Re: [Vo]:got permission to send
Therefore it also most probably falsifies Znidarsic's theory, if it is truly classical/deterministic theory. . I compute the probability of transition which is not deterministic. The probability is based on the electron emerging at the transitional condition. The transitional condition then is deterministic. Frank Z
[Vo]:got permission to send
Any Vorts who want a copy of my article in Science and Society winter addition. Write to me I will send pdf. I know Jones will come down on me for saying this, however, it is one of the greatest works in 100 years. Frank Znidarsic
RE: [Vo]:got permission to send
Hey Frank, Please don't get me wrong. I wish you all the success possible, and I will not be negative towards your hypothesis in any way- if and when if it can be shown to work predicatively. Maybe that is too much to ask. However, the last 100 years does cover a lot of prime territory in scientific advancement, including relativity, QM, string theory, electro-gravity, etc. Are you certain you are not being a little too generous in this self-appraisal, given the paucity of validation ? In fact, I wish that your simple formula did work in a way that was not retrospective and not iffy (with fudge factors many orders of magnitude) and not coincidental - and most of all: had demonstrable predictive power, since it would help with so many things. BTW - to fill us in on the last few years which have pushed you over the top, apparently - have you been able to predict anything previously unknown, based on the megahertz-meter theory ? You mentioned in an earlier post that you had been doing lab work recently - do you have real data that shows how this knowledge has guided you to achieve fabulous results ? If so, please elaborate. That kind of thing would change opinions, and put us kibitzers in their proper groveling places at the feet of the great master. Geeze . if we could somehow merge you and Rossi into one mega-genius, wow, just think of the possibilities? Jones From: fznidar...@aol.com Any Vorts who want a copy of my article in Science and Society winter addition. Write to me I will send pdf. I know Jones will come down on me for saying this, however, it is one of the greatest works in 100 years. Frank Znidarsic
Re: [Vo]:got permission to send
Dr Jones, as Rossi would say, NO! Frank Z -Original Message- From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sat, Nov 26, 2011 12:03 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:got permission to send Hey Frank, Please don’t get mewrong. I wish you all the success possible, and I will not be negative towardsyour hypothesis in any way– if and when if it can be shown to work predicatively.Maybe that is too much to ask. However, the last “100years” does cover a lot of prime territory in scientific advancement, includingrelativity, QM, string theory, electro-gravity, etc. Are you certain you arenot being a little too generous in this self-appraisal, given the paucity ofvalidation ? In fact, I wish that yoursimple formula did work in a way that was “not retrospective” and notiffy (with fudge factors many orders of magnitude) and not coincidental –and most of all: had demonstrable predictive power, since it would help with somany things. BTW – to fill us inon the last few years which have pushed you over the top, apparently - have youbeen able to predict anything previously unknown, based on the megahertz-meter theory? You mentioned in an earlier post that you had been doing lab work recently –do you have real data that shows how this knowledge has guided you to achieve fabulousresults ? If so, please elaborate.That kind of thing would change opinions, and put us kibitzers in their proper grovelingplaces at the feet of the great master. Geeze … if we could somehow mergeyou and Rossi into one mega-genius, wow, just think of the possibilities? Jones From:fznidar...@aol.com Any Vorts who want a copyof my article in Science and Society winter addition. Write to me I will sendpdf. I know Jones will comedown on me for saying this, however, it is one of the greatest works in 100 years. Frank Znidarsic
Re: [Vo]:got permission to send
For those of you who do not understand my paper or why I believe it is important, I recommend these two videos. http://www.hulu.com/watch/135528/milestones-in-science-and-engineering-max-planck-and-quantum-physics#s-p2-sr-i0 http://www.hulu.com/watch/135537/milestones-in-science-and-engineering-the-atom-%E2%80%93-john-dalton-and-niels-rohr Frank Znidarsic
Re: [Vo]:got permission to send
These videos are not available outside USA and Japan. I cannot watch them. 2011/11/26 fznidar...@aol.com For those of you who do not understand my paper or why I believe it is important, I recommend these two videos. http://www.hulu.com/watch/135528/milestones-in-science-and-engineering-max-planck-and-quantum-physics#s-p2-sr-i0 http://www.hulu.com/watch/135537/milestones-in-science-and-engineering-the-atom-%E2%80%93-john-dalton-and-niels-rohr Frank Znidarsic -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:got permission to send
Here is a list of all the videos from Lane Davis on Frank's Z-Theory: http://tinyurl.com/ztheory In YouTube format, for you international folks... - Brad
Re: [Vo]:got permission to send
The videos are just some background on Planck and Bohr. They state Planck's constant is empirical and the Bohr model even with the help of Schrodinger depends on the empirical formulation. They are from Germany Milestones of Science and Technology and quite good. -Original Message- From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sat, Nov 26, 2011 2:56 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:got permission to send These videos are not available outside USA and Japan. I cannot watch them. 2011/11/26 fznidar...@aol.com For those of you who do not understand my paper or why I believe it is important, I recommend these two videos. http://www.hulu.com/watch/135528/milestones-in-science-and-engineering-max-planck-and-quantum-physics#s-p2-sr-i0 http://www.hulu.com/watch/135537/milestones-in-science-and-engineering-the-atom-%E2%80%93-john-dalton-and-niels-rohr Frank Znidarsic -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
Re: [Vo]:got permission to send
2011/11/27 ecat builder ecatbuil...@gmail.com: Here is a list of all the videos from Lane Davis on Frank's Z-Theory: http://tinyurl.com/ztheory In YouTube format, for you international folks... I just cannot understand why people have a perversion to classical physics. Democritus proved more than 2000 years ago that classical physics is a dead end, because it is absurd (infinite regress argument) to think that matter can be divided endlessly. And if it cannot be divided endlessly, then this means that basic units of nature behave in indeterminable way. That is, they are expressed as probabilistic entities. There is just no way to go around quantum indeterminacy, because only thing what we know for sure, is that nature is not infinite. And it is also important to understand, that nature not only abhors infinities where the count of objects in the universe is infinite, but also infinities, where individual objects are defined in infinite accuracy. That is, mathematics and nature has absolutely nothing to do with each other, but nature can be described only in statistical means. And as there are no mathematics in nature, there cannot also be anything that is deterministic, or the other way around, as there is no determinism, there cannot be mathematical description for the nature. Also I find it odd to cite to Einstein in philosophical context, because Einstein's most important philosophical idea, the principle of relativity or that the physical laws are the same in all reference frames, is debunked by recent neutrino speeding anomaly. This falsifies Einstein's most important religious and philosophical beliefs of classical physics and classical determinism. Therefore it also most probably falsifies Znidarsic's theory, if it is truly classical/deterministic theory. –Jouni
