[Vo]:How is the mainstream science misarable
How Did Supermassive Black Holes Grow So Big? http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131023090952.htm Gravitational waves are never found, even there is no encouraging clue. GW possibly does not exist becuase c is not a limit. It is a comedy to give the 'upper limit' argument of non existing GW in BH (non)observations. Of course: Absence of evidance is not evidence of absence.
[Vo]:arXiv:1306.6364 Comments on the report Indications of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel powder
Thanks
[Vo]:ecat arxiv.org paper updated
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1305.3913 Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device Giuseppe Levi, Evelyn Foschi, Torbjörn Hartman, Bo Höistad, Roland Pettersson, Lars Tegnér, Hanno Essén (Submitted on 16 May 2013 (v1), last revised 7 Jun 2013 (this version, v3)) Comments: Appendix on electrical measurements added I had not realized that he is using 3-phase system for just obtaining 380V AC single phase power. BR, Hamdi
Re: [Vo]:Suppression trends in late 2000's
Hello John, The circuit is basically an single transistor oscillator based on TIP-3055 where Collector-Vcc and Emitter-Gnd is connected through two air coils wound on a single 2 cm diameter empty fax roll, each 79 or 179 turns (I should find my notes) one CW other CCW, they meet at the center without a gap (this point called junction). It is based on Ronald R. Stiffler circuit called BiPeg. The base is connected to emitter trough a coupled coil. The circuit oscillate in random manner, hardly to see any periodic oscillations, bursts are also present. The chaotic behavior is caused I think due to base-collector voltage goes beyond specs and cause intermediate failures. It was very difficult to tune the circuit for the proper regime, also, even tuned, circuit can oscillate in multiple modes. The voltage difference at junction can be high as 90V. The O3 comes from point where two coils meets. No arc or hiss sound was present. Important thing is the O3 is only produced in a period of a month in summer where temperature was 30-35 degrees and more than 90% humidity. The O3 emission ceased when climate become normal. I later figured out that the O3 was not produced from O2 of the air but from H2O of the humidity. The reason of this was the experiments of John Kanzius showing salt water 'burned'. Ozone smell was very strong, and did not have a 'bitter' flavor which caused by cheap HV ozone generators (may Nitrogen compounds are also produced). Regards Hamdi On 14-Jan-13 11:50, John Berry wrote: Hey Hamdi, Long time. I am re-interested in a coil that you reported generating Ozone at low voltages. Can you give some more detail on that one please? Thanks, John On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Hamdi Ucar u...@verisoft.com mailto:u...@verisoft.com wrote: Hello everybody remembering me,
Re: [Vo]:Suppression trends in late 2000's
Hi John, The configuration of coils and schematics are similar to JNL TEP project where I am able to find it at http://www.kumanov.com/docs/Deco/Mag_Pompa/jnaudin.free.fr/html/tepv21.htm except coil is not bifilar but two separate coils meeting at middle of the cylinder. Coils are not covered in my config and I had some filtering coil at Vcc and some variable pF trimmers at base (base-collector?). I never tried ferrite rods. My power was only 5-6 Volts and 4-10 miliAmps. The experiments had show some exceptional phenomana I did not found explanations still today, and never appears on other kind oscillations having periodic character on this and on similar circuits. Regards, Hamdi On 14-Jan-13 18:00, John Berry wrote: The 2 coils sound interesting, did the wires cross at some angle, either within a coil or between the 2 coils? Thanks. John On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Hamdi Ucar u...@verisoft.com wrote: Hello John, The circuit is basically an single transistor oscillator based on TIP-3055 where Collector-Vcc and Emitter-Gnd is connected through two air coils wound on a single 2 cm diameter empty fax roll, each 79 or 179 turns (I should find my notes) one CW other CCW, they meet at the center without a gap (this point called junction). It is based on Ronald R. Stiffler circuit called BiPeg. The base is connected to emitter trough a coupled coil. The circuit oscillate in random manner, hardly to see any periodic oscillations, bursts are also present. The chaotic behavior is caused I think due to base-collector voltage goes beyond specs and cause intermediate failures. It was very difficult to tune the circuit for the proper regime, also, even tuned, circuit can oscillate in multiple modes. The voltage difference at junction can be high as 90V. The O3 comes from point where two coils meets. No arc or hiss sound was present. Important thing is the O3 is only produced in a period of a month in summer where temperature was 30-35 degrees and more than 90% humidity. The O3 emission ceased when climate become normal. I later figured out that the O3 was not produced from O2 of the air but from H2O of the humidity. The reason of this was the experiments of John Kanzius showing salt water 'burned'. Ozone smell was very strong, and did not have a 'bitter' flavor which caused by cheap HV ozone generators (may Nitrogen compounds are also produced). Regards Hamdi
[Vo]:Suppression trends in late 2000's
Hello everybody remembering me, I had difficulty to join Vortex List by a possible reason of http://www.mail-archive.com is possibly being filtered here. Terry helped me. I would like to ask your opinions about suppression (trends) after 2000 where global CO2 emissions is widely considered a serious issue. It appears that self-suppression is effective enough, so direct interventions are no longer needed :) I dont want also blame mainstream science for lack of interest as long as the they haven't the phenomenon in their hands. For example if you (inventor) have a commercial grade fuel-less energy producing device (requiring new physics), would you going to contact a large US company who having some relations with govt and also making lot of future investments (including on green energy) like Google? Actually a device working based on totally unknown phenomenon should not be consumer product at the first hand, all step for commercializing such a product will have serious difficulties. I think the acceptance problem can be reduced to predictability of the future. Breakthroughs in physics and technologies change the World. Sometimes it could be possible to introduce these innovations without loosing capability to predict the future. So a large organization could be advantageous to determine the way of realization of the breakthrough for this reason... Hamdi
[Vo]:Sun-free photovoltaics and Second Law of Thermodynamics
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/sun-free-photovoltaics-0728.html What happens when the PV have same temparature of the thermal emmiters? BTW, can be used with e-cat.
