Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-05 Thread Craig Haynie
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 18:44 -0800, Mary Yugo wrote:
 Rossi lied when he said he was self-funded when in fact he had
 received funds from Ampenergo.  Either that or Casserino lied.  Rossi
 had a reason to lie, Casserino did not.

There is no Ampenergo; it's just a paper company, like Leonardo corp.

If so, where is it physically located? Because here in New Hampshire,
it's just a name associated with Karl Norwood.

Craig




Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-04 Thread Peter Gluck
Not in LENR I want to tell.
Peter

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:

   
 We have the great luck that we don't know liers.

  LOL


  *From:* Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, December 04, 2011 7:43 PM
 *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
 *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:can we use such a program?

 We have the great luck that we don't know liers.
 Thank you for signalling the book.
 peter

 On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:40 PM, ecat builder ecatbuil...@gmail.comwrote:

 We're not there yet.. but a 100% accurate lie detector would change
 everything.
 This book is a fun read on the subject: The Truth Machine by James
 Halperin
 http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Machine-Speculative-Novel/dp/0345410564
 - Brad
   Software That Listens for Lies:
 




 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-04 Thread Peter Gluck
Yes he is, but I have read many messages here saying he is NOT lying and I
thought I have prejudices against him for the following story:

He claims to be the discoverer of an absolutely new and original Ni-H LENR
method and denies any connection with the achievements of the past.

Newton has used a rather clumsy metaphor *“If I have seen further it is
only by standing on the shoulders of giants”* (don’t try this it is risky
even for acrobats- but metaphors have not much to do with practice and
common sense they are poetical and symbolistic. Andrea Rossi on the
contrary, answered to my question on Krivit’s blog saying: *“My process has
nothing to do with the process of Piantelli, The proof is that I am making
operating reactors; he is not.”* I was shocked, did not believed this
statement and disliked strongly the logic and the ethics on which it is
based.

But it is probably my fault and bias.

Peter



On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:

   Not in LENR I want to tell.

 So Rossi is not in LENR?


  *From:* Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, December 04, 2011 8:11 PM
 *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
 *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

 Not in LENR I want to tell.
 Peter

 On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.comwrote:

   
 We have the great luck that we don't know liers.

  LOL


  *From:* Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Sunday, December 04, 2011 7:43 PM
 *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
 *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:can we use such a program?

 We have the great luck that we don't know liers.
 Thank you for signalling the book.
 peter

 On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:40 PM, ecat builder ecatbuil...@gmail.comwrote:

 We're not there yet.. but a 100% accurate lie detector would change
 everything.
 This book is a fun read on the subject: The Truth Machine by James
 Halperin
 http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Machine-Speculative-Novel/dp/0345410564
 - Brad
   Software That Listens for Lies:
 




 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





 --
 Dr. Peter Gluck
 Cluj, Romania
 http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com





-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-04 Thread Mary Yugo
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.comwrote:

   Yes he is, but I have read many messages here saying he is NOT lying
 and I thought I have prejudices against him for the following story:

 Rossi is lying  and we have some facts about it.
 In an interview (March) he said that he’s not asking money and that he
 will be paid ONLY when the 1MW reactor was delivered. In the same time, he
 asked a lot of money to Defkalion for his “technology”, with a deadline
 around June.


Rossi also received money from Ampenergo as per this article in NyTeknik
and the related interview:

 http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3179019.ece

But another interesting question is what he may received from secret
investors.  He gets offers every day on his blog and even on other people's
blogs!  One can only imagine what he gets offered in private.


Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:



 But yeah, now comes Jed Rothwell saying that this is not lying and that
 every businessman like Edison and Jobs done that. Yeah.


I have said repeatedly that I know nothing about Rossi's business affairs,
and I have no idea whether he is lying or not. I said that as far as I know
know, he has never lied about the engineering aspects of his machines.
Perhaps he has, but I have not caught him.

Please do not distort what I say. I know nothing about his business
dealings. Frankly, I do not care about them, and I do not want to know. I
think people should mind their own business and stop asking nosy questions
about Rossi. I have advised him to do things differently and be more open,
but I have never asked him about contracts or business or anything of that
nature.

Regarding truth and lies --

Defkalion says they have the technology, and Rossi says they do not.
Clearly, one is lying, or the other is, or they both are. They cannot both
be telling the truth. I will not speculate about who is telling the truth
in this matter.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:


 But another interesting question is what he may received from secret
 investors.  He gets offers every day on his blog and even on other people's
 blogs!  One can only imagine what he gets offered in private.


Yes, one can imagine, but as Fats Waller said, one never knows, do one?

I don't find this interesting. I think it pointless. You know nothing about
Rossi's business, so this is mere empty speculation, gossip, and snooping
into other people's private business.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-04 Thread Mary Yugo
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:


 But another interesting question is what he may received from secret
 investors.  He gets offers every day on his blog and even on other people's
 blogs!  One can only imagine what he gets offered in private.


 Yes, one can imagine, but as Fats Waller said, one never knows, do one?

 I don't find this interesting. I think it pointless. You know nothing
 about Rossi's business, so this is mere empty speculation, gossip, and
 snooping into other people's private business.


You're entitled to your opinion but I think Rossi has made himself a public
figure.  Also, catching him in obvious lies, such as that he is entirely
self funded, is legitimate.  After all, Rossi uses that claim to help him
convince people that his E-cat really works.

Rossi may have been caught lying about technical and engineering issues in
the Stable! Stable! video.  At least he was lying by omission because he
never admitted adjusting the heater power during a run and especially not
during a run which needed less anemic steam generation.   Rossi probably
also lied about self-destruct mechanisms and on the cheap isotope
enrichment.  He lied about providing video coverage of the megawatt test.
I can't recall offhand but he's been caught in other various infelicities
if not outright lies as well.

The other thing you need to consider is that generally people either lie or
they don't.  If they do, it's because they don't mind doing it and they can
lie about any assertion which they make.  Liars tend to be not reliable
about anything.


Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:


 I don't find this interesting. I think it pointless. You know nothing
 about Rossi's business, so this is mere empty speculation, gossip, and
 snooping into other people's private business.


 You're entitled to your opinion but I think Rossi has made himself a
 public figure.  Also, catching him in obvious lies, such as that he is
 entirely self funded, is legitimate.


I agree. If you catch him in a lie, this will be newsworthy, and you should
report it. However, you have not caught him in a lie. You have engaged in
fatuous, groundless speculation about his business even though you know
nothing about it. I find this uninteresting.


I can't recall offhand but he's been caught in other various infelicities
 if not outright lies as well.


About some things, but not others.


The other thing you need to consider is that generally people either lie or
 they don't.


That is incorrect. They often tell half-truths, or they see things in
different ways. I think you say this because you have a bad habit of
oversimplifying and seeing things in black in white which are actually in
shades of grey. It often happens that people think they are telling the
truth but other people think they are lying. It is often impossible to
know, even years later when the full historical record is available -- even
when the event is famous and well documented -- such as IBM's market
decline in the 1980s, the discovery of the polio vaccine, the discovery of
DNA and the role of Pauling and Franklin, or what happened in the Battle of
Midway.

Read two or three history books describing Midway, for example, and try to
determine a critical question: whether the Admiral Nagumo was decisive or
dithering; and after the decisive U.S. attacks whether he acted as if he
were determined to win, or whether he in cowardly retreat, and led by the
nose by Adm. Yamaguchi. Everyone there, on both sides, from his commanding
officer Yamamoto on down, had different opinions. His own officers and
friends said one thing; those who blamed him for the defeat said another.
His actions and orders are preserved, but depending on who you read, his
orders were lies, evasions, or the best response to an impossible situation
imposed on him by Yamamoto. You can read a full description of this in the
new book Shattered Sword which describes this and dozens of other well
established facts that turn out to be questionable or myths. I guarantee
you will be confused. You would need a time machine and the ability to read
minds to know the answer.



 If they do, it's because they don't mind doing it and they can lie about
 any assertion which they make.  Liars tend to be not reliable about
 anything.


That depends on many things such as: what you ask them, whether they have
some motivation to lie, whether it is in their best interests to tell the
truth, and whether they are rational or irrational. Some people lie for a
reason, some because they are delusional, some just for the fun of it. Some
lie to help themselves and some feel a compulsion to lie even when telling
the truth is in their best interest. People are complicated, and
inscrutable. Most people that you suppose are lying turn out to be telling
one aspect of the truth. The real truth is forever unknowable, because
people are not omniscient. History books are never fully right, and seldom
completely wrong.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-04 Thread Mary Yugo
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:


 I don't find this interesting. I think it pointless. You know nothing
 about Rossi's business, so this is mere empty speculation, gossip, and
 snooping into other people's private business.


 You're entitled to your opinion but I think Rossi has made himself a
 public figure.  Also, catching him in obvious lies, such as that he is
 entirely self funded, is legitimate.


 I agree. If you catch him in a lie, this will be newsworthy, and you
 should report it. However, you have not caught him in a lie. You have
 engaged in fatuous, groundless speculation about his business even though
 you know nothing about it. I find this uninteresting.


Rossi lied when he said he was self-funded when in fact he had received
funds from Ampenergo.  Either that or Casserino lied.  Rossi had a reason
to lie, Casserino did not.

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3179019.ece

Many people argued that Rossi's scheme could not be a scam because there
was no way he could profit from it if it were.  In fact there are countless
ways, one of which is to take plenty of money from Ampenergo.  Rossi also
tried to get money from NASA and from Defkalion but apparently failed.  We
don't know who else he tried to solicit for money and how it came out.  We
do know that Rossi is offered money all the time on blogs and forums.


Re: [Vo]:Re: can we use such a program?

2011-12-04 Thread Horace Heffner


On Dec 4, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Mattia Rizzi wrote:


And, no, AR does not display any of the bodily traits of deception.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=uviXoafHWrU

Rossi's face: GOTHCA!

-Messaggio originale- From: Terry Blanton Sent: Sunday,  
December 04, 2011 8:22 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re:  
[Vo]:can we use such a program?

Short of engaging Dr. Lightman (Tim Roth):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_to_me

I have found watching eye movement to be effective:

http://www.blifaloo.com/info/lies_eyes.php

And, no, AR does not display any of the bodily traits of deception.

T



For some interpretations the handedness of the individual must be  
known.  Rossi writes with his right hand, as evidenced by this video:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1v=YrTz5Bq6dsA

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/