[Vo]:LENR-CANR.org downloads may be trending up
In recent years, average downloads per month were lowest in June 2022, at 6,117. This year, the average per month is 10,412. Perhaps this indicates increased interest in the field? It could be because of the DoE announcements. More people have looked at the News section lately, where the DoE announcements are listed. I think the increase mainly comes from people at various institutions downloading the entire library. See: https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1213 Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CwBlnYM7IFRjYCQcJ0OGjt-vRbbzqvm6T2Uk4YYsii0/edit#gid=0 News: https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=522
[Vo]:Cold fusion in Popular Science
Here is an annoying article about cold fusion. I guess any publicity is good publicity, but it is annoying: https://www.popsci.com/science/cold-fusion-low-energy-nuclear-reaction/ "Cold fusion is making a scientific comeback A US agency is funding low-energy nuclear reactions to the tune of $10 million. . . ." I cannot post a message at the website without registering, so I sent my standard response to the author: raorr...@gmail.com You wrote: "Fleischmann and Pons’ fatal flaw—that their results could not be replicated . . ." That is incorrect. Within a year Fleischmann and Pons were replicated in 92 major laboratories, listed here: https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/WillFGgroupsrepo.pdf By the mid-1990s, over 180 laboratories reported replications. These replications were published in mainstream, peer-reviewed journals. I suggest you review this literature before commenting on this subject. See: https://lenr-canr.org/
