Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

2012-08-03 Thread James Bowery
Friday, August 17 at 10am -- near the end of the ICCF-17 program -- is the
scheduled time of the Defkalion presentation.

http://www.iccf17.org/program.php



On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear Daniel,

 I know the future but like a lady called Cassandra I am not believed.
 Defkalion is in Canada on a financially safe territory
 next week they shal be at the great National Instruments
 meeting and they will make presentations at ICCF-17. Let's
 discuss when you have read these, OK?
 Peter


 On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:

 Peter,

 Are you saying that the will *surely* convince? Or just that they will
 only try. I mean, it's only a presentation, it doesn't seem that there is
 an ongoing open experiment with large and famous research
 institutes/companies.


 2012/8/1 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com

 Defkalion will also convince the public that its technology works.




 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

2012-08-01 Thread Randy Wuller
Peter;

The systematic careful detailed analysis you seek will likely happen in 
overwhelming quantity and quality if Defkalion or Rossi publish independent 3rd 
party tests and do definitive demonstrations.  The idea that they could do the 
above and don't leads to paralysis and very real and legitimate doubt as to 
this reality.  That is all that is now missing.

Ransom
  - Original Message - 
  From: Peter Gluck 
  To: CMNS ; VORTEX 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 7:50 AM
  Subject: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17


  Dear Friends,


  I have written an Open Letter to ICCF-17-


  http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/08/open-letter-to-iccf-17.html


  It is a co-product of my discontent due to how the LENR field is progressing
  and of my desire to help.
  Appreciations, critics and even insults are all welcome, being forms of
  popularity and attention.


  Peter
  -- 
  Dr. Peter Gluck
  Cluj, Romania
  http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com



Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

2012-08-01 Thread fznidarsic
You are not kidding, it will soon be a year since Rossi's big test.  I worked 
for and was at meetings with a big utility.  Independent tests mean a lot.  The 
lack of such is a disappointment.  


Increasingly bigger claims is no substitute for independent tests.  The claim 
of 600 deg F then 1000 deg F reminds me of an earlier period in new energy.  


Henry Morray was one such inventor.  His device not only produced limitless 
free energy but it also picked up the weakest far away radio signals.  The 
addition claim of radio sensitivity was no substitute for an independent test. 


Frank Znidarsic









Peter;
 
The systematic careful detailed analysis you seek will likely happen in 
overwhelming quantity and quality if Defkalion or Rossi publish independent 3rd 
party tests and do definitive demonstrations.  The idea that they could do the 
above and don't leads to paralysis and very real and legitimate doubt as to 
this reality.  That is all that is now missing.
 
Ransom





-Original Message-
From: Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 10:02 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17


Peter;
 
The systematic careful detailed analysis you seek will likely happen in 
overwhelming quantity and quality if Defkalion or Rossi publish independent 3rd 
party tests and do definitive demonstrations.  The idea that they could do the 
above and don't leads to paralysis and very real and legitimate doubt as to 
this reality.  That is all that is now missing.
 
Ransom
  
- Original Message - 
  
From:   Peter   Gluck 
  
To: CMNS ; VORTEX 
  
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 7:50   AM
  
Subject: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17
  


Dear Friends,  


  
I have written an Open Letter to ICCF-17-
  


  
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/08/open-letter-to-iccf-17.html
  

  
It is a co-product of my discontent due to how the LENR field is   progressing
  
and of my desire to help.
  
Appreciations, critics and even insults are all welcome, being forms   of
  
popularity and attention.
  


  
Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck  
Cluj, Romania
  
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com



 


Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

2012-08-01 Thread Daniel Rocha
It was not Fahrenheit, it was Celsius!

2012/8/1 fznidar...@aol.com

 You are not kidding, it will soon be a year since Rossi's big test.  I
 worked for and was at meetings with a big utility.  Independent tests mean
 a lot.  The lack of such is a disappointment.

  Increasingly bigger claims is no substitute for independent tests.  The
 claim of 600 deg F then 1000 deg F reminds me of an earlier period in new
 energy.

  Henry Morray was one such inventor.  His device not only
 produced limitless free energy but it also picked up the weakest far away
 radio signals.  The addition claim of radio sensitivity was no substitute
 for an independent test.

  Frank Znidarsic




  Peter;

 The systematic careful detailed analysis you seek will likely happen in
 overwhelming quantity and quality if Defkalion or Rossi publish independent
 3rd party tests and do definitive demonstrations.  The idea that they could
 do the above and don't leads to paralysis and very real and legitimate
 doubt as to this reality.  That is all that is now missing.

 Ransom




 -Original Message-
 From: Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com
 To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 10:02 am
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

  Peter;

 The systematic careful detailed analysis you seek will likely happen in
 overwhelming quantity and quality if Defkalion or Rossi publish independent
 3rd party tests and do definitive demonstrations.  The idea that they could
 do the above and don't leads to paralysis and very real and legitimate
 doubt as to this reality.  That is all that is now missing.

 Ransom

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
 *To:* CMNS c...@googlegroups.com ; VORTEX vortex-l@eskimo.com
 *Sent:* Wednesday, August 01, 2012 7:50 AM
 *Subject:* [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

  Dear Friends,

  I have written an Open Letter to ICCF-17-

  http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/08/open-letter-to-iccf-17.html

 It is a co-product of my discontent due to how the LENR field is
 progressing
 and of my desire to help.
 Appreciations, critics and even insults are all welcome, being forms of
 popularity and attention.

  Peter
 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

2012-08-01 Thread Chemical Engineer
Frank,

That was 600 C and 1000 C and not F...

On Wednesday, August 1, 2012, wrote:

 You are not kidding, it will soon be a year since Rossi's big test.  I
 worked for and was at meetings with a big utility.  Independent tests mean
 a lot.  The lack of such is a disappointment.

  Increasingly bigger claims is no substitute for independent tests.  The
 claim of 600 deg F then 1000 deg F reminds me of an earlier period in new
 energy.

  Henry Morray was one such inventor.  His device not only
 produced limitless free energy but it also picked up the weakest far away
 radio signals.  The addition claim of radio sensitivity was no substitute
 for an independent test.

  Frank Znidarsic




  Peter;

 The systematic careful detailed analysis you seek will likely happen in
 overwhelming quantity and quality if Defkalion or Rossi publish independent
 3rd party tests and do definitive demonstrations.  The idea that they could
 do the above and don't leads to paralysis and very real and legitimate
 doubt as to this reality.  That is all that is now missing.

 Ransom




 -Original Message-
 From: Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
 'rwul...@freeark.com');
 To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
 'vortex-l@eskimo.com');
 Sent: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 10:02 am
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

  Peter;

 The systematic careful detailed analysis you seek will likely happen in
 overwhelming quantity and quality if Defkalion or Rossi publish independent
 3rd party tests and do definitive demonstrations.  The idea that they could
 do the above and don't leads to paralysis and very real and legitimate
 doubt as to this reality.  That is all that is now missing.

 Ransom

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Peter Gluck javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'peter.gl...@gmail.com');
 *To:* CMNS javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'c...@googlegroups.com'); ; 
 VORTEXjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'vortex-l@eskimo.com');
 *Sent:* Wednesday, August 01, 2012 7:50 AM
 *Subject:* [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

  Dear Friends,

  I have written an Open Letter to ICCF-17-

  http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/08/open-letter-to-iccf-17.html

 It is a co-product of my discontent due to how the LENR field is
 progressing
 and of my desire to help.
 Appreciations, critics and even insults are all welcome, being forms of
 popularity and attention.

  Peter
 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

2012-08-01 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Randy,

I think Defkalion will explain their understanding of the process- in some
extent at ICCF-17. I hope that the participants will listen with empathy
even if some old truths will be contradicted, actually by facts.
Defkalion will also convince the public that its technology works.
Re Rossi- he is not predictible and perhaps he does not define correctly
what is secret in his technology.
And he is not interested in collaboati ng with scientists, except for
publicity- at least it seems so.

Peter

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote:

 **
 Peter;

 The systematic careful detailed analysis you seek will likely happen in
 overwhelming quantity and quality if Defkalion or Rossi publish independent
 3rd party tests and do definitive demonstrations.  The idea that they could
 do the above and don't leads to paralysis and very real and legitimate
 doubt as to this reality.  That is all that is now missing.

 Ransom

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
 *To:* CMNS c...@googlegroups.com ; VORTEX vortex-l@eskimo.com
 *Sent:* Wednesday, August 01, 2012 7:50 AM
 *Subject:* [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

 Dear Friends,

 I have written an Open Letter to ICCF-17-

 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/08/open-letter-to-iccf-17.html

 It is a co-product of my discontent due to how the LENR field is
 progressing
 and of my desire to help.
 Appreciations, critics and even insults are all welcome, being forms of
 popularity and attention.

 Peter
 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

2012-08-01 Thread Daniel Rocha
Peter,

Are you saying that the will *surely* convince? Or just that they will only
try. I mean, it's only a presentation, it doesn't seem that there is an
ongoing open experiment with large and famous research institutes/companies.

2012/8/1 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com

 Defkalion will also convince the public that its technology works.



Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

2012-08-01 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Daniel,

I know the future but like a lady called Cassandra I am not believed.
Defkalion is in Canada on a financially safe territory
next week they shal be at the great National Instruments
meeting and they will make presentations at ICCF-17. Let's
discuss when you have read these, OK?
Peter

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Peter,

 Are you saying that the will *surely* convince? Or just that they will
 only try. I mean, it's only a presentation, it doesn't seem that there is
 an ongoing open experiment with large and famous research
 institutes/companies.


 2012/8/1 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com

 Defkalion will also convince the public that its technology works.




-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com