Re: [Vo]:Communicating cold fusion needs more than words

2012-08-09 Thread Ruby

On 8/8/12 10:25 AM, Ruby wrote:
Despite the massive typing that goes on each day, words are not the 
dominant form of communication.  Words are too puny compared to the 
huge networks that move data on a planetary-scale.  It is macroscopic 
gesticulation.


How is this for an example of macroscopic gesticulation:

http://now.jit.su/

Holy moly. This visibly shows the ambient environment of AI global-brain 
that we are operating in unbeknownst.  It almost makes me want to give 
up advocating; how can any message survive this data tsunami?





--
Ruby Carat

r...@coldfusionnow.org mailto:r...@coldfusionnow.org
United States 1-707-616-4894
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org http://www.coldfusionnow.org


RE: [Vo]:Communicating cold fusion needs more than words

2012-08-09 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
That is way Kewl, Ruby!!  Thx.

 

From: Ruby [mailto:r...@hush.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:58 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Communicating cold fusion needs more than words

 

On 8/8/12 10:25 AM, Ruby wrote:

Despite the massive typing that goes on each day, words are not the
dominant form of communication.  Words are too puny compared to the huge
networks that move data on a planetary-scale.  It is macroscopic
gesticulation.


How is this for an example of macroscopic gesticulation:

http://now.jit.su/

Holy moly. This visibly shows the ambient environment of AI global-brain
that we are operating in unbeknownst.  It almost makes me want to give up
advocating; how can any message survive this data tsunami?






Re: [Vo]:Communicating cold fusion needs more than words

2012-08-09 Thread Bruno Santos
Extraordinary!

Thanks for sharing!


2012/8/9 MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net

 That is way Kewl, Ruby!!  Thx…

 ** **

 *From:* Ruby [mailto:r...@hush.com]
 *Sent:* Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:58 AM
 *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
 *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Communicating cold fusion needs more than words

 ** **

 On 8/8/12 10:25 AM, Ruby wrote:

 Despite the massive typing that goes on each day, words are not the
 dominant form of communication.  Words are too puny compared to the huge
 networks that move data on a planetary-scale.  It is macroscopic
 gesticulation.


 How is this for an example of macroscopic gesticulation:

 http://now.jit.su/

 Holy moly. This visibly shows the ambient environment of AI global-brain
 that we are operating in unbeknownst.  It almost makes me want to give up
 advocating; how can any message survive this data tsunami?


 



Re: [Vo]:Communicating cold fusion needs more than words

2012-08-08 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Ruby,

I think your assessment of the information situation is a good one.

The only thing I would tack on to your suggestion would be that
digital artists with science backgrounds be employed. They DO exist.

If I had the time I would avail my services. Unfortunately, I'm
currently swamped with other priorities. For one thing, my own website
is in dire need of a major overhaul. I'm still in the middle of
wrestling with that task.

To all you youngsters out there, seeking employment in the digital
communication arts fields looks to be be a promising future. There ARE
lucerative careers in the making here. Six figures in some cases. :-)

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks