[Vo]:Here is the truth..

2012-01-22 Thread Dusty Bradshaw

Cold Fusion turned me gay... srsly.



Re: [Vo]:Opponents should please go away and form your own group

2012-01-22 Thread Dusty Bradshaw



Some of us doubters would rather unsubscribe but since this is like Hotel 
California, welp..

Also, didn't know this was a religion here, worshipping at the altar of fringe 
science?

Is this a cult or science, and where can I get off this train? 

Heavens Gate much??

Have a nice day.

--
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 3:15 PM CST Tom Barnett wrote:

yes - the rules:
Pathological Skepticism is banned

if your mind is open and you wish to test crazy claims
   rather than ridiculing them or explaining them away, hop on  board!

For what my opinion is worth, it is quite clear from what I have been
reading here that those of you who are sincere and positive about this
technology might want to create another forum elsewhere (even though as you
say Jed this forum was created with the above rules set down). Those who,
perhaps imagining they have good intentions, but are clogging this space up
with negativity, are clearly not going to leave. In fact they will probably
call over their like minded vulture mates to join in until all the meat is
gone.
Sounds drastic, but email all those who are on board and find better
pastures.

Thanks for all your great work those of you who count.
Tom


On 22 January 2012 20:49, *** Craig Brown *** cr...@overunity.co wrote:

 Jed, what you have described here is EXACTLY what happened to the Steorn
 Forum. MaryYugo and all the moletrap clowns took over the forum and it
 became so abusive that the forum was closed. They are a cancer and a
 barrier to progress because of their own egos.

 ** **

 These people include Mary Yugo, Axil Axil, John Milstone, Eff Wivakeef and
 others. You know who you are. If you will not stop this childish nonsense,
 I ask you to shut up and go away. I ask Bill Beaty to ban you. I have been
 adding you to my personal kill file, but there seems to be so many of you
 lately, and you are so noisy, you are interfering with scientific
 discourse, and perverting the spirit of this forum.

 ** **

 The Internet is unbounded. You can form your own discussion group. You can
 subscribe to this group while you post your attacks and ad hominem
 elsewhere. Or take it to VortexB-L. Of course we welcome your contributions
 to the technical discussion here.

 ** **

 - Jed

 ** **

 ** **




[Vo]:Stable Fusion??

2012-01-22 Thread Dusty Bradshaw

I have been having some success heating my house with a device that consists of 
unpressurized proteins, sugars, starches, and waters that undergo heating via 
an electric resistance.

Here are the salient facts:
Flour
Eggs
Water
Sucrose
Vaniila

I mix these together in a reactor vessel constructed of stainless steel and 
place them in an insulated cabinate where they are heated several times for a 
period of time, and they undergo a transmutation. When the heater is turned off 
after ramp up the reactants change colors and their physical properties become 
different. 

I can then remove the reactor vessel out of the ramp up box and place it 
carefully on an insulated holder, but have to take great pains not to touch as 
temperatures are dangerously high. It smells quite delicious and remains quite 
warm for quite a period of time. After which even the heating box is now hot 
enough to comfortably warm the entire lab area.

I'm considering the manufacture of these as the by product alone may feed an 
army.

Any thoughts??



RE: [Vo]:Opponents should please go away and form your own group

2012-01-22 Thread Dusty
A lot more transparancy would negate the need for 'open' minds. 

Sadly,  Rossi = Fail. 

Any University would be happy to test his device under an NDA and blackbox..

How you gonna change the world without coming out into the light? He could have 
protected his IP and changed the world, but alas chooses to hide behind smoke 
screens. Why? Because he has something to hide.

Now excuse me while go brush my teeth. (Just threw up in my mouth a little).

Craig Brown cr...@overunity.co wrote:



[Vo]:UNSUBSRIBE

2012-01-13 Thread Dusty Bradshaw
Unsubscribeunsubscribeunsubscribe...
I've tried 4 times to get off this mailing list.
This is the fifth!

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

[Vo]:Unwsu

2011-12-26 Thread Dusty Bradshaw


-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

[Vo]:unsubscribe

2011-12-26 Thread Dusty Bradshaw





[Vo]:unsubscribe

2011-12-18 Thread Dusty Bradshaw
unsubsribe

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

[Vo]:unsubscribe

2011-11-26 Thread Dusty Bradshaw


-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

Re: [Vo]:Andrea rossi: This is not yet our official website

2011-11-12 Thread Dusty
What I find funny, is Rossi can write and author great English when he wants 
to, and then at other times he writes like this... funny..

Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:

Latest Rossi-ism:


   -  Andrea Rossi
November 12th, 2011 at 8:57
AMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=32#comment-117146

   WARNING: THE WEBSITE
http://WWW.LEONARDO-ECAT.COMhttp://www.leonardo-ecat.com/IS NOT OUR
WEBSITE. IT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED, IT IS A DRAFT OF A PROPOSAL
   WHOSE TEXT HAS TO BE CONTROLLED, APPROVED. WE ASKED TO THE INFORMATIC WHO
   PROPOSED IT TO PUT IT IMMEDIATELY OUT OF THE NET, BECAUSE IT CONTAINS
   SUBSTANTIAL ERRORS, WRONG NAMES IN WRONG PLACES :SPECIFICALLY, ALL THE
   NAMES PUT IN THE PAGE “BONA FIDE” ARE TOTALLY WRONG AND SUCH NAMES HAVE NOT
   TO BE PUT IN THAT POST.
   WARM REGARDS,
   ANDREA ROSSI

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510#comments

Good old Sterling and Hank apparently not only jumped the shark but also
screwed the pooch!


Re: [Vo]:NASA officially responds to an FOIA request that Rossi has never proved his claim

2011-11-10 Thread Dusty
That sounds about right! SCAM!

Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:

http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/11/10/nasa-engineer-explains-why-rossi-demos-failed/

According to a slide presentation given by NASA engineer Michael A.
Nelson, which New Energy Times obtained under a FOIA request, “Energy
Catalyzer” inventor Andrea Rossi failed to conclusively show that his
device produced excess heat from a nuclear energy source.    According
to Nelson, a NASA engineer who investigates low-energy nuclear
reactions and space applications, Rossi did not run his demonstration
long enough to prove his extraordinary claim.At the Sept. 22, 2011
LENR Workshop at NASA Glenn Research Center, Nelson explained that
Rossi “would need to run [his experiment] for eight hours or more with
a small E-Cat and much longer for an Ottoman [Fat-Cat] to rule out a
chemical reaction.”   According to Nelson, it would take “three or
more days for a small E-Cat, two or more weeks for an Ottoman
[Fat-Cat] E-Cat and several months for a 1 MW plant.”

The slide and more at the link.



[Vo]:Unidentified subject!

2011-10-30 Thread Dusty Bradshaw
First time poster here, but have been reading voraciously for a long 
time now, and I've been wondering why Rossi has been using those RFG's..
 I found something that might explain it. It seems RFG's can be used to 
dissociate water, and produce hydrogen, and burn it.. Here is the link, 
and was wondering what other's thoughts on this might be? It makes sense
 to me that in fact the E-Cat might be utilizing something along these 
lines..

Just a thought..

http://www.engineeringservicesoutsourcing.com/ref/eng/fut/uni/kanzius_salt_water_energy.html

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

Re: [Vo]:Unidentified subject! RFG's if you please...

2011-10-30 Thread Dusty Bradshaw

LOL, sorry for the missing subject.


-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux

--- On Sun, 10/30/11, Dusty Bradshaw d_bra...@bellsouth.net wrote:

From: Dusty Bradshaw d_bra...@bellsouth.net
Subject: [Vo]:Unidentified subject!