Re: [whatwg] Mathematics in HTML5
Anne van Kesteren wrote: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Since MathML does not fit into the WHATWG philosophy, I would aknowledge information about your own solution to the problem of mathematical markup on the web. Oh please, cut the crap. Did you miss the message from Ian saying how it could integrate? If by integrate you mean integrate, then yes I did miss it. Please could you cite it for I can learn from. If by integrate you mean another... well I have heard contradictory things from Ian, therefore, I am not sure, really. Juan R. Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
Re: [whatwg] Mathematics in HTML5
Since MathML does not fit into the WHATWG philosophy, I would aknowledge information about your own solution to the problem of mathematical markup on the web. Oh please, cut the crap. Did you miss the message from Ian saying how it could integrate? If by integrate you mean integrate, then yes I did miss it. Please could you cite it for I can learn from. http://listserver.dreamhost.com/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2006-June/006518.html has most of the details. It's dicussed in related messages from him as well. Not too hard to find if you look in the archives... (I was referring to your usage of fit when saying integrate...) So how does it fit in the scope of fundamental principles upon which the WHAT working group intends to operate? http://www.w3.org/2004/04/webapps-cdf-ws/papers/opera.html -- ___ Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way: Download Opera 8 at http://www.opera.com Powered by Outblaze
Re: [whatwg] Mathematics in HTML5
White Lynx wrote: So how does it fit in the scope of fundamental principles upon which the WHAT working group intends to operate? http://www.w3.org/2004/04/webapps-cdf-ws/papers/opera.html I don't see anything contradictory there (and in any case I'm not sure the document you point to is considered normative e.g. it mentions a byline element which does not appear in current drafts of the HTML5 spec). -- You see stars that clear have been dead for years But the idea just lives on... -- Bright Eyes
Re: [whatwg] Mathematics in HTML5
Le 16 juin 2006 à 9:27, White Lynx a écrit : Yes, sub/sup will behave like HTML sub/sup with offsets being based on font size like it is currently done in HTML implementations, while llim/ulim and marker/submark will have offsets based on size of their base (operator, fence, matrix etc.) not font size like in case of HTML sub/sup elements. Am I right to say than an exponent made with sup following a fence of a undefined height cannot be aligned correctly vertically? Could the same thing be said when sup is preceded by a matrix? Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michelf.com/
Re: [whatwg] On accessibility
Le 14 juin 2006 à 21:09, Lachlan Hunt a écrit : If implementations can be modified so that accesskeys do not interfere with existing shortcut keys, then that's great. Perhaps they could offer a kind of web-apps mode where all Alt+[key] combinations are safe to be used by the web page, and then another mode where they retain their normal browser functions. But until something like that happens and proves successful, accesskeys should not be retained. I'd like to point out that accesskeys are working very well on the Mac. Application commands are issued using the Command key and most browsers bind accesskeys to the minimally-used Control key. Accesskeys do not conflict with other system and application shortcuts unless the user defines his own conflicting shortcuts in the system preferences. It would be sad to see accesskeys disappear just because they are hard to implement elsewhere. But I acknowledge most other computers don't have a spare key which can be used for that. Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michelf.com/
