Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

2012-08-19 Thread Mauro Lacy

On 08/16/2012 01:19 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:


FYI:  this forwarded to me by a colleague...

-Mark

Trouble with Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory:

Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v5.pdf

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to point out that Maxwell's 
electromagnetic theory,


believed by the majority of scientists a fundamental theory of 
physics, is in fact built


on an unsupported assumption and on a faulty method of theoretical 
investigation.


The result is that the whole theory cannot be considered reliable, nor 
its conclusions


accurate descriptions of reality. In this work it is called into 
question whether radio


waves (and light) travelling in vacuum, are indeed  composed of 
mutually inducing


electric and magnetic fields.



The idea of mutually inducing electric and magnetic fields is, without a 
doubt, one of the cleverest stupid things found in modern science. We 
don't want to abandon it so soon... it has the big advantage that it 
solves the problem of the light carrying medium.


It reminds me of the feats of the Münchhausen's baron, who raises 
himself up by pulling from the strings of his shoes.




Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

2012-08-19 Thread David Roberson

I think the concept of one field generating the other in space as the wave 
advances is defective.  In my way of thinking it is not possible to stop a wave 
in motion and perform a test of this nature.

You would need to travel faster than light to get to an observation point that 
allows this.  I prefer to measure the field parameters at a point removed from 
the moving charge that initiates the wave.  Then I am able to measure the 
effect of the electric field and magnetic field as it passes by at the speed of 
light.  There is no reason to assume one vector generates the other.

I came to the realization years ago that there is actually only one parameter 
defining both fields.  Charge and its movement is the key.  Current is 
proportional to the first derivative of the spatial position of charge with 
respect to time(charge velocity).  Radiation is related to the charge 
acceleration.   The magnetic field is determined by the currents in space and 
time.   Everything electromagnetic originates with charge.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 6:05 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?


  On 08/16/2012 01:19 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:


FYI:  this forwarded to me by a colleague…

-Mark

 

Trouble with Maxwell’s Electromagnetic  Theory: 

Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v5.pdf

 

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to point out  that Maxwell’s 
electromagnetic theory,

believed by the majority of scientists a  fundamental theory of 
physics, is in fact built

on an unsupported assumption and on a  faulty method of theoretical 
investigation.

The result is that the whole theory cannot  be considered reliable, nor 
its conclusions

accurate descriptions of reality. In this  work it is called into 
question whether radio

waves (and light) travelling in vacuum, are  indeed  composed of 
mutually inducing

electric and magnetic fields.

 
  


The idea of mutually inducing electric and magnetic fields is,without a 
doubt, one of the cleverest stupid things found in modernscience. We don't 
want to abandon it so soon... it has the bigadvantage that it solves the 
problem of the light carrying medium.

It reminds me of the feats of the Münchhausen's baron, who raises
himself up by pulling from the strings of his shoes.

  
 


[Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

2012-08-16 Thread Mark Iverson
FYI:  this forwarded to me by a colleague.

-Mark

 

Trouble with Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory: 

Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v5.pdf

 

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to point out that Maxwell's electromagnetic
theory,

believed by the majority of scientists a fundamental theory of physics, is
in fact built

on an unsupported assumption and on a faulty method of theoretical
investigation.

The result is that the whole theory cannot be considered reliable, nor its
conclusions

accurate descriptions of reality. In this work it is called into question
whether radio

waves (and light) travelling in vacuum, are indeed  composed of mutually
inducing

electric and magnetic fields.

 



Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

2012-08-16 Thread David Roberson

Come on Mark,  now you want to really mess up our minds!

Dave


-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 12:19 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?



FYI:  this forwarded to me by a colleague…
-Mark
 
Trouble with Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Theory: 
Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?
http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v5.pdf
 
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to point out that Maxwell’s electromagnetic 
theory,
believed by the majority of scientists a fundamental theory of physics, is in 
fact built
on an unsupported assumption and on a faulty method of theoretical 
investigation.
The result is that the whole theory cannot be considered reliable, nor its 
conclusions
accurate descriptions of reality. In this work it is called into question 
whether radio
waves (and light) travelling in vacuum, are indeed  composed of mutually 
inducing
electric and magnetic fields.
 

 


RE: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

2012-08-16 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
As Morpheus said…

 

 

Free…. 

 

 

 

 

 

Your….

 

 

 

 

 

Mind!

 

 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

 

Come on Mark,  now you want to really mess up our minds!

 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 12:19 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

FYI:  this forwarded to me by a colleague…

-Mark

 

Trouble with Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Theory: 

Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v5.pdf

 

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to point out that Maxwell’s electromagnetic 
theory,

believed by the majority of scientists a fundamental theory of physics, is in 
fact built

on an unsupported assumption and on a faulty method of theoretical 
investigation.

The result is that the whole theory cannot be considered reliable, nor its 
conclusions

accurate descriptions of reality. In this work it is called into question 
whether radio

waves (and light) travelling in vacuum, are indeed  composed of mutually 
inducing

electric and magnetic fields.

 



Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

2012-08-16 Thread David Roberson

It is totally free and fried!  I read the document and see many holes in the 
argument.

Once when I was more naive I thought about the magnetic field surrounding a 
wire broken by a capacitor coupling device.  As I visualized the magnetic field 
due to the current, I began to think that there must be a gap or discontinuity 
since no real current is flowing within the capacitor.  Between the plates 
there is only an electric field that is changing as charge is being added or 
subtracted from the plates of the capacitor.

Then it occurred to me that this was in fact the famous displacement current 
that Maxwell was suggesting.  At that point I realized that the external 
magnetic field could be smooth and continuous.

The author of the document states in no uncertain terms that such a time 
changing electric field can not generate a magnetic field and he is obviously 
wrong.

It was an interesting read but I suspect it was related to an April fools joke 
or something similar.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 6:34 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?



As Morpheus said…
 
 
Free…. 
 
 
 
 
 
Your….
 
 
 
 
 
Mind!
 
 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

 

Come on Mark,  now you want to really mess up our minds!

 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 12:19 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?


FYI:  this forwarded to me by a colleague…

-Mark

 

Trouble with Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Theory: 

Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v5.pdf

 

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to point out that Maxwell’s electromagnetic 
theory,

believed by the majority of scientists a fundamental theory of physics, is in 
fact built

on an unsupported assumption and on a faulty method of theoretical 
investigation.

The result is that the whole theory cannot be considered reliable, nor its 
conclusions

accurate descriptions of reality. In this work it is called into question 
whether radio

waves (and light) travelling in vacuum, are indeed  composed of mutually 
inducing

electric and magnetic fields.

 



 


RE: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

2012-08-16 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
I’m just the reporter!

We report… you decide.

 

OK, I confess… there might be some interesting, and sometimes heated, 
discussions in between the report/decide thingy… Vorts are a rambunctious lot, 
and after having a few at the Dime Box Saloon, brawls are not uncommon... but 
mostly friendly.

 

If you’re not afraid to ask, “What if”… if that doesn’t cause cog-diss, then 
pull up a stool and have a go at it!  You’re welcome here.  But when you step 
up onto the Dime Box, you’d better make sure your guns at loaded, cuz Vorts are 
bound to take a few shots atcha!  ChemE is packin’ a 191… so better have some 
heavy loads when taking shots at him.

 

All kidding aside… having dual degrees with one in science (Biology) and having 
spent 5 years at a scientific research institute, the few scientists I admire 
didn’t mind asking, “What if…”!  After all, isn’t science all about learning 
and understanding what makes things tick… the unknown is what a *true* 
scientist SHOULD be interested in;  SHOULD get excited about.  And just because 
a scientist asks “What If”; just because he begins to follow a line of thought, 
however crazy it sounds, or whether it ‘violates’ theory, doesn’t mean he has 
lost all sense of skeptical reason… which is what he’s accused of more often 
than not.  It happens in the Collective as well, recently in fact.  One at a 
time I guess…

 

-mark Iverson

PS: don’t forget to ante up…  I’ll let you guess how much that is! 

;-)

 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

 

It is totally free and fried!  I read the document and see many holes in the 
argument.

 

Once when I was more naive I thought about the magnetic field surrounding a 
wire broken by a capacitor coupling device.  As I visualized the magnetic field 
due to the current, I began to think that there must be a gap or discontinuity 
since no real current is flowing within the capacitor.  Between the plates 
there is only an electric field that is changing as charge is being added or 
subtracted from the plates of the capacitor.

 

Then it occurred to me that this was in fact the famous displacement current 
that Maxwell was suggesting.  At that point I realized that the external 
magnetic field could be smooth and continuous.

 

The author of the document states in no uncertain terms that such a time 
changing electric field can not generate a magnetic field and he is obviously 
wrong.

 

It was an interesting read but I suspect it was related to an April fools joke 
or something similar.

 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 6:34 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

As Morpheus said…

 

 

Free…. 

 

 

 

 

 

Your….

 

 

 

 

 

Mind!

 

 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com mailto:dlrober...@aol.com? ] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

 

Come on Mark,  now you want to really mess up our minds!

 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 12:19 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

FYI:  this forwarded to me by a colleague…

-Mark

 

Trouble with Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Theory: 

Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v5.pdf

 

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to point out that Maxwell’s electromagnetic 
theory,

believed by the majority of scientists a fundamental theory of physics, is in 
fact built

on an unsupported assumption and on a faulty method of theoretical 
investigation.

The result is that the whole theory cannot be considered reliable, nor its 
conclusions

accurate descriptions of reality. In this work it is called into question 
whether radio

waves (and light) travelling in vacuum, are indeed  composed of mutually 
inducing

electric and magnetic fields.

 



Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

2012-08-16 Thread David Roberson

OK Clark Kent.  I am unafraid of controversy to a great extent.  Personal 
attacks are off limits as far as I am concerned because they seldom settle 
issues and tend to shut down conversation.  Feel free to question any 
assertions that I make and I will return the pleasure!  One thing this guy is 
not worried about is strange unknowns.  I spent a large portion of my career 
solving complex electronic design problems and realize that a great deal is to 
be discovered that way.  The more weird the problem, the more it interests me.

On many occasions the engineers working for me would have issues arise that 
would tie them in knots for days.  The circuits would behave in a few unusual 
ways, but the guys would just put these effects aside and figure they were not 
related to the issue at hand.  When they would finally give up, I would be 
asked to help and generally within a couple of hours the problem would be 
resolved.   I always gave them time to learn before jumping in to further their 
knowledge.  I am a bit slower these days, but still have plenty of fuel 
remaining to attack interesting phenomena.

So, mister reporter, bring on the strange systems and I will gladly give them 
my thoughts.  I might be wrong most of the time, but on occasion, I hit a home 
run.

I must say that any scientist that wants to win a prize or change the world had 
better not run when things act strange.  That might be the gift they had hoped 
for.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 8:34 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?



I’m just the reporter!
We report… you decide.
 
OK, I confess… there might be some interesting, and sometimes heated, 
discussions in between the report/decide thingy… Vorts are a rambunctious lot, 
and after having a few at the Dime Box Saloon, brawls are not uncommon... but 
mostly friendly.
 
If you’re not afraid to ask, “What if”… if that doesn’t cause cog-diss, then 
pull up a stool and have a go at it!  You’re welcome here.  But when you step 
up onto the Dime Box, you’d better make sure your guns at loaded, cuz Vorts are 
bound to take a few shots atcha!  ChemE is packin’ a 191… so better have some 
heavy loads when taking shots at him.
 
All kidding aside… having dual degrees with one in science (Biology) and having 
spent 5 years at a scientific research institute, the few scientists I admire 
didn’t mind asking, “What if…”!  After all, isn’t science all about learning 
and understanding what makes things tick… the unknown is what a *true* 
scientist SHOULD be interested in;  SHOULD get excited about.  And just because 
a scientist asks “What If”; just because he begins to follow a line of thought, 
however crazy it sounds, or whether it ‘violates’ theory, doesn’t mean he has 
lost all sense of skeptical reason… which is what he’s accused of more often 
than not.  It happens in the Collective as well, recently in fact.  One at a 
time I guess…
 
-mark Iverson
PS: don’t forget to ante up…  I’ll let you guess how much that is! 
;-)
 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?

 

It is totally free and fried!  I read the document and see many holes in the 
argument.

 

Once when I was more naive I thought about the magnetic field surrounding a 
wire broken by a capacitor coupling device.  As I visualized the magnetic field 
due to the current, I began to think that there must be a gap or discontinuity 
since no real current is flowing within the capacitor.  Between the plates 
there is only an electric field that is changing as charge is being added or 
subtracted from the plates of the capacitor.

 

Then it occurred to me that this was in fact the famous displacement current 
that Maxwell was suggesting.  At that point I realized that the external 
magnetic field could be smooth and continuous.

 

The author of the document states in no uncertain terms that such a time 
changing electric field can not generate a magnetic field and he is obviously 
wrong.

 

It was an interesting read but I suspect it was related to an April fools joke 
or something similar.

 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 6:34 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?


As Morpheus said…

 

 

Free…. 

 

 

 

 

 

Your….

 

 

 

 

 

Mind!

 

 


From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?


 


Come on Mark,  now you want to really mess up our minds!


 


Dave


-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson markiver...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 12:19 pm
Subject