"Worrying" 2000 climatologists about Global Warming ....
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/07/04/a-peer-reviewed-admission-that-global-surface-temperatures-did-not-rise-dr-david-whitehouse-on-the-pnas-paper-kaufmann-et-al-2011/ What about the above? Frank z ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: We just need a little more dark/vacuum energy increase over the next year to cool things even more. I am expecting the sun to lob some our way next year and cool things off further... On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: Here's some new data that is "worrying" 2000 climatologists about Global Warming .... Obviously, since 2000 of them were right, this new data must be wrong. This first link shows the rate of ice melting leading to the conclusion that Global Warming must be accelerating....??? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/28/sea_levels_new_science_climate_change/ Then, to confirm it, this 2nd link "definitely" shows that Global warming is occuring that is "correlated" to the amount of C02 that man pumps out into the atmosphere.... ???? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/29/wmo_global_temp_figures_2012_doha_ninth_hottest/ But, what do I know. I'm not one of those 2000 climatologists who where NOT bribed or threatened in any way. And since, there's 2000 of them; there's only one of me. They must be right and I am wrong and anybody questioning their conclusions must be nuts. Right Jed? Hey, if others can violate forum list rules with impunity regarding AGW propaganda, I should be able to do the opposite propaganda with impunity... right? Jojo PS: BTW, I want nothing more than people laying off AGW (or Anti-AGW) propaganda from this forum. We just need a little more dark/vacuum energy increase over the next year to cool things even more. I am expecting the sun to lob some our way next year and cool things off further... On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: > ** > Here's some new data that is "worrying" 2000 climatologists about Global > Warming .... > > Obviously, since 2000 of them were right, this new data must be wrong. > > This first link shows the rate of ice melting leading to the conclusion > that Global Warming must be accelerating....??? > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/28/sea_levels_new_science_climate_change/ > > > Then, to confirm it, this 2nd link "definitely" shows that Global warming > is occuring that is "correlated" to the amount of C02 that man pumps out > into the atmosphere.... ???? > > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/29/wmo_global_temp_figures_2012_doha_ninth_hottest/ > > > But, what do I know. I'm not one of those 2000 climatologists who where > NOT bribed or threatened in any way. And since, there's 2000 of them; > there's only one of me. They must be right and I am wrong and anybody > questioning their conclusions must be nuts. Right Jed? > > > Hey, if others can violate forum list rules with impunity regarding AGW > propaganda, I should be able to do the opposite propaganda with impunity... > right? > > > > > Jojo > > > PS: BTW, I want nothing more than people laying off AGW (or Anti-AGW) > propaganda from this forum. > > > >
