Re: [Vo]:ideal client -- sekrit
Rossi no-comments : Andrea Rossi October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875 Dear Max: The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I do not know if and when they will want to make public statements and I am bound to a strict non disclosure agreement. Warm Regards, A.R.
Re: [Vo]:ideal client -- sekrit
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: Rossi no-comments : Andrea Rossi October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875 Dear Max: The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I do not know if and when they will want to make public statements and I am bound to a strict non disclosure agreement. A skeptic forum member elsewhere predicted those words almost verbatim. T
Re: [Vo]:ideal client -- sekrit
Area 51? 2011/10/29 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com Rossi no-comments : Andrea Rossi October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875 Dear Max: The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I do not know if and when they will want to make public statements and I am bound to a strict non disclosure agreement. Warm Regards, A.R.
Re: [Vo]:ideal client -- sekrit
Am 29.10.2011 19:55, schrieb Daniel Rocha: Area 51? Cosa Nostra? Mafia! ;-) 2011/10/29 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com mailto:a...@well.com Rossi no-comments : Andrea Rossi October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875 http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875 Dear Max: The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I do not know if and when they will want to make public statements and I am bound to a strict non disclosure agreement. Warm Regards, A.R.
Re: [Vo]:ideal client -- sekrit
Exxon
Re: [Vo]:ideal client -- sekrit
I don't think the Mafia has written non-disclosure agreements. But when things go wrong, they are known for putting out contracts Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: Am 29.10.2011 19:55, schrieb Daniel Rocha: Area 51? Cosa Nostra? Mafia! ;-) 2011/10/29 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com mailto:a...@well.com Rossi no-comments : Andrea Rossi October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875 http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875 Dear Max: The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I do not know if and when they will want to make public statements and I am bound to a strict non disclosure agreement. Warm Regards, A.R.
Re: [Vo]:ideal client -- sekrit
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. . . . A skeptic forum member elsewhere predicted those words almost verbatim. Not hard to predict. Rossi said that before the test. It may not be true, but that is what he claimed all along. - Jed
Re: [Vo]:ideal client -- sekrit
I am of the contrarian opinion; for an American, this is the very best of news. If the customer is a military organization (the US Navy), the security apparatus of the associated country (the US) is now available in all its varied and potent forms both known and clandestine to protect the Rossi technology. Recall from the recent past how the United States Air Force protected the F-117 Stealth Fighter and B-2 Stealth Bomber technology with a cunning decade’s long campaign of disinformation and obfuscation: Spy and stealth planes--many with bizarre, bat-shaped wings, others with triangular silhouettes that inspire otherworldly designs in the minds of the general public--have long been cultivated by the military: the defense intelligence agency and the CIA. UFO sightings and lore and their official denials, feed rumors that the government isn't telling us about alien ships. The CIA estimates that over half of the UFOs reported from the '50s through the '60s were U-2 and SR-71 spy planes. At the time, the Air Force misled the public and the media to protect these Cold War programs; it's possible the government's responses to current sightings of classified craft--whether manned or remotely operated--are equally evasive. The result is an ongoing source of UFO reports and conspiracy theories. The armadas of secret Earth-built Air Force craft that have likely have lit up 911 switchboards over the years remain largely unknown in the minds and lives of the general public. Cold fusion is the ideal framework for a similar campaign of disinformation as a cover for advance Ni-H powered weapons systems. Rossi will quietly fade from the scene; while the US government paints anyone that believes that cold fusion is real as a kook, not only to protect defense secrets but to maintain the economic continuity of the fossil fuel economy that has served the US so well from disruptive turbulence. In a few decades, when the oil is much depleted and the natural gas from US shale deposits are petered out, cold fusion will emerge from the shadows of the skunk-works defense labs to continue the hegemony of the US and its oil producing allies. For all of us who own substantial holdings of oil and gas stocks, this is good news…the best. We can anticipate continued lucrative distributions of dividends into the indeterminate future with no prospect of disruptions or diminishment. On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. . . . A skeptic forum member elsewhere predicted those words almost verbatim. Not hard to predict. Rossi said that before the test. It may not be true, but that is what he claimed all along. - Jed
