Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-14 Thread Teslaalset
Up and running again.


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://www.defkalion-energy.com/

 This now says only:

 Account Suspended

 This Account Has Been Suspended


 I suppose this is because they did not pay the ISP. Maybe not, because it
 costs little to maintain a web site these days. I pay for LENR-CANR.org
 once a year. My ISP bill comes due on April Fool's Day, which seems
 appropriate.

 - Jed




RE: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-14 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From: Teslaalset

 

 Up and running again.

 

 http://www.defkalion-energy.com/

 

FWIW:

 

I accessed the website this morning myself. I got in but several seconds
later I got the following warning message from my virus protection s/w. FYI,
I use WEBROOT:

 

***

 

This website has been reported as unsafe.

 

We recommend that you don't continue to this website because it is reported
to contain the following threats:

 

Suspicious threat:

 

This is a suspicious site. There is a higher than average probability that
you will be exposed to malicious links or payloads.

 

* Unlock page and continue

 

***

 

This is the first time my WebRoot virus protection s/w has ever given me a
direct warning after accessing a website.

 

Of course, this doesn't prove anything. WebRoot did not give me any
specifics. Nevertheless, from my perspective it was a totally unexpected.

 

Regards,

svjart.orionworks.com



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-14 Thread Alain Sepeda
maybe hacked?


2014-04-14 14:27 GMT+02:00 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson 
orionwo...@charter.net:

 From: Teslaalset



  Up and running again.



  http://www.defkalion-energy.com/



 FWIW:



 I accessed the website this morning myself. I got in but several seconds
 later I got the following warning message from my virus protection s/w.
 FYI, I use WEBROOT:



 ***



 *This website has been reported as unsafe.*



 *We recommend that you don't continue to this website because it is
 reported to contain the following threats:*



 *Suspicious threat:*



 *This is a suspicious site. There is a higher than average probability
 that you will be exposed to malicious links or payloads.*



 ** Unlock page and continue*



 ***



 This is the first time my WebRoot virus protection s/w has ever given me a
 direct warning after accessing a website.



 Of course, this doesn't prove anything. WebRoot did not give me any
 specifics. Nevertheless, from my perspective it was a totally unexpected.



 Regards,

 svjart.orionworks.com



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-14 Thread ChemE Stewart
Alien abduction?  Can they do that to web sites?

On Monday, April 14, 2014, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:

 maybe hacked?


 2014-04-14 14:27 GMT+02:00 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson 
 orionwo...@charter.netjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','orionwo...@charter.net');
 :

 From: Teslaalset



  Up and running again.



  http://www.defkalion-energy.com/



 FWIW:



 I accessed the website this morning myself. I got in but several seconds
 later I got the following warning message from my virus protection s/w.
 FYI, I use WEBROOT:



 ***



 *This website has been reported as unsafe.*



 *We recommend that you don't continue to this website because it is
 reported to contain the following threats:*



 *Suspicious threat:*



 *This is a suspicious site. There is a higher than average probability
 that you will be exposed to malicious links or payloads.*



 ** Unlock page and continue*



 ***



 This is the first time my WebRoot virus protection s/w has ever given me
 a direct warning after accessing a website.



 Of course, this doesn't prove anything. WebRoot did not give me any
 specifics. Nevertheless, from my perspective it was a totally unexpected.



 Regards,

 svjart.orionworks.com





Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-13 Thread Jed Rothwell
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

The MIT 2014 LENR Colloquium included in the agenda:

 Yiannis Hadjichristos Heat Energy from Hydrogen-Metal Interactions
 and the need for new Scientific Alliances

 but, I can't find anything on the web about the presentation.  Does
 anyone have a reference?


Hadjichristos cancelled at the last minute. The Colloquium organizers were
upset by that.

- Jed


RE: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-13 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From Daniel:

 

 Alright, if Defkalion cannot answer for themselves, 

 I am not going to do it anymore for free.

 

I realize I'm probably misinterpreting the intent of your message, but the
implication I'm making is that you may have been a paid shill for Defkalion.
Needless to say, I do not believe that for one second. I don't believe
English is your primary language so one must make allowances for that. FWIW,
your English is pretty damned good.

 

You recently asked me if why I seem to be talking back to you at you, as if
you have no credibility or experience in cold fusion. Actually, It's quite
likely that you have more CF knowledge than I. I'm not a scientist nor a CF
researcher. I don't work for a patent office, like you do, either. I'm Just
an interested observer with a plethora of eclectic and eccentric interests
that occasionally causes me to focus in on this controversial matter. CF 
LENR is a fascinating subject. It's as much a sociological/political
phenomenon as it is a scientific investigation in-progress. The politics
involved are utterly fascinating... and unfortunately occasionally
disgusting. What can I say. I'm hooked. Sometimes it's better that watching
another episode of Game of Thrones. Who the hell is Mr. Martin going to
kill off in this episode!  Oh No! Not him!!! ;-)

 

Let me try to conclude on a personal observation I've made concerning my own
behavior  actions. I have, at times, made excuses for the behavior 
actions others and the organizations they might run where excuses I later
came to realize were not warranted. I did so because I believed in them or
WANTED to believe in them and their organizations - to the point that I had
acquired an almost religious-like faith in them - as if they could never do
no wrong. One of the truths I've had to learn (a truth I'm STILL in the
process of learning) is that most people... ALL people for that matter, are
only human. To be human is to occasionally error. There is no fault in that.
But as Scotty once said in one of the original Star Trek episodes: Fool me
once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Who knows, perhaps DGT can
redeem themselves. I'm cool with that. We'll see.

 

PS: I hope you continue to make contributions. Having a dedicated individual
like you on this list who works for the patent office can be insightful for
the insights gleaned.

 

Regards

Steven Vincent Johnson

svjart.orionworks.com



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Whois tells me they are hosted here:

http://www.liquidweb.com/web-hosting/

The most expensive plan is $40 a month. I doubt they are so broke they
can't even pay that. But who knows. They are not good at paying bills.

The domain registry expires in 2016.

The ISP Knowledge Base says:

*Shared Hosting Disadvantages*:

If the account bandwidth limit is exceeded the account is suspended until
the end of the month, or until the account is upgraded.

Liquid Web will not install 3rd party applications or scripts that require
root level configurations, as the stability of the server could be affected.

Because of the number of users all utilizing the same server Liquid Web is
very proactive at suspending accounts that overload the server.  Below is a
small excerpt from the Liquid Web Shared Hosting Terms of Service covering
limitations of resource usage:

Limitations on Use*:*


Any account using 15% or more of the server CPU or memory can be suspended
and/or terminated.

Any account that uses excessive amounts of bandwidth can and will be
subjected to bandwidth throttling.

I doubt they are getting a lot of traffic. The last I checked, they had
only one page.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Daniel Rocha
What a crusade to badmouth DGT!
-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:

What a crusade to badmouth DGT!


They are badmouthing themselves. All of their problems are of their own
making. I and others bent over backwards to accommodate them, as described
in Lewan's book.

Anyway, this has nothing to do with that. I am just curious about this
latest web-page problem.

It is displaying /cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi, which is built into the ISP
file structure. Some person or some event at the ISP triggered the
redirect. It could be the files are corrupt or were accidentally erased, or
some other temporary problem.

It is not a server problem.

This could be triggered by a DDoS attack but I doubt anyone would bother.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Daniel Rocha
Yes, and you make sure everyone knows and you drive your own conclusion as
it can be noticed here:  doubt they are getting a lot of traffic. The last
I checked, they had only one page.

One assumption is, you think the only thing they have host is that page.
There are other assumptions. like they got a DDOS attack. Only assumptions.
Or, they have investors, but are just working on a secured line with their
costumers, so they abandoned the page. Or want more security by closing
contacts until they finish developing and test their lastest iteration of
the  Hyperion. Maybe they do have people that want to spy them and were
actually doing that. And so on.




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


RE: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Jones Beene
What's up with you, Rocha? Are you an investor in DGT?

 

You are acting like a complete jack-ass to Rothwell. He is reporting facts
and learned opinion here - in the interest for furthering LENR . while you
are acting like little more than a shill, and putting him down with every
post. 

 

Why don't you pack up your anger and go somewhere else to vent. We do not
need your constant bad-mouthing of honest opinion here.

 

Jones

 

From: Daniel Rocha 

 

Yes, and you make sure everyone knows and you drive your own conclusion as
it can be noticed here:  doubt they are getting a lot of traffic. The last
I checked, they had only one page.

 

One assumption is, you think the only thing they have host is that page.
There are other assumptions. like they got a DDOS attack. Only assumptions.
Or, they have investors, but are just working on a secured line with their
costumers, so they abandoned the page. Or want more security by closing
contacts until they finish developing and test their lastest iteration of
the  Hyperion. Maybe they do have people that want to spy them and were
actually doing that. And so on.

-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ

danieldi...@gmail.com



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Daniel Rocha
No, I am not investor. But I know enough of DGT to know that they might
save the world.

But why isn't my opinion honest? Why can't I putting him down? I Why can't
I shill? If I think Defkalion is going to save the world, why can't I give
counter points? Remember that this forum can be viewed by anyone, it's
open. So, it's important to give him counter points.


2014-04-12 22:37 GMT-03:00 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net:

  - in the interest for furthering LENR ... while you are acting like little
 more than a shill, and putting him down with every post.


 --
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Daniel Rocha
Alright, if Defkalion cannot answer for themselves, I am not going to do it
anymore for free.



-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Jed Rothwell
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:


 One assumption is, you think the only thing they have host is that page.


That was the only thing visible on that server. There were not other pages,
mail services, boards, or other visible pages.



  There are other assumptions. like they got a DDOS attack.


Yes, that is what I said. It seems unlikely.

They have very low traffic, according to Alexa and other services. Here's
something interesting:

http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=www.defkalion-energy.com



 Only assumptions. Or, they have investors, but are just working on a
 secured line with their costumers, so they abandoned the page.


If they had abandoned it, there would be another message.

The registration still has a couple of years, as I said.



  Or want more security by closing contacts until they finish developing
 and test their lastest iteration of the  Hyperion.


The ISP would have no role in that. This was triggered by the ISP, on
purpose or by accident. It could be a glitch. LENR-CANR.org has gone down
for hours at a time for various reasons. In those cases you could not reach
it at all.

- Jed


RE: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Jones Beene
Fair enough. 

As long as you have no financial interest, your opinion is as valid as any
other educated observer here, but at least give Rothwell credit for being a
top expert, held in high regard on this list - having been involved for
several decades with no bias, and having never shown prejudice in the past
for companies or inventors who did not deserve the criticism they received.

We all must realize that any form of alternative energy draws scammers like
a magnet, and DGT was from the very first report associated with a list of
unsavory characters - which you may not remember, and which no one wants to
bring up again, as it is not relevant to the situation today... assuming of
course that they have anything like the technology they claim... which I
think they may have. What they seem to lack is top level management skills.

From: Daniel Rocha 

No, I am not investor. But I know enough of DGT to know that
they might save the world. 

But why isn't my opinion honest? Why can't I putting him
down? I Why can't I shill? If I think Defkalion is going to save the world,
why can't I give counter points? Remember that this forum can be viewed by
anyone, it's open. So, it's important to give him counter points.

Jones Beene wrote:
- in the interest for furthering LENR ... while you are
acting like little more than a shill, and putting him down with every post.

-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
attachment: winmail.dat

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Axil Axil
Being without much money has no relationship to the validity of the
engineering or the science of a project. Didn't Rossi sell his house to
keep going? Did that low point in the man's financial life invalidate
Rossi's project? Didn't people try to starve Rossi out as a business
strategy? I am sure that there are people at DGT who have knowledge that
will attract development money form many sources. This eventually proved
true for Rossi. All the key players at DGT need to do is boil water is the
proper way to validate their expertise and the money will come.


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Alright, if Defkalion cannot answer for themselves, I am not going to do
 it anymore for free.



 --
 Daniel Rocha - RJ
 danieldi...@gmail.com



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Axil Axil
I value the discussions I have with Jed as a rare privilege in the same way
that Bill Clinton valued his contact with JFK as a young man. The
privilege of discussion with such emanates and illustrious personages as
Jed and Ed Storms are a rare opportunity that the internet makes possible.



I had many similar adversarial discussions with dr. Per Peterson of
the Beckley criticizing Per's reactor designs when such criticism was
required.



http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/People/Per_Peterson



 He was always gracious as all giants in their fields are. That is until I
got band from that nuclear energy site for mentioning the possibility and
validity of LENR.



That blatant homage to pseudoscience was just too much. All my posts were
removed and my name as well as all mention of LENR was eliminated from all
storage and memory on that site.



I hope such censorship and intolerance to ideas is uncommon here.






On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 Fair enough.

 As long as you have no financial interest, your opinion is as valid as any
 other educated observer here, but at least give Rothwell credit for being a
 top expert, held in high regard on this list - having been involved for
 several decades with no bias, and having never shown prejudice in the past
 for companies or inventors who did not deserve the criticism they received.

 We all must realize that any form of alternative energy draws scammers like
 a magnet, and DGT was from the very first report associated with a list of
 unsavory characters - which you may not remember, and which no one wants to
 bring up again, as it is not relevant to the situation today... assuming of
 course that they have anything like the technology they claim... which I
 think they may have. What they seem to lack is top level management skills.

 From: Daniel Rocha

 No, I am not investor. But I know enough of DGT to know
 that
 they might save the world.

 But why isn't my opinion honest? Why can't I putting him
 down? I Why can't I shill? If I think Defkalion is going to save the world,
 why can't I give counter points? Remember that this forum can be viewed by
 anyone, it's open. So, it's important to give him counter points.

 Jones Beene wrote:
 - in the interest for furthering LENR ... while you are
 acting like little more than a shill, and putting him down with every post.

 --
 Daniel Rocha - RJ
 danieldi...@gmail.com



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Axil Axil
*By the way, I can't wait to tell Per and all like him that his courses of
study are no longer needed to be replaced by the department of LENR; and
those obnoxious and arrogant nuclear reactor operators who think that they
have a lock on certain and truth.  *



*Permanent unemployment for these types is called for as a lesson in
humility. Am I bad?*




On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:

 I value the discussions I have with Jed as a rare privilege in the same
 way that Bill Clinton valued his contact with JFK as a young man. The
 privilege of discussion with such emanates and illustrious personages as
 Jed and Ed Storms are a rare opportunity that the internet makes possible.



 I had many similar adversarial discussions with dr. Per Peterson of
 the Beckley criticizing Per's reactor designs when such criticism was
 required.



 http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/People/Per_Peterson



  He was always gracious as all giants in their fields are. That is until
 I got band from that nuclear energy site for mentioning the possibility and
 validity of LENR.



 That blatant homage to pseudoscience was just too much. All my posts were
 removed and my name as well as all mention of LENR was eliminated from all
 storage and memory on that site.



 I hope such censorship and intolerance to ideas is uncommon here.






 On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 Fair enough.

 As long as you have no financial interest, your opinion is as valid as any
 other educated observer here, but at least give Rothwell credit for being
 a
 top expert, held in high regard on this list - having been involved for
 several decades with no bias, and having never shown prejudice in the past
 for companies or inventors who did not deserve the criticism they
 received.

 We all must realize that any form of alternative energy draws scammers
 like
 a magnet, and DGT was from the very first report associated with a list of
 unsavory characters - which you may not remember, and which no one wants
 to
 bring up again, as it is not relevant to the situation today... assuming
 of
 course that they have anything like the technology they claim... which I
 think they may have. What they seem to lack is top level management
 skills.

 From: Daniel Rocha

 No, I am not investor. But I know enough of DGT to know
 that
 they might save the world.

 But why isn't my opinion honest? Why can't I putting him
 down? I Why can't I shill? If I think Defkalion is going to save the
 world,
 why can't I give counter points? Remember that this forum can be viewed by
 anyone, it's open. So, it's important to give him counter points.

 Jones Beene wrote:
 - in the interest for furthering LENR ... while you are
 acting like little more than a shill, and putting him down with every
 post.

 --
 Daniel Rocha - RJ
 danieldi...@gmail.com





Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Terry Blanton
The MIT 2014 LENR Colloquium included in the agenda:

Yiannis Hadjichristos Heat Energy from Hydrogen-Metal Interactions
and the need for new Scientific Alliances

but, I can't find anything on the web about the presentation.  Does
anyone have a reference?

Thanks!



Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended

2014-04-12 Thread Bob Cook
Axil--

The fission reactor guys are no different in their skeptopathic bias toward 
LENR than the hot fusion guys are.  They both have cash cows in their barnyard 
that sadly give only sour milk--if any at all--it may be good for feeding pigs 
and most of them don't like it because it so sour.  But their buddies in the 
government still support their barnyard business.  Duping third world countries 
and waste management is their latest and last hope to keep the cash flowing.   
They are stringing it out as long as possible and at the greatest expense.  
Vitrification of high level radioactive waste at Hanford is a good 
example--$15Billion and counting--no end in sight.  

Hanford engineers designed and operated a pilot plant  to solidify (calcine) 
the high level wastes with a projected cost of $26million for a production 
facility associated with PUREX in the late 1960's.  The fission guys in the AEC 
decided that it was better to spend those $26millions on long lead equipment 
for the high temperature sodium fast neutron breeder Clinch River reactor.  
Those components ended up in a storage yard at Hanford and may still be there.  

 That started a trend that it was better to waste money than use it for some 
good.   The trend was needed to keep the nuclear tech guys employed.   I would 
love to debate the waste management issues with Per and the issues associated 
with the development of new fission  reactors.  

 Japan and Germany may have finally gotten it right regarding the desirability 
of fission reactor energy. 

Bob



.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2014 8:11 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion web site account suspended


  By the way, I can't wait to tell Per and all like him that his courses of 
study are no longer needed to be replaced by the department of LENR; and those 
obnoxious and arrogant nuclear reactor operators who think that they have a 
lock on certain and truth.  



  Permanent unemployment for these types is called for as a lesson in humility. 
Am I bad?






  On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:

I value the discussions I have with Jed as a rare privilege in the same way 
that Bill Clinton valued his contact with JFK as a young man. The privilege of 
discussion with such emanates and illustrious personages as Jed and Ed Storms 
are a rare opportunity that the internet makes possible.  



I had many similar adversarial discussions with dr. Per Peterson of the 
Beckley criticizing Per's reactor designs when such criticism was required.



http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/People/Per_Peterson



 He was always gracious as all giants in their fields are. That is until I 
got band from that nuclear energy site for mentioning the possibility and 
validity of LENR. 



That blatant homage to pseudoscience was just too much. All my posts were 
removed and my name as well as all mention of LENR was eliminated from all 
storage and memory on that site. 



I hope such censorship and intolerance to ideas is uncommon here.








On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

  Fair enough.

  As long as you have no financial interest, your opinion is as valid as any
  other educated observer here, but at least give Rothwell credit for being 
a
  top expert, held in high regard on this list - having been involved for
  several decades with no bias, and having never shown prejudice in the past
  for companies or inventors who did not deserve the criticism they 
received.

  We all must realize that any form of alternative energy draws scammers 
like
  a magnet, and DGT was from the very first report associated with a list of
  unsavory characters - which you may not remember, and which no one wants 
to
  bring up again, as it is not relevant to the situation today... assuming 
of
  course that they have anything like the technology they claim... which I
  think they may have. What they seem to lack is top level management 
skills.

  From: Daniel Rocha


  No, I am not investor. But I know enough of DGT to know 
that
  they might save the world.

  But why isn't my opinion honest? Why can't I putting him
  down? I Why can't I shill? If I think Defkalion is going to save the 
world,
  why can't I give counter points? Remember that this forum can be viewed by
  anyone, it's open. So, it's important to give him counter points.


  Jones Beene wrote:
  - in the interest for furthering LENR ... while you are

  acting like little more than a shill, and putting him down with every 
post.

  --
  Daniel Rocha - RJ
  danieldi...@gmail.com






RE: [Vo]:Defkalion web site changed a little

2014-01-17 Thread Jones Beene
Does this mean they found that check which was lost in the mail ? :-)

 

 

 

From: Jed Rothwell 

 

See:

 

http://defkalion-energy.com/

 

Some text was added, as follows:

 

 

January 16, 2014

 

 

We are pleased to announce that our timetable for 2014 is as follows:

 

Currently we are developing our R 6 technology in our three laboratories.
We are doing this using robust calorimetric methods, without the use of
water coolant, based on both positive and negative experiences we have
gained.   

 

Concurrently we are finalizing the heat management and control electronic
subsystems for the final pre-industrial prototype.  

 

Several third party independent tests from international organizations,
universities and teams are expected to present their results thus verifying
our recent technological and scientific breakthroughs. 

 

Accordingly we expect the commercialization of our technologies in the 3rd
quarter of 2014.  For further inquiries please contact us through our
offices

 

Canadian Office: 
Suite 204, 2389 Health Sciences Mall (UBC)
Vancouver, B.C. 
V6T 1Z3
Tel: +1 604 683 

 

European Office: 
Syggrou Av  Ymittou 2-4,

Palaio Faliro, 17564,

Athens, Greece
Tel. +302109479260


Please note our site is currently under construction



RE: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Robert Leguillon
Registered for the forum.  Now, let's hope for useful information straight from 
Defkalion's mouths. All posts await moderation, though; I'd imagine skeptical 
questions that they don't like may get cast into an atomic dustbin.

Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:03:02 +0300
From: peter.gl...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

This morning the Defkalion website became functional. Registrationnecessary.. 
Info re Products and RD. In construction, still.Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter GluckCluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


  

Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Peter Gluck
I consider that apart of questioning, perhaps we could help them,. They are
at the interface with the customers and their success depends on the
performances and reliability of the E-cats- now Hyperions.
It is not easy to transform/.apply a brand new energy source - for example
in a home heater as say Bosch 3000W- automated hot water for heat exchangers
when it is cold, hot water for washing when desired.
The device costs some 700 euro and consumes natural gas for some
300 euro pro year, it is reliable and versatile- has a good infrastructure/.
The development department of the Defkalion company has a herculean task.

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Robert Leguillon 
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:

 Registered for the forum.  Now, let's hope for useful information straight
 from Defkalion's mouths. All posts await moderation, though; I'd imagine
 skeptical questions that they don't like may get cast into an atomic
 dustbin.

 --
 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:03:02 +0300
 From: peter.gl...@gmail.com
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Subject: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site


 This morning the Defkalion website became functional. Registration
 necessary.. Info re Products and RD. In construction, still.
 Peter

 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Akira Shirakawa

On 2011-06-23 08:03, Peter Gluck wrote:

This morning the Defkalion website became functional. Registration
necessary.. Info re Products and RD. In construction, still.


Defkalion Green Technologies white paper:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/White%20Paper_DGT.pdf

Cheers,
S.A.



Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Terry Blanton
I love it :  All products are plug-and-play.

T



Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Andrea Selva
plug-and-play ?
They do have to meet Microsoft certification :)

2011/6/23 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com

 I love it :  All products are plug-and-play.

 T




RE: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message-
From: Akira Shirakawa 

Defkalion Green Technologies white paper:

http://www.defkalion-energy.com/White%20Paper_DGT.pdf

I was hoping for actual photographs of their prototypes. 

None there, but they do mention getting away from water/steam and going to a
heat transfer fluid and a large thermal store. 

So far, so good.

Jones






Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:

 None there, but they do mention getting away from water/steam and going to a
 heat transfer fluid and a large thermal store.

I mentioned Thermisol on their forum and got this response from
someone tagged as farshooter:

therminol (monsanto) is not a good choice. I have used fot 35+ years,
it is a fire hazard
, polution hazard and, and has a max useful temp of just over 600 Deg
F. You need
to design your faciliy to be explosion proof.

end



Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:

 I mentioned Thermisol

ThermiNol.

Fat fingers.



RE: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Jones Beene
Terry,

There is an improved version from another company:

http://www.solutia.com/en/SolarEnergy.aspx

quote: Therminol(r), the world leader in high-temperature synthetic heat
transfer fluids, can be used in numerous applications including renewable
energy technologies such as solar and biodiesel, manufacturing processes,
waste heat transfer, pharmaceuticals, specialty chemicals and oil and gas
processing.

It all depends on the design goals and the temperature range of the E-Cat,
since you want a low pressure system, at the highest possible temperature. 

Glycol is cheaper, but lower performance, and if it is satisfactory - that
means that they have chosen a lower range of operating temperatures - below
200C.

It also means that they have probably given up (at least at this early stage
of development) on the possibility of efficient conversion of the heat to
electricity. That would be expected at the initial stages - since the
engineering required to convert heat efficiently is more demanding. They
will probably license that task out to companies that are specialists.

Jones



-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton 

I mentioned Thermisol on their forum and got this response from
someone tagged as farshooter:

therminol (monsanto) is not a good choice. I have used fot 35+ years,
it is a fire hazard, polution hazard and, and has a max useful temp of just
over 600 DegF. You needto design your faciliy to be explosion proof.


attachment: winmail.dat

Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Jones:

...

 It also means that they have probably given up (at least at this early stage
 of development) on the possibility of efficient conversion of the heat to
 electricity. That would be expected at the initial stages - since the
 engineering required to convert heat efficiently is more demanding. They
 will probably license that task out to companies that are specialists.

I agree with this assessment. Many wish Rossi's e-cats would be
efficient enough to generate electricity RIGHT NOW, but that simply
isn't in the cards. I bet they COULD but it would be unpredictable 
dangerous to do so insofar as selling such configurations to the
general public. If they can get the catalizers to act as efficient
building heaters, the obvious next goal would be to begin intense RD
on electrical conversion. But alas, I suspect few have a clue as to
the actual physics involved. Makes me think of the movie: Quest for
Fire. Seems very appropriate here!

Defkalion seems to be approaching the exploitation of the Rossi effect
cautiously. That's smart. Should help cut down on potential lawsuits
possibly due to unanticipated/unspecified injuries.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Rocha
I guess it means sets of 20'' containers.



Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Man on Bridges

Hi,

On 23-6-2011 18:23, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:

If they can get the catalizers to act as efficient
building heaters, the obvious next goal would be to begin intense RD
on electrical conversion.


For the conversion to electricity, it should be first determined which 
method to follow.

A couple come in mind:
- TEG
- Steam turbine
- Stirling engine

From those above I have the impression that Rossi seems to prefer the 
Stirling engine.
Well he's in luck as actually these types of systems are already albeit 
in low volumes used for conventional heating systems in the Netherlands 
and Belgium.
See also second column (MEC) on the following page 
http://www.microchap.info/stirling_engine.htm

One of the companies who produces these is Vaillant.
Promotional video of a vaillant boiler including stirling engine  with 
design-layout: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygg7NqLGgCQ


As you can see it is absolutely feasible to have very fast a combined 
system on the market.
Maybe a suggestion for Rossi or Defkalion to start some kind of 
cooperation with one of these companies to develop and produce a 
combined heater and CHP system.


Kind regards,

MoB





Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel Rocha
How about this:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-06-source-green-electricity.html

?



Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Daniel said:

 All MW range products are built within a 20 sized container

 I guess it means sets of 20'' containers.

That's not how I would interpret the meaning. I perceive no plural
interpretation within the sentence structure. But who knows.  ;-)

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



RE: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Mark Iverson
They are distancing themselves from LENR... Note last sentence.

Many have labeled Cold Fusion with positive and negative connotations. It has 
also been
referred to as LENR and CANR. Most of these terms hold behind them thousands of
hours of research work, all hoping to achieve the ultimate energy dream: 
limitless
energy. However, overall, a stigma has created ambiguous feelings of aiming to 
reach
the end of the rainbow. The science behind the products of Defkalion is none of 
the
above, even though it is identified as such in current media coverage.

They're just calling it a, Ni-H Exothermic reaction

-Mark


-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson [mailto:svj.orionwo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 9:43 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

Reading the White Paper,

On page six it sez:

All MW range products are built within a 20 sized container

That's inches... right! If that is correct, wow! That's small!
Significantly smaller than prior speculation on the 1 MW contraption.
It's the size of a hefty microwave oven, or compact refrigerator.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Man on Bridges

Hi,

On 23-6-2011 18:42, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:

All MW range products are built within a 20 sized container


I guess this is again a European typo, I read somewhere else 20 feet 
(which is, as you may know one of the predefined lengths for cargo 
containers on ships/trucks/trains)
They'd better say the size in meters/kgs/Centigrades etc. and forget 
about imperial measures.


Kind regards,

MoB





Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
From Bridges:

 All MW range products are built within a 20 sized container

 I guess this is again a European typo, I read somewhere else 20 feet (which
 is, as you may know one of the predefined lengths for cargo containers on
 ships/trucks/trains) They'd better say the size in meters/kgs/Centigrades
 etc. and forget about imperial measures.

Good assessment.

I agree. They should stick with using the same unit of measurement -
especially within the same document... in adjacent sentences. Very
confusing.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:DEFKALION web-site

2011-06-23 Thread Man on Bridges

Hi,

On 23-6-2011 18:52, Daniel Rocha wrote:

How about this:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-06-source-green-electricity.html

*
*Ok, looks interesting, but two comments:
1. Quote: This revolutionary energy conversion method is in the early 
stages of development
When do they think they can commercialize it? (This usually takes 
approx. 5-10 years)
2. What is it's efficiency? (is it higher than TEG?, which is only 
approx. 2-3%)


Kind regards,

MoB
*
*
**