Re: [Vo]:Podcast interview about Ian Bryce's e-Cat investigation on behalf of Dick Smith

2012-01-21 Thread James Bowery
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Robert Leguillon 
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:

 It should be quite obvious by now, that there are a lot of people being
 separated from their money without any product testing...purely as
 investors.


Under what pretext?  Sales territories?


Re: [Vo]:Podcast interview about Ian Bryce's e-Cat investigation on behalf of Dick Smith

2012-01-21 Thread Shaun Taylor

On 21/01/2012 11:19 PM, James Bowery wrote:

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com mailto:robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:

It should be quite obvious by now, that there are a lot of people
being separated from their money without any product
testing...purely as investors.


Under what pretext?  Sales territories?


I suggest they were there to be investors in the Exclusive Australian 
Distributor for Australia via the Not For Profit business model they 
had created. Bryce did comment about how they wanted to discuss their 
rate of return, the financial projections and that they were talking 
about a LOT of profit for such a venture.


Little fat green fish, swim this way. There are no sharks in these safe, 
gentle, green and you will save the planet Not For Profit waters. 
Chomp, Chomp, Chomp.


Shaun



[Vo]:Podcast interview about Ian Bryce's e-Cat investigation on behalf of Dick Smith

2012-01-20 Thread Hjärn Synkronisatorn
The other week there was a story about Ian Bryce from Australian Skeptics
doing an investigation on behalf of Dick Smith. See these stories:
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/mullumbimby-helping-to-save-world-20120112-1pxj2.html
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/more-fizzer-than-fusion-so-dicks-not-energised-20120114-1q0fv.html

And now there's an interview out with Ian Bryce in the latest Skeptic Zone
episode:
http://skepticzone.libsyn.com/webpage/the-skeptic-zone-170-21-jan-2012


RE: [Vo]:Podcast interview about Ian Bryce's e-Cat investigation on behalf of Dick Smith

2012-01-20 Thread Robert Leguillon
Those articles have been mentioned here in the past, but thanks for adding the 
podcast to the mix.

Though there were absolutely no technical revelations, what I did take away 
from the interview is the breath of investors being lured in.

In the past, Rossi claimed that the customer's money would be held in escrow 
until they were satisfied that the E-Cat works as promised. Those statements 
lewd many to believe that he could not be perpetrating a scam.  

It should be quite obvious by now, that there are a lot of people being 
separated from their money without any product testing...purely as investors.

For anyone who doesn't want to listen to the whole interview, just listen ~ 
6:30 to ~30:00.

Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:58:53 +0100
From: hjarns...@gmail.com
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Podcast interview about Ian Bryce's e-Cat investigation on behalf 
of  Dick Smith

The other week there was a story about Ian Bryce from Australian Skeptics doing 
an investigation on behalf of Dick Smith. See these 
stories:http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/mullumbimby-helping-to-save-world-20120112-1pxj2.html
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/energy-smart/more-fizzer-than-fusion-so-dicks-not-energised-20120114-1q0fv.html

And now there's an interview out with Ian Bryce in the latest Skeptic Zone 
episode:http://skepticzone.libsyn.com/webpage/the-skeptic-zone-170-21-jan-2012