RE: [Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them

2013-10-15 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Not that I think that gas motion is missing, in fact I believe that both of 
these vacuum effects coexist but obviously at different scales with a strong 
possibility that random gas motion is locally unchanged by the less local CE 
and DCE. Where just gas motion or just CE would be expected to reach 
equilibrium / COE where gas atoms simply move back and forth to average out to 
zero gain.  I believe the geometry and quantum effects allow the normally 
chaotic motions to be organized into an exploitable force where the random 
motion opposes the change in Casimir force [DCE] and allows HUP to  act like 
the hammer against which the now moving anvil that is DCE strikes in this 
confined space. IMHO zero point is the energy source for whatever theory you 
like, disassociating molecules, lowering the coulomb barrier, Lamb pinch or 
what ever. The DCE is of course needs a resonance but can be powered by many of 
the mechanism described in this forum like plasmons, lasers , audio, piezo and 
combinations thereof alternately opposing random motion to greater and lesser 
extents and if my pet theory is correct to a greater and lesser extend based on 
atomic or molecular state of the gas. In this pet theory the energy gain is 
realized by discounting the disassociation threshold lower than the thermal 
gain when the molecule immediately reforms..runaway. Other theories realize 
gain in different manners but I suspect the underlying energy they are 
exploiting is still this normally unexploitable force responsible for gas 
motion..HUP.
Fran

_
From: Frank roarty [mailto:fr...@roarty.biz]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:38 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them


Agreed it is possible to imagine that there are surface features of this 
nickel powder in the ~50 nm range and easy to imagine these microtubules 
become interlaced when packed into bulk form and resonate through a range of 
nano geometries. Without even moving the hydrogen is already exposed to dynamic 
values of Casimir force.
Fran

_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.commailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them


-Original Message-
From: Brad Lowe

  Question: How do you create phonons in a lattice and be able to adjust and 
measure their frequency to get the results suggested by the theory?

Brad - IMO the precise way you have stated this question makes it unlikely 
(i.e. adjusting the lattice frequency), but claimed results may have been 
accomplished in another way.

The trick that Rossi apparently uses is somewhat the inverse of this, and could 
be called serendipity. Intentionally or not, Rossi has used a ceramic 
(SiC)containment structure for the Hot Cat which is semi-coherent in the IR at 
a certain important temperature (very sharp peak). Rossi may not have known of 
the incredibly steep peak of reflectance for SiC at 10-11 microns, leading to 
superradiance - but he was fortunate to be in a particular Italian Lab (with 
Focardi) where SiC is routinely used, so it was available. The result is the 
HotCat.

The optical photons and lattice phonons are locked, and emitted at the same 
semi-coherent frequency. It is laser-like optical emission, not pure coherence 
but superradiant.

IOW the enclosure material of the HotCat itself is superradiant at the desired 
frequency of ~27-28 THz which is 10-11 micron photon wavelength. This photon 
has a mass energy of .113 eV which is the temperature equivalent to 1038 C. 
Many theorists (Hagelstein et al) have noticed this far IR range of activity 
seems to be semi-coherent and related to gain.

Conclusion: The natural IR resonance of SiC happens to be intrinsic to the gain 
of the Rossi Hot Cat, due to its inherent properties at a specific wavelength 
(no need for adjustment)- and gain is achieved by surface plasmon absorption of 
semi-coherent IR irradiation in a positive feedback loop.

If Frank Z's MHz-meter hypothesis is involved in Rossi's device, then one would 
need to show nanometer particulate. Rossi says many times that his nickel is 10 
micron obtained from http://www.gerlimetalli.it/inglese/ihome.htm

However, it is possible to imagine that there are surface features of this 
nickel powder in the ~50 nm range which Frank Z has claimed is active for Pd-D 
cold fusion.

Once again, however, the evidence seems to show that Pd-D (which may be far 
more relevant to MHz-meter) is a different reaction entirely than is Ni-H. The 
two cannot easily be rationalized as being the part of a single modus operandi.

Jones







[Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them

2013-10-14 Thread Brad Lowe
E-Cat World has a guest post by a Gordon Docherty on LENR 101:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/10/lenr-101-by-gordon-docherty/

One part that has me puzzled:

Once hydrogen has been introduced into the evacuated crystal lattice
under pressure and heat applied,one more VITAL element is applied
 – very high frequency compression waves, known as phononic waves due
to their equivalence to sound waves (frequencies around 1 x 10
14Hz are typical.). The important factor is that (grain) size *
frequency equals 1.094 MHz-metre, as this is the frequencey at which
impedance reduces to zero, so allowing energy to transfer between
elements in the lattice without loss.

I don't care so much whether this is a WAG (wild-ass guess), a message
from space aliens (or Frank Znidarsic), or a stolen company secret...
I want to know if this can be done, and has it been attempted...

Question: How do you create phonons in a lattice and be able to adjust
and measure their frequency to get the results suggested by the
theory?


Would like something that can be mounted inside a hot chamber
containing nickel, hydrogen, heat, and pressure...

Example: Signal generator (with range A through B) - circuit ?? -
equipment [???] -- measurement(s).

Thoughts?

- Brad


P.S. Does anyone have a picture of the inside of the Hot Cat that was
posted on Cobraf? It showed two two copper discs with the nickel
like substance... with the suggestion that the two discs created a
type of IR laser.. Seemed interesting but I didn't save the link...



Re: [Vo]:Phonons and how do you make them

2013-10-14 Thread Brad Lowe
Thanks Jones.. Not sure I have the skills to build what you describe either..

By the way, this is the purported picture of the inside of the hot cat:
http://www.cobraf.com/showimage.php?image=/forum/immagini/R_123537009_1.jpg

from:

http://www.cobraf.com/forum/topic.php?reply_id=123537112topic_id=5747ps=20pg=3sh=0

So the hot cat would be the copper discs, nickel + hydrogen suspended
in a asbestos-like substance, heated inside a carborundum tube?
http://www.alibaba.com/showroom/carborundum-tube-furnace-heater.html


- Brad

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: Brad Lowe

 Question: How do you create phonons in a lattice and be able to adjust and
 measure their frequency to get the results suggested by the theory?

 Brad - IMO the precise way you have stated this question makes it unlikely
 (i.e. adjusting the lattice frequency), but claimed results may have been
 accomplished in another way.

 The trick that Rossi apparently uses is somewhat the inverse of this, and
 could be called serendipity. Intentionally or not, Rossi has used a ceramic
 (SiC)containment structure for the Hot Cat which is semi-coherent in the IR
 at a certain important temperature (very sharp peak). Rossi may not have
 known of the incredibly steep peak of reflectance for SiC at 10-11 microns,
 leading to superradiance - but he was fortunate to be in a particular
 Italian Lab (with Focardi) where SiC is routinely used, so it was available.
 The result is the HotCat.

 The optical photons and lattice phonons are locked, and emitted at the same
 semi-coherent frequency. It is laser-like optical emission, not pure
 coherence but superradiant.

 IOW the enclosure material of the HotCat itself is superradiant at the
 desired frequency of ~27-28 THz which is 10-11 micron photon wavelength.
 This photon has a mass energy of .113 eV which is the temperature equivalent
 to 1038 C. Many theorists (Hagelstein et al) have noticed this far IR range
 of activity seems to be semi-coherent and related to gain.

 Conclusion: The natural IR resonance of SiC happens to be intrinsic to the
 gain of the Rossi Hot Cat, due to its inherent properties at a specific
 wavelength (no need for adjustment)- and gain is achieved by surface plasmon
 absorption of semi-coherent IR irradiation in a positive feedback loop.

 If Frank Z's MHz-meter hypothesis is involved in Rossi's device, then one
 would need to show nanometer particulate. Rossi says many times that his
 nickel is 10 micron obtained from
 http://www.gerlimetalli.it/inglese/ihome.htm

 However, it is possible to imagine that there are surface features of this
 nickel powder in the ~50 nm range which Frank Z has claimed is active for
 Pd-D cold fusion.

 Once again, however, the evidence seems to show that Pd-D (which may be far
 more relevant to MHz-meter) is a different reaction entirely than is Ni-H.
 The two cannot easily be rationalized as being the part of a single modus
 operandi.

 Jones







Re: [Vo]:Phonons

2013-08-16 Thread H Veeder
Seems a paper was written about stadium waves in 2002
http://angel.elte.hu/wave/download/article/MexWave.pdf

Harry


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

 In reply to  H Veeder's message of Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:32:37 -0400:
 Hi,
 [snip]
 what determines the speed of this wave?
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfX0j7-fLmk

 Human reaction time. People react to what those around them are doing. Herd
 mentality.

 
 
 
 Harry
 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html




Re: [Vo]:Phonons

2013-08-12 Thread mixent
In reply to  H Veeder's message of Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:32:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
what determines the speed of this wave?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfX0j7-fLmk

Human reaction time. People react to what those around them are doing. Herd
mentality.




Harry
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



Re: [Vo]:Phonons

2013-08-12 Thread ChemE Stewart
You proved my theory, Beer effects human reaction time :)


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:21 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:

 In reply to  H Veeder's message of Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:32:37 -0400:
 Hi,
 [snip]
 what determines the speed of this wave?
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfX0j7-fLmk

 Human reaction time. People react to what those around them are doing. Herd
 mentality.

 
 
 
 Harry
 Regards,

 Robin van Spaandonk

 http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html




Re: [Vo]:Phonons

2013-08-12 Thread mixent
In reply to  ChemE Stewart's message of Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:02:46 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
You proved my theory, Beer effects human reaction time :)

:)
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html



[Vo]:Phonons

2013-08-09 Thread Terry Blanton
Dynamic visual aid:

http://nofiriantirani.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ilussion/

Can you imagine this in 3D?



Re: [Vo]:Phonons

2013-08-09 Thread H Veeder
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dynamic visual aid:

 http://nofiriantirani.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ilussion/

 Can you imagine this in 3D?



what determines the speed of this wave?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfX0j7-fLmk



Harry


Re: [Vo]:Phonons

2013-08-09 Thread ChemE Stewart
Beer


On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 11:32 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:




 On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dynamic visual aid:

 http://nofiriantirani.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/ilussion/

 Can you imagine this in 3D?



 what determines the speed of this wave?

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfX0j7-fLmk



 Harry