Re: [whatwg] RDFa statement consistency
Plain text loses context under copy and paste as well. I doubt it is possible to express complex cultural phenomena without context of any kind. When you paste a fragment of another document, you usually have to provide some information about the context of the fragment. Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 1:25 AM To: Henri Sivonen Cc: Ben Adida; whatwg@lists.whatwg.org; 'Manu Sporny'; Kristof Zelechovski Subject: Re: [whatwg] RDFa statement consistency I like GRDDL, too, but it has problems with respect to scaling similar to microformats. Things will get complicated when you want to combine statements from different vocabularies on the same page. The completely prefixless microformat naming approach isn't good when different microformats overlap and common words have been allocated badly. It works if you can decide that all classes that are on descendants of a class identifying a format root belong to that format (i.e. the subtree root is effectively the prefix). Yes. But in that case the format is fragile under copypaste, just as prefix-based approaches.
[whatwg] In correct HTML 5 tutorials
http://www.w3schools.com/ is a very popular tutorial site. They have already started tutorials for HTML5 http://www.w3schools.com/tags/html5.asp I see errors at http://www.w3schools.com/tags/html5_video.asp and http://www.w3schools.com/tags/html5_audio.asp autoplay == true | false controls == true | false As far as I know autoplay=false also means enable autoplay in firefox. I wish somebody contact them to correct those and other errors. Otherwise people start using autoplay=false to disable autoplay. and some vendors will start supporting that. while others will go by w3 standards Which in turn will bring trouble to user who surf the site using a browser which is not the one used by the web developer.
Re: [whatwg] In correct HTML 5 tutorials
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Biju [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.w3schools.com/ is a very popular tutorial site. Yes, that is annoying. It's always at the top of the search result. w3schools has no relationship with the w3c. It is not the most reliable source of information. They have already started tutorials for HTML5 [snip links] Starting tutorials for a working draft in progress sounds like a bad idea. I wish somebody contact them to correct those and other errors. With advertisement bringing in money, it seems that SEO might take priority over properly educating web developers. The fact that the comp.lang.javascript FAQ links to it doesn't help. Garrett
