Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm

[Stefan Israelsson Tampe]

I would probably like to reconsider and reformulate this in hindsight

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 9:20 PM bobcook39...@hotmail.com <
bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Only 2  POINTS ON A SPHERICAL SURFACE CAN HAVE THE SAME VECTOR DIRECTION
> AND HENCE THE SAME VELLOICTRY, 0 velocity is not considered.  One would
> assume the same corrodent system for velocity defines the spherical surface
> and its points.  The 2 points would lie on a line that runs through the
> center of the spherical surface at the surface.
>
>
>
>
>
> The statement assumes that the tenants of solid geometry apply to real
> spcce
>
>
>
> Bob cook
>
> -
>
>
>
> *From: *Jürg Wyttenbach 
> *Sent: *Saturday, May 6, 2023 11:00 AM
> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm
>
>
>
> Stefan
>
> There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points on a
> sphere except for one axes angular motion  (w instead of v)
>
>
> J.W.
>
> On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> > I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the
> > connection between EM and QM now take this link and explain Aspects
> > experiment... How come we can define a normal 2000 century model and
> > end up with no determinism and whatnot strangities.
> >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/14G9U_Iee4jsppn0Rcp4A5BBrGDRkR5tC/view?usp=drivesdk
> >
> > I will blog in easier to understand format later. But really it's not
> > a difficult stude, which is a good thing in my mind.
>
> --
> Jürg Wyttenbach
> Bifangstr. 22
> 8910 Affoltern am Albis
>
> +41 44 760 14 18
> +41 79 246 36 06
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:Link between em and qm

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Only 2  POINTS ON A SPHERICAL SURFACE CAN HAVE THE SAME VECTOR DIRECTION  AND 
HENCE THE SAME VELLOICTRY, 0 velocity is not considered.  One would assume the 
same corrodent system for velocity defines the spherical surface and its 
points.  The 2 points would lie on a line that runs through the center of the 
spherical surface at the surface.


The statement assumes that the tenants of solid geometry apply to real spcce

Bob cook
-

From: Jürg Wyttenbach
Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2023 11:00 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm

Stefan

There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points on a
sphere except for one axes angular motion  (w instead of v)


J.W.

On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the
> connection between EM and QM now take this link and explain Aspects
> experiment... How come we can define a normal 2000 century model and
> end up with no determinism and whatnot strangities.
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/14G9U_Iee4jsppn0Rcp4A5BBrGDRkR5tC/view?usp=drivesdk
>
> I will blog in easier to understand format later. But really it's not
> a difficult stude, which is a good thing in my mind.

--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis

+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06