[webkit-dev] Windows mobile build
Right now we have a windows mobile 6.x build for webkit. I'd like to start merging this into the tree but wanted to get some consensus on an approach. We have created our own solution and vcproj files that pretty much follow the current solution/vcproj files for the windows cairo build configuration. Would it make sense to add a windows mobile build and solution configuration to the existing windows solution (with some different vsprop changes) or should we check in our version of the solution and project files separately (and where?) I don't like the idea of a separate solution/vcproj files but as far as I know if we add the windows mobile configuration you need to have the windows mobile sdk installed to be able to open the solution. I need to confirm that this is true also if you just run the build from the command line though. I've had some success merging changes between vcproj files so it's possible this might be automated. Thanks, Jason. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build
Hi, Jason. I don't think it is a good idea to add separate solution and vcproj files for Windows Mobile. Windows Mobile is just a small part of Windows CE. Windows CE covers multiple CPU architectures (ARM, MIPS, ..) and platforms with varying features. I hope the build system covers multiple configurations easily. vcproj file is too verbose and not easy to maintain to keep multiple configurations as we can see from Windows port. If we are going to add a build system for Windows CE, I think we need a more clever way to deal with this problem. I am currently working on a build system which generates MSVS solution and vcproj files from a build script. The sole purpose of this build system is to support multiple Windows CE platforms and configurations from a single script. I'd like to contribute this work once it is ready. By the way, what is your contribution plan? Do you plan to contribute WebKit API and layout tests? Regards, Kwang Yul Seo On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Jason Rukman jas...@bsquare.com wrote: Right now we have a windows mobile 6.x build for webkit. I’d like to start merging this into the tree but wanted to get some consensus on an approach. We have created our own solution and vcproj files that pretty much follow the current solution/vcproj files for the windows cairo build configuration. Would it make sense to add a windows mobile build and solution configuration to the existing windows solution (with some different vsprop changes) or should we check in our version of the solution and project files separately (and where?) I don’t like the idea of a separate solution/vcproj files but as far as I know if we add the windows mobile configuration you need to have the windows mobile sdk installed to be able to open the solution. I need to confirm that this is true also if you just run the build from the command line though. I’ve had some success merging changes between vcproj files so it’s possible this might be automated. Thanks, Jason. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build
That's great news... How far away are you from getting this build toolchain working? I want to upstream the API once I work out how we can integrate our changes; which I think means that first we need a build environment that can build our changes. We are still working on the LayoutTests right now so I'm not sure. -Original Message- From: KwangYul Seo [mailto:kwangyul@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:46 AM To: Jason Rukman Cc: Webkit Development List Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build Hi, Jason. I don't think it is a good idea to add separate solution and vcproj files for Windows Mobile. Windows Mobile is just a small part of Windows CE. Windows CE covers multiple CPU architectures (ARM, MIPS, ..) and platforms with varying features. I hope the build system covers multiple configurations easily. vcproj file is too verbose and not easy to maintain to keep multiple configurations as we can see from Windows port. If we are going to add a build system for Windows CE, I think we need a more clever way to deal with this problem. I am currently working on a build system which generates MSVS solution and vcproj files from a build script. The sole purpose of this build system is to support multiple Windows CE platforms and configurations from a single script. I'd like to contribute this work once it is ready. By the way, what is your contribution plan? Do you plan to contribute WebKit API and layout tests? Regards, Kwang Yul Seo On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Jason Rukman jas...@bsquare.com wrote: Right now we have a windows mobile 6.x build for webkit. I’d like to start merging this into the tree but wanted to get some consensus on an approach. We have created our own solution and vcproj files that pretty much follow the current solution/vcproj files for the windows cairo build configuration. Would it make sense to add a windows mobile build and solution configuration to the existing windows solution (with some different vsprop changes) or should we check in our version of the solution and project files separately (and where?) I don’t like the idea of a separate solution/vcproj files but as far as I know if we add the windows mobile configuration you need to have the windows mobile sdk installed to be able to open the solution. I need to confirm that this is true also if you just run the build from the command line though. I’ve had some success merging changes between vcproj files so it’s possible this might be automated. Thanks, Jason. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build
KwangYul, have you considered using gyp (and the files already there) rather than add another generating solution? Jason, have you considered using gyp to generate your solution? Disclaimer: I have no stake in gyp nor do I think it is necessarily better than anything else, but I do care about not modifying 7+ build files for any file additions/moves, etc. dave On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Jason Rukman jas...@bsquare.com wrote: That's great news... How far away are you from getting this build toolchain working? I want to upstream the API once I work out how we can integrate our changes; which I think means that first we need a build environment that can build our changes. We are still working on the LayoutTests right now so I'm not sure. -Original Message- From: KwangYul Seo [mailto:kwangyul@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:46 AM To: Jason Rukman Cc: Webkit Development List Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build Hi, Jason. I don't think it is a good idea to add separate solution and vcproj files for Windows Mobile. Windows Mobile is just a small part of Windows CE. Windows CE covers multiple CPU architectures (ARM, MIPS, ..) and platforms with varying features. I hope the build system covers multiple configurations easily. vcproj file is too verbose and not easy to maintain to keep multiple configurations as we can see from Windows port. If we are going to add a build system for Windows CE, I think we need a more clever way to deal with this problem. I am currently working on a build system which generates MSVS solution and vcproj files from a build script. The sole purpose of this build system is to support multiple Windows CE platforms and configurations from a single script. I'd like to contribute this work once it is ready. By the way, what is your contribution plan? Do you plan to contribute WebKit API and layout tests? Regards, Kwang Yul Seo On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Jason Rukman jas...@bsquare.com wrote: Right now we have a windows mobile 6.x build for webkit. I’d like to start merging this into the tree but wanted to get some consensus on an approach. We have created our own solution and vcproj files that pretty much follow the current solution/vcproj files for the windows cairo build configuration. Would it make sense to add a windows mobile build and solution configuration to the existing windows solution (with some different vsprop changes) or should we check in our version of the solution and project files separately (and where?) I don’t like the idea of a separate solution/vcproj files but as far as I know if we add the windows mobile configuration you need to have the windows mobile sdk installed to be able to open the solution. I need to confirm that this is true also if you just run the build from the command line though. I’ve had some success merging changes between vcproj files so it’s possible this might be automated. Thanks, Jason. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build
I haven't looked at any other build solutions as the vcproj files have been working for us at the moment. I would think leveraging an existing build configuration would be best though. From: le...@google.com [mailto:le...@google.com] On Behalf Of David Levin Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 11:43 AM To: KwangYul Seo Cc: Jason Rukman; Webkit Development List Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build KwangYul, have you considered using gyp (and the files already there) rather than add another generating solution? Jason, have you considered using gyp to generate your solution? Disclaimer: I have no stake in gyp nor do I think it is necessarily better than anything else, but I do care about not modifying 7+ build files for any file additions/moves, etc. dave On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Jason Rukman jas...@bsquare.com wrote: That's great news... How far away are you from getting this build toolchain working? I want to upstream the API once I work out how we can integrate our changes; which I think means that first we need a build environment that can build our changes. We are still working on the LayoutTests right now so I'm not sure. -Original Message- From: KwangYul Seo [mailto:kwangyul@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:46 AM To: Jason Rukman Cc: Webkit Development List Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build Hi, Jason. I don't think it is a good idea to add separate solution and vcproj files for Windows Mobile. Windows Mobile is just a small part of Windows CE. Windows CE covers multiple CPU architectures (ARM, MIPS, ..) and platforms with varying features. I hope the build system covers multiple configurations easily. vcproj file is too verbose and not easy to maintain to keep multiple configurations as we can see from Windows port. If we are going to add a build system for Windows CE, I think we need a more clever way to deal with this problem. I am currently working on a build system which generates MSVS solution and vcproj files from a build script. The sole purpose of this build system is to support multiple Windows CE platforms and configurations from a single script. I'd like to contribute this work once it is ready. By the way, what is your contribution plan? Do you plan to contribute WebKit API and layout tests? Regards, Kwang Yul Seo On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Jason Rukman jas...@bsquare.com wrote: Right now we have a windows mobile 6.x build for webkit. I'd like to start merging this into the tree but wanted to get some consensus on an approach. We have created our own solution and vcproj files that pretty much follow the current solution/vcproj files for the windows cairo build configuration. Would it make sense to add a windows mobile build and solution configuration to the existing windows solution (with some different vsprop changes) or should we check in our version of the solution and project files separately (and where?) I don't like the idea of a separate solution/vcproj files but as far as I know if we add the windows mobile configuration you need to have the windows mobile sdk installed to be able to open the solution. I need to confirm that this is true also if you just run the build from the command line though. I've had some success merging changes between vcproj files so it's possible this might be automated. Thanks, Jason. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
[webkit-dev] Gtk debug bots (32 / 64 bit) are out of space
clean up needed! http://build.webkit.org/builders/GTK%20Linux%2032-bit%20Debug/builds/4614/steps/compile-webkit/logs/stdio (...) DerivedSources/JSSVGZoomEvent.lo DerivedSources/JSWebSocket.lo /bin/mkdir -p ./.deps/DerivedSources ranlib: .libs/libWebCoreJS.a: No space left on device make[1]: *** [libWebCoreJS.la] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/slave/webkitgtk/gtk-linux-64-debug/build/WebKitBuild/Debug' -- --Antonio Gomes ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
[webkit-dev] Directly Destroy webview widget
Hello All, I am using the ubuntu karmic version of webkit which is 1.1.15.2-1. I create a webview widget and place it in a fixed layout container in GTK. Now when I destroy or remove the widget from the layout there is segmentation fault. I browsed the forums and found that a bug (ID : 25042) has been filed with status fixed and resolved for the same issue. Can anybody please let me know the status on the bug or the procedure the free the widget? Regards, Vijay. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Directly-Destroy-webview-widget-tp28122528p28122528.html Sent from the Webkit mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Directly Destroy webview widget
See http://webkit.org/contact.html for information about mailing lists. This mailing list, webkit-dev, is for discussion of the development of WebKit. For questions like yours about the use of WebKit, webkit-help is the appropriate list. And there’s also a list called webkit-gtk that might be appropriate for your question. -- Darin ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build
Just in case it is helpful, there is a place where you can ask any gyp questions: gyp-develo...@googlegroups.com On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Rukman jas...@bsquare.com wrote: I haven't looked at any other build solutions as the vcproj files have been working for us at the moment. I would think leveraging an existing build configuration would be best though. From: le...@google.com [mailto:le...@google.com] On Behalf Of David Levin Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 11:43 AM To: KwangYul Seo Cc: Jason Rukman; Webkit Development List Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build KwangYul, have you considered using gyp (and the files already there) rather than add another generating solution? Jason, have you considered using gyp to generate your solution? Disclaimer: I have no stake in gyp nor do I think it is necessarily better than anything else, but I do care about not modifying 7+ build files for any file additions/moves, etc. dave On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Jason Rukman jas...@bsquare.com wrote: That's great news... How far away are you from getting this build toolchain working? I want to upstream the API once I work out how we can integrate our changes; which I think means that first we need a build environment that can build our changes. We are still working on the LayoutTests right now so I'm not sure. -Original Message- From: KwangYul Seo [mailto:kwangyul@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:46 AM To: Jason Rukman Cc: Webkit Development List Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Windows mobile build Hi, Jason. I don't think it is a good idea to add separate solution and vcproj files for Windows Mobile. Windows Mobile is just a small part of Windows CE. Windows CE covers multiple CPU architectures (ARM, MIPS, ..) and platforms with varying features. I hope the build system covers multiple configurations easily. vcproj file is too verbose and not easy to maintain to keep multiple configurations as we can see from Windows port. If we are going to add a build system for Windows CE, I think we need a more clever way to deal with this problem. I am currently working on a build system which generates MSVS solution and vcproj files from a build script. The sole purpose of this build system is to support multiple Windows CE platforms and configurations from a single script. I'd like to contribute this work once it is ready. By the way, what is your contribution plan? Do you plan to contribute WebKit API and layout tests? Regards, Kwang Yul Seo On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Jason Rukman jas...@bsquare.com wrote: Right now we have a windows mobile 6.x build for webkit. I'd like to start merging this into the tree but wanted to get some consensus on an approach. We have created our own solution and vcproj files that pretty much follow the current solution/vcproj files for the windows cairo build configuration. Would it make sense to add a windows mobile build and solution configuration to the existing windows solution (with some different vsprop changes) or should we check in our version of the solution and project files separately (and where?) I don't like the idea of a separate solution/vcproj files but as far as I know if we add the windows mobile configuration you need to have the windows mobile sdk installed to be able to open the solution. I need to confirm that this is true also if you just run the build from the command line though. I've had some success merging changes between vcproj files so it's possible this might be automated. Thanks, Jason. ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
