From Alan:
McKubre's response at
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111210McKubreResponse.shtml
...
McKubre states:
People sometimes question the value a traditional scientific
education but this case highlights one of its clear benefits. Poor
Steve simply does not know what he does not know. ...
Interpretation of data without access to the lab notebooks and
detailed knowledge of the procedures actually employed, is worse
than fruitless, as this case demonstrates.
McKubre's commentary was extracted from the private CMNS list group.
It's my understanding Mr. Krivit is not a CMNS member. Therefore,
someone must be feeding CMNS info to him. Once again Krivt appears to
have posted private information not meant for public consumption.
However, based on past experience, I'm sure McKubre suspected that Mr.
Krivit would somehow acquire the details of his private response.
The fact that Mr. Krivit proceeded to quickly defend his M4 actions
suggests to me that he is concerned about his perceived reputation. I
suspect McKubre knows this as well.
In Mr. Krivt's rebuttal, he begins with:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/McKubreM4/20111221ToWhomItMayConcern.shtml
To whom it may concern:
In 2010, I conducted an investigation of the EPRI-funded SRI International
experiment M4, performed by Michael McKubre and staff in 1994, and
I published my findings. I also provided them to the federal intelligence
community.
To ... the federal intelligence community! Wow! Mr. Krivit really
did that? ...as if to insinuate the seriousness of McKubre's alleged
M4 transgressions. Be that as it may, I'm under the impression that
McKubre, for the most part, really doesn't give a crap how Mr. Krivit
has chosen to interpret his M4 work.
The laundry will eventually sort itself out.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
