Re: [Vo]:A possible hypothesis for Rossi and Greece
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings Vortex-l I am not sure IF my thoughts on Rossi and DKL are even logical BUT what if a major world entity wants all of Rossi s patent rights. Would his actions then be logical...merely a hypothesis. Thoughts are welcomed. EXXON!
Re: [Vo]:A possible hypothesis for Rossi and Greece
On 08/07/2011 05:53 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ron Kitachiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings Vortex-l I am not sure IF my thoughts on Rossi and DKL are even logical BUT what if a major world entity wants all of Rossi s patent rights. Would his actions then be logical...merely a hypothesis. Thoughts are welcomed. EXXON! Selling it to the best bidder, of course. That makes complete sense, and I think is consistent with previous developments and information we have about the players. Here's a probable scenario, then: Rossi in fact discovered something which dramatically improves the efficiency of Ni-H exothermically reactions. As is the case with other cold fusion techniques and experiments, it probably does not work always. It still needs further development, and that can even take a couple of years. Instead of continuing with the research, he decided to announce it, making waves as big as possible, to sell his discovery to the best bidder. Who will probably bury it, by the way. He advanced with the company, the building of plants, etc. to attract a buyer as big as possible. Now that the buyer has arrived, he's parting ways. In the future, with the technology effectively buried, we'll be left with the impression that all was just a big, although somewhat incomprehensible, scam. Which it is, in a sense. But not in the strictest sense. Now that makes sense to me. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part. And of course too, if the improvement Rossi discovered is real, there can be really unexpected developments, like some other agency rediscovering it on their own, etc. Regards, Mauro
Re: [Vo]:A possible hypothesis for Rossi and Greece
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote: Instead of continuing with the research, he decided to announce it, making waves as big as possible, to sell his discovery to the best bidder. Who will probably bury it, by the way. Unfortunately, they cannot bury it deep enough. As Steven said, the eCat is out of the bag. Ahern has already shown this. I think Rossi understood the issue here. He has a working technology; but, he does not understand why it works. He was willing to pay the UoB to study the process. He understood that, once the process is thoroughly understood, the optimum operating point (Swartz) may then be determined. If the patent does not state the OOP IP, it is open to a new patent and Rossi is rendered to prior art. T
Re: [Vo]:A possible hypothesis for Rossi and Greece
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 7 Aug 2011 16:53:08 -0400: Hi, [snip] On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings Vortex-l I am not sure IF my thoughts on Rossi and DKL are even logical BUT what if a major world entity wants all of Rossi s patent rights. Would his actions then be logical...merely a hypothesis. Thoughts are welcomed. EXXON! A couple of months back I informed Ford of the existence of Rossi's technology and suggested it might be useable in cars. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Re: [Vo]:A possible hypothesis for Rossi and Greece
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:38 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: A couple of months back I informed Ford of the existence of Rossi's technology and suggested it might be useable in cars. God in the safe and Ford on the shelves. - Aldous Huxley, Brave New World, Ch. 17
Re: [Vo]:A possible hypothesis for Rossi and Greece
On 08/07/2011 06:34 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote: Instead of continuing with the research, he decided to announce it, making waves as big as possible, to sell his discovery to the best bidder. Who will probably bury it, by the way. Unfortunately, they cannot bury it deep enough. As Steven said, the eCat is out of the bag. Unfortunately for them, I suppose. Ahern has already shown this. I think Rossi understood the issue here. He has a working technology; but, he does not understand why it works. He was willing to pay the UoB to study the process. He understood that, once the process is thoroughly understood, the optimum operating point (Swartz) may then be determined. If the patent does not state the OOP IP, it is open to a new patent and Rossi is rendered to prior art. Any references for Swartz? I see. He's delaying the patenting, basically because he does not have anything really patentable. The secret catalyst is exactly that. Even for him. Regards, Mauro
Re: [Vo]:A possible hypothesis for Rossi and Greece
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote: Any references for Swartz? Sure. That was a reference to discussions by Michael Swartz, who publishes: http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html He sponsors the MIT Colloquiums you see mentioned here sometimes. I think he and Larry Forsley came up with the CF OOP term, or so they claim. :-) T
Re: [Vo]:A possible hypothesis for Rossi and Greece
On 08/07/2011 07:34 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote: Any references for Swartz? Sure. That was a reference to discussions by Michael Swartz, who publishes: http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html He sponsors the MIT Colloquiums you see mentioned here sometimes. I think he and Larry Forsley came up with the CF OOP term, or so they claim. :-) :-) Nice reference. Thanks!
