmas found in nuclear fusion experiments.  This proposal
> has been mentioned in connection with a demonstration made by Andrea Sella
> consisting of a glass tube filled with phosphoric acid and traces of
> xenon.  When the glass tube is gently shaken, a clinking sound occurs like
> that of a ball bearing hitting the glass wall, along with visible blue
> sparks.  The temperature transients that are believed to occur in the glass
> tube are up to 10,000 degrees, but they are nowhere near sufficient to
> strip the electrons witnessed in the sonoluminescence.  So there must be
> something else going on as well in addition to temperature spikes.
>
> Putterman does not suggest fusion, but he does offer the dense plasma.  I
> think this suggestion is interesting in two ways.  First, a very dense
> plasma might be good for accelerating alpha and beta decay in already
> unstable radionuclides.  Second, several xenon isotopes have double-beta
> decay modes.  It would be interesting indeed to ultimately discover that
> sonoluminescence is just accelerated beta decay, and that those blue sparks
> are Cherenkov radiation.
>
> Eric
>
>
Perhaps the energy of the collapsing bubble is channeled ( with the help of
the dense plasma) into the isotope'sā€‹ nucleus converting it into an
unstable isomer which triggers prompt beta decay.

Harry


Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

2016-01-28 Thread Ron Kita
I hope that Bill Good is still with BLP.  Many many years ago...we had a
few telephone conversations..pleasant.
Ad astra,
Ron
the company may have been tied to ThermocoreFranklin and Marshall U.

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Craig Haynie 
wrote:

> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 09:30 -0800, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> > Mills does not want to address the problem of having no verifiable
> > data to share.
> >
> As we've seen from previous attempts, there is no such thing as
> verifiable data at a public demonstration. Everything will be
> questioned, and nothing can be verified.
>
> > This appears to be a staged production of no scientific value. It is
> > simply another PR event to raise funding.
>
> Yes, but it would still be fun to watch. I'm wondering if Mills is
> presenting a self-sustaining generator? Anything less would be
> disappointing at this stage.
>
> Craig
> Manchester, NH
>
>
>
>


[Vo]:Airbus...New Scientist citation

2016-01-28 Thread Ron Kita
Interesting:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/01/28/new-scientist-magazine-segment-on-cold-fusion/
RonK


[Vo]:An AI tool Google 's Go playerl- model fotr LENR tools

2016-01-28 Thread Peter Gluck
Inspiring achievement!

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/01/jan-28-2016-lenr-will-prevail-by-using.html

BLP's demo seems to be not very public, still can be good
We learned to dislike secrecy

peter
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

2016-01-28 Thread Craig Haynie
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 09:30 -0800, Jones Beene wrote:

> Mills does not want to address the problem of having no verifiable
> data to share. 
> 
As we've seen from previous attempts, there is no such thing as
verifiable data at a public demonstration. Everything will be
questioned, and nothing can be verified.

> This appears to be a staged production of no scientific value. It is
> simply another PR event to raise funding.

Yes, but it would still be fun to watch. I'm wondering if Mills is
presenting a self-sustaining generator? Anything less would be
disappointing at this stage.

Craig
Manchester, NH