[Vo]:Bismuth + Dr. Schwartz = 3kW free energy
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7842
Re: [Vo]:Bismuth + Dr. Schwartz = 3kW free energy
Explanation given: Schwartz says it's an 'electromagnetic device'. Hmmm, that's a little thin on the explanation front. The first thing he does is he activates it. NOTE WELL: First it must be turned on and activated, and the first thing it does when he flips the switch is light some LEDs, and the electricity for that comes from WHERE, exactly? There *must* be an internal power source to allow it to start up, yet he *never* mentions that. In order to do its initial power up and agitate the plates (as he says it does) and do its seek-out-and-find operation so it can connect to the Earth, it must be using internal battery power, since it's not running yet (and hence not self-powering yet) and it's not plugged in. Just how much battery power does it have on board, anyway? Since the power needed to start it up is never mentioned, we don't know. It's grounded to the earth but there's no ground wire, as they show us after it's activated. So, the statement that it's grounded is just misdirection, like most of what he says. I loved the bit where they pick up the case and turn it over -- this is pure stage-magician stuff: see, the box is solid on all sides. Unfortunately for the demo that little operation also shows that it's not grounded to the earth no matter what he says about it; the claim that it's grounded was a simple lie. It weighs 42 pounds, just 8 pounds of that are electronics, the weight is mostly case, he says -- bloody heavy case, eh? Or maybe it's case and batteries, eh? It has no moving parts and no carbon footprint; he says this as though the second follows from the first. For that matter, even if the only energy it uses was the energy required to manufacture it, its carbon footprint would be nonzero, but again, this is all just part of the patter which goes with the trick of lighting the lightbulbs. In short, this video positively screams scam. MJ wrote: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7842
Re: [Vo]:Bismuth + Dr. Schwartz = 3kW free energy
On Jul 28, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Explanation given: Schwartz says it's an 'electromagnetic device'. Hmmm, that's a little thin on the explanation front. Makes me wonder where Schwartz obtained his doctorate. My favorite part is where he says the device makes electrons. He's also a bit unclear himself as to whether those are each 100 watt or 1000 watt light bulbs! The light looks like 100 watts each to me, which would make the output 300 W, not 3000 W. The first thing he does is he activates it. NOTE WELL: First it must be turned on and activated, and the first thing it does when he flips the switch is light some LEDs, and the electricity for that comes from WHERE, exactly? There is an enclosure to the back left that looks like it would just hold a 12V Everstart motorcyle wet cell battery from Wal-Mart, the same kind I'm using for my Marinov ball bearing motor experiment at the moment. Must be projection on my part. There *must* be an internal power source to allow it to start up, yet he *never* mentions that. In order to do its initial power up and agitate the plates (as he says it does) and do its seek-out-and-find operation so it can connect to the Earth, it must be using internal battery power, since it's not running yet (and hence not self-powering yet) and it's not plugged in. Just how much battery power does it have on board, anyway? Since the power needed to start it up is never mentioned, we don't know. It's grounded to the earth but there's no ground wire, as they show us after it's activated. So, the statement that it's grounded is just misdirection, like most of what he says. I loved the bit where they pick up the case and turn it over -- this is pure stage-magician stuff: see, the box is solid on all sides. Unfortunately for the demo that little operation also shows that it's not grounded to the earth no matter what he says about it; the claim that it's grounded was a simple lie. It weighs 42 pounds, just 8 pounds of that are electronics, the weight is mostly case, he says -- bloody heavy case, eh? Or maybe it's case and batteries, eh? It has no moving parts and no carbon footprint; he says this as though the second follows from the first. For that matter, even if the only energy it uses was the energy required to manufacture it, its carbon footprint would be nonzero, but again, this is all just part of the patter which goes with the trick of lighting the lightbulbs. Hey! It has bismuth! It *has* to be real! 8^) In short, this video positively screams scam. MJ wrote: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7842 Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:Bismuth + Dr. Schwartz = 3kW free energy
This research is apparently supported by the Noah's Ark Research Foundation: http://www.freewebs.com/narfschwartz/ I can't help noticing their web page spiel begins with spelling mistake -- a new-agey spiritualist sounding mistake: The Noah's Ark Research Foundation was formed Sept 27, 1976 in the Philippines for the soul purpose of doing research in alternative energy, new battery technology, water purification and electric vehicles. I wonder if their mission statement has been spelled wrong for 33 years. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Bismuth + Dr. Schwartz = 3kW free energy
You didn't like the 100th Monkey recital? Terry On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: This research is apparently supported by the Noah's Ark Research Foundation: http://www.freewebs.com/narfschwartz/ I can't help noticing their web page spiel begins with spelling mistake -- a new-agey spiritualist sounding mistake: The Noah's Ark Research Foundation was formed Sept 27, 1976 in the Philippines for the soul purpose of doing research in alternative energy, new battery technology, water purification and electric vehicles. I wonder if their mission statement has been spelled wrong for 33 years. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:Bismuth + Dr. Schwartz = 3kW free energy
Looks like he ripped off: http://www.rexresearch.com/craig/craig.htm On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: You didn't like the 100th Monkey recital? Terry On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: This research is apparently supported by the Noah's Ark Research Foundation: http://www.freewebs.com/narfschwartz/ I can't help noticing their web page spiel begins with spelling mistake -- a new-agey spiritualist sounding mistake: The Noah's Ark Research Foundation was formed Sept 27, 1976 in the Philippines for the soul purpose of doing research in alternative energy, new battery technology, water purification and electric vehicles. I wonder if their mission statement has been spelled wrong for 33 years. - Jed
