Re: [Vo]:Great quote from Benjamin Franklin
What Ben said about finding the truth in nature is valid, but finding what will work in Engineering is a different issue. A good engineer will imagine a billion ways in which an invention will fail so that invention is built to avoid all those failure modes. The disciples of Cassandra make the best engineers. On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Jed Rothwellwrote: > A Certain Person with a Vivid Imagination often makes Bold Claims about > cold fusion. These claims are not borne out by the literature, or by > theory. They are, as far as I know, imaginary. He is the only one who > believes them. > > > Okay, there are many people like that in this field. > > > Anyway, in answer to this person, I looked up a quote from Benjamin > Franklin: > > > "Perhaps the history of the errors of mankind, all things considered, is > more valuable and interesting than that of their discoveries. Truth is > uniform and narrow; it constantly exists, and does not seem to require so > much an active energy, as a passive aptitude of soul in order to encounter > it. But error is endlessly diversified; it has no reality, but is the pure > and simple creation of the mind that invents it. In this field, the soul > has room enough to expand herself, to display all her boundless faculties, > and all her beautiful and interesting extravagancies and absurdities." > > > —Benjamin Franklin, Report of Dr. Benjamin Franklin, and Other > Commissioners, Charged by the King of France, with the Examination of the > Animal Magnetism, as Now Practiced in Paris (1784) > > > (People unfamiliar with his biography may not realize that Franklin was > one of history's leading scientists. He was an FRS and he made fundamental > contributions such as discovering positive and negative electricity, and > inventing lighting rods and the Franklin stove.) > > > - Jed > > > >
[Vo]:Great quote from Benjamin Franklin
A Certain Person with a Vivid Imagination often makes Bold Claims about cold fusion. These claims are not borne out by the literature, or by theory. They are, as far as I know, imaginary. He is the only one who believes them. Okay, there are many people like that in this field. Anyway, in answer to this person, I looked up a quote from Benjamin Franklin: "Perhaps the history of the errors of mankind, all things considered, is more valuable and interesting than that of their discoveries. Truth is uniform and narrow; it constantly exists, and does not seem to require so much an active energy, as a passive aptitude of soul in order to encounter it. But error is endlessly diversified; it has no reality, but is the pure and simple creation of the mind that invents it. In this field, the soul has room enough to expand herself, to display all her boundless faculties, and all her beautiful and interesting extravagancies and absurdities." —Benjamin Franklin, Report of Dr. Benjamin Franklin, and Other Commissioners, Charged by the King of France, with the Examination of the Animal Magnetism, as Now Practiced in Paris (1784) (People unfamiliar with his biography may not realize that Franklin was one of history's leading scientists. He was an FRS and he made fundamental contributions such as discovering positive and negative electricity, and inventing lighting rods and the Franklin stove.) - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Measuring Spin
Bob I followed up the lead to Phillip Hatt's ideas. I find these various grand unified ideas that individuals have put together fascinating. I encountered one myself many years ago which I posted up on my website and I think mentioned on vortex-l some years ago http://thedyers.org.uk/nigel/alfred-claude-jessup/ I suspect that a lot could be learnt by soing a careful study of all of these ideas and attempt some kind of meta synthesis. There must be a genetic component to this in that my son has come up with his own GUT of a kind, but unfortunately it has got stuck in a pre-publication loop. When it has managed to leave the loop, vortex-l will be one of the first places to know. What it does do is show the very clear relationship between the fundemental particles, quarks, electrons and neutrinos and certainly leaves me in no doubts of the reality of quarks. Nigel On 28/05/2017 18:59, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: Nigel— Philippe Hatt’s theory of the composition and parameters of neutrons and protons—charge, mass and magnetic moment---as a system of positons and electrons is instructive. His predictions of these parameters is “dead nuts on” with respect to existing experimental accuracy. (No quarks involved or other virtual particles, only real particles.) Bob Cook